1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INFN Milano, Universita` degli Studi Milano Bicocca Siena IPRD May Testbeam results of the CMS electromagnetic calorimeter Alessio Ghezzi.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
AHCAL Saturation Study CALICE week – Casablanca, Morocco 2010/09/22 Jaroslav Zalesak Institute of Physics, Prague / DESY Study of single SiPM response.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology On behalf othe CMS ECAL Collaboration High-resolution, high-granularity.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.
ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, May 19, PWO Crystal ECAL Ren-yuan Zhu California Institute of Technology May 19 th 2001.
CMS ECAL 2006 Test Beams Effort Caltech HEP Seminar Christopher Rogan California Institute of Technology May 1, 2007.
Background Issues: Real Time Radiation Measurement S.M.Yang EPC.IHEP Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study March 2008 Institute of High Energy.
Calibration of the calorimeter by punch-through muons and cosmic muons Doroshenko M. E391 collaboration.
PANDA electromagnetic calorimeters Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group INSTR08 28 Feb - 05 Mar 2008.
October 2002US CMS HCAL at BU1 US CMS HCAL Meeting Boston University Vasken Hagopian Florida State University.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectBeam test meeting, September 27, 2006 CsI afterglow - possible explaination of pedestal drift and excess of energy. Alexandre.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
S.Hou, Academia Sinica Taiwan. 2Outline Optical links for ATLAS Laser-driver  fiber  PIN-driver LHC modules in service Rad-hard requirement for LHC/SLHC.
1 Prototype Calibration System for Forward Hadron Calorimeter L. Almeida, M. Baarmand, L. Caraway, M. Hohlmann, T. Qureshi, I. Vodopianov FLORIDA TECH.
CMS ECAL performance and upgrade Anton Karneyeu (INR, Moscow) CMS Collaboration INSTR14, Novosibirsk, Russia, 27 February 2014.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
1 Yu. Guz HCAL status 22/06/ Yu. Guz HCAL 137 Cs calibration The 3 rd run in 2011 was performed at the technical stop, May-09. Two source passages,
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
LHC Beam Loss Monitors, B.Dehning 1/15 LHC Beam loss Monitors Loss monitor specifications Radiation tolerant Electronics Ionisation chamber development.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
Remembering PWO Radiation hardness studies at IHEP, Protvino Y. Kubota.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
Paolo Rumerio, CERN On behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Group CALOR 2006 Chicago, June 5 th – 9 th, 2006 Commissioning of the CMS Electromagnetic.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
G. Eigen, Paris, Introduction The SiPM response is non-linear and depends on operating voltage (V-V bd ) and temperature  SiPMs need monitoring.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
PbWO 4 crystals Calorimeter Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Sergey BarsukElectromagnetic Calorimeter for 1 Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the LHCb experiment Perugia, Italy March 29 – April 2, 2004 ECAL CALO Sergey.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
2004 LHC DAYS IN SPLIT- October 8 th 2004 L. Dobrzynski - LLR CMS - ECAL Test beam results Ludwik Dobrzynski On behalf of ECAL CMS LLR- Ecole polytechnique.
COMPASS calorimeters S. Platchkov IRFU, CEA-Saclay GDR, 8-9 avril 2008
Why we need an improved LASER calibration system
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Overview Detector details Crystals Photo-detectors
Studies on TH2 chamber Michele, Maria, Givi, Joerg
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Studies of the effect of the LHC cycle on
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Studies of the effect of the LHC cycle on
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL - The PROBLEM - The IDEA - The SETUP - Some RESULTS

2 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The PROBLEM  In order to discover a light Higgs decaying in gg  we need an excellent calorimeter, with a constant term of ~0.5%; so we must have:  CMS-ECAL PbWO 4 crystals are radiation hard (no damage to scintillation process) but there are small changes in transparency due to radiation exposure. The change is of the order of 2-3 % and is fairly rapid ( hours ).The change of transparency light will be monitored in situ with a laser and a correction to particles signal will be applied: R =  particle /  monitoring The crystal-to-crystal variation of R must be limited to about 5% to avoid R becoming another calibration constant. crystal-to-crystal inter-calibration error must be limited to ~0.4%;

3 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The IDEA  The ideal solution would be to measure R for all the crystal of the CMS-ECAL, but this is practically impossible;  the solution is to do systematic measurements of R for group of crystals and correlate the results with other important parameters of the crystals. To do that, we built a setup at the General Irradiation Facility (GIF) of CERN. With it we can do (at the same time) : Irradiate with a Cs 137  source (E  =0.662 MeV, dose rate=15 rad/h i.e. LHC conditions) Excite the crystals with SPS e beam (50 and 100 GeV) Excite the crystals with UV laser ( =337  10 nm, 1.55mJ/pulse, t =600 ps) Monitor the transmission of the crystals at different wave length:   LED ( =450  50 nm, t=500 ns)   Xenon lamp ( =400, 420, 440, 500, 524 nm, t=1  s) Transmission UV Laser LED

4 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP GIF is a multi-CERN-users facility, due to that three main constraints exist:  very little space available;  very few days of beam per year (8-10 days) ;  we cannot take at the same time data and irradiate with Caesium source;  we cannot take at the same time e data and irradiate with Caesium source;  UV laser can replace the beam;  UV laser can replace the e beam;  crystals are tested in batches of 5;  the setup can move from and back the irradiation position to the beam, and allows to scan the 5 crystals with the electrons

5 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP  Cs137 irradiation is done transversally to the crystal  The light detectors for the crystals are standard CMS-ECAL APDs  It’s very important to monitor the different light sources: a 6th crystal and a PM are installed to monitor all light sources; a PIN diode is used to monitor the laser  The gain is monitored periodically with a constant charge injected to the amplifiers (Test Pulse)  The 5 different triggers(LED, Laser, Lamp, Beam, Test Pulse, Pedestals) are generated asynchronously

6 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Irradiation procedure  24 hours of stabilisation: at the end of the stabilisation, the beam is tuned on crystal 5 (the lowest); just before the irradiation starts, three scans per crystals with electrons are done  Irradiation starts, it lasts ~48h (~700 rad) : during the first two hours of irradiation the scan in the beam is done every 30 minutes; then the scan is done every hour for the next 8 hours of irradiation; then the scan is done every 2 hours till the end of the irradiation;  Sometime a recovery is done, the scan is done every two hours.  Crystals are taken out and annealed in oven. P.S. one scan lasts ~14 minutes (~ 3 minutes per crystal). In total 7000 electrons per crystals are kept in data, (out of electrons hitting the crystals). This corresponds to a dose of ~2 rad per crystal per scan.

7 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP LED box Laser fiber Lamp fiber Cooling pipes Crystals box

8 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP PM PIN diode for Laser

9 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP Cooling Scintillators trigger block APDs block

10 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP APD Temperature probe Beamdirection Lead radiation screen

11 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP Irradiation window

12 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP Beam direction Crystal Temperature probe Beam trigger scintillator Lamp fiber Laser fiber LED fiber

13 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP

14 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The SETUP Laser box

15 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Some RESULTS  The results I will show are still preliminary  Results are from data taken this summer: SPS e beam of 50 and 100 GeV; 10 different production barrel crystal were irradiated, 5 of them 2 times and 5 of them 4 times.  Our goals of this summer were: confirm that UV laser can replace the beam; confirm that UV laser can replace the e beam; check the reproducibility of the results; check the reproducibility of the results; first evaluation of the crystal-to-crystal variation of R first evaluation of the crystal-to-crystal variation of R.

16 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The BEAM Drift chamber x Drift chamber y 1 cm ADC cry1 ADC cry2 ADC cry3 ADC cry4 ADC cry5

17 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Typical irradiation curve 330 rad

18 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Temperature correction CoCoCoCo  S/S as a function of  T/T UV Laser: 2.5% per 0.1 Cº LED: 0.8% per C o

19 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como R calculation  LED  LASER Distribution of  LASER /  LED (i.e. R) 1dim gaussian fit 2dim linear fit Distribution of S LASER versus S LED  BEAM S LED S LASER S BEAM

20 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como The best: Stabilisation Irradiation Recovery Exponential fit: Irradiation decay time is 5 times faster than Recovery rime (R is calculated doing the ratio of the Exponential functions. No problems from normalisation !)

21 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Reproducibility The same crystal (9257) has been irradiated several times. The variance of R is 5%

22 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como R dependence from R dependence from

23 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle Physics” conference, 18 October 2001 Como Conclusions  GIF-ECAL is a setup which allows to monitor the change in transparency of PbWO 4 CMS-ECAL crystals due to radiation exposure (LHC dose rate);  this summer test-beam showed that: UV Laser can reproduce the e beam crystal excitation (R~1.2) good reproducibility of results (~5%) the analysis is not yet fine enough in order to reduce measurement error such that the crystal-to-crystal dispersion can be extracted A measurement error less than 5% is needed (actually around 15%) improve the analysis improve the setup SYSTEMATIC irradiations