Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions ---- Overview ---- Russ Pimmel Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions Feb. 8 –10,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is an Extended Response?
Advertisements

Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Classroom Assessment Techniques for Early Alert of Students At Risk Carleen Vande Zande, Ph.D. Academic Leaders Workshop.
2011 PI Conference Overview Assessment/Evaluation 2. Collaboration 3. Dissemination 4. Faculty Development 5. Key Challenges 6. Materials Development.
TUES PI Forum Workshop Yolanda George, Lance Perez, Russ Pimmel, Roger Seals, and Sheryl Sorby Jan 25, 2013.
Funding for Education Scholarship Russ Pimmel NSF ASEE Annual Conference June 20, 2006.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
Guidelines for your Thematic Units TLPI—Secondary Math/Science April 2, 2007.
5/15/2015 copyright - All Rights Reserved 1 Home Educator’s Network, Inc. Present Training Module III Methods of Teaching.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
1 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program Seminar 2 ©Valorie Troesch 2006.
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Basic Skills and Career and Technical Education Lin Marelick & Valerie Carrigan August 11 & 13, 2008 BSI August Institute.
Russell Pimmel, Roger Seals and Stephanie Beard.  Spring 2010, NSF/DUE Engineering PDs initiate IWBW Series; Spring 2011-CS PDs join  Overall goals.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
CIE 500D “Introduction to Graduate Research in Constructed Systems” (3) Spring Semester, 2007 Friday, 3:00 – 5:30 pm, 140 Ketter Hall Instructor: George.
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald & Maura Borrego.
SPAT-ing Your Prompt Analysis Tool. In each prompt- Look for SPAT Situation: Event that causes you the need to write. (on test you pretend) Purpose: The.
Dealing with Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Criteria
Training Session #2 Further Practice with the IWBW Approach Lance C. Pérez, Russ Pimmel, Roger Seals, and Sheryl Sorby January 31, 2013.
Writing More Effective Proposals Russ Pimmel Abe Nisanci U of Alabama NSF. Share The Future IV March 17, 2003.
A PPT prepared by Luis Salazar. Reaction/Response Papers  These are papers where writers express their opinion about another work, be it in agreement.
Project Evaluation Don Millard John Yu March 27, 2012 Guy-Alain Amoussou Lou Everett
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Proposal Enhancement Strategies Russell Pimmel AASCU Workshop March 4, 2006.
Primary Languages Education.  to recognise and value the contributions that members of MLTAQ make to the teaching and learning of languages.
Presentation Five Using Descriptive, Analytical, and Reflective Writing to Analyze Practice.
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
Honors Seminar on Science and Technology in NYC in-class activities Tuesday Monday out-of-class activities Wednesday Sat and Sun Thursday Friday Health.
The College Admission Essay Personal Statement This personal statement helps university officials become acquainted with you in ways different from courses,
  100 points (cross out 50 and write 100)  Essentially you are just writing a final report on your topic.  Into paragraph, explain your topic and why.
Title of Training Module Design Plan
Project Evaluation Barb Anderegg, Connie Della-Piana, Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation FIE Annual Conference.
Proposal Writing Strategies Barb Anderegg and Susan Burkett National Science Foundation Annual ASEE Conference June 18, 2006.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Dr. Sande Caton. Assessments Why do we assess our students? Individually, write at least three ideas you have about assessments With one or two colleagues.
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Stephanie Adams February 9, 2006.
Welcome to EECS 395/495 Networking Problems in Cloud Computing.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Critical Thinking Lesson 8
1 Developing a Competitive Proposal ( An Interactive, Web-Based Workshop) Russell Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
Part 1 1. March 20, 2012 Susan Finger & Sue Fitzgerald Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation March 21, 2012 Sue Fitzgerald &
Dealing with Large Lecture Classes Steve Ackerman University of Wisconsin-Madison.
NSF’s Broader Impacts Criteria Bev Watford, Sue Kemnitzer, Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Session T4B, Thursday.
Making Connections Friday, May 30, 11:58:27 AM.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
1. October 25, 2011 Louis Everett & John Yu Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation October 26, 2011 Don Millard & John Yu Division.
Program Evaluation Making sure instruction works..
© Services GmbH Proposal writing: Part B 2/1/ St. Petersburg, May 18, 2011 Dr. Andrey Girenko
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Writing a More Effective Proposal Susan Burkett and Russell Pimmel CASEE Symposium and Annual Meeting October 19, 2005.
Earth Educators’ Rendezvous Workshop Leader Webinar Introduction Workshop Design Best Practices Utilizing the Web Tools Evaluation Instruments David McConnell,
Writing More Effective IUSE-EHR Proposals Jeff Ryan, University of South Florida Jill Singer, SUNY Buffalo State Earth Educators’ Rendezvous July 14, 2015.
NSF’s Broader Impacts Criterion Bev Watford and Russ Pimmel Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Annual ASEE Conference June.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
EnFUSE PI Forum Apr. 27, 2016.
IMT-2020 Contribution Content
Questioning: Consider the following statements
Work session 1 – Create your action!
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Outlines Your outline should have four or five parts:
Post-Session Assignment
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Your Prompt Analysis Tool
Learning Log Name:___________________________ Date: _____ / ____ / 20____ SUBJECT AREA: __________________________.
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Your Prompt Analysis Tool
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions ---- Overview ---- Russ Pimmel Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Intuitions Feb. 8 –10, 2006

Caution Most of the information presented in this workshop represents the opinions of the individual program offices and not an official NSF position.

