doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE IETF Liaison Report Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 2 Abstract This presentation contains the IEEE – IETF liaison report for March 2013.

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 3 Follow-up from IETF- IEEE 802 Liaison Activity Joint Meetings, agenda and presentations: Meeting held 16 March – –9:00-9:30AM Introductions (including new IESG and IAB members), goals of the meeting –9:30-10:00AM - Status of 4441bis (Spencer) –10:00-10:45AM - Status of the Shared Areas work (Dan, Pat) –10:45-11:00AM - coffee break –11:00-11:45AM - Processes and communication between the IETF and IEEE what we learned in the last eight months, what can be improved (Dan, Pat) –11:45AM-12:00PM - Recent End-Runs on IETF and IEEE 802 Standards (Russ) –12:00-1:15PM - lunch (the core leadership teams will meet in executive session during lunch) –1:15-1:45PM - OmniRAN Study Group (Max Riegel) –1:45-2:15PM - Time Protocols Unification AS/1588 and NTP (Michael Johas Teener) –2:15-3:00PM - Dealing with Regulators (Mike Lynch) –3:00 - 3:15PM coffee break –3:15-4PM - action items and planning work ahead

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 4 Follow-up from IETF- IEEE 802 Liaison Activity IEEE items –RFC4441bis update, see IEEE Comments submitted. Still opportunity to provide comments; Will review any additional contributions in ARC session (Weds AM) –PAWS –review comments submitted and resolved –RADEXT – comments resolved –TRILL item closed –External IANA dependencies, add check in Internal MEC process –Interest in ISO interaction

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 5 About RFC 4441 & IETF liaisons Reference document: RFC 4441 –2006 document, but still relevant: “The IEEE 802/IETF Relationship”, see –Liaison info: IETF has a liaison manager FROM IETF to IEEE SA and IEEE 802.1, not to The IETF has a limited number of liaison relationships with other organizations. Liaisons are appointed by the IAB when the IAB feels that conditions warrant appointing a specific person to such a task. Note that such appointments are rare as the best way for organizations to work with the IETF is to do so within the working groups –Liaison statements are here: New: IEEE 802 Liaisons link and list now available – –

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 6 IETF/ISOC update on WCIT In December the ITU-T held the World Conference on Telecommunication (WCIT) in Dubai. Session held at March IETF 86 meeting to provide participants an overview of the processes leading up to WCIT as well as a summary of the results, what related events there are, and an opportunity to ask questions: WCIT Review: ISOC's Dec 14 Summary of WCIT outcomes: daily-updateshttp:// daily-updates Some post-WCIT thinking:

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 7 IETF Meetings Meetings: –July 28 – August 2, 2013 – Berlin –November 3-8, 2013 – Vancouver –March 2-5, 2014 – London –July 20-25, 2014 – Toronto –November 9-14, Honolulu –Newcomer training: tutorials.html#newcomershttps:// tutorials.html#newcomers –Tutorials (process and technical); 802.1Q tutorial presented last week:

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 8 RADEXT WG See RADIUS Extensions –The RADIUS Extensions Working Group will focus on extensions to the RADIUS protocol required to define extensions to the standard attribute space as well as to address cryptographic algorithm agility and use over new transports. –In addition, RADEXT will work on RADIUS Design Guidelines and define new attributes for particular applications of authentication, authorization and accounting such as NAS management and local area network (LAN) usage. Updates [March 2013] –Of interest: RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks, see –Additional comments provided based on Nov discussion in ARC, see archive/web/radext/current/msg07916.html, in addition to archive/web/radext/current/msg07864.htmlhttp:// archive/web/radext/current/msg07916.htmlhttp:// archive/web/radext/current/msg07864.html

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 9 Diffie-Hellman Group Repository Liaison Request Liaison request from July 2012 meeting –See repository.dochttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/ liaison-to-ietf-group- repository.doc –Liaison was discussed at IETF July Vancouver meeting, at Security Area Directorate –Agreed way forward Registry update by IANA is “RFC required” RFC being written to define requested updates Updates [March 2013] –IKE Group Registry update RFC – Draft available: –Document approved; In RFC Edit State; RFC Number being assigned

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 10 Protocol to Access White Space database (paws) WG paws Working Group was formed June 2011, see Charter and problem statement documents: –Charter, see –Problem Statement, see Goals and Milestones –Aug Submit 'Use Cases and Requirements for Accessing a Radio White Space Database' to the IESG for publication as Informational –April Submit 'Accessing a Radio White Space Database' to the IESG for publication as Proposed Standard Updates [March 2013] –Updated Use Cases and requirements, see stmt-usecases-rqmts/ - completed Working Group Last call, now in IESG reviewhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-paws-problem- stmt-usecases-rqmts/ –Updated: Paws protocol draft document: –Security Considerations, see –Potential future request for P802.11af draft

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 11 EAP Method Update (EMU) Working Group website: RFC Documents - published –The EAP-TLS Authentication Protocol - –Extensible Authentication Protocol - Generalized Pre-Shared Key (EAP-GPSK) Method- –Channel-Binding Support for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Methods –Requirements for a Tunnel-Based Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Method Updates [March 2013]: –Tunnel EAP Method (TEAP) Version tunnel-method/ - In Working Group Last Call (analogous to Working Group Letter Ballot). Comments due April 12. tunnel-method/ –Updated: EAP Mutual Cryptographic Binding, see crypto-bind/. Introduces a new form of cryptographic binding that protects both peer and server, rather than just the server. crypto-bind/

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 12 New: Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) (pkix) Working Group website: –Develops Internet standards to support X.509-based Public Key Infrastructures (PKIs). RFC Documents - published –Numerous – see website Updates [March 2013]: –Of interest for enrollment of devices into a certificate infrastructure: Updated: Enrollment over Secure Transport: –X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol – OCSP –Working Group will close shortly

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 13 IETF Geographic Location and Privacy (Geopriv) WG See Specific reference to WLANs: –Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS, see Documents referenced in (TGv) –Geopriv Requirements, see –Civic Address definitions, see July 2009 Liaison to IETF GEOPRIV –See ietf-geopriv.dochttps://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/09/ v-liaison-request-to- ietf-geopriv.doc Updates [March 2013] –Relative Location, see location/ draft to be submitted for publicationhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-relative- location/ –No meeting at March IETF.

