1 Improvement of Public Transport in Surabaya Multidisciplinary MSc Project Faculty Civil Engineering and Geosciences TU Delft.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Advertisements

SCATTER final seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2004 SCATTER Testing and evaluating potential solutions to control urban sprawl, through simulation.
SCATTER WORKSHOP, Brussels, November 9th 2004 KARI LAUTSO / LT CONSULTANTS SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS Lic.
SCATTER WORKSHOP Virpi Pastinen/LT Consultants SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS SCATTER WORKSHOP MILAN.
1 Global and Regional Perspectives of Sustainable Transport Development Madan B. Regmi, DEng Transport Division UNESCAP, Bangkok Regional Expert Group.
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Welcome to CIVITAS.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When to invest in High Speed Rail Links and Networks Chris Nash Research Professor
Sprawling Cities and TransporT From Evaluation to Recommendations.
Cork: Towards a Healthier City Denise Cahill Health Promotion Dept, HSE South.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
US East Africa Workshop “Developing Sustainable Transportation Systems” Emerging Issues.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
THE ADVANTAGES OF ROAD-SIDE AIR POLLUTION DATA FOR IDENTIFYING PRIORITY IN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND URBAN HOTSPOT MONITORING Driejana 1 *, Harmein Rahman.
BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sachdeva, RITES Ltd Viresh Goel, RITES Ltd D.S.Chari,
AFD’s strategy of intervention towards Sustainable Urban Transport in China Herve Breton AFD Shanghai Nov.2008.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Peak Car: implications for policy David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Christian Schweizer WHO Regional Office for Europe Dawei Wu University of Oxford Jobs in green and healthy transport.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL David Banister The Bartlett School of Planning University College London Mobile Network Seminar – 16 th May 2003.
W. Suchorzewski, WUT, th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw.
Scenarios for CO 2 Emissions from the Transport Sector in Asia Presentation by John Rogers 24 th May, 2006.
City Planning Commission eThekwini Transport Authority.
Traffic Management and Transport Demand Management Gladys Frame Consultant Traffic Engineer The World Bank Module 4: Urban Transport Planning.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
Characteristics of an efficient transportation system - a well designed intra-city system - reasonable cost - high degree of safety and reliability - avoid.
DEMOCRITOS DEveloping the MObility CRedits Integrated platform enabling travellers TO improve urban transport Sustainability Grant agreement no
Trends in travel – evidence to help think about the future David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Utrecht Attractive and Accessible A new approach for sustainable urban mobility in Utrecht Paul Kouijzer, Manager Environment and Mobility.
ET2050 Transport Trends and Scenarios Michael Wegener Spiekermann & Wegener (S&W) ET2050 Project Group Meeting, Brussels, 19 March 2012.
Monitoring Progress in the implementation of the action plan Presentation by John Rogers 25 th May, 2006.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl Inter-city comparison.
CAI-Asia is building an air quality management community in Asia Investment Implications of the Action Plan Sustainable Urban.
Transport for Regional Growth 5th November 2015 Strategic Development Plan Ian Angus Strategic Development Plan Manager.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
The White Paper from 2001 to 2010 Vision White Paper  Issued by the EC  Consultation from stakeholders, Parliament and Council  Will set out.
Janos MONIGL director of TRANSMAN Ltd 1968 TU Dresden – M.Sc.traffic engineer 1974 TU Budapest – M.Sc.engineer economist 1976 Hungarian Academy of Science.
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Forecasting Land Use Change at European and at Urban Level: SASI and PROPOLIS EEA Expert Meeting on Land Use Accounting Copenhagen, 16 March 2005 Spiekermann.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
The case studies of Mexico City and Belo Horizonte Carbon Expo Cologne, 28 May 2010.
Travel in the Twenty-First Century: Peak Car and beyond David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
© ATAG INTRODUCING… AIR TRANSPORT.
‘Free’ public transport in the Netherlands Sebastiaan van der Vliet.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Konstantinos Alexopoulos Transport Division UNECE
West of England Joint Transport Study
Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: Monitoring & Evaluation
Regional Roads Committee
David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London
Bus and coach transport for greening mobility
Welcome to CIVITAS.
Congestion is not a fate F.Wittwer
Predicting Benefits of a New Investment
What can CREATE contribute to SUMPs?
Conclusions of the European Cities Report
Car Ownership Models Meeghat Habibian History and Analysis
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Why build this new link to Heathrow?
Sustainable Mobility and Tourism as Drivers for Economic Growth in European Islands Ms. Sylvia Gauci Executive Secretary, Malta Council for Economic Social.
Key Facts-Ireland’s Transportation
Welcome to CIVITAS.
Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl
Presentation transcript:

1 Improvement of Public Transport in Surabaya Multidisciplinary MSc Project Faculty Civil Engineering and Geosciences TU Delft

2 Indonesia Population: 249 Million Dutch colony Economic growth Urbanization Weather Nature

3 Problem definition Surabaya Congestion Increasing demand for mobility Air pollution and public health Traffic safety Social inclusion

4 Research question Which public transport system for Surabaya makes the entire city more sustainable, accessible and less congested, while creating most value for money?

5 Use of Simulation OmniTRANS Intensity and capacity of roads Java Spatial Model Predicting settlement Population Employment

6 Scenario set-up Realistic scenario and two optimistic scenarios 1.Current Trend 2.Super City 3.Super City with Sustainable Conditions Scenarios CT 2030SC 2030SCSC 2030 GDP growth5%7% Employment growth1%-2%2%-3% Good governance--+ Economic centres--+ TDM--+

7 Alternatives Alternative 1: Future plans Surabaya Alternative 2: BRT ring road + grid Alternative 3: Future plans + BRT ring road

8 Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) Scores for Current Trend 2030 MCA total scores CT2030WeightBase Future plans Surabaya 2. Ring road + Grid 3. Future plans + Ring Travel time gain Speed Accessibility0.2197,000204,000237,000226,000 PT trips0.397,000176,000328,000214,000 ScenarioBase Future plans Surabaya 2. Ring road + Grid 3. Future plans + Ring CT SC SCSC GoodSufficientMediumBad

9 Impact assessment Financial evaluation Cost Revenue  BRT ring road + grid Economic evaluation Traffic accidents Healthcare CO 2 emissions Value of time  BRT road + grid

10 Conclusions Which public transport system for Surabaya makes the entire city more sustainable, accessible and less congested, while creating most value for money? BRT ring road + grid Best mobility performance Most value for money Future plans Surabaya Improvement for Surabaya but high investment Future plans + BRT ring road only Only feasible for the optimistic scenarios

11 Recommendations More research is needed about the implementation of the BRT system Expansion of study area towards Madura Island to the north and Waru and Juanda Airport to the south Public transport can be an effective solution, however policy change and urban planning is needed to create a larger modal shift towards PT Include different income groups in the OmniTRANS model More detailed road network in the OmniTRANS model

12 Terima kasih! Questions?