12.540 Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room 54-820A; 253-5941

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Advertisements

Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
1 Internal waves and tidal energy dissipation observed by satellite altimetry E. Schrama, TU Delft / Geodesy The Netherlands
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 03 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
On the alternative approaches to ITRF formulation. A theoretical comparison. Department of Geodesy and Surveying Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Athanasios.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Jake Griffiths & Jim Ray NOAA/National Geodetic Survey Acknowledgement: Kevin Choi SUBDAILY ALIAS AND DRACONITIC ERRORS IN THE IGS ORBITS Harmonics of.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Phases of the Moon Data
Ocean Tides and Sea Level - tide – “daily rise and fall of sea level” (C&D) - tide – distortions of sea by gravitational attraction of Moon and Sun on.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_MOD stations corrections Hana Spicakova.
“Real-time” Transient Detection Algorithms Dr. Kang Hyeun Ji, Thomas Herring MIT.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_MOD station corrections Hana Spicakova.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 10 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 16 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 13 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
Generalization of Farrell's loading theory for applications to mass flux measurement using geodetic techniques J. Y. Guo (1,2), C.K. Shum (1) (1) Laboratory.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 3: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 20 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
State-of-the-art physical models for calculating atmospheric pressure loading effects 1 Geodätische Woche October, Köln, Germany Dudy D.
Lecture Guidelines for GEOF110 Chapter 5 ( 2 hours) Chapter 6 (2 Hours) Ilker Fer Guiding for blackboard presentation. Following Pond & Pickard, Introductory.
Gravity Summary For a point source or for a homogeneous sphere the solution is easy to compute and are given by the Newton’s law. Gravity Force for the.
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
(c) 2009 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Improving Predictions of the Earth’s Rotation Using Oceanic Angular Momentum.
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
12.201/ Essentials of Geophysics Geodesy and Earth Rotation Prof. Thomas Herring
Celestial Mechanics VI The N-body Problem: Equations of motion and general integrals The Virial Theorem Planetary motion: The perturbing function Numerical.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
WHY DOES THE IGS CARE ABOUT EOPs?
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 13
Presentation transcript:

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;

4/21/ Lec 182 Mathematical models in GPS Review assignment dates (updated on class web page) –Paper draft due May 5, 2010 –Homework 3 due Wednesday May 12, 2010 –Final class is Wednesday May 12. Oral presentations of papers. Each presentation should be 20 minutes, with additional time for questions. Next four lectures: –Mathematical models used in processing GPS –Processing methods used

4/21/ Lec 183 Mathematical models used in GPS Models needed for millimeter level positioning Review of basic estimation frame: –Data (phase and pseudorange) are collected at a sampling interval (usually 30-sec) over an interval usually a multiple of 24-hours. Typically 6-8 satellites are observed simultaneously –A theoretical model is constructed to model these data. This model should be as complete as necessary and it uses apriori values of the parameters of the model. –An estimation is performed in which new values of some of the parameters are determined that minimize some cost function (e.g., RMS of phase residuals). –Results in the form of normal equations or covariance matrices may be combined to estimate parameters from many days of data ( Dong D., T. A. Herring, and R. W. King, Estimating Regional Deformation from a Combination of Space and Terrestrial Geodetic Data, J. Geodesy, 72, 200–214, 1998.)

4/21/ Lec 184 Magnitude of parameter adjustments The relative size of the data noise to effects of a parameter uncertainty on the observable determines in general whether a parameter should be estimated. In some cases, certain combinations of parameters can not be estimated because the system is rank deficient (discuss some examples later) How large are the uncertainties in the parameters that effect GPS measurements?

4/21/ Lec 185 Magnitudes of parameter adjustments Major contributions to GPS measurements: –Pseudorange data: Range from satellite to receiver, satellite clock and receiver clock (±10 cm) –Phase data: Range from satellite to receiver, satellite clock oscillator phase, receiver clock oscillator phase and number of cycles of phase between satellite and receiver (±2 mm) Range from satellite to receiver depends on coordinates of satellite and ground receiver and delays due to propagation medium (already discussed). How rapidly do coordinates change? Satellites move at 1 km/sec; receivers at 500 m/s in inertial space. To compute range coordinates must in same frame.

4/21/ Lec 186 Parameter adjustment magnitudes Already discussed satellite orbital motion: Parameterized as initial conditions (IC) at specific time and radiation model parameters. For pseudo range positioning, broadcast ephemeris is often adequate. Post-processed orbits (IGS) ±3-5 cm (may not be adequate for global phase processing). Satellites orbits are easiest integrated in inertial space, but receiver coordinates are nearly constant in an Earth-fixed frame. Transformation between the two systems is through the Earth orientation parameters (EOP). Discussed in Lecture 4.

4/21/ Lec 187 EOP variations If analysis is near real-time, variations in polar motion and UT1 will need to be estimated. After a few weeks, these are available from the IERS (±0.05 mas of pole position, 0.01 ms UT1) in the ITRF2005 no-net-rotation system. ITRF2008 should be available soon (problems with scale in current versions). For large networks, normally these parameters are re- estimated. Partials are formed by differentiating the arguments of the rotation matrices for the inertial to terrestrial transformation.

