P1622 Audit Use Case Neal McBurnett IEEE P1622 meeting 2011-02-08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. The ASCII file is uploaded on election night and the details field is marked to final upload and saved. This begins the canvass.
Advertisements

County Canvassing Board Training 2010 Sheryl Moss Certification and Training Manager Office of the Secretary of State (360)
ETen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 1 E-TEN E-POLL Project Electronic Polling System for Remote Operation Strasbourg.
Corvelle Drives Concepts to Completion 1. Case Study: Implementing a risk-based continuous compliance assessment program ISACA Fall Conference 25 November.
Common Data Format Thoughts for IEEE P1622 Andy Rodgers Hart InterCivic 2/9/2011.
Election Data Standards Requirements: Getting on with what we’ve got John L. McCarthy, volunteer Verified Voting Foundation Common Elections Data Format.
Business Plan Preparation Frank Moyes Leeds School of Business University of Colorado Boulder, Colorado 1 Framework for the Business Plan.
EFACT electronic Financial Aid Compliance Tool. What is eFact? A scholarship collection and reporting system. It will be used to pass financial aid awards.
Resources Needed for Post-Election Audits: People, Time, and Money Robert Kibrick, Legislative Analyst Verified Voting Foundation Gail Pellerin, County.
ElectionAudits: a Django App for Good Election Auditing Neal McBurnett OSCON July
Common Data Format in Election Results Reporting Mid-Atlantic Election Officials Consortium efforts to produce a unified platform for election results.
Ballot Processing Systems February, 2005 Submission to OASIS EML TC and True Vote Maryland by David RR Webber.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Batch Reports for Audits - ElectionAudits and the Boulder 2008 Election Neal McBurnett NIST Common Data Formats Workshop Oct
Automark and Other Optical Scan Voting Systems Allen Stone CMSC-691V2/12/2006.
CSI-4138/CEG-4394 Design of Secure Computer Systems Virtual Election Booth Lab Project Jean-Yves Chouinard Fall 2002.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 IEEE P.1622 Update John P. Wack Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL
Corvelle Drives Concepts to Completion 1. Monitor Compliance Risks Through Data Analytics IIA Calgary Luncheon 15 September
Audit Purpose of Audit Quality assurance procedure Check accuracy of machine tally of ballots Ballots for a contest are sampled, manually verified, and.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S. Browning Secretary of State Donald L. Palmer Director/Division of Elections Presented by M. Matthews.
Introduction to Standard Reports. Standard Reports 2 How to get information out of AQS Standard Reports Site / Monitor Metadata Detail Data Reports “
SB /Bills/Senate/PDF/S403v6.pdf 013/Bills/Senate/PDF/S403v6.pdf August 6, 2014 Statewide.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OCTOBER 20, 2014 ITEM NO. 21 CALLING OF THE MARCH 10, 2015 CITY AND PUSD CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION AND THE APRIL.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OCTOBER 22, 2012 CALLING OF THE MARCH 5, 2013 CITY AND PUSD CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION AND THE APRIL 16, 2013 GENERAL.
Chapter 1:Statistics: The Art and Science of Learning from Data 1.1: How Can You Investigate Using Data? 1.2: We Learn about Populations Using Samples.
IEEE P1622 Meeting, Feb 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST Voting Data Formats Workshop Gaithersburg October, 2009 Parker Abercrombie EML for Open Voting.
&. THE REQUIREMENTS Over voting stations in 297 Municipal Districts in a big country with 25 million registered voters. Ballots are being.
IEEE Working Group P1622 Meeting February 24-25, 2013 National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM. election period pre-election period post-election period period in-between elections pre-election period electoral.
Scott Hilkert, Managing Principal NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems. Oct , 2009.
TGDC Meeting, December Common Data Format Directions John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
County Canvassing Board Training 2010 Sheryl Moss Certification and Training Manager Office of the Secretary of State (360)
New Hampshire’s Approach to the State Plan for the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Disabilities Access and Voting Systems Task Force.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Auditing concepts David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Auditability Working Group David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology r4.
Software Testing. Software testing is the execution of software with test data from the problem domain. Software testing is the execution of software.
Election Review. Orange County Election Infrastructure Neal Kelley, Registrar of Voters April 15, 2011.
Enter the Title of Your Presentation Lead Inventors Name Other Inventors Name Purpose: Enter why you are coming to patent committee (initial filing, PCT,
Report on California Audit Log Study David Wagner U.C. Berkeley.
Principles for Post-Election Audits: Putting It All Together Panel 7 Saturday, October 27.
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Writing a Research Proposal.
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the UOCAVA Working Group John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.
TDRp Implementation Challenges David Vance, Executive Director Peggy Parskey, Assistant Director October 23, 2014.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
WHAT CONSTITUTES A VOTE? Annual Training for County Election Officials
NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems October 29-30, 2009 National Institute of Standards and Technology 1.
VOTING TECHNOLOGY AND STATE POLICY 2016 By Katy Owens Hubler Democracy Research, LLC Consultant for the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
Running for City Office  Filing Papers turned into city auditors office  Candidates file:  Petition/Certificate of Nomination  Statement of Interests.
Revising Research Papers. Intro Paragraphs ● Include a strong, memorable hook (1-2 sentences). ● Briefly introduce the career you’re writing about (2-3.
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Chapter 13 Writing a Research Proposal.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OCTOBER 24, 2016 CALLING OF THE MARCH 7, 2017 CITY AND PUSD CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION AND THE APRIL 18, 2017.
Distinguishing “BEST ESTIMATES” from “best estimates”
Orange County Committee on School District Organization
2018 Animal Control Budget Presentation
Ronald L. Rivest MIT NASEM Future of Voting December 7, 2017
Election Contracts, Joint Election Agreements & Leases For Equipment
Election Security Best Practices
Election System Modernization
Election Contracts, Joint Election Agreements & Leases For Equipment
My Journey into Election Security Advocacy Kirstin Mueller League of Women Voters of Washington Election Security Chair.
Maintaining Voter Registration Records State Board of Elections
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OCTOBER 24, 2016 CALLING OF THE MARCH 7, 2017 CITY AND PUSD CONSOLIDATED PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION AND THE APRIL 18, 2017.
Overview of Updated Proposal and Reporting Guidelines
Proof of concept 29 September 2010
Election Security Best Practices
Risk Limiting Audits Nuts, Bolts, and Paperclips
Why 25% of Voter Polls are Wrong
Executive Sponsor: Tom Church, Cabinet Secretary
SOS IRIS Phase 3 - Modernizing the NM Election System
Presentation transcript:

P1622 Audit Use Case Neal McBurnett IEEE P1622 meeting

Audit: Compare system's reported results with the evidence Take sample of detailed results by audit unit and compare to hand counts of those audit units

Report of Vote Counts by Audit Unit

Recent progress in Auditing Growing momentum behind good audits Law in Colorado: risk limiting audits by 2014 New law in CA to pilot risk-limiting audits NM: state-wide audit starting 2010 EAC audit grant funding opportunity ; notes risk-limiting small batch audits

Principles and Best Practices for Post-Election Audits (2008) League of Women Voters Election Audit Report (2009) American Statistical Association 2010‏ statement on Risk-Limiting Audits and small-batch audit reporting

Typically, amount of work required to perform a risk-limiting vote-tabulation audit is roughly proportional to the batch sizes, with no reduction in statistical efficacy.

State-wide coordination of audits Auditable tabulation reports from counties to state Audit unit selections from state back to counties Audit discrepancy reports back to state Potential for additional selections Final audit report aggregates discrepancies

Audit results also need to be published in a standard format Include hand counts and discrepancies for all units audited, whether they were targeted or randomly selected, information needed to validate the selections (e.g. algorithms used, random seeds used as input), results of the audit

Audit unit result Audit unit id For each candidate or “under” or “over”  System tally  Hand count (multiple?)‏  Discrepancies (Hand count - system)‏  Resolution code  Resolution text description

Proof of Concept: ElectionAudits Audit Management System Open source, MIT license Supports the Best Practices and risk-limiting audits Imports standard election report file, e.g. Hart, Sequoia; EML 510 support Automates many steps of the audit Enter the data, publish with statistics Roll 15 dice, publish all the selections

Biggest challenge: getting small-batch data out of election systems Want Interoperable systems, out-of-the-box Not just Integratable via consultants See David Flater's CDF presentation

Summary Proper audits are critical Risk-limiting audits in CO, CA law Small-batch reports help enormously Coordinated state-wide audits: lots of data flow Standard, machine-readable format is needed EML looks appropriate