Accessing and Integrating CV and AV Sensor Data into Traffic Engineering Practice Dr. Jonathan Corey ITITS 2015 December 12, 2015 Chang’an, China.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COS 461 Fall 1997 Routing COS 461 Fall 1997 Typical Structure.
Advertisements

Making the most of Satellite Navigation and Tracking Integration with your Business System.
Technology Solutions. There are a variety of technologies—old and new—that have been developed to warn drivers and operators when workers on foot are.
© 2005 by Prentice Hall Appendix 2 Automated Tools for Systems Development Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F.
Calibration of an Infrared-based Automatic Counting System for Pedestrian Traffic Flow Data Collection Step 3: Calibration Models Calibration models were.
IBM TJ Watson Research Center © 2010 IBM Corporation – All Rights Reserved AFRL 2010 Anand Ranganathan Role of Stream Processing in Ad-Hoc Networks Where.
Ch 8: Traffic Data Collection and Reduction Methodologies 1  Explain how traffic data are used  List typical traffic studies  Use typical data collection.
Networking and Telecommunications 9.  2001 Prentice Hall9.2 Chapter Outline Linking Up: Network Basics Electronic Mail, Teleconferences, and Instant.
Axis Intelligent Video Intelligence where you need it.
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Customized Simulation Modeling Using PARAMICS Application Programming Interface Henry Liu, Lianyu Chu & Will Recker.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Overview of SAFER.
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
Design of Cooperative Vehicle Safety Systems Based on Tight Coupling of Communication, Computing and Physical Vehicle Dynamics Yaser P. Fallah, ChingLing.
World Renewable Energy Forum May 15-17, 2012 Dr. James Hall.
Basic Concepts of Computer Networks
Machine Learning and Optimization For Traffic and Emergency Resource Management. Milos Hauskrecht Department of Computer Science University of Pittsburgh.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University1 Evaluation of Intersection Collision Warning System Using an Inter-vehicle.
1 Proposed Additional Use Cases for Congestion Exposure draft-mcdysan-conex-other-usecases-00.txt Dave McDysan.
Agriculture.co.ke - outsourcing.co.ke - architecture.co.ke SWISSKENKO LTD Elgon View Estate Tilil Crescent Plateau Road P.O.Box Eldoret, Kenya.
Abstract Design Considerations and Future Plans In this project we focus on integrating sensors into a small electrical vehicle to enable it to navigate.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
Traffic Enforcement And Management System Malam-Team is Israel's largest systems integration organization, One of the most exciting solutions offered by.
Advisor: Prof. Gong Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Team 8 Alternative Choices November 26 th, 2012 Mid-course Design Review.
Caitlin Motsinger ● Sure Program ● Summer 2007 Advisor: Dr. Todd Hubing ● Graduate Student Assistant: Robert Clippard Clemson University ● Clemson, South.
Sensors Cassandra, Gayathri, Rohan, Patrick. -Many distractions while driving -Want to dramatically reduce accidents that occur -Try to figure out ways.
Security Tracking and Advising for Taxi Customers Group Member Tanapol Euaungkanakul Chayanin Mukviboonchai Thanachit Viriyayanyongsuk.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
1 Development and Evaluation of Selected Mobility Applications for VII (a.k.a. IntelliDrive) Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program Institute.
1. This seminar paper is based upon the project work being carried out by the collaboration of Delphi- Delco Electronics (DDE) and General Motors Corporation.It.
Common Devices Used In Computer Networks
University of Maryland Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering By G.L. Chang, M.L. Franz, Y. Liu, Y. Lu & R. Tao BACKGROUND SYSTEM DESIGN DATA.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Jump Starting ITS Deployment in Los Angeles County using Wireless Communications Lessons Learned.
F Networked Embedded Applications and Technologies Lab Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Cheng Kung University, TAIWAN.
Test Intersection: Status, Results, Preparation for State Data Collection Lee Alexander Pi-Ming Cheng Alec Gorjestani Arvind Menon Craig Shankwitz Intelligent.
Implementing Codesign in Xilinx Virtex II Pro Betim Çiço, Hergys Rexha Department of Informatics Engineering Faculty of Information Technologies Polytechnic.
A Framework for Elastic Execution of Existing MPI Programs Aarthi Raveendran Graduate Student Department Of CSE 1.
Towards Low Overhead Provenance Tracking in Near Real-Time Stream Filtering Nithya N. Vijayakumar, Beth Plale DDE Lab, Indiana University {nvijayak,
Prediction of Traffic Density for Congestion Analysis under Indian Traffic Conditions Proceedings of the 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION: A Coordinated Effort Tom Dancey, P.E. Signal System Engineer City of Springfield CITY OF SPRINGFIELD & MISSOURI DEPARTMENT.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
A Software Solution for the Control, Acquisition, and Storage of CAPTAN Network Topologies Ryan Rivera, Marcos Turqueti, Alan Prosser, Simon Kwan Electronic.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Team AlternativeChoices October 10, 2012 Preliminary Design Review.
Advanced AMR Utilizing a Radio Mesh Network In Rural Electric Cooperatives Matthew Ryan Advanced AMR
1 Vehicular Networks Slides are integrated from researchers at EPFL.
1 The Role and Design of V2X Communications for Automated Driving Gaurav Bansal Toyota InfoTechnology Center, USA Mountain View, CA
1 Travel Times from Mobile Sensors Ram Rajagopal, Raffi Sevlian and Pravin Varaiya University of California, Berkeley Singapore Road Traffic Control TexPoint.
ITS Virginia Annual Conference April 20, 2012 Sensys Networks and the Sensys Networks logo are trademarks of Sensys Networks, Inc. Other product and company.
ParkNet: Drive-by Sensing of Road-Side Parking Statistics Irfan Ullah Department of Information and Communication Engineering Myongji university, Yongin,
The City of Calgary’s Intelligent Transportation Systems and Yeatland (Yeats) Wong, P. Eng. The City of Calgary Transportation Department.
IMAGE PROCESSING APPLIED TO TRAFFIC QUEUE DETECTION ALGORITHM.
VEMANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,BANGALORE
Intelligent Transportation System
Rhetorical SITUATION We are at a convention for Canadian retailers, transportation brokers and yard management companies. I am a representative from.
Channel Allocation (MAC)
Embedding Technology in Transportation Courses
ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL
Overview of CV2X Requirements
Bluetooth Based Smart Sensor Network
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
Module 6 A 21st Century Transportation Network
Presentation transcript:

