© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
Advertisements

Water Framework Directive Programme of Measures River Basin Management Plans Milan Matuška Ministry of the Environment Slovak Republic Water Protection.
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
Seite Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith.
IPPC Discharges Monitoring Workshop Water Framework Directive Overview (and its implications for Industry) Peter Webster Regional Chemist (EPA Cork)
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
Water Framework Directive Implementation and Risk Analysis John Sadlier Water Quality Section.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
WFD Reporting, Copenhagen, 4th Feb 2010 Schema overview WFD reporting training Copenhagen, 4 February 2010 Jorge Rodriguez-Romero DG Env, European Commission.
WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
Water.europa.eu Assessment River Basin Management Plans CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting Brussels, May 2011 Marieke van Nood WFD Team DG.
Water Framework Directive WISE Items on which to report progress oFinalising schemas for 2005 reporting oDevelop WISE Web site for 2005 oDevelop.
WFD Schemas Article 3 – RBDs and Competent Authorities Article 5 – Water Bodies, Protected Areas and Summary RBD information Article 8 – Monitoring Programmes.
Reporting and compliance checking on RBMP in 2010 WFD Reporting Working Group D on Reporting Brussels, 17/18 October 2006.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Date/event: Water accounts and economics workshop, 7-8/10/2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
EEA water report 2012 Upcoming EEA report state of our water environment 2012 In support of the Commission Report on WFD implementation Peter Kristensen.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
EEA 2017 State of European waters
Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales
Type of presentation/visualisation
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans
EU Water Framework Directive
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
WG groundwater – Update on EEA’s RBMP assessment and dataviewer
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Discussion on compliance checking
WFD Article 8 Schemas Yvonne Gordon-Walker.
Update on RBMP&FRMP adoption and reporting Assessment of RBMP&FRMP
EU Water Framework Directive
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Stefan Jensen EU water directors meeting, Saarisälkaa, FI
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
Meeting of Water Directors 2/3 December 2004
EEAs assessments of the status of Europe’s waters
EU Water Framework Directive
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans State of Play
Compliance checking of RBMP An inventory of questions
Water Framework Directive implementation: RBMP assessment
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
Philippe Quevauviller
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Guidance document on the identification of water bodies
Article 13 RBMP Schema.
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
WISE GIS Group 15 January 2008 John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example

© WRc plc 2010 Summary of WISE electronic delivery MS publish(ed) RBMPs by 22 December 2009 and reported electronic data to the Commission through WISE by 22 March Automatic validation on XML data on submission to WISE Validation process likely to lead to a number of issues being identified MSs will be asked to check and correct any detected errors or invalid entries EEA responsible for managing the validation process, for checking the results, and liaising with MSs regarding the resolution of validation issue Summary based on validated information/data Approximate machine generated translations (into English) of text fields

Front cover

© WRc plc 2010 Table of contents

© WRc plc 2010 Governance Competent authorities International co-operation Overview of RBMP Introduction Publication dates Table of contents More detailed programmes and management plans Justification for inaction Public participation Update of RBMP Detailed supporting documents

© WRc plc 2010 River Basin District Characteristics General Surface waters Delineation of surface water bodies Typology of surface water bodies Designation of HMWB and AWB Pressures on surface water bodies at a water body level Pressures on surface water bodies at sub-unit an RBD level Impacts on surface water bodies Groundwater Delineation of groundwater bodies Pressures on groundwater bodies at a water body level Pressures on groundwater bodies at sub-unit and RBD level Impacts on surface water bodies

© WRc plc 2010 River Basin District Characteristics (2) Economic analysis Investment costs Water services Volumes and prices Cost recovery International coordination Cost-effectiveness Information gaps Additional information Steps and measures taken to meet the requirements of Article 9 Definition of water services and uses Implementing Article 9.1 Environmental and resource costs Explanation of the use of Article 9(4) Water pricing strategy Cost recovery strategy Data collection and gaps Previous information and supporting documents Register of protected areas

© WRc plc 2010 Classification of status Surface waters Ecological status of surface waters Ecological potential of HMWB and AWB Chemical status of surface waters Groundwater Quantitative status of groundwater Chemical status of groundwater Threshold values

