RECYCLE Jenkins Independent District Data STATE NCLB DATA 103 of 175 school districts (58.9%) met 100% of their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) AYP goals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
PUBLIC RELATIONS PURDUE UNIVERSITY CALUMET EDFA 51600: SCHOOL COMMUNITY RELATIONS DR. PAM FRAMPTON Kimberly J. Cummings June 20, 2014.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Jenkins Independent Schools STATE INFORATION RELATED TO 2007 NCLB DATA: Data indicate that 75.8 percent – 884 – of Kentucky's 1,167 public schools made.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
September 13, Title I is a federal program which provides financial assistance to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers.
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 9, 2012.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
AYP and Report Card.
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
AYP and Report Card.
Presentation transcript:

RECYCLE

Jenkins Independent

District Data

STATE NCLB DATA 103 of 175 school districts (58.9%) met 100% of their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) AYP goals. Of the 72 school districts (41.1%) that did not make AYP, 65 of these districts made 80% or more of their goals (41 of these school districts met at least 90% or more of their goals). Overall, 168 of 175 school districts (96.0%) in the state met 80% or more of their goals.

NCLB and Title I and Consequences Schools and districts that are funded by the federal Title I program, which provides funds to ensure that disadvantaged children receive opportunities for high-quality educational services, will be subject to federal consequences if they do not make AYP in the same content area in any student group for two or more consecutive years.

Consequences for the tiers increase each consecutive year that a school does not make AYP:

The 2008 NCLB Implications for Districts : 3 Title I districts are in Tier 1 consequences. 13 Title I districts are in Tier 2 consequences. 18 Title I districts are in Tier 3 first-year consequences. 16 Title I districts are in Tier 3 second-year consequences. 17 Title I districts are in Tier 3 third-year

JIS Add JIS

JIS

DISTRICT READING

DISTRICT MATH

School Data

School INFORMATION RELATED TO 2008 NCLB DATA: Data indicate that 70.9 percent of Kentucky's 1,157 public schools made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in the school year under the requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, the Kentucky Department of Education announced August 5th. This is a decline from 2007 when 78.7percent of schools made AYP.

A rise in reading and mathematics goals likely contributed to a lower percentage of schools making AYP in 2008 than in 2007.

NCLB and Title I Schools 809 of the 1,174 schools that participated in the state's assessment and accountability system were funded by Title I.

Consequences RELATED TO 2008 NCLB DATA: · 47 Title I schools are in Tier 1 consequences. · 34 Title I schools are in Tier 2 consequences. · 20 Title I schools are in Tier 3 consequences. · 40 Title I schools are in Tier 4 consequences. · 1 Title I school is in first-year Tier 5 consequences. · 5 Title I schools are in second-year Tier 5 consequences.

Each SBDM will present their NCLB School Level Data

CATS The public release date for information related to the Commonwealth Accountability Testing System (CATS) is for September

One last thought before the schools present their data: RECYCLE

Once a Cavalier Always a C AVALIER !!!