Effective Filtering of Common Mode Radiated Emissions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety for electronic systems High-frequency Filtering of DC Power Lines Technical, constructional and practical issues with filtering on dc power lines.
Advertisements

The L-Network L-networks are used to match the output impedance of one circuit to the input of another. Rsource < Rload, 1< Q < 5 Rsource > Rload, 1
EKT 441 MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS
ENE 428 Microwave Engineering
How they work How they are made
Chapter 13 Transmission Lines
Power e Lab PowerELab Limitedwww.powerelab.com 1 An Active EMI reduction IC WT6001 POWERELAB LIMITED A Power Converter Technology Provider.
1 New high permeability materials for EMI suppression February 2011 February 2011.
PCB Design for 1 Gbps ECE 4006 Dr Brooke. Overview What signals are being routed? How can you route those signals? How to apply routing to PCB? PCB design.
Passive Bandpass and Notch Filters. Experimental Procedure It is not in the lab manual. It is posted on Week 8 module on Scholar. Figure 1Figure 2 Bandpass.
Designing a EMC Compatible Electronic Meter using AD7755 a.
Transfer Functions in EMC Shielding Design
Switching Power Supply Component Selection
EE136 Project Subject:Soft start & E.M.I. Prof. D Zhou Student: Dan Lee Date:Dec. 6 th,2003.
EELE 461/561 – Digital System Design Module #6 Page 1 EELE 461/561 – Digital System Design Module #6 – Differential Signaling Topics 1.Differential and.
Mid-Semester Design Review High Frequency Radio with BPSK Modulation.
EEE 194RF_ L121 ELEC 412 RF & Microwave Engineering Fall 2004 Lecture 12.
Transformers and Coupled Circuits
Instrumentation & Power Electronics
Problem Solving Part 2 Resonance.
May 17, Platform Design Considerations Jim Choate Intel Corporation.
Frequency Characteristics of AC Circuits
Power Electronics and Drives (Version ) Dr. Zainal Salam, UTM-JB 1 Chapter 3 DC to DC CONVERTER (CHOPPER) General Buck converter Boost converter.
Conducted Emissions and Susceptibility Conducted emissions are simpler to investigate than radiated emissions because only the product’s power cord needs.
Alternating Current Circuits
Today Course overview and information 09/16/2010 © 2010 NTUST.
Oscillators with LC Feedback Circuits. LC Feedback elements are used for the generation of higher frequencies of oscillation. Because of lower unity gain.
DC/AC Fundamentals: A Systems Approach
Electronics Fundamentals 8 th edition Floyd/Buchla © 2010 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. chapter 14 electronics.
Lecture 8 Periodic Structures Image Parameter Method
Microwave Filters Filters allow some frequencies to go through while block the remaining In receivers, the system filters the incoming signal right after.
PCB Layout Introduction
© X2Y Attenuators, LLC Confidential Information
Page 1 © 2014 X2Y Technology Presentation – May 2014.
LARGE VALUE X2Y® IN DC-DC CONVERTERS All commonly deployed DC-DC converter topologies:  Buck, boost, flyback, SEPIC (Cuk topology is rare) have at least.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
10/7/2015© X2Y Attenuators, LLC1. Common Mode Filters Test comparisons, X2Y ® versus CM Chokes and PI Filters 10/7/2015© X2Y Attenuators, LLC2.
PCB Layout Introduction
Transmission Lines No. 1  Seattle Pacific University Transmission Lines Kevin Bolding Electrical Engineering Seattle Pacific University.
Page 1 © 2011 Real World HF Performance of Common Mode Filter Solutions Popular EMI filters include common mode chokes (CMC), ferrite beads, and chip inductors.
LDO or Switcher? …That is the Question Choosing between an LDO or DC/DC Converter Frank De Stasi Texas Instruments.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Passive Bandpass and Notch Filters. Experimental Procedure It is not in the lab manual. It is posted on Week 8 module on Scholar. Figure 1Figure 2 Bandpass.
12/13/2015© X2Y Attenuators, LLC1. Common Mode Filters Test comparisons, X2Y ® versus CM Chokes and PI Filters 12/13/2015© X2Y Attenuators, LLC2.
Bandpass Filter Terminology f r Rejection A r Upper and Lower Rejection Frequencies Shape A r : SF = B r (A r )/B p.
1 Decoupling Capacitors Requirements Intel - Microprocessor power levels in the past have increased exponentially, which has led to increased complexity.
Getting faster bandwidth HervéGrabas Getting faster bandwidth - Hervé Grabas1.
Electrical Principles 1 1 G5 - ELECTRICAL PRINCIPLES [3 exam questions - 3 groups] G5A - Reactance; inductance; capacitance; impedance; impedance matching.
1 Fundamentals of EMC Mitigation Strategies John McCloskey NASA/GSFC Chief EMC Engineer Code 565 Building 23, room E
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
RLC CIRCUITS AND RESONANCE
1 John McCloskey NASA/GSFC Chief EMC Engineer Code 565 Building 29, room Fundamentals of EMC Dipole Antenna.
4/28/2017 Crystal Filters Company confidential Company Confidential.
ANTENNA THEORY : Analysis and design Third edition
전자파 연구실 1. Fundamentals. 전자파 연구실 1.1 Frequency and time Passive circuit elements is emphasized in high speed digital design : Wires, PCB, IC- package.
Power Distribution Copyright F. Canavero, R. Fantino Licensed to HDT - High Design Technology.
HNC/D Engineering Science
Passives What Are Passives? What Do They Do?
High-Speed Serial Link Layout Recommendations –
Oscillators with LC Feedback Circuits
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
PIN DIODE.
Electromagnetic Compatibility BHUKYA RAMESH NAIK 1.
WELCOME.
electronics fundamentals
Passive Bandpass and Notch Filters
ESL - Equivalent Series Inductance ‘L’
Ferrite cores for transmitting chokes (baluns)
Alternating Current Circuits
Presentation transcript:

