COPAG Workshop 3 Christopher Martin Chair COPAG Executive Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THESIS – the Terrestrial and Habitable-zone Exoplanet Spectroscopy Infrared Spacecraft a concept for a joint NASA/ESA exoplanet characterization mission.
Advertisements

CCAT Project Status. The Project: Phase 1: Feasibility/Concept Design Study, $2M, completed and peer reviewed Phase 1: Feasibility/Concept Design Study,
Report from NASA’s ExoPAG (Exoplanet Exploration Program Analysis Group) James Kasting ExoPAG Chair.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 KEPLER; Data Validation and Follow Up Observations CoRoT Symposium W.J. Borucki & the Kepler Team 5 February.
ATHENA: The Advanced Telescope for High Energy Astrophysics
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA COS Science Calibration & Instrument Status TIPS 20 Nov 2003 Last COS TIPS Aug 2003.
GALEX UV Light-curves of M-Dwarf Flare Stars: “ THE FLARING UV SKY” Barry Welsh, Jonathan Wheatley & Stanley Browne (UC Berkeley) Richard Robinson (Catholic.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
AURA New Initiatives Office S.C. Barden, M. Liang, K.H. Hinkle, C.F.W. Harmer, R.R. Joyce (NOAO/NIO) September 17, 2001 Instrumentation Concepts for the.
Imaging Science FundamentalsChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science The LASP* at RIT’s Center for Imaging Science *Laboratory for Astronomy in Strange.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Fundamental Physics and the Decadal Survey Quantum to Cosmos 3 Airlie, VA 7 July 2008 Michael Salamon NASA HQ/Astrophysics Div.
Astrophysics Breakout Don Figer RIT, RIDL 3 IT Collaboratory 2009 Research Symposium Charge to Breakout Sessions Breakout groups will determine: – the.
Definitive Science with Band 3 adapted from the ALMA Design Reference Science Plan (
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
COPAG Response to Hertz: Candidate Large Astrophysics Missions Charge And … Exploring the Synergies of a Joint ExoPlanet / UVOIR Mission Mary Beth Kaiser.
The Universe in the Infrared What is the Spitzer Space Telescope, and how does it work? Funded by NASA’s Spitzer Science Center Images courtesy NASA/JPL.
4-meter Space Telescope Design Concepts for a UVOIR / ExoPlanet Mission Dr. Charles F. Lillie January 8, 2012 COPAG Community Meeting.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 Traub Exoplanets: Astro2010 Survey Results, ExEP Proposed Community Actions (Joint presentation with Alan.
Enabling a GSMT for the US Community: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom 04 June, 2004 Tucson, AZ National Optical Astronomy Observatory Tucson.
Program Status Physics of the Cosmos Program (PCOS) Cosmic Origins Program (COR) M. Ahmed Briefing to the PhysPAG January 8, 2012 AAS Meeting, Austin Texas.
Toward an Exoplanet Roadmap. ExoPAG 8 Meeting Denver, CO October 5+6, 2012 Scott Gaudi.
1 BDRv3 - November 26, Markus Kissler-Patig E-ELT Programme 1 E-ELT Science Case Markus Kissler-Patig.
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Hubble Space Telescope James C. Green University of Colorado Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Instrument Design and Capabilities.
Potential Impacts of UV/Optical Photon- Counting DetectorTechnology Developments Christopher Martin California Institute of Technology NRC Technology Roadmap.
Will exobiology out of the Solar System stop after the DARWIN mission ? Marc Ollivier (1), Alain Léger (1), Pascal Bordé (2) and Bruno Chazelas (1) (1)
STDT: S. Seager (Chair, MIT), W. Cash (Colorado), S. Domagal- Goldman (NASA GSFC), N. J. Kasdin (Princeton), M. Kuchner (NASA GSFC), A. Roberge (NASA GSFC),
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
Exoplanets: What’s new and next for HST? Jennifer Wiseman NASA GSFC.
Exo-Planet Task Force (ExoPTF) Jonathan Lunine (LPL) Stephen Ridgway (NASA)
Modern Universe Space Telescope Visions 2003 Proposal Dennis Ebbets Ball Aerospace UV Optical Space Telescope Workshop STScI February 26, 2004.
COPAG 2011 May 24 AAS Meeting Christopher Martin Chair, COPAG Executive Committee.
SOFIA 2 nd Generation Instrument Plans & Technology Development Paul Hertz SOFIA Program Scientist & SMD Chief Scientist SOFIA Science Steering Committee.
NGSTNGST ASWG 22 Oct. ASWG Charter & Role  NGST Scientific Goals & Metrics  Refine actual goals and put in DRM √  Refine DRM model assumptions √  Assist.
Scientific Strategic Plan The Process Fall 2008: SSC and Observatory Management began activities to revise the SSP Previous SSP from 2003, last.
WFIRST-AFTA Mission Science Alan Dressler, AAS Seattle, January 7, /30/2014WFIRST-AFTA SDT Report 1.
1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Town Hall AAS 211 th Meeting – Austin, Texas Science Synergies with NRAO Telescopes Chris Carill NRAO.
Physics of the Cosmos Program Analysis Group John Nousek Penn State University International Workshop on Astronomical X–Ray Optics Prague, Czech Republic.
Technologies for Future Far-IR Telescopes and Interferometers Dave Leisawitz, NASA GSFC SPICA SPIRIT CALISTO.
TMT-India Science Interests and Project Update G.C. Anupama & R. Srianand (On behalf of the TMT-India)‏ TMT-SAC Meeting: November 2010, Pasadena,
CELT Science Case. CELT Science Justification Process Put together a Science Working Group –Bolte, Chuck Steidel, Andrea Ghez, Mike Brown, Judy Cohen,
Program Office Technology Management PhysPAG BriefingAAS Meeting, Austin Texas Jackie Townsend PCOS/COR Advanced Concepts and Technology Office Head January.
The Far-Infrared Universe: from the Universe’s oldest light to the birth of its youngest stars Jeremy P. Scott, on behalf of Locke D. Spencer Physics and.
ANN HORNSCHEMEIER Chief Scientist, Physics of the Cosmos Program NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Mega Telescopes of the 21 st Century Evolution in the Ground-Space Synergy Dr. Marc Postman (STScI) & Richard Ellis (Caltech) James Webb Space Telescope.
1 Douglas Hudgins Exoplanet Exploration Program Scientist Presentation to ExoPAG#8, Denver Colorado October 5, 2013.
Astrophysics Missions in ESA’s Cosmic Vision Program
Exoplanet Characterization with JWST
Characterizing Habitable Worlds... From the Moon Margaret Turnbull - STScI / Carnegie.
PhysPAG Technology Study Analysis Group (SAG) Status Roger Brissenden for the TechSAG team 8 January 2012 AAS Austin, TX 1.
Cosmology with ESO telescopes Bruno Leibundgut. Outline Past and current cosmology projects with ESO telescopes Future instrumentation capabilities (interferometry?)
July 29, MEPAG Goals Committee Update Jeffrey R. Johnson Chair, MEPAG Goals Committee USGS Astrogeology Science Center Flagstaff,
Study Lead Center : Goddard Space Flight Center Study Scientist : Aki Roberge (GSFC) Large Mission Concept Studies Kick Off AAS 227 th Meeting Kissimmee,
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Introduction: Goals for JWST Transit Meeting C. Beichman Jonathan Lunine March 11, 2014.
ExoPAG 9: Introduction and Motivation ExoPAG 9 Meeting Washington, DC January 4+5, 2014 Scott Gaudi (ExoPAG EC Chair)
PCOS/PhysPAG Town Hall AAS-HEAD, Monterey Richard Griffiths PCOS Program Scientist April 9, 2013 NASA HQ Perspective.
V - 1 V. System Technology for Large Space Telescopes Session Chair: Juan A. Roman.
IPSAG Telecon April 21, 2011 Shaul Hanany. Agenda Greetings ( 5 minutes) Background for IPSAG and connection to PhysPAG and APS (Shaul Hanany, 10 minutes)
The Submillimeter Array 1 David J. Wilner
NASA Astrobiology Institute Planetary System Formation Focus Group: Astro 2010 Decadal Survey White Paper NASA Astrobiology Institute Planetary System.
The Science Case Hubble Space Telescope CELT+AO HDF.
ATACAMA CCAT : The Cornell-Caltech Atacama Telescope
Commissioning of ASTECAM
Christopher Martin Chair, COPAG Executive Committee
Probing the IMF Star Formation in Massive Clusters.
High Resolution Spectroscopy of the IGM: How High
APS Meeting, Washington DC July 14, 2011 James Kasting, ExoPAG Chair
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Presentation transcript:

COPAG Workshop 3 Christopher Martin Chair COPAG Executive Committee

COPAG Workshop 3 Agenda TimeSpeakerSectionTitle 09:00MartinIntroGoals of workshop/Overview of Tech Assessment 09:30BenfordIntroCO Program Office Activities 09:45PerezIntroHQ Perspective 10:00MartinTech AssessmentUV Photon-counting detectors 10:15GardnerTech AssessmentOptical-IR Detectors (large, photon-counting) 10:30GoldsmithTech AssessmentFar IR Detectors 10:45Tech AssessmentDiscussion 11:00MartinTech AssessmentUV Coatings 11:15LillieTech AssessmentUV/Optical Telescopes (monolithic, segmented) 11:30LeisawitzTech AssessmentFIR Telescopes/Interferometers/Cryocoolers 11:45Tech AssessmentDiscussion 12:30LUNCH 1:30NoeckerJoint ExoPAG/COPAGOptical/UV Flagship Mission Requirements 2:00MartinJoint ExoPAG/COPAGLinked Probe-class missions 2:30Traub/MartinJoint ExoPAG/COPAGJoint Technology development possibilities 3:00Kasting/MartinJoint ExoPAG/COPAGDiscussion 3:30Adjourn to separate meetings 3:30DiscussionIssues: Tech Assessment, Probes, Future COPAG activities 5:00Adjourn

COPAG Executive Committee Chris Martin, Caltech (Chair) Ken Sembach, StScI Jonathan Gardner, GSFC Chuck Lillie, NGST Paul Goldsmith, JPL Dave Leisawitz, GSFC Lynne Hillenbrand, Caltech Juliane Dalcanton, U. Wash. 2-3 more members to be added shortly

2011 Tasks (Revised) SAG1: Science Objectives for a Next Generation UVOIR Flagship Mission (4-8 m) SAG2: Determine technology focus areas for a monolithic 4m Aperture UV/Optical/NIR mission with Internal Coronograph for Exoplanet Imaging SAG3: Determine technology focus areas for a segmented 8 m Aperture UV/Optical/NIR mission with External Occulter for Exoplanet Imaging SAG4: Determine technology focus areas for future Far IR Instruments

COPAG Activities 2011 Community meeting -- Jan 2011 AAS Regular telecons COPAG Web site (2 now) AAS Exploder Provide inputs to NRC/NASA Technology Roadmap Process Joint COPAG/ExoPAG Meeting April 2011 Community meeting – May 2011 AAS Fall community workshop – Sept 22-23, 2011 – StScI Draft Technology Assessment  ApS (Oct 19, 2011) Winter community workshop – Jan 8, 2012 – AAS Austin

COPAG Workshop 1) Science Objectives for future Cosmic Origins Missions –Cosmology –Galaxy Evolution –Gas –Stellar Populations –Star and Planet Formation 2) Mission Concepts: –UV and Far IR Probes –4-m UV/Optical/NIR –8-m UV/Optical/NIR –Spica –CALISTO and SAFIRE

COPAG Fall 2011 Workshop 3) Technologies –UVOIR Detectors –UVOIR Coatings –UVOIR Telescopes –UV Gratings/multiplexing –Joint UVOIR mission technologies –Far IR/Sub mm technologies 4) Discussion [at workshop and later] –Technology Assessment –Technology Prioritization –Technology Roadmapping [preliminary] –Probes –Balanced program

COPAG Technology Assessment: Science Measurements Tracing the flow of Baryons from the IGM to Galaxies Tracing the buildup of galactic structure through the history of the cosmos Tracing the history of star formation in nearby and distant galaxies using stellar and galactic photometry Tracing the cycle of baryons in the ISM, CGM, and Stars in Galaxies Exoplanet Imaging and Characterization [Joint with ExoPAG] Discover how conditions of habitability arise during planetary system formation

COPAG Technology Assessment: Sample Science Objective Objective: Tracing the flow of Baryons from the IGM to Galaxies Capability: spectroscopy with R~30, ,000 over nm, stretch goal nm. Multi-object capability may allow tomography using galaxies. Apertures of 4-m to 8-m required to provide significant single-object enhancement over HST. Multi-object capability and UV technology improvements could make ~1.5-m apertures scientifically compelling. Sample investigations: IGM and CGM absorption using background QSOs and galaxies to measure column density, ionization, temperature, metallicity of IGM, CGM, and ISM gas. Technology requirements: High-very high QE UV detectors, high pixel counts, low-very low backgrounds, moderate dynamic range, moderate out-of-band rejection (excluding spectrograph), photon- counting essential for lowest noise. Moderate-large apertures. Coatings with excellent reflectivity over nm.

Astro2010 Science Question  Science Measurement (Example: UVOIR)

Science Measurement  Technology Requirement (Example: UV Detectors)

Technology Figures of Merit 1. Current and projected (2020, assuming funding as specified below) performance. –e.g., for detectors: QE vs. wavelength, internal/dark noise, photon-counting capability, number of pixels/formats/scaleability, energy resolution, dynamic range. 2. Implementation and operational issues/risks: –e.g., for detectors requirements for cooling, high voltage, required materials/process improvements, red leak/out of band response. 3. Cost/time to TRL-6 and leverage: –What is the current TRL level, what NASA funding and time is required to reach TRL6, –What is the degree of difficulty of these developments for example using the DOD Degree of Difficulty scale –What non-NASA astrophysics division resources can be brought to bear to leverage the development> significant industrial involvement and prior investments, cross-division, cross-agency, private-sector investments and applications, existing infrastructure and institutional investment 4. Relevance to and impact on possible future missions: –Large 4-8 m UVOIR general astrophysics missions, Far IR/Sub mm missions –Joint Exoplanet imaging missions & required compatibility technologies

Cosmic Origins Technology Priorities Priority 1. These technologies are “mission enabling”, and are the highest priority for immediate investment. We provide preliminary roadmaps for these technologies. Priority 2. These technologies are “mission enhancing”. Some early investment should be considered contingent upon science and mission prioritization. Priority 3. Many interesting and important technologies may be relevant to future CO missions. Some can be developed once mission choices are made. Others may be developed as part of other activities and programs. Still others may be at early stages of readiness and require more basic research support to mature. Level 3 technologies were not included in Table 3.

UVOIR Technologies

Far IR/Sub mm Technologies

COPAG Workshop 3 Agenda TimeSpeakerSectionTitle 09:00MartinIntroGoals of workshop/Overview of Tech Assessment 09:30BenfordIntroCO Program Office Activities 09:45PerezIntroHQ Perspective 10:00MartinTech AssessmentUV Photon-counting detectors 10:15GardnerTech AssessmentOptical-IR Detectors (large, photon-counting) 10:30GoldsmithTech AssessmentFar IR Detectors 10:45Tech AssessmentDiscussion 11:00MartinTech AssessmentUV Coatings 11:15LillieTech AssessmentUV/Optical Telescopes (monolithic, segmented) 11:30LeisawitzTech AssessmentFIR Telescopes/Interferometers/Cryocoolers 11:45Tech AssessmentDiscussion 12:30LUNCH 1:30NoeckerJoint ExoPAG/COPAGOptical/UV Flagship Mission Requirements 2:00MartinJoint ExoPAG/COPAGLinked Probe-class missions 2:30Traub/MartinJoint ExoPAG/COPAGJoint Technology development possibilities 3:00Kasting/MartinJoint ExoPAG/COPAGDiscussion 3:30Adjourn to separate meetings 3:30DiscussionIssues: Tech Assessment, Probes, Future COPAG activities 5:00Adjourn