Naval Mine Countermeasures Vision

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airpower: the Industry Vision
Advertisements

Statement A: Approved for Public Release, Distribution is unlimited
Navy’s Operational Authority for Naval Networks, Information Operations, and FORCEnet 2004 Strike, Land Attack & Air Defense Annual Symposium Vice Admiral.
Mine Warfare Transition of Platform
Portada 2013 CALL FOR PROPOSAL PREVENTION AND PREPAREDNESS Agreement Number – ECHO/SUB/2013/ Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Ready for Preparedness.
1/11 TARDEC Technical Director (Acting) Dr. Marilyn Freeman presentation on Force Protection to the Science & Engineering Technology Conference TARDEC.
Concept of Operations Development SITREP
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
Naval Division 08 Thales Naval UK. 2 Naval Division – 08 NAVAL INDUSTRIAL FOOTPRINT France UK Netherlands Germany Australia JV Samsung Thales (STC) South.
This Brief is UNCLASIFIED
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Force (EAF) Getting lighter, leaner, and more responsive Col.
ENGAGE RESPOND PROJECT UNCLASSIFIED MINE WARFARE REQUIREMENTS BRIEF TO
LCS CONOPS Backup Slides.
PEO Littoral and Mine Warfare CAPT Terry Briggs, USN PMS 490 MINWARA Summer Regional Conference 7 May 2003 Vision for The Future of Mining In Support of.
NATO Network Enabled Capabilities
Commodity Architectures and Army Research Challenges Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures (EDGE) 24 May 2006 J. Michael Coyle Program.
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Warfare
Industry as a Partner to Achieve Maritime Infrastructure Protection (MIP) and Freedom of Navigation (FON) 28 October 2014 Mr. Thomas Jones Vice President,
Navy International Program Office
1 U.S. Naval Forces Central Warfighting First, Operate Forward, Be Ready Mine Warfare and Concept of Operations in (IMCMEX-MIPS) 2013 CAPT Glenn Allen.
1 IMAT Capable Manpower FNC Interactive Multisensor Presented at the Workshop on : Analysis Training Storytelling as an Instructional Method Mesa, AZ 7-8.
Partnership in Unmanned Marine Systems GATE Electronics TR Technologies TURKEY.
March 2004 New Technologies For Improved Operational Testing Of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles Naval Sea Systems Command Naval Undersea Warfare Center
May 2003 Long-term Mine Reconnaissance System (LMRS) Update Presented to:Mine Warfare Association Presented by:CAPT John D. Lambert, USN Program.
Cooperative Experience Employment Education (Co-Op) Program Earn While You Learn Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division Patuxent River, Maryland February.
Littoral Warfare Product Area Director 20 Oct 2003 Dr. David P. Skinner Briefing to the NDIA.
Air University: The Intellectual and Leadership Center of the Air Force Aim High…Fly - Fight - Win The AFIT of Today is the Air Force of Tomorrow. Distribution.
1 United States Marine Corps Power Projection Requirements: Naval Mine Countermeasures LtGen E. R. Bedard, DC PP&O A Brief for the Mine Warfare Association.
Commander Mine Warfare Command Future Vision May 6, 2003.
Precision Strike Association Annual Programs Review 20 April 2005 LtGen Michael A. Hough Deputy Commandant for Aviation.
Navy Warfare Development Command
Sustainability/Logistics – Transportation and Distribution Management (4b) Technology Enabled Capability Demonstration Alan Santucci
Navy QDR 4 December Overall brief classification: Unclassified C5ISR Conference.
Sea Mine Warfare: An Assessment Update July 2001 RDML M. A. Sharp, Program Executive Officer.
The Fleet Engagement Strategy: Introduction of Organic MCM MGen Bill Whitlow.
1 TRANSFORMING NAVAL POWER PROJECTION. 2 Developing Joint Seabasing Capabilities National Security Strategy National Security Strategy JointOperationalConcept.
20 th ISMOR COL Jeff Appleget TRAC-WSMR 28 August 2003 Future Combat System (FCS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Metrics for Transformation.
Overview of Information and Signal Processing Program 24 January 2007 Liyi Dai, Program Manager Computing & Information Sciences Division Mathematical.
The use of scenarios to develop Concepts of Operation for unmanned vehicles 19 ISMOR 30th August Michael Tulip.
Maritime Homeland Defense / Security Mine Countermeasures
Commander Mine Warfare Command May 6, 2003 ISSUES.
Last Updated 1/17/02 1 Business Drivers Guiding Portal Evolution Portals Integrate web-based systems to increase productivity and reduce.
Naval Sea Systems Command D A H L G R E N D I V I S I O N N A V A L S U R F A C E W A R F A R E C E N T E R Sea Battlespace Dominance & Mining Vision MINWARA.
Seabasing Roadmap † : A Littoral Warfare Systems Perspective Dr. David P. Skinner, LWS Product Area Director October 2004 † Seabasing Roadmap N703/N75.
CAPT RUSTY STILES Deputy Fleet Surgeon U.S. Fleet Forces Command
1Autonomous Ops Above Core Br f v1 - 1 Feb 00 UUV PROGRAM Proposed Capability: Undersea Autonomous Operations: ISR, Battlespace Preparation, Target Cueing.
Unmanned Maritime Systems September 30, 2015 John A. Lamb Director, Submarine Programs Newport News Shipbuilding.
CNA Mainstreaming mine warfare: Fleet initiatives 26 July 2001 MINWARA conference CNA Sabrina R. Edlow CNA.
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
Sensors Directorate and ATR Overview for Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for ATE MURI 21 July 2006 Lori Westerkamp Sensor.
ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective The Honorable Claude M. Bolton, Jr. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) and Army Acquisition.
Autonomous Mission Management of Unmanned Vehicles using Soar Scott Hanford Penn State Applied Research Lab Distribution A Approved for Public Release;
1 Containerized Towing / Handling Equipment System with ISO base can be anchored to deck with bolts or ISO corner fittings to provide ability to reconfigure.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML MARK R. MILLIKEN Navy International Program Office.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 10/7/09 Autonomous Systems Sensors – The Front End of ISR Mr. Patrick M. Sullivan SPAWAR ISR/IO.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML Mark R. Milliken Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, International Programs (DASN IP)
PROPRIETARY —Do not distribute Presented to: Date: OPTIMIZING DATA LINK PERFORMANCE FOR UNMANNED SYSTEM PAYLOADS C4 Robot Platforms & Sensors Exposition.
Luigi Cicchese Partner Reply Building a Smarter City.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Airfield Damage Repair (ADR) 1.
Fleet Design RADM Kenny Floyd Current Strategy Forum.
Employment Considerations: Considerations at the Outset of Combat
Unmanned Control & Tracking System (UCATS)
9th Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference Protection of the SEA BASE
Protecting the Sea Base NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference Rear Admiral Brad Hicks 20 October 2004.
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
CAPT RUSTY STILES Deputy Fleet Surgeon U.S. Fleet Forces Command
Enabling Technologies for Joint Protection of the Sea Base
OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION PERSPECTIVE
DDR&E Advanced Capabilities Overview
Spatial Integrated Systems, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Naval Mine Countermeasures Vision NDIA 8th Annual Expeditionary Warfare Conference Naval Mine Countermeasures Vision MajGen J.R. Battaglini Director, Expeditionary Warfare Division