Accessing and Integrating CV and AV Sensor Data into Traffic Engineering Practice Dr. Jonathan Corey ITITS 2015 December 12, 2015 Chang’an, China

Outline Current Signal Timing Practice Sensors Data Processing Integration Into Practice Traffic Signal Control Systems 2

Challenge Conventional traffic signal control systems will be in use for decades Most current traffic signal research assumes 100% CV or AV populations Current projections put AV adoption at 75% in 2040 How can we improve current traffic signal system performance with CV/AV data? 3

Outline Current Signal Timing Practice Sensors Data Processing Integration Into Practice Traffic Signal Control Systems 4

Current Signal Timing Practice United States Department of Transportation –Recommends retiming traffic signals every 3 years Ohio State Department of Transportation –Traffic signals retimed every 3-6 years –Typically using hour counts –Data is frequently processed to peak hour turning counts 5

Current Signal Timing Practice The current availability of data is driven by data collection intervals and operational requirements –Operations sensors tend to have small detection areas (loop detector, camera, etc.) –Traffic counts are generally taken with temporary equipment (tube counter, radar, etc.) 6

Current Signal Timing Practice Conventional systems will be in use for decades Algorithms to translate CV and AV data into traffic signal timing plans are needed –Data will be available in real-time compared to occasional collection –Data quality will depend on vehicle make/model, sensor type, and number of CV/AVs in the area 7

Outline Current Signal Timing Practice Sensors Data Processing Integration Into Practice Traffic Signal Control Systems 8

Sensors For traffic signal control –CVs have generally been seen as probe vehicles sending back data such as Position Speed Hazard messages –AV behaviors have been modeled as either Reading existing and obeying signals Actively managed participants in the traffic control system 9

Sensors There are many sensors on production cars that can generate useful data –Adaptive cruise control (ACC) uses a radar to detect collision hazards ahead of the vehicle –Rear-end and blind spot detection (BSD) uses radar and ultrasonic sensors AVs will use radar and lidar to scan their surroundings for collision hazards 10

Sensors The Delphi Electronic Scanning Radar (ESR) is a common sensor for ACC The ESR detects vehicles, pedestrians and obstacles The ESR is effectively two radars in the same unit –60m range with 90° arc –175m range with 22° arc meters 22° arc 60 meters 90° arc

Sensors 12

Sensors Vehicles with ACC and BSD systems are currently on the road CV systems become mandatory in USA on new vehicles soon Some CVs will come with ACC and/or BSD from the very beginning This means we could begin collecting data from selected CVs from the very beginning 13

Outline Current Signal Timing Practice CV and AV Sensors Data Processing Integration Into Practice Traffic Signal Control Systems 14

Data Processing Data processing in a CV, AV and traffic signal control system context is complex Processing can occur at multiple points and to multiple degrees Data storage is another challenge Overlapping needs and requirements may mandate processing, storage, and transmission locations 15

Data Processing Start with what we need –Sensing vehicle location, speed, and direction –Vehicle type, sensor type and field of view (horizontal and vertical) –Location, speed and direction of detected vehicles Additional data we want –Light status (if the vehicle has a camera) –Video (when queried) 16

Data Processing CV systems are both designed to send back their own position, speed, and location Sensor types and metadata are very simple to store or transmit –Central database –Short query and message through CV system So far, it looks easy 17

Data Processing Where do we process the sensor data to determine the location, speed and direction of other vehicles? There are several options –Central computer –Traffic signal control system –Within the vehicle (in sensor and/or computer) –… 18

Data Processing If we process the data at a central location –We will need to have very large and fast communications links –The processed data will still need to be sent to the traffic signal control system –Algorithms to translate processed data into traffic signal control data are needed –Failure at the central processing node will kill the entire system 19

Data Processing Processing the data at the traffic signal control system –Requires allocation of CV/AV communications to the proper traffic signal control system –Communication volume is still potentially high –Current traffic signal control systems are not high performance computing systems –Each traffic signal system will need its own algorithms to be developed 20

Data Processing Processing data on the vehicle –Sensor data volumes are small –Processing power is limited –Dedicated processing hardware can be used –Only one set of sensor types and one configuration need to be considered –Lower communication requirements to transmit processed data –AVs will be processing data locally 21

Data Processing Assuming raw data processing occurs on vehicle, we still have work to do –Processed data is not perfect data –Two different CVs/AVs may show a detected vehicle in different locations due to Sensor error and bias Angle measurement was taken from Time discrepancies 22

Data Processing 23 CV2CV2 CV1CV1 CARCAR

Data Processing The final data processing step will need to be at either a central computer or at the traffic signal control system A model based approach will allow constraints to be used –Vehicle conservation between detections –Predicted location of previously detected vehicles 24

TRUCKTRUCK CARCAR Data Processing 25 CV2CV2 CV1CV1 CARCAR CV2CV2 CV1CV1 CV2CV2 CV1CV1 CARCAR

Outline Current Signal Timing Practice Sensors Data Processing Integration Into Practice Traffic Signal Control Systems 26

Integration into Practice Current practice does not use generally use real-time data Conventional systems are retimed on multiple year time scales Planning of new intersections is slower Incident detection is one of the few areas current practice uses real-time information 27

Integration into Practice Some traffic signal control systems use near real-time data for operations –Adaptive and traffic responsive systems frequently aggregate data to the cycle –Many systems offer reporting services current to the last cycle Data output from traffic signal control systems can be problematic 28

Integration into Practice Many of the potential benefits of real-time data collection are discarded –Real-time data requires large storage –Reported data and measures are obsolete –Personnel are not trained in computer operations Database operations Visualization of data Modeling software 29

Integration into Practice The biggest required changes are institutional –Personnel need to have significantly stronger and varied computer skills –Data and processes need to focus on disaggregation Stop treating every day of the year as though it were the same There are many more events in a day than practice currently acknowledges 30

Integration into Practice CV and AV systems offer tremendous opportunities to advance the practice Looking at history, there will be a chicken and egg problem –Will new data drive new reporting and standards? –Will new standards drive data collection? Either solution has its own challenges 31

Outline Current Signal Timing Practice Sensors Data Processing Integration Into Practice Traffic Signal Control Systems 32

Traffic Signal Control Systems Current traffic signal control systems are not designed to incorporate CV/AV data New systems, or extensions of existing systems, will need to be developed Current systems are generally reacting to past information 33

Traffic Signal Control Systems To operate during the transition from conventional vehicles to CVs and AVs –Traffic signal systems need to incorporate CV and AV data into their optimization algorithms –These systems should function seamlessly from 0% to 100% CVs and AVs Separate the data processing –Model of the area –Traffic signal control 34

Traffic Signal Control Systems The model portion of the traffic signal control system –Estimates the positions of previously detected vehicle –Is simple to reduce computation and data loads –Can replace estimated vehicle data with CV/AV reported data 35

Traffic Signal Control Systems 36

Traffic Signal Control Systems With the underlying model we can run any kind of traffic signal control system –Current systems could be run via emulation –New systems New system models can also be implemented –Reservation based systems –Cooperative traffic signals 37

Questions? Jonathan Corey 796 Rhodes Hall 2850 Campus Way Dr. Phone: