Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Advertisements

Jane Frankenberger Purdue University.  Opportunity for agreement -- Even people with widely divergent views can agree on numbers drawn from the literature.
Livestock/Perennial grass/Row crops-a solution? University of Florida, Auburn University, UGA, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, National Peanut Laboratory,
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico Spring 2013.
Scenario Analysis costs per acre for various practices estimate each fully applied practice for N or P then combine for N or P to reach 20 or 45% finally,
Making Sense of Farmland Lease Options by Dale Lattz, Gary Schnitkey, and Bruce Sherrick.
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
Copyright © University of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. Conservation Tillage Workshop Heron Lake, MN March 22, 2012 David Bau Extension Educator.
Practice – CP-39 Farmable Wetland Program Constructed Wetland.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
N and P Reduction Estimation Consider complete range of management and structural practices Models vs. Measurements Iowa results where possible Capturing.
DRAINAGE WATER MANAGEMENT FOR MIDWESTERN ROW CROP AGRICULTURE DWM PARTNER FORUM II JUNE 15, 2011 WAYNE HONEYCUTT USDA-NRCS.
Drainage Water Management to meet Agronomic and Environmental goals University of Minnesota Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate Southwest Research and Outreach.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DWM AT LARGE SCALE MOHAMED A. YOUSSEF and R. WAYNE SKAGGS 1 By.
2011 Shannon Zezula NRCS Indiana State Resource Conservationist Improving Water Quality in the Corn Belt (and Beyond...)
Ethanol: Impacts on Soil and Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Water Quality Program (573)
Long-Term Field Research for Developing Nitrogen BMP’s Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center
Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren.
Soil Effects on Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension.
Iowa Science Assessment of Nonpoint Source Practices to Reduce Phosphorus to the Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Reduction Strategy Phosphorus Science.
Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Background Information Reid Christianson, P.E., Ph.D. Center for Watershed Protection Ellicott City, Maryland.
Agricultural Water Pollution: Some Policy Considerations Catherine Kling Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University Iowa Environmental.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
Conservation Drainage: Drainage for the 21st Century
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
The Economics of Feedstocks - Calculating Your Cost of Producing Energy Crops and Crop Residues Madhu Khanna and Nick Paulson University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Iowa Nutrient Reduction Science Assessment Cost Estimate and Outreach John D. Lawrence Associate Dean and Director Ag and Natural Resources Extension Iowa.
2014 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Back to the Future? 2015 Crop and Income Outlook: Conserve Cash Now Gary.
Empirical Modeling of Nitrate Loading and Crop Yield for Corn-Soybean Rotations in Iowa Rob Malone, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA Liwang Ma, Doug Karlen, Terry Meade,
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,
Iowa CREP Meeting/Tour October 15, 2007 Why off-field practices/buffers? Jim Baker, IDALS (professor emeritus, Dept. Agric. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State.
Preliminary Draft Experience from the Cedar River TMDL “Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Implications and Strategies for Iowa” Jim Baker Professor emeritus,
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
Agenda Item 2. A review of basic concepts and terminology related to phosphorus movement from cropland to streams and rivers. Great Lakes Protections Fund.
Drainage and Nitrate Loss Matthew Helmers Dean’s Professor, College of Ag. & Life Sciences Professor, Dept. of Ag. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State University.
Mixed Annual-Perennial Systems: Diversity on Iowa’s Land Matt Liebman Wallace Chair for Sustainable Agriculture Iowa State University.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Summary of supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23, 2013.
Linking Land use, Biophysical, and Economic Models for Policy Analysis Catherine L. Kling Iowa State University October 13, 2015 Prepared for “Coupling.
G RAIN M ARKETS AND C OST OF P RODUCTION Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison
TARGETING PERENNIAL/BIOMASS CROPS TO SENSITIVE AREAS Claire Baffaut USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, MO Translating.
Economics of Alternative Rotations North Central Research Association March 11, 2004.
April 8, 2009Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum Land Use Change in Agriculture: Yield Growth as a Potential Driver Scott Malcolm USDA/ERS.
Grain Profitability Outlook Cash Rents Land Values Greg Halich Univ. of Kentucky
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell August 8,
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
Dead Zones & Drinking Water: Farming’s Nutrient Loss Challenge Jonathan Coppess University of Illinois.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
26 May, 2016 Panevėžys, Lithuania
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
Plant Roots and P - K Uptake  Relatively immobile nutrients, main uptake mechanism is slow diffusion through soil water to roots from a short distance.
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Iowa Conservation Practices:
Costs and Environmental Gains from Conservation Programs
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
Developments in Drainage in Illinois
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy
Drainage Water Management
Cover Crops.
Presentation transcript:

Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign November 13,

Riverine N and P Fluxes WaterNitrate-NTotal NDRPTotal P ft 3 yr -1 million lb N or P yr -1 David & Gentry (2000) Urban runoff Point sources Percent of load Point sources David & Gentry (2000) 1647

Illinois Nutrient Sources

Point and agricultural sources ( )

Nitrate-N and Total P Targets Red line is target, purple is average 1997 to 2011

Point Source P Estimates Point Source Limit (mg P/L)million lb of P reduced % of target (18.8 million lb P) All majors to 1 mg/L standard (0.7 mg P/L actual) Top 20 majors to Top 30 majors to Top 50 majors to All majors to Top 20 majors to Top 30 majors to Top 50 majors to Total P from point sources currently ~18.1 million lb P per year

Possible intermediate reduction goal 30% total P reduction by 2025 – top 50 majors reduce total P to 0.7 mg P/L (21%) – buffers and cover crops (9%) 20% nitrate-N reduction by 2025 – fertilizer timing, cover crops, buffers, and bioreactors (20%) to Gulf of Mexico

Nitrate Yield by MLRA Combined MLRA Description Drained cropland (acres) Nitrate-N yield per row crop acre (lb N/acre/yr) Nitrate-N yield per tile drained acre (lb N/acre/yr) Nitrate-N yield from non-tiled land (lb N/acre/yr) MLRA 1 Northern Illinois drift plain 288, MLRA 2 Northeastern Illinois heavy till plain 2,063, MLRA 3 Northern Mississippi Valley 20, MLRA 4 Deep loess and drift 5,437, MLRA 5 Claypan 310, MLRA 6 Thin loess and till 226, MLRA 7 Central Mississippi Valley, Northern Part 1,284, MLRA 8 Sandstone and shale hills and valleys 49, MLRA 9 Central Mississippi Valley, Western Part 23,

Cost analysis Gary Schnitkey – agricultural costs per acre Mark David – point source costs – N loss reduction costs Greg McIsaac – P loss reduction costs

Agricultural Cost Estimates No changes in corn and soybean yields across scenarios No reduction in nitrogen application rates with timing changes Up front costs amortized over 20 years at 6% interest rate

Costs per acre Practice/ScenarioCost Per Acre Notes Reducing N rate from background to the MRTN (10% of acres) -$8Reduce N rates (20 pounds) Nitrification inhibitor with all fall applied fertilizer on tile- drained corn acres $7Cost of inhibitor Split (50%) fall and spring (50%) on tile-drained corn acres $17Additional field pass, switch to N solutions Fall to spring on tile-drained corn acres $18Switch to N solutions, higher ammonia price, additional application costs Cover crops on all corn/soybean tile-drained acres $29Aerial applications of cereal rye Cover crops on all corn/soybean non-tiled acres $29Aerial applications of cereal rye Bioreactors on 50% of tile-drained land $17Upfront costs of $133 per acre Wetlands on 25% of tile-drained land $605% of farmland out of production Major cost is land ($11,000) Buffers on all applicable crop land (reduction only for water that interacts with active area) $294 per buffer acre Land costs plus $50 planting, $10 yearly maintenance Perennial/energy crops equal to pasture/hay acreage from 1987 $86Less profit compared to corn-soybean rotation Perennial/energy crops on 10% of tile-drained land $86Less profit compared to corn-soybean rotation Edge-of- field Land use change In-field

P Reduction Practices Reduce tillage: -$16 per acre – One less field pass Eliminate P application for six years: -$15 per acre – Eliminate 6 years of applications, spread over 20 years to draw down P reserves Incorporate P: $6 per acre – Additional application costs

Point Source Costs dependent on size of facility – costs >>>> for smaller STP’s (< 1-2 MGD) great variability among STP’s used data from: – North Shore Sanitary District three plant cost analysis – USEPA 2008 Municipal Nutrient Removal Technologies report eight plant case study more data to come, cost per lb likely to increase

Point Source Cost Summary (more estimates to be added) Median $2.92/lb P $1.72 lb/N

Example Statewide Results for N Practice/ScenarioNitrate- N reduction per acre (%) Nitrate- N reduced (million lb N) Nitrate-N Reduction % (from baseline) Cost ($/lb N removed) Baseline410 Reducing N rate from background to the MRTN (10% of acres) Nitrification inhibitor with all fall applied fertilizer on tile-drained corn acres Split (50%) fall and spring (50%) on tile-drained corn acres 7.5 to Fall to spring on tile-drained corn acres 15 to Cover crops on all corn/soybean tile-drained acres Cover crops on all corn/soybean non-tiled acres Bioreactors on 50% of tile-drained land Wetlands on 25% of tile-drained land Buffers on all applicable crop land (reduction only for water that interacts with active area) Perennial/energy crops equal to pasture/hay acreage from Perennial/energy crops on 10% of tile-drained land Point source reduction to 10 mg nitrate-N/L Point source reduction in N due to biological nutrient removal for P Point source Edge-of- field Land use change In-field

Example Statewide Results for P Practice/ScenarioTotal P reduction per acre (%) Total P reduced (million lb P) Total P Reduction % (from baseline) Cost ($/lb P removed) Baseline37.5 Convert 1.8 million acres of conventional till eroding >T to reduced, mulch or no-till P rate reduction on fields with soil test P above the recommended maintenance level Cover crops on all corn/soybean acres Cover crops on 1.6 million acres eroding>T currently in reduced, mulch or no-till Incorporation of all P fertilizers 25Unknown areaUnknown Wetlands on 25% of tile-drained land Buffers on all applicable crop land Perennial/energy crops equal to pasture/hay acreage from Perennial/energy crops on 1.6 million acres>T currently in reduced, mulch or no-till Perennial/energy crops on 10% of tile- drained land Point source reduction to 0.5 mg total P/L Point source Edge- of-field Land use change In-field

University of Illinois Science Team Website

Iowa Costs

Overall Comparison of Nitrate-N Practices Nitrate-N Reduction Cost of N Reduction Other Benefits (Ecosystem Services) Practice/Scenario % (from baseline) ($/lb) Reducing nitrogen application rate from background to the MRTN Cover crops (rye) on ALL CS and CC acres Install Wetlands to treat 45% of the ag acres Install Denitrification Bioreactors on all tile drained acres Install Buffers on all applicable lands Installing Controlled Drainage on all applicable acres Perennial crops (energy crops) on ~6.5 million acres

Overall Comparison of Phosphorus Practices P Reduction Cost of P Reduction Other Benefits (Ecosystem Services) Practice/Scenario % (from baseline) ($/lb) Cover crops (rye) on ALL CS and CC acres Convert all tillage to no-till P rate reduction in MLRA’s that have high to very high soil test P Establish streamside buffers (35ft) on all crop land Perennial crops (energy crops) equal to pasture/hay acreage from Pasture and Land Retirement to equal acreage of Pasture/Hay and CRP from