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 14 Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Working Group website: charter.htmlhttp:// charter.html Emergency Services –Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia, see –Describing boundaries for Civic Addresses, see thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-02.txthttp://tools.ietf.org/id/draft- thomson-ecrit-civic-boundary-02.txt Updates [March 2013] –Updated: Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) Callback ietf-ecrit-psap-callback/ ietf-ecrit-psap-callback/ –Updated: Policy for defining new service-identifying labels, see

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 15 Home Networking (homenet) WG See This working group focuses on the evolving networking technology within and among relatively small "residential home" networks –The task of the group is to produce an architecture document that outlines how to construct home networks involving multiple routers and subnets. –This document is expected to apply the IPv6 addressing architecture, prefix delegation, global and ULA addresses, source address selection rules and other existing components of the IPv6 architecture, as appropriate. Updates [March 2013] Documents of interest: –Home networking Architecture for IPv6, see arch/ - in Working Group last Callhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet- arch/ –IPv6 Home Network Front End Naming Delegation, see mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/ mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/ –Secret Gardens are Better than Walled Gardens, see richardson-homenet-secret-gardens/ richardson-homenet-secret-gardens/ –BRDP for homenet, see gardens/ gardens/ –Bootstrapping trust on a Homenet, see trust-bootstrap/ trust-bootstrap/ –Grazed and Lightweight Open Protocol, see homenet-galop-proto/ homenet-galop-proto/ –Extended Multicast DNS:

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 16 Dynamic Host Configuration (dhc) WG See The DHC WG is responsible for reviewing DHCP options or other extensions (for both IPv4 and IPv6). –The DHC WG is expected to review all proposed extensions to DHCP to ensure that they are consistent with the DHCP specification and other option formats, that they do not duplicate existing mechanisms, etc. –Generally speaking, the DHC WG will not be responsible for evaluating the semantic content of proposed options. Similarly, the ownership of specifications typically belongs the relevant working group that needs more functionality from DHCP, not the DHC WG. The DHC WG coordinates reviews of the proposed options together with those working groups. It is required that those working groups have consensus to take on the work and that the work is within their charter. Exceptionally, with AD agreement, this same process can also be used for Individual Submissions originating outside WGs. Updates [March 2013] –Of interest: also –Updated: –Updated: In publication queuehttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption/

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 17 6LOWPAN Working Group Working Group website: Focus: IPv6 over Low Power PAN: Adaption of IPv6 protocol to operate on constrained nodes and link layers –RFC 4944: adaption of IPv6 to link layer –Improved header compression scheme, see –RFC 6282, “Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE Based Networks” published, see –Design and Application Spaces (Use Cases), see 6lowpan-usecases/ 6lowpan-usecases/ –RFC 6066 “Problem Statement and Requirements for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Routing” see –RFC “Neighbor Discovery Optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)”, see Updates [March 2013] –Submitted for publication: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over BLUETOOTH Low Energy: –Updated: –Of interest: 6LoWPAN Roadmap and Implementation Guide

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 18 ROLL Working Group Working Group website: Focus: Routing over Low Power and Lossy Networks –Routing Objectives, see –Routing protocol for efficient operation in low-power, lossy networks, see –RFC 6719, “The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis Objective Function“, see Updates [March 2013] –Of Interest: A Security Threat Analysis for Routing over Low Power and Lossy Networks, see - In IESG Evaluation –Updated: A Mechanism to Measure the Quality of a Point-to-point Route in a Low Power and Lossy Network, see In IESG Evaluationhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement/ –Updated: Reactive Discovery of Point-to-Point Routes in Low Power and Lossy Networks, see In IESG Evaluation –Of Interest: Lightweight Key Establishment and Management Protocol in Dynamic Sensor Networks (KEMP), see

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 19 CORE Working Group CORE ( Constrained RESTful Environments) Working Group website: Focus: framework for resource-oriented applications intended to run on constrained IP networks. –Constrained networks can occur as part of home and building automation, energy management, and the Internet of Things. –RFC 6690, Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Link Format, see Updates [March 2013] –Updated: Constrained Application Protocol, see coap/ In Last Callhttp://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core- coap/ –Of interest: Security Bootstrapping of Resource-Constrained Devices, see –New of interest: Security Considerations in the IP-based Internet of Things:

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 20 New: Operations Area Working Group –Area WG processes submissions related to Operations Area WGs that have closed –Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Working Group closed in 2009 Recently, individual submissions related to the CAPWAP protocol and extensions were submitted – Operations Area Working Group is considering next steps for these documents

doc.: IEEE /0326r0 Submission March 2013 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 21 References RFC IEEE Requirements on EAP Methods Jan 2012 report (PAWS, Homenet details), january-2012-liaison-to-ietf.ppt january-2012-liaison-to-ietf.ppt