Effective Filtering of Common Mode Radiated Emissions 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Blank page sync 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Common Mode and EMI Many EMI compliance problems are due to common mode radiated emissions. Only 10’s of uAs in external cables are enough to violate EMC standards. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Common Mode Noise Model (or signal load) E field developed between any lead (power or signal) exiting a shielded enclosure and the enclosure outer skin radiates Complementary H field couples to victim antennae. Ability to radiate depends on: Power of the noise source Coupling efficiency between the effective antenna structure and the surrounding space Leads and the case form the antenna 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Common Mode Noise Model Reduce Radiation by: Reducing potential between the case and leads, AND/OR Reduce the coupling efficiency to surrounding space Reduce antenna gain. Mismatch source impedance to antenna impedance. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Reduce Noise Potential Reduce HF current in product Rarely an option Decrease shunt impedance to case Optionally insert additional series impedance between source and shunt 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Reduce Coupling Reduce antenna efficiency Mismatch antenna impedance Cable length Cable routing / shielding Mismatch antenna impedance Increase driving impedance >> 377Ω* Decrease driving impedance << 377Ω* *Antenna impedance may be anywhere from 10’s to 100’s of Ohms 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Differential Mode Noise Voltage(s) between multiple leads that form an antenna in the area between. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Mode Conversion Occurs when individual filters are not matched Differential signal energy converts into common-mode energy Common-mode energy converts into differential energy Avoid by matching filters throughout stop-band Emmission concern when signals exist in the noise stop band. Susceptibility concern at all frequencies. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

CM Chokes as EMI Filters Ideally, CM chokes work by increasing the noise source impedance, mismatching it to the antenna. A CM choke is a 1:1 transformer where the primary and secondary are both driven. Both windings act as both primary and secondary. Current through one winding induces an opposing image current in the other winding For K close to 1.0, effective impedance is: Z ≈ 2πF*LMAG 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

CM Chokes as EMI Filters Real CM chokes work over a limited frequency range due to parasitic capacitance. For a given core material, the higher the inductance used to obtain lower frequency filtering, the greater the number of turns required and consequent parasitic capacitance that defeats high frequency filtering. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

CM Choke Bandstop Insertion loss builds up to FSRF due to series inductance. Insertion loss declines past FSRF due to parasitic shunt capacitance. Parasitic capacitance, noise source impedance and lead antenna impedance define high impedance noise attenuation. Parasitic capacitance is combined effects of the CM Choke and the CM Choke PCB mount. Very small capacitances, < 1pF can have very big effects above 100MHz 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