4/21/ Lec 188 Position variations in ITRF frame The International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) defines the positions and velocities of ~1000 locations around the world (GPS, VLBI, SLR and DORIS). Frame is defined to have no net rotation when motions averaged over all tectonic plates. However, a location on the surface of the Earth does not stay at fixed location in this frame: main deviations are: –Tectonic motions (secular and non-secular) –Tidal effects (solid Earth and ocean loading) –Loading from atmosphere and hydrology First two (tectonics and tides) are normally accounted for in GPS processing

4/21/ Lec 189 Solid Earth Tides Solid Earth Tides are the deformations of the Earth caused by the attraction of the sun and moon. Tidal geometry

4/21/ Lec 1810 Solid Earth Tide The potential at point P U=GM*/ l We can expand 1/ l as: For n=0; U 0 is GM*/R and is constant for the whole Earth For n=1; U 1 =GM*/R 2 [r cos  ]. Taking the gradient of U 1 ; force is independent of position in Earth. This term drives the orbital motion of the Earth

4/21/ Lec 1811 Solid Earth Tide The remaining terms are the tidal potential, U T. Second form is often referred to as the “vector” tide model (convenient if planetary ephemeredes are available)

4/21/ Lec 1812 Solid Earth Tide The work of Love on tides showed that the response of the (spherical) Earth is dependent on the degree n of the tidal deformation and that:

4/21/ Lec 1813 Solid Earth Tide h n and l n are called Love numbers (also a k n for the change in potential, needed for orbit integration). For the moon r/R=1/60 and for the Sun r/R=1/23,000: Most important tidal terms are 2nd degree harmonics: k 2 =0.3; h 2 =0.609; l 2 =0.085 Expand the second harmonic term in terms of , of point and  ’, ’ extraterrestrial body

4/21/ Lec 1814 Solid Earth Tide: Resultant expansion gives characteristics of tides:

4/21/ Lec 1815 Solid Earth Tide Magnitude: h 2 (GM*/R)r=26.7 cm. Long period tides: 0 at ±35 degree latitude Diurnal tides: Max at mid-latitudes Semidiurnal tides: zero at poles The planetary positions  ’, ’ have periodic variations that set the primary tidal frequencies. Major lunar tide M2 has a variation with period of days (1/2 lunar period) Additional consideration: Presence of fluid core affects the tides. Largest effect is  h 2 = at 1 cycle/sidereal day

4/21/ Lec 1816 Series expansion The tidal potential can be expanded in series in terms of: lm, ls - Longitude of moon and sun,  - Argument of lunar perigee, GST - Greenwich sidereal time The other system used with tides is Doodson’s arguments:  - Time angle in lunar days; s, h - Mean longitude of Sun and Moon p, p1 - Long of Moon's and Sun’s perigee N' - Negative of long of Moon's Node

4/21/ Lec 1817 Earth tides: The Fortan routine earth_tide.f computes the tidal displacement at any location on the Earth. (This routine uses numerical derivatives for the tangential components. Analytic derivatives are not that difficult to derive.)earth_tide.f (The const_param.h file contains quantities such as pi).

4/21/ Lec 1818 Ocean tides The ocean tides also load the solid Earth causing and additional tidal like signal in the Earth. At the temporal frequencies of the tides, both systems behave linearly and so the temporal frequencies of the response is the same. For the solid Earth tides, the spatial frequency response is also linear but no so for the ocean tides. The P 2 forcing of the ocean tides, generates many spherical harmonics in the ocean response and thus the solid earth response has a complex spatial pattern.

4/21/ Lec 1819 Ocean tides The solution to the ocean tidal loading problem requires knowledge of the ocean tide potential (the level of the tides) and the loading response of the Earth. The loading problem has a similar solution to the standard tidal problem but in this case load Love numbers, denoted k n ’, h n ’ and l n ’ are used.

4/21/ Lec 1820 Load Love numbers The load love numbers depend on the elastic properties of the Earth (deduced from seismic velocities) n-h n ’nl n ’-nk n ’

4/21/ Lec 1821 Load signal calculations For simple homogenous Earth, the Love numbers depend on rigidity of the Earth Load signals can be computed by summing all the spherical harmonics. An alternative is a Green’s function approach (Farrell, 1972) in which the response to a point load is computed (the point load is expanded in spherical harmonics) The Green’s function can then be convolved with a surface load to compute the amount of deformation.

4/21/ Lec 1822 Ocean loading magnitudes

4/21/ Lec 1823 Loading signals In addition to ocean tidal loading, any system that loads the surface will cause loading deformations. Main sources are: –Atmospheric pressure loading (~0.5 mm/mbar). Often short period, but annual signals in some parts of the world. –Surface water loading (~0.5 mm/cm of water). More difficult to obtain load data In some locations, sediment expansion when water added (eg. LA basin)

4/21/ Lec 1824 Basic loading effect

4/21/ Lec 1825 Example: Penticton Canada

4/21/ Lec 1826 Summary Tides and loading –All high-precision GPS analyses account for solid-Earth tides; most account for ocean tidal loading –Loading effects for the atmosphere, surface water and non- tidal ocean loading are not commonly directly applied because inputs are uncertain. –Atmospheric pressure loading could be routinely applied soon (data sets are high quality) –Two issues on loading: Application at the observation level or use a “daily average” value. If latter how to compute. Tidal effects with 12-hour period and 6 hour sampling –Gravity mission GRACE recovers surface loads well enough to allow these to be applied routinely (current research topic).