Conflicts of Interest in Research : Perspective of the IRB Human Subject Protections Monika S. Markowitz, PhD Director, Office of Research Compliance and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
ETHICAL TREATMENT OF HUMAN SUBJECTS All research projects must be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Federal law APA (American Psychological.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethical Principles of Human Subjects Protection
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying and Minimizing COI from the Perspectives of Sponsors, Faculty and the IRB Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying.
 Tracy L. LeGrow, Psy.D. Associate Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
The Role of IRBs and Ethics Susan Kornetsky, MPH Children’s Hospital, Boston.
Effectiveness in Review & Oversight of Human Subjects Research Steven Joffe, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Pediatrics.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Managing Conflicts of Interest at the IRB and Institutional Level: INSTITUTIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Claudia R. Adkison, J.D., Ph.D. Executive Associate.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: RECOGNITION AND MANAGEMENT Judith L. Curry Associate General Counsel NC State University March 5, 2007.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Second Annual Medical Research Summit March 25, 2002 Washington, D.C.
Medical Research in Times of Bioterrorism - OHRP’s Perspective Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.
0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
Christine Yalda, J.D., Ph.D. Chair, Human Research Review Committee Grand Valley State University.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
UW Conflict of Interest Program Manager Office of Research Policy
Investigator Responsibilities in Human Subjects Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Conflict of Interest IRB Review of Management Plans
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Conflicts of Interest in Research : Perspective of the IRB Human Subject Protections Monika S. Markowitz, PhD Director, Office of Research Compliance and Education Chair, Conflict of Interests Committee Vice President’s Office for Research

Financial Interests/Relationships may lead to Conflicts of Interest  Holding financial interests is not inherently ‘wrong’  COI: A set of conditions in which an investigator’s judgment concerning a primary interest (e.g. subject welfare, integrity of the research) could be biased by a secondary interest (e.g. personal or financial gain)  The COIC fosters research integrity on behalf of the university  The IRB ensures that subject protections are not compromised by conflicts of interest

Unmanaged financial interests may be implicated in subject harm  Case of Jesse Gelsinger – years old, metabolic disorder (OTC deficiency) Gene transfer study Died of massive organ failure Allegations of conflicts of interest against research team and university No causal relationship established, but a remaining suspicion that money clouded judgment

Underlying Principles for COI Consideration by the IRB  Respect for persons  Beneficence Belmont Principles  Justice These should not be compromised by financial relationships that comprise conflicts of interest

What do federal regulations for IRBs say about COI? § IRB membership (e) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB. However…

…Reasonable inferences abut COI from regulations §46.111/ Criteria for IRB approval of research. (a) In order to approve research covered by this policy the IRB shall determine that all of the following requirements are satisfied: (1) Risks to subjects are minimized (2) Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits §46.116/50.20 General requirements for informed consent. An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence.

What does AAHRPP say about COI? Domain I – Organization Standard I.3.G  The Organization has and follows written policies and procedures to identify, manage, and minimize individual conflicts of interest of investigators. The Organization works with the IRB regarding conflicts of interest, when appropriate.

Minimizing/Managing Conflicts of Interest at VCU: Process  Completed COI Reporting Form sent to VCU Conflict of Interests Committee (COIC) – no monetary threshold for financial interests related to human subjects research  Based on investigator’s report (extent of relationship, assessment of relatedness, involvement in other similar activities in the past), COIC makes a determination: via expedited review and/or full COIC determination  Determination reported to Sponsored Programs AND/OR to IRB (VCU and WIRB). Latter report includes more info and recommendations for further IRB action, if any.  Review by the IRB may be concurrent, however, IRB approval is not final until IRB reviewers consider the COIC determination and whether further actions apply.

Minimizing or managing conflicts – examples from COIC  Disclosure of financial interest in publications, presentations and to involved students/trainees  PI is removed from portions or all of the investigator role  Oversight of research by non-conflicted faculty member in School  Data monitoring committee  Remove self from financial interest during the research

Attitudes/views about COI in research –   Focus group of IRB/COIC Chairs, Investigators: Most frequent rationale for disclosing financial interests in ICF is enabling informed decision making about enrollment. Agreement about disclosing early in IC process and about naming sponsor. Disagreement about disclosing amount. Weinfurt, Friedman, et al J. of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 2006, 34: Weinfurt, Friedman, et al J. of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 2006, 34:  Survey of 300 research coordinators. Almost ½ disclose financial interests to potential participants. Comfort in disclosing is related to research experience. ICF is not the source of info about financial interest for most. Many responded that they don’t have enough info about financial interests to answer participant questions. Friedman, Sugarman, et al Clinical Trials, 2007, 4: Friedman, Sugarman, et al Clinical Trials, 2007, 4: 272-8

Attitudes/views about COI in research: participants   Most potential participants want to be informed (and believe this should be required) about financial interests even while still wanting to participate in the research. Kim, Millard, et al J Medical Ethics 2009; 30: 73-9 Kim, Millard, et al J Medical Ethics 2009; 30: 73-9   Focus groups: Many participants want to know about financial interests in research, but great variability in desire, and aptitude, to understand nature and implication of financial interests. Weinfurt, Friedman, et al J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: Weinfurt, Friedman, et al J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21: 901-6

Removing or minimizing conflicts of interest to better protect subjects  Disclosure of financial interests in informed consent form – may not be enough to decrease the risks to subjects

In addition to ICF disclosure, questions for IRB consideration Under what circumstances, if any, should a conflicted individual be allowed to participate in:  Subject recruitment?  Subject selection, including prescreening for inclusion/exclusion criteria?  The consent process?  Clinical treatment of subjects, separate from the research interventions or procedures?  Clinical evaluation of subjects during the research, separate from research interventions or procedures, including adverse evaluation and reporting? From: AAU Association of American Universities AAMC Association of American Medical Colleges - Letter to NIH

VCU Resources about Researcher COI  VCU Researcher Conflict of Interests Policy  IRB Written Policy and Procedure (WPP) VIII-10 Evaluating Investigator Potential Conflicts of Interest Coming soon: - Modified COI Reporting and Supplement Forms - COI website AND

What about institutional COI?  The ‘elephant in the room’  An institutional COI may exist whenever the financial interests of the institution, or of institutional officials acting on behalf of the institution, (reasonably) affect institutional processes for the design, conduct, reporting, review, or oversight of human subjects research.