Workshop Goals -- Overview Goal: Prepare you to write more competitive proposals Approach: Three short targeted workshops interspersed with proposal writing activities –Proposal strategies –Broader impacts –Project evaluation

Workshop Schedule -- Overview Thursday Morning (Discipline Groups) –Proposal Strategies – Targeted Workshop & Activity Thursday Afternoon (Campus Groups) –NSF Programs -- Discussion –Broader Impacts – Targeted Workshop & Activity Friday Morning (Discipline Groups) –Project Evaluation – Targeted Workshop & Activity Friday Afternoon (Campus Groups) –Planning On-Campus -- Workshop Activity

Framework for the Workshop

Learning situations involve prior knowledge –Some knowledge correct –Some knowledge incorrect (i. e., misconceptions) Learning is –Connecting new knowledge to prior knowledge –Correcting misconception Learning requires –Recalling prior knowledge – actively –Altering prior knowledge

Active-Cooperative Learning Learning activities must encourage learners to: –Recall prior knowledge -- actively, explicitly –Connect new concepts to existing ones –Challenge and alter misconception The think-share-report-learn (TSRL) process addresses these steps

Workshop Format “Working” Workshop –Short presentations (mini-lectures) –Group exercise Exercise Format –Think  Share  Report  Learn (TSRL) Limited Time – May feel rushed –Intend to identify issues & suggest ideas Get you started No closure -- No “answers” – No “formulas”

Target Workshop Proposal Strategy Stephanie Adams Susan Burkett

Proposal Strategy Activity

Begin outlining your proposal –Write 2 to 3 goal statements and the corresponding outcomes –Write 5 to 10 topic sentences describing the background and rational –Write 5 to 10 topic sentences describing the methods 40 minutes

Critiquing Proposal Outlines Review your colleagues’ outlines –Indicate questions and concerns –Suggest improvements 30 minutes

Reporting on Proposal Strategy Activity Determine the most important lesson you learned about writing proposals – your individual response to –TSRL 20 minutes

NSF Programs Stephanie Adams Barb Anderegg

Target Workshop Broader Impacts Barb Anderegg Bev Watford

Broader Impacts Activity

Broader Impacts –List the broader impacts of your project –Indicate the measure that you will use in evaluating the broader impacts of your project –Write a paragraph describing the broader impacts statement for your proposal’s Project Summary Dissemination plan –Write a sentence or two to indicate how you will “contribute to the STEM education knowledge base” –Write a sentence or two to indicate how you will “help build the STEM education community” 40 minutes

Critiquing Broader Impacts Material Review your colleagues’ broader impacts and dissemination material –Indicate questions and concerns –Suggest improvements 30 minutes

Reporting on Broader Impacts Activity Determine the most important lesson you learned about broader impacts and dissemination – your individual response to –TSRL 20 minutes

Workshop Schedule – Overview For Friday Thursday Morning (Discipline Groups) –Proposal Strategies – Targeted Workshop & Activity Thursday Afternoon (Campus Groups) –Broader Impacts – Targeted Workshop & Activity –NSF Programs -- Discussion Friday Morning (Discipline Groups) –Project Evaluation – Targeted Workshop & Activity Friday Afternoon (Campus Groups) –Planning On-Campus -- Workshop Activity

Reminders Caution –Opinions of the individual program offices –Not an official NSF position ACL and TSRL process –Connecting new knowledge to prior knowledge –Correcting misconception –Recalling prior knowledge – actively –Altering prior knowledge “Working” Workshop Get you started -- No closure

Target Workshop Project Evaluation Connie Della-Piana Russ Pimmel Bev Watford

Project Evaluation Activity

Evaluation plan –Write the “topic sentences” for three to five paragraphs in your evaluation plan Evaluation Approaches –List three to five outcomes for your project and briefly describe how you will evaluate each 40 minutes

Critiquing Evaluation Material Review your colleagues’ material –Indicate questions and concerns –Suggest improvements 30 minutes

Reporting on Project Evaluation Activity Determine the most important lesson you learned about evaluation – your individual response to –TSRL 20 minutes

Preparing for Workshop at Home Institution Russ Pimmel

Reminders Learning situations involve prior knowledge –Connecting new knowledge to prior knowledge –Correcting misconception ACL encourages –Recall of prior knowledge -- actively, explicitly –Connecting new concepts to existing ones –Challenging and altering misconception TSRL process –Recalling prior knowledge – actively –Altering prior knowledge “Working” Workshop Get you started -- No closure

Planning Your Workshop-- Exercise Workshop should deal with –Most important misconception –Least understood aspects Plan a workshop that fits your institution's situation –List the outcomes of your workshop –Indicate the length of your workshop –Indicate what material you will use 30 minutes

Final Exercise What is the most important lesson you are taking away with you? to