1 A Consideration on Muon System II Y.Sugimoto KEK 2005.12.13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

ISS meeting UCIrvine 21 August 2006 Alain Blondel 1 Evaluation of « optimal » segmentation for neutrino factory far detectors A. magnetized iron sampling.
Vertex Detector: Engineering Issues Craig Buttar University of Glasgow Cambridge GLDC meeting Sept 07.
LECTURE 2 The detectors, all you always wanted to know about how to build muon detectors ESIPAP, 10/02/2014Muon detection II, Joerg Wotschack (CERN)1 Muon.
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
Detectors & Measurements: How we do physics without seeing… Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
GLC Detector Geometry Y. Sugimoto. Introduction Figure of merit : Main Tracker.
Segmented magnetised detectors Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Universidad de Valencia ISS meeting RAL (UK) 25/04/06 RAL (UK) 25/04/06.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
October 20th, 2006 A. Mazzacane 1 4 th Concept Software First Results.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Optimization of the SiD Detector ? Adam Para, Sept. 18, 2006.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
1 ACFA8, July , 2005, Youngjoon Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) Simulation / Recon. Workgroup summary for ACFA8  The Framework for Sim./Recon. Status report.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
1 GLD and GLDc Sep. 12, 2007 Y. Sugimoto KEK. 2 Compact GLD Option Motivation –GLD and LDC will write a common LoI –The detector design should have common.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
June 2nd, 2007 LCWS C. Gatto 1 Calorimetry Studies in the 4th Concept On behalf of 4th Concept Software Group D. Barbareschi V. Di Benedetto E.
Cost Issues Y.Sugimoto, A.Maki Estimation Procedure Get unit cost from the cost estimation for GLD(DOD) Estimate (relative) amount of return-yoke.
ITEP Physics Winter School, Moscow, 13-20/02/ D. Froidevaux, CERN Honorabilis et amplissimus rector, laudati conlegae Experimental prospects at the.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
“Huge” Detector Concept 3 Sep 2004 ECFA LC Durham Satoru Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo On behalf of many colleagues Towards our common.
8 April 2000Karel Safarik: Tracking in ALICE1 Tracking in ALICE  OUTLOOK: Requirements History Tracking methods Track finding Tracking efficiency Momentum.
C. Milsténe1 Muon Purity and Detection Efficiency Variation With Depth in an SiD Type Detector C. Milstene- Fermilab SiD Workshop- SLAC- October-2006 In.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
MAMUD Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, March 29, 2005 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation.
Software Status for GLD Concepts Akiya Miyamoto 31-October-2007 ILD Optimization Meeting References: - Y.Sugimoto, “GLD and GLDc”, talk at ALCPG07, ILD.
A Fourth Detector Concept (no name, yet) Silicon Vertex: 3-4 layers, conventional Tracking TPC: 1 atm, moderate B field Calorimeter: measure all main fluctuations,
1 Design Activity of Large Detector for ILC July 18, 2007 Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK.
GLD experimental hall and detector assembly Y.Sugimoto KEK 27 Sep
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
1. Introduction 2. Magnetic field design Optimization of yoke configuration in several conf. Boundary conditions -
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Detector Here, we will only discuss a multi-purpose high-luminosity ep detector, not a dedicated lower-luminosity ep/eA detector as.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Jin Huang BNL/LANL. ePHENIX Review J. Huang 2 RICH GEM Station4 EMCal HCal GEM Station2 R (cm) HCal p/A EMCal GEMs EMCal & Preshower TPC DIRC η=+1 η=
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Lecture 8 – Detectors - II
Solenoid Performances in Different Situations
Propagation of Reconstructed Tracks
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015
Studies with PandoraPFA
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
Measurement of Muon Energy Loss in ATLAS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
Experimental Particle Physics
Buttons. Click on any particle type to display the relevant slide with animations. Clicking again will return to this slide. Recommend putting this slide.
Particles going through matter
Presentation transcript:

1 A Consideration on Muon System II Y.Sugimoto KEK

2 Muon ID in a Jet How to identify muon track in the TPC? Conventional method: Extrapolate TPC track and find a matching track segment in the Muon Tracker within a range of expected spread by multiple scattering For muons inside jets (small p t jet ), background is large:  Pion punch-through  Decay of shower pion  Pion sail-through (irreducible, but very small for GLD:>7 )  Pion decay-in-flight (irreducible)  Kaon decay-in-flight (reducible by dE/dx and kink) If there are two near-by tracks in TPC, both can be the muon candidate, or mismatching due to M.S. can happen At ILC, we have to study more collimated jets and the matching using spatial information only may not be sufficient ?

3 Power of GLD Deflection of muon ~ 0.15BR c BR c (R M -R c ) (R c : coil radius, R M : MUD radius, reverse bending outside coil not included) At the front surface of MUD TOPAZ ~1 Tm 2 OPAL ~ 1 Tm 2 ALEPH ~ 4 Tm 2 GLD ~ 9 Tm 2 SiD ~ 8.5 Tm 2 LDC ~ 11 Tm 2 (dE/dx not taken into account)

4 Muon deflection and M.S. Muon deflection in front of iron return yoke is ~x20 larger than the fluctuation by multiple coulomb scattering due to calorimeter Extrapolation of TPC track to find a matching track segment in the muon tracker within a range of expected spread by multiple scattering will work quite well (dE/dx and bending by B field have to be taken into account: Kalman filter can do equivalent procedure?) Better spatial resolution can do better job for high momentum tracks P (GeV/c)  m.s. (cm) Deflection (cm)

5 Summary Because of large deflection of tracks in GLD solenoid, muons below ~10 GeV/c becomes “isolated tracks” So, the muon system does NOT have to have muon range measurement capability in the barrel region However, for low momentum muons, multiple point measurement with first few layers with thin Fe plates would be effective to define a track segment and discriminate it from shower punch through Because of the sizable deflection even for high momentum tracks, the conventional method of muon identification (extrapolation of TPC track to find a matching track segment in the muon tracker within a range of expected spread by multiple scattering) will work quite well (dE/dx and bending by B field have to be taken into account), and stand-alone momentum measurement by the muon system may not be necessary Even with the conventional method, however, better spatial resolution of the muon tracker (at least for few layers) can do the better job for high momentum muons

6 Appendix Stand-alone p measurement With L=2.3m, B Fe =2T, N meas =5,  meas =1cm,