A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sponsored by CEPA Foundation – Cultural & Educational Programs Abroad CEPA Foundation Webinar #3 on Curriculum Integration: Evaluation Integrating Education.
Advertisements

UNLV Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering 2006 Parent Survival 101: Getting Your Child Ready for College UNLV Howard R. Hughes College of Engineering.
Year-Long Learning Communities Rethinking the Summer Bridge Nikolas Huot, Assistant Director for First-Year Programs.
Welcome to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Advising 1001.
Georgia State University Sadé Tramble, M.Ed- Academic Advisor
Higher Education Conference. Engaging Faculty in Retention Issues Part II Presidential Summit on Retention The Need and Scope February 20, 2007 Dr. Richard.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
High Risk Factors for Retention Freshman Year Experience Review of the Literature Review of Preliminary Data.
1 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) UCLA’s Higher Education Research Institute COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) Presentation.
Institutional Research & Effectiveness Who Are the Freshmen at Austin Peay? Institutional Research & Effectiveness Ellen Smyth May 2009.
NIU – An Historical Snapshot Daniel House Office of Institutional Research Brian Brim Division of Academic and Student Affairs Daniel House Office of Institutional.
E ducational O pportunity P rogram “A Community of Support” S A C R A M E N T O S T A T E EOP ADMISSION INFORMATION AND SERVICES
Success C enter PAUL L. FOSTER Baylor University Fostering Transfer Student Success at Baylor University.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Facts about First-Year Students at Central Connecticut State University Presented by Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
OU Student Profile Who are OU’s Students? June 7, 2006 Laura Schartman.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
Expectation & Experience Surveys 1998 & 2002 AIRPO, June West Point, New York.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
From Recruitment to Retention: Focusing Campus Efforts to Promote Transfer Student Success National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January.
1 College Student Expectations Questionnaire Presentation by the Office of Assessment Division of Student Affairs Mississippi State University Research.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
Dual Enrollment. What is Dual Enrollment  Dual enrollment classes are taken at your local high school and taught by high school instructors. Students.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Results from the 2013 Undergraduate Alumni Survey Karen Gil, Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Arts & Sciences Lynn Williford, Assistant Provost,
Profile of an Engineering Education and Professions Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and.
1 Retention Update Susan Awbrey November Why Retain Students?
The 4-Year College Plan College Academic Vocabulary.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
YOUR ROAD TO SUCCESS MONTIE MONTGOMERY MHS COUNSELOR WHERE WILL IT TAKE YOU.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Regular Versus Shorter University Orientations: A Comparison of Attendee Make-up Carla Abreu-Ellis & Jason Brent Ellis.
The Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA SM ).
ISECON 2008 Strategies for Increasing IT Enrollment: Recruiting, Retaining and Encouraging the Transfer of Women and Underrepresented Groups to Four-Year.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY Institutional Research WEST VIRGINIA ADVENTURE ASSESSMENT Created by Jessica Michael & Vicky Morris-Dueer.
Student Affairs 08/10. Enrollment 11,648 undergraduate students –9,855 Full Time –1,793 Part Time 2,222 graduate students –1,237 Full Time – 985 Part.
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
Undergraduate Student Persistence and Completion: Do Pell Grants Matter? Charles Hatcher, California Competes CAIR Conference, Tongshan Chang, University.
Who Are Our Students? Demographic Profile Retention and Choice Student Time Use Alcohol and Drugs Student Satisfaction Academic Performance Career and.
Your future. Our Mission. futurestudents.mst.edu Founded 1870 | Rolla, Missouri.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Selected Results of President’s Office Survey of Alumni Graduating in 1997/98 The Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies July 15, 2003 Jennifer.
Provost’s Address to the University Senate December 13, 2004.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
The Changing American College Student: Thirty-Year Trends, Alexander W. Astin “While each of the 30 freshman surveys since 1966 has revealed.
Transfer Student Survey Enrollment Management Student Assessments for Missouri S&T Transfer Conference | October 9, 2008
Undergraduate Academic Advising UNDERGRADUATE ACADEMIC ADVISING AT September 2015.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
GRADUATE IN FOUR MAKING A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION INTO COLLEGE.
University Academic Advising ACADEMIC ADVISING AT September 2015.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
College: Making it Happen Source: College - Making it Happen A Guide for California Middle School Families and Educators.
Ph.D., in Applied Science with Major in Systems Engineering 2001 Vs Prepared by: Gerard Ibarra.
2012 Summer Assessment Academy June 14, Overview Data Barriers Solutions Identification of Best Practices Partnerships – Adult Education, P-12 &
GRADUATE IN FOUR MAKING A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION INTO COLLEGE.
Bridging the Gap for Students at Risk: A Data-Driven Case
Dissertation Findings
NFO - Overview of WCU Students
Getting to Know Our AHS Undergraduate Students
Presentation transcript:

A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008

 Who They Are?  What They Expect from Life and BGSU?  What They Are Doing?  What They Think of BGSU and BGSU Faculty?  What We could Do for Them?

Enrollment (Fall 2007)  15,638 main campus undergraduates  2,981 main campus graduate students  2,065 Firelands students  20,684 total (lower than in 2004, 2005, and 2006)  Full/Part Time: Full Time Part Time main campus undergraduates93% 7% main campus graduate students52% 48% Firