November 3 IDR To do: What we have, what we’d like to do Modeling Mathematical/numerical approaches What we need inside the codes Tasks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are.
Advertisements

Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
MACRODISPERSION AND DISPERSIVE TRANSPORT BY UNSTEADY RIVER FLOW UNDER UNCERTAIN CONDITIONS M.L. Kavvas and L.Liang UCD J.Amorocho Hydraulics Laboratory.
About Estuarine Dynamics
An efficient parallel particle tracker For advection-diffusion simulations In heterogeneous porous media Euro-Par 2007 IRISA - Rennes August 2007.
Alpine3D: an alpine surface processes model Mathias Bavay WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.
/08/2002SMARTER meeting 1 Solution of 2D Navier-Stokes equations in velocity-vorticity formulation using FD Remo Minero Scientific Computing Group.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
WATER TEMPERATURE MODEL FOR BRANCHED RIVER SYSTEMS.
A History of Modern Weather Forecasting. The Stone Age Prior to approximately 1955, forecasting was basically a subjective art, and not very skillful.
Providing distributed forecasts of precipitation using a Bayesian nowcast scheme Neil I. Fox & Chris K. Wikle University of Missouri - Columbia.
Direct and iterative sparse linear solvers applied to groundwater flow simulations Matrix Analysis and Applications October 2007.
Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
Quantify prediction uncertainty (Book, p ) Prediction standard deviations (Book, p. 180): A measure of prediction uncertainty Calculated by translating.
Eruption Forecasting through the Bayesian Event Tree: the software package BET_EF INGV BET: a probabilistic tool for Eruption Forecasting and Volcanic.
Air Quality Modeling.
Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service météorologique du Canada Modeling Volcanic Ash Transport and Dispersion:
Towards Developing a “Predictive” Hurricane Model or the “Fine-Tuning” of Model Parameters via a Recursive Least Squares Procedure Goal: Minimize numerical.
NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION K. Lagouvardos-V. Kotroni Institute of Environmental Research National Observatory of Athens NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION.
Eruption Forecasting through the Bayesian Event Tree: the software package BET_EF INGV PART II: BET_EF installation PART II: BET_EF installation.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
January 2008 Trajectories Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Hung X. Nguyen and Matthew Roughan The University of Adelaide, Australia SAIL: Statistically Accurate Internet Loss Measurements.
Quantifying long- and short-term volcanic hazard. Erice, 6-8 Nov INGV BET: a probabilistic tool for Eruption Forecasting and Volcanic Hazard Assessment.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
Ash3d: A new USGS tephra fall model Hans Schwaiger 1 Larry Mastin 2 Roger Denlinger 2 1 Alaska Volcano Observatory 2 Cascade Volcano Observatory.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ash3d: A new USGS tephra fall model
An ATD Model that Incorporates Uncertainty R. Ian Sykes Titan Research & Technology Div., Titan Corp. 50 Washington Road Princeton NJ OFCM Panel Session.
BBC Workshop DeBilt, 18.–19. October 2004 Reconstruction of three dimensional cloud fields from two dimensional input datasets Klemens Barfus & Franz H.
Experiences in assessing deposition model uncertainty and the consequences for policy application Rognvald I Smith Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh.
“Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather” Forum 1 November 2012 Michael D. McPartland Wind Data Quality Factors & Metrics* *This work was sponsored by the.
ECE 466/658: Performance Evaluation and Simulation Introduction Instructor: Christos Panayiotou.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Eyjafjallajökull eruption: How well were the volcanic ash clouds predicted? Helen Dacre and Alan Grant Robin.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Data was collected from various instruments. AOD values come from our ground Radiometer (AERONET) The Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) height is collected.
Summarizing Risk Analysis Results To quantify the risk of an output variable, 3 properties must be estimated: A measure of central tendency (e.g. µ ) A.
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
- 1 - Computer model under uncertainty In previous lecture on accuracy assessment –We considered mostly deterministic models. – We did not distinguish.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Reducing the risk of volcanic ash to aviation Natalie Harvey, Helen Dacre (Reading) Helen Webster, David Thomson, Mike Cooke (Met Office) Nathan Huntley.
CISC Machine Learning for Solving Systems Problems Microarchitecture Design Space Exploration Lecture 4 John Cavazos Dept of Computer & Information.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
Accuracy of multi-parameter response surfaces generated from sensitivity coefficients Daniel Cohan and Antara Digar CMAS Conference 2009 October 19, 2009.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1 Statistics: The Art and Science of Learning from Data Section 1.1 Using Data to Answer.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
/ Vidy Bay hydrodynamics under different meteorological conditions
Michele Prestifilippo
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Aerosol Physics & Climate
Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
Assessing Volcanic Ash Hazard by Using the CALPUFF System
What temporal averaging period is appropriate for MM5 verification?
Stefano Grassi WindEurope Summit
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
(1) Amphos 21 Consulting S.L. (2) Grupo Tragsa - SEPI, Spain.
Hydrology Modeling in Alaska: Modeling Overview
Data Assimilation of TEMPO NO2: Winds, Emissions and PBL mixing
What are Multiscale Methods?
WRF plume modelling update NCAS, Leeds
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Presentation transcript:

November 3 IDR To do: What we have, what we’d like to do Modeling Mathematical/numerical approaches What we need inside the codes Tasks

What we promised to do Volcanic eruption column, plume advection and dispersion Where is the cloud likely to be # hours from now? Quantifiable likelihoods and confidence intervals/error metrics

Sources of uncertainty Volcanological: – Column height – Size distribution within column Translates into – Vent radius – Eruption rate/mass flux – Particle size distribution

Sources of uncertainty Meteorological: – Local windfield – Time evolution of windfield

Sources of uncertainty Modeling/numerical: – What is the effective equation of XXX code (numerical diffusion) – How does code account for local windfield variability? – How accurate is XXXcode in horizontal/vertical directions?

Column modeling Use a vent model (e.g. BENT) to replace column uncertainty with physical model and epistemicly uncertain parameters (radius, flux) Reasonable distributions of parameters to characterize vent and exflux

Windfield modeling Reconstructed windfields roughly known (known at a few points), but local uncertainty large. Predictive modeling must characterize all the uncertainty in weather prediction in a few parameters

Under the hood Inside XXXcode (WRF?) – Distributions for spatial fluctuations, temporal changes? – How to characterize the accuracy of the relatively sparse (compared to computational grid) windfield samples? – How is advection, diffusion computed?

Numerics Characterize all sources of uncertainty Remove uncertainty where possible, replace with physics (and physical model uncertainty) where possible Distributions for uncertain parameters Simulations for aleatoric uncertainty Reconstruct output distributions

Numerics Several approaches – Basic advection-diffusion equation, uncertain speed, boundary conditions. What is known? What is computed? – PCQ/gaussian sum marriage – Alternatives?

To do – short term Advection-diffusion solver, analysis, simulation WRF(?) details, pull source code apart Column-WRF(?) marriage and characterize all the uncertain inputs required

AGU plans ?