CM Choke Winding Mismatch Mismatch between windings from mechanical manufacturing tolerance causes mode conversion. A percentage of signal energy converts to common mode, and vice-versa. This gives rise to EMC issues as well as immunity issues. Mismatch reduces the effective inductance in each leg. LEFF ≈ LMAG * (1+KMATCH) 0.9 < KMATCH < 0.99 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

CMCs Stop Band Mode Conversion Parasitic capacitance and winding mismatch both defeat inductive cancellation in the stop band causing mode conversion. Not a major concern where signal energy is negligible in the stop band. Conditions under which a shunt filter is a viable alternative 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

CM Chokes as EMI Filters CM chokes have one really good application: Signals must be passed that operate in the same frequency range as CM noise that must be suppressed. Mode conversion and winding mismatch is a major concern in these applications. Otherwise, CM chokes are often large, heavy, expensive, and subject to vibration induced failure. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitors, Nearly Ideal Shunts Two closely matched capacitors in one package. Effects of temperature and voltage variation eliminated Effect of ageing equal on both lines Very low inductance between terminals. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitors, Nearly Ideal Shunts When properly applied, X2Y® capacitors filter CM noise by both attenuating source energy, and mismatching antenna impedance. The key is very low, and matched inductance. Proper application must mind inductance in the common path: G1/G2 terminals 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitors, Nearly Ideal Shunts Performance is typically limited by external capacitor wiring inductance: L3A/L3B, L4A, L4B Maximize performance by minimizing L3x, and L4x inductances Follow X2Y® mounting guidelines L1x, and L2x inductance is OK and even beneficial when balanced Limitation on L2 is to keep connection close to egress Figure 11, X2Y Capacitor as EMI Filter 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Bandstop Insertion loss builds up to FSRF due to parallel capacitance. Insertion loss declines past FSRF due to parasitic common inductance. Y capacitor mismatch reduces insertion loss below FSRF. Increases low frequency cut-off by ≈ 2/(1 + KMATCH) 0.9 < KMATCH < 0.99 generally no concern 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® vs. CM Choke Bandstop ZSOURCE = 50 Ohms LWIND = 5µH CPARASITIC = 1pF KMATCH = 98% ZTX_CM = 50 Ohms -10dB 4.2MHz – 600MHz -20dB 15MHz – 174MHz ZSOURCE = 50 Ohms CY = 4.7nF KMATCH = 95% ESL (1 side) = 280pH ZTX_CM = 50 Ohms -10dB 3.7MHz – 5.63GHz -20dB 14MHz – 1.4GHz 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Bandstop Low frequency performance determined by source and antenna impedances and X2Y® capacitance. Increase capacitance as required to set filter lower cut-off frequency. High frequency attenuation determined by: noise source Z, antenna Z, and mounted capacitor common inductance. Unique X2Y® advantage is larger capacitors do not substantially increase common inductance. Larger values/sizes simply set wider stop bands. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications Example, Single Board Computer Power Feed: 68HC11 processor 5uH CM choke tested PI filter w/ 5uH CM choke tested 0.1uF cap_5uH CM choke_220nF cap Seven values of X2Y® capacitors tested 47pF, 100pF, 220pF, 330pF, 470pF, 560pF, 1000pF 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications CM Choke and PI filters both exhibit similar performance Filter cut-off ≈ 32MHz Attenuation effective to about 450MHz Parasitic capacitance completely defeats CM choke and PI filter above 450MHz HC11 (1MHz – 500MHz, CMC and PI) No effective attenuation 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz CMC and PI No effective attenuation 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 47pF X2Y® 47pF Superior to CM choke Above 300MHz GSM ambient 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 100pF X2Y® 100pF Superior to CM choke Above 150MHz 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 220pF X2Y® 220pF Comparable/Superior to CM choke Above 50MHz 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 330pF X2Y® Larger X2Y® capacitor values Extend low frequency attenuation 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 470pF X2Y® 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 560pF X2Y® 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 1,000pF X2Y® X2Y® 1,000pF high frequency radiated emissions vastly better then CMC or PI 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Applications 1MHz – 500MHz, 47pF & 1,000pF X2Y® High frequency performance is nearly identical between capacitor values. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Comparative Performance Summary X2Y® capacitors effective to 1GHz and beyond Capacitance value determines low frequency rejection Very small X2Y® caps (47pF) superior solution vs. CM chokes or PI filters down to 300MHz 470pF and larger X2Y® caps superior to choke based filters over all frequencies X2Y® 1000pF vastly better radiated emissions than 5uH CM choke or PI filter 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitor Selection For HFRE filtering on POWER lines blocking desired signals not a concern primary criteria is voltage rating all values have very good HF attenuation use higher cap values if lower HF band is a concern For HFRE filtering on SIGNAL lines X2Y’s attenuate all energy above cut-off frequency Select value large enough to block offensive HF noise Select value small enough to pass required signal energy See following methods 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Cap. Value Selection Use Acceptable Signal Rise and Fall Times Establish TRISE / TFALL C <= TRISE_10%_90% _MIN/(2.2*ZSOURCE) Example: CAN BUS 1Mbps, 120 Ohm TRISE_10%_90% <= 50ns ZSOURCE = 120 Ohms / 2 = 60 Ohms CMAX <= 50ns/(2.2*60 Ohms) CMAX <= 380pF Recommended value = 330pF TRISE_10%_90% <= 44ns 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitor Selection Method 2. Pass Signal Rise and Fall Times Based on Signal Bit Rate and % Allowable TR / TF TRISE_10%_90% / TFALL_90%_10% < 5-10% of bit period is usually OK 5% C <= 1/(44*Bit_Frequency*ZSOURCE) CAN BUS Example” C <= 1/(44*1MHz*60Ohms) <= 380pF 10% C <= 1/(22*Freq*ZSOURCE) 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitor Selection Method 3. Cut Noise Down to a Specific Low Frequency Noise cut-off frequency FCO is known, source impedance ZSOURCE. C => 1/(2π*FCO*ZSOURCE) Example: Switching power supply harmonic suppression FCO = 2MHz ZSOURCE = transmission line impedance 1 Ohm CMIN >= 1/(2π*2MHz*1 Ohm) = 1/1.26E7 = 80nF Recommended minimum value = 100nF Use larger capacitances for lower frequencies and/or lower impedances. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitor Selection Method 4. Substitute for known CM Choke at a known source and load impedance. CMIN >= LCM/(ZSOURCE || ZLOAD)2 Recommended minimum value =100nF Use larger capacitances for lower frequencies and/or lower impedances. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

X2Y® Capacitors, Best Mounting Practices Performance is typically limited by external capacitor wiring inductance: L3A/L3B, L4A, L4B Maximize performance by minimizing L3x, and L4x inductances. Follow X2Y® mounting guidelines. L1x, and L2x inductance is OK and even beneficial when balanced. Limitation on L2 is to keep connection close to egress. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC 39

X2Y® Capacitors Example, Circuit 1 Mount: Minimize, L3A, L3B Connect internal A, B pad connections near base of pads Connect external A, B pad connections near base of pads Minimize L4A, L4B: Connect through minimum length, maximum width connections to chassis edge. G1 immediate connection to Chassis metal G2 via to wide polygon on PCB layer 2 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC 40

X2Y® Capacitors Example, Circuit 1 Mount: AVOID THESE BAD PRACTICES: “T” to A, or B pad connections Leaving G2 unconnected Stringer trace from any pad. Any of the above practices insert substantial inductance which impairs performance at high frequency. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC 41

Summary Most EMI problems are Common Mode Reduce common mode by attenuating driving voltage and/or mismatching antenna impedance Properly mounted X2Y® caps do both Series elements suffer from mode conversion and/or poor CM insertion loss at high frequencies. Series element noise emission degrades as actual circuit antenna impedance increases above measuring instrument 50 Ohm Z. 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Summary X2Y® rejection compared to series filters improves as actual circuit antenna impedance increases above measuring instrument 50 Ohm Z. Select X2Y® capacitor values based on known source impedance and either: required signal pass-band (sets max value), or, required noise stop-band (sets min value) 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Summary CM Choke X2Y® Poor High Freq. RE Performance Current Limitations Large & Heavy Expensive Vibration Issues X2Y® Superior High Freq. RE Performance No Current Limit Small & Light Lower Cost No Vibration Issues 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC

Thank You! For Application Information: Let us show you the advantages of using X2Y® in your products. Johanson Dielectrics, Inc. can provide application engineering assistance, application specific test results, and component samples. For product samples or more technical information please contact your local representative or: Steve Cole X2Y Marketing Manager Tel: (603) 433-6328 Email: scole@johansondielectrics.com Website: http://www.johansondielectrics.com 2/16/11 © X2Y Attenuators, LLC