Criteria for Secondary to Primary System Transfers Robert W. Hofrichter Assistant Administrator Transportation and Mobility Planning Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Transportation Funding and Roadway Service Delivery Study Study Update – Transportation.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Board Transportation Committee Updates on Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Discussion of Converting.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Board Transportation Committee Meeting March 1, 2011 Department.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
US101: SE 16 th – SE 36 th Street (Lincoln City) )Project Community Advisory Committee July 11, 2007 Meeting.
HB 1048 / SB 518 Adjustments for Local Programs May 13, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
Ohio Department of Transportation Leadership Meeting#1 Jun 12, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Pike and Wok Travel.
Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Transportation Alternatives Program FY 2015 Proposed Projects for Funding in Northern Virginia Transportation Planning Board May 21, 2014 Sarah Crawford.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
VACO Conference Transportation Programs Update November 14, 2011 Gregory A. Whirley, Sr. Commissioner.
Functional Classification CE 453 Lecture 3. Objectives Summarize general highway design process Identify different roadway classification systems Identify.
A Heavy-Duty Vehicle Visual Classification Scheme: Heavy-Duty Vehicle Reclassification Method for Mobile Source Emissions Inventory Development Prepared.
Functional Classification Maranda Obray, Transportation Planner Idaho Transportation Department.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
Why do you need a plan for walkers? They can walk anywhere, can’t they?
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Kern Motorist Aid Authority Services And Operations.
The Link Between Land-Use and Transportation Planning
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
The Virginia Department of Transportation Infrastructure Assets ( The data presented is for illustration purposes only ) November 8, 2000.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Impact of Low Volume Roads Downstream of Dams on Hazard Classification By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive,
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Rte 11, Canton Village PIN Village Board Meeting October 29 th, 2007 Project Information.
1 Patriot’s Crossing  PROVIDES MOST REGIONAL CONGESTION RELIEF  UNIQUELY POSITIONED TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH  IMPROVING TOTAL REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY.
Public Hearing PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS I-95 DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS RAMPS TO THE ENGINEER PROVING GROUND Fort Belvoir, Virginia AUGUST 20, 2008.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board December 6th, 2013 Ashley Probart Deputy Director Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board Primary Freight.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
Review of Principal Arterial Routes on the National Highway System For MAP-21 Reta R. Busher Chief of Planning and Programming October 17, 2012.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
Projects of Division Interest PoDI PoDI Plans. All SYP Projects.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Complete Streets Training
Hampton Roads Third Crossing I. Introduction VDOT, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is proposing to construct a new bridge-tunnel.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Policy on Level of Service in Activity Centers Board Transportation Committee December 17, 2013 Department of Transportation.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
Prospective Rural Additions Meeting JULY 15, 2015.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services
Category 2 Parameters Transportation Management Areas (TMA) – 200,000+ pop. 8 TMAs in Texas Austin Corpus Christi Dallas-Fort Worth El Paso Hidalgo County.
Evaluation and Redesign Faisal and Amman Streets
Board Transportation Committee May 6, 2014
Adopt a Resolution of the City of Pasadena Approving the Submittal of a Functional Classification Change for Local Streets and Roads to the State of California.
City Council Meeting May 23, 2011
Traffic Incident Management Legislation
Presentation transcript:

Criteria for Secondary to Primary System Transfers Robert W. Hofrichter Assistant Administrator Transportation and Mobility Planning Division

2 Impetus Recent Activity –Transferred 48.8 miles at February 2012 meeting Rte 3000 (Prince William County) Rtes 7100 & 7700 (Fairfax County) –Transferred 7.5 miles at July 2012 meeting Rte 863 (Pittsylvania County) VDOT Business Plan (Item 4.2.2) –Evaluate transfer of additional selected secondary highways to Primary Highway System Authorized under § of the Code of Virginia –CTB approval required (for non-project transfers) –Limited to 50 miles per (fiscal) year

3 Current Criteria Current Criteria Set by DPM (CTB Resolution of Dec 1998) In order for VDOT to present consideration of transfer to CTB, the highway must meet a majority of following criteria –Serves as link between interstate or intrastate highways –Serves site of historic or scenic interest –Connects county seats –Minimum traffic volume of 2,000 vehicles per day –Minimum of 7% out-of-state vehicles –Minimum of 20% light and medium duty trucks –Minimum of 2% tractor-trailers and buses –Minimum of 20% trips with length 25+ miles –Minimum of 5% trips with length 100+ miles

4 Reconsideration of Criteria Currently there are 9 Criteria (same as 1973 Criteria) –Except traffic volume (increased from 750 to 2,000 VPD in 1998) Cost –License plate study can cost over $40,000 (for out-of-state %) –Origin-Destination study can cost over $100,000 (for trip length) Consistency of Data –Light and medium duty truck % (differences in VDOT and locality counts) Relevance of Data –Freight movement better counted by tractor-trailer use –Functional classification covers issues of trip length, purpose, access No Individual Criterion is a Requirement –All are part of “must meet majority of” test

5 Study Results (Current Criteria) Current CriteriaInformation Link Between HighwaysNot a requirement so allows disjointed network Sites of Historic/Scenic InterestMay leave out other tourist destinations Connects County SeatsLeaves out other major activity centers 2,000 VPD or GreaterVPD chosen in 1998; significant traffic growth 7% or More Out of StateData expensive to gather; relevance to primary 20% or More Light/Medium TrucksConsistency of information; relevance to primary 2% or More Tractor-Trailers/BusesPenalizes commuter routes 20% or More Trips of 25+ MilesData expensive to gather 5% or More Trips of 100+ MilesData expensive to gather

6 Recommended Changes to Criteria Eliminate –Light and medium duty truck percentage –Percentage of trip lengths –Percentage of out-of-state vehicles Modify –Increase minimum traffic volume –Tractor-trailer/bus percentage to a volume –Provides service to activity centers (not only historical and scenic sites and county seats) Add –Require system continuity –Functionally classification as a factor –NHS designation

7 Study Results (Proposed Criteria) CriteriaReasons Required connection to primary or Interstate highway Maintain system continuity Connects activity centers not already connected Cities, towns, UDAs, major commercial centers, airports, military bases, tourist sites 10,000 VPD or greater840 segments eligible 200 or more tractor-trailers/buses per day 340 segments eligible Functionally classified as arterialConsistent with other states Designated as NHS facilityNational importance, federal oversight Meets current design standards (lane width and shoulders) Expectations of traveling public Must meet a majority of these

Criteria for Secondary to Primary System Transfers