MCM Vision Key Enablers: MCM VISION: Legacy Platforms and Systems Slow Heavy Large footprint Stovepiped Primarily CONUS-based Distributed Expeditionary MCM Systems Fast Light Agile Precise Lethal Modular ORGANIC Concept of Operations Unmanned Operations Distributed and Netted Cooperative Behavior Sea Trial Experiments Common Tactical Picture (CTP) MCM VISION: Field a Common Set of Unmanned, Modular MCM Systems Employable from a Variety of Host Platforms or Shore Sites that can Quickly Counter the Spectrum of Mines to Enable Assured Access with Minimum Risk from Mines The vision for future mine countermeasures is to: “field a common set of unmanned, modular MCM systems employable from a variety of host platforms or shore sites that can quickly counter the spectrum of mines to enable assured access with minimum risk from mines.” The two principal goals of this vision are: (1) to accelerate the MCM timelines and, (2) to get the Sailor/Marine out of the minefield. The desire is to transform from the slow legacy MCM platforms and systems to future MCM forces that are characterized as fast, light, agile, precise, lethal and organic to strike groups. We will have a distributed and networked force; use offboard and unmanned nodes; with persistent surveillance and pervasive sensing and weapons; rapidly delivering precision and volume effects. Within the FYDP, we expect to reduce the MCM timeline by half, and if S&T systems prove effective, time to complete MCM missions could be further reduced to 90% of the time it now takes to complete the mission. Key enablers that will assist in bridging the gap from today to the future vision are the development of an overarching MCM Concept of Operations (CONOPS), development of unmanned MCM systems that operate cooperatively in a distributed/netted environment, experimentation of these new systems and concepts through the Sea Trial process, and development of the capability to generate and disseminate a Common Tactical Picture (CTP). Get the Sailor/Marine Out of the Minefield Accelerate MCM from Weeks/Days to Hours/Minutes

MCM Future CONOPS: Tactical View Unmanned Nodes Distributed, Offboard, Cooperative & Netted MCM Capability ISR/IPB Enabled Database Mining Geo-Registration Sensor Fields Pattern Recognition Smart Cueing BAMS Overhead Databased “Mining tracks” TUAV Search Vehicle (LFBB) ID Vehicle Neutralizing Vehicle “Mother” Vehicle Neutralization Event Identified Mine Undetected Mine Geo-Registration Device / Sensor Field Identified Non-Mine The future distributed and networked MCM force will feature the use of offboard and unmanned nodes with persistent surveillance and pervasive sensing. MCM weapons will rapidly deliver precision and volume effects. The future MCM CONOPS is enabled by Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) and Intelligence Preparation of the Battle Space (IPB). Using overhead, reconnaissance assets (Broad Area Maritime Surveillance {BAMS} UAVs) and undersea sensors, knowledge of the battle space will be established prior to commencement of hostilities. Sharing distributed, dynamic databases, US forces will be able to pull track history data and use artificial intelligence to correlate information to cue search vehicles. LCS-based tactical aviation systems (TUAV & MH-60S) prepare the volume for follow-on unmanned systems. The CONOPS will employ multiple unmanned vehicles, operating autonomously and cooperatively, controlled from platforms at a safe standoff from the mine threat. The functions of locating, classifying, identifying, and neutralizing mines will be carried out by a family of UUVs, deployed from a “mother” USV. This USV will host (provide power, download data and link to sensor grid) UUVs that detect, ID, and neutralize mines. Navigation devices will provide precision underwater navigation and geo-registration of the undersea tactical picture with the GPS-enabled surface and air navigation picture. This vision culminates in providing follow-on forces sufficient maneuver area to execute missions. Technology under development in Science and Technology programs has the potential to reduce the MCM timeline by over 90%. PIM Strike Group Geo-Registration Grid

MCM Force Transformation Today FYDP Future Dedicated Dedicated CONOPS Dedicated Common Vehicles & Systems Organic + Follow-on Systems Today’s mine countermeasures force is capable. Platform centered, it is single mission focused, and dedicated to MCM. A strategic capability, most of the Dedicated MCM (DMCM) force is CONUS-based. The MCM triad of airborne, surface and underwater MCM forces will normally support operational plans (OPLANS) via strategic lift into theater to accomplish early MCM objectives. Follow-on force arrival is normally required to accomplish the MCM objectives necessary to transition to offensive operations and conduct post conflict MCM cleanup. In order to meet evolving threats, increase speed of effort, and be capable of achieving early MCM objectives, we are fielding next generation MCM systems to the operational forces. These Organic MCM (OMCM) systems will be embedded in Strike Groups (SG) and will provide organic MCM capability to operational commanders. Future introduction of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) with a mine warfare (MIW) mission module improves the ability of operational forces to conduct MCM due to greatly increased closure speed and capability. The DMCM force will continue to be the predominant MCM capability during OMCM introduction. The maturity, growth, and spiral development of OMCM capabilities in concert with the introduction of future MCM platforms such as LCS may provide a sufficiently viable MCM capability such that a reduction in DMCM platforms becomes feasible. As we look to the future, MCM transformation will continue as new CONOPS and developing capabilities lead to a MCM force composed of a set of common vehicles and systems that are employable from a variety of host platforms. The MCM force transformation will take us from the platform-centered legacy force of today to a “capability-centered” MCM force that is distributed, netted, and cooperative. Organic Platform Centered Capability Centered Stovepipe/Legacy Distributed/Netted/Cooperative

Roadmap: MCM Transition Spirals Today (2003) Near-Term (FYDP) Mid-Term (2009-2015) Far-Term (>2015) Platform Centered FY05 Plan (FY05 - FY09) MH-53E Decision MCM(X) Decision Progression of MCM Capabilities Built Upon Preceding Platforms/Systems Dedicated MCM Forces AMCM Capabilities Organic MCM Systems Spiral Developments MH-60S RMS LMRS OMCM The roadmap will consist of a series of gap filling and transformational capabilities and spiral developments of existing capabilities. Beginning with today's forces, the roadmap will incorporate OMCM systems and continue towards achieving platform independent, capability-centered, cooperative, distributed, and netted MCM employable from a variety of host platforms. The first LCS MIW Mission Module delivers within the FYDP. The MCM capability of the LCS will depend upon the final composition of the mission module that will include a combination of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), and Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs). The LCS FLT 0 will include the Remote Minehunting System (RMS) and the five Organic Airborne MCM (OAMCM) systems as part of the initial MIW Mission Module. The Global CONOPS envisions LCS ships in support of both Carrier Strike Groups (CSG) and Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESG). Therefore, an LCS equipped with a MIW Mission Module provides an organic MCM capability to these strike groups. With the approaching end of service life for the dedicated (DAMCM) aircraft (MH-53E), a decision to replace the aircraft , extend the aircraft’s service life, or allow the service life to terminate is required not later than FY08. As the OAMCM helicopters (MH-60S) and systems are fielded and capabilities mature, the requirement for and viability of the MH-60S as a potential replacement will be assessed. The MCM-1 Class begins to reach the end of its service life in 2017 and the decision regarding a follow-on MCM platform, MCM(X), is required in the mid-term. In the far-term, as LCS continues to be fielded in greater numbers, squadrons of LCS or “LCS-like” ships with MCM capabilities may become the replacement for the current fleet of dedicated surface MCM platforms. LCS with MIW Mission Modules UUV, UAV, USV Future MCM Capability Centered