© WRc plc 2010 Monitoring – surface waters Numbers of monitoring sites Numbers of programmes and subprogrammes Design of monitoring programmes Design considerations - geographic scale, international aspects, start and end dates Design considerations - links to supporting documents Monitoring methodologies Summary of site, and quality element information reported at subprogramme level. Number of sites used for the surveillance and operational monitoring of quality elements Number of water bodies included in surveillance and operational monitoring Inclusion of all required biological quality elements in the surveillance monitoring of surface water bodies Biological quality elements monitored for operational purposes in relation to the significant pressures on a water body Investigative monitoring of surface waters Monitoring of surface waters protected areas

© WRc plc 2010 Monitoring – groundwater Summary and generic information Numbers of groundwater monitoring programmes Design of groundwater monitoring programmes Design considerations - geographic scale, international aspects, start and end dates Design considerations - links to supporting documents Monitoring methodologies Summary of site and groundwater parameter information reported at programme level. Number of sites used for quantitative, chemical surveillance and chemical operational monitoring of groundwater parameters Number of groundwater water bodies included in quantitative, chemical surveillance and operational monitoring Inclusion of all required parameters in chemical surveillance monitoring of groundwater Parameters monitored for chemical operational purposes in relation to the main pressures on groundwater bodies Monitoring of groundwater protected areas

© WRc plc 2010 Surface water status Summary Statistics Background information and data Overall ecological status/potential of waterbodies Overall chemical status of water bodies Ecological status of natural water bodies Rivers Lakes Transitional waters Coastal waters Ecological potential of heavily modified water bodies (Water categories) Ecological status of artificial water bodies (Water categories) Chemical status of surface waters

© WRc plc 2010 Groundwater status Quantitative status Overall summary of status of water bodies Reasons for failure to achieve good quantitative status: Chemical status Overall summary of status of water bodies Reasons for failure to achieve good chemical status Pollutants causing failure Natural background levels Groundwater bodies with significant upward trends Groundwater bodies with significant trend reversal Interpretation of maps on groundwater status

© WRc plc 2010 Status of Protected Areas Surface water Protected Areas Status of groundwater Article 7 Drinking Water Protected Areas

© WRc plc 2010 Environmental Objectives and Exemptions Information on how exemptions been applied to surface waters Surface waters - Ecological status exemptions Surface waters - Chemical status exemptions Information on how exemptions been applied to groundwaters Groundwater good quantitative status exemptions Groundwater good chemical status exemptions Surface water Protected Area exemptions Groundwater Article 7 Drinking Water Protected areas

© WRc plc 2010 Programme of Measures Basic measures Other basic measures Supplementary and additional measures in surface waters Supplementary and additional measures in ground waters Cost of measures Coordination of measures in international RBDs Additional comments and links to more detailed supporting documents

© WRc plc 2010 To be completed Summary of completeness check Compliance indicators

© WRc plc 2010 WISE summary report contains Basic information e.g. name of competent authority Basic statistics e.g. number of water bodies Simple and derived indicators e.g. ecological status of rivers, number of quality elements used to classify ecological status Summarised in tables and visualised in charts and figures Methodological and explanatory text e.g. for the classification of ecological status

© WRc plc 2010 Overall ecological status/potential of waterbodies

© WRc plc 2010 Simple indicator: Classification of the ecological status/potential and chemical status of all water bodies, natural water bodies, heavily modified and artificial water bodies in RBD

© WRc plc 2010 Simple indicator: Confidence in ecological classification

© WRc plc 2010 Simple indicator: Ecological status of rivers in RBD and each sub-unit – by river length

© WRc plc 2010 Derived indicator

© WRc plc 2010 Derived indicator

© WRc plc 2010 Methodological and explanatory text Economic analysis - Volumes and prices The methodology (e.g. aggregation) and assumptions used to estimate the volume, costs and prices associated with water services of the investments for the period of 2009 to 2015 were: ________ Ecological potential of HMWB and AWB The methodology used for the classification of ecological potential including the determination of the relevant quality elements and their class boundaries for artificial and heavily modified water bodies was:_____________ Interpretation of the maps resulting from surface water monitoring programmes The summary text for visualising Map 1 (ecological status of natural water bodies) and Map 2 (ecological potential of heavily modified water bodies) was as follows: ___________________

© WRc plc 2010 Next steps Completed dummy to be distributed for information to WGD Summary of WISE delivery reports to be produced for each RBD after validation – summer/autumn 2010 To be used in the Commission’s screening and assessment of RBMPs – starting autumn 2010

© WRc plc 2010 Thank you for your attention!!