Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Southern Observatory European Southern Observatory © ESO 2005 Page 1 AO Department Leiden, April 26th 2005 MUSE M ulti U nit S pectroscopic E.
Advertisements

GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Thomas Stalcup June 15, 2006 Laser Guidestar System Status.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
LBT AO Progress Meeting, Arcetri Walter Seifert (ZAH, LSW) The LBT AO System and LUCIFER 1.Requirements for the commissioning of LUCIFER:
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Kinematics/Dynamics  Chemistry/dust  Stellar populations  Searches for z ~ 6-7 « Hot » scientific researches at VLT in cosmology Mass Galaxy formation/gas.
AO188/LGS status AO188 development group(Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) (JST)
Laser Guide Stars by Roberto Ragazzoni INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova (Italy)
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
LGS WFS Design Status & Issues Dekany, Delacroix, & Velur Caltech Optical Observatories.
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
A Short Presentation of Ongoing AO Work at Lund Observatory Mette Owner-Petersen Lund Observatory Workshop for “Forskarskolen i Rymdteknik” Gothenburg.
Robo-AO Replicable Robotic Laser Adaptive Optics and Science System for 1-3 m Telescopes Christoph Baranec Caltech Optical Observatories Laboratory development.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: 1 st & 2 nd Milestones AOWG Telecon Oct. 17, 2003 A. Bouchez, J. Chin, A. Contos, S. Hartman, E. Johansson,
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
Next generation wide field AO (GLAO) and NIRMOS for Subaru Telescope.
Blue Dot Team « Multi aperture imaging ». BDT sept MAI techniques High accuracy visibility measurement Differential interferometry Nulling.
ATST Science Requirements ScienceTeam. Outline/Scope State Requirements – focus on top level No attempt to give detailed explanation or justification.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
The two faces of the METIS Adaptive Optics system Remko Stuik, Stefan Hippler, Andrea Stolte, Bernhard Brandl, Lars Venema, Miska Le Louarn, Matt Kenworthy,
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Edimburg June 2006 Fast detectors 1 Fast detectors (for E-ELT AO) Philippe Feautrier INSU/CNRS-LAOG.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
GMTIFS – An AO-Corrected Integral-Field Spectrograph and Imager for GMT Peter McGregor The Australian National University 1 IFUs in the Era of JWST - October.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
OC, June 3, SAM – SOAR Adaptive Module Andrei Tokovinin Nicole van der Bliek.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Conference “Feeding the Giants: ELTs in the era of Surveys” -- Ischia 31/08/2011 Large field of view and ELTs: an impossible marriage? Paolo Ciliegi (INAF.
Status report of AO188+LGS (+future AO) Yutaka Hayano (Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) S. Oya, M. Hattori, Y. Saito, Y. Minowa, M. Ito, H. Terada, T.S. Pyo, H.
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Some Thoughts on Ground Layer Adaptive Optics & Adaptive Secondary Mirrors for Keck P. Wizinowich 9/15/14 1.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
1 Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6.5m (and 4m) NGST NAS Committee of Astronomy & Astrophysics 9 th April 2001 Matt Mountain Gemini.
Wide field telescope using spherical mirrors Jim Burge and Roger Angel University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Jim
Subaru GLAO Simulation
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
1# 3-D Morphology of V723 Cas Nova Ejecta KeckII+LGSAO+OSIRIS Randy Campbell and Jim Lyke Hα images from Classical Novae, ed. Bode and Evans, Ch 12, O’Brien.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. AO corrected average Strehl ratios at different field positions and Sun elevations.
Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Science Priorities and Implications of Potential Cost Savings Ideas
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Comparative Performance of a 30m Groundbased GSMT and a 6
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Presentation transcript:

Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System

GLAS is only major project on WHT for the next few years Overall top objective: = Increasing sky coverage, approaching 100% = Niche: Integral Field Spectroscopy from μm = Ground-layer correction: not highest Strehl, but scientifically useful correction = Aim for easy operation – keep (relatively) simple Rayleigh option for cost & operational reasons Strategic Considerations

Why on a 4-m telescope ? Big enough to produce exciting science Exploit good seeing on La Palma Prospect of large science programmes Complement large telescopes Cost effective 0.37” Natural seeing NAOMI AO in I band

Sky coverage expectations R = 18 & search field of 2 arcmin diameter Thank-you Remko !

Ground layer turbulence Jimenez & IAC team, 2004

Performance expectations RIJH Uncorrected Corrected PSF specifications using R=17 th mag tip-tilt star (R=18 goal) in median seeing conditions

AO corrects 2D PSF IFS can fully exploit increased resolution Integral field spectroscopy

Multiple band-pass Sources confused Effective spatial resolution is low = Broad band-pass ‘Monochromatic’ data-cube slices Separate star from gas Effective spatial resolution increased Additional spectral separation (Becker et al, astro-ph/ ) Crowded field spectroscopy

Infrastructure

Goal beacon 20 km turbulence laser Laser beacon at fixed distance of 20km, of 200m depth. Laser beam will remain always on-axis. Laser wavelength primarily defined by availability of affordable quality solid-state lasers.

System diagram

The laser Solid state, diode-pumped Yb-YAG ‘disk’ laser Wavelength: 515nm Output power: 30W Beam quality: M 2 < 1.1 Q-switched, 400ns pulse

Laser location

Beam launch telescope

Wavefront sensor shutter

Wavefront sensor 8 x 8 Shack-Hartman Matched to DM 2 arcsec wide apertures Max. elongation 0.2 arcsec

WFS detectors Standard CCD39 for LGS L3CCD for NGS: ~zero read noise gives 1-2 mag advantage LGS loop speed 300 Hz NGS loop speed 100 Hz

Schedule MILESTONEDATE MILESTONEDATE Kick-off meetingApr 2004 Preliminary Design Review Jan 2005 Final Design Review Aug 2005 Lab verification of sub systems May 2006 Science verification Sep 2006 Operation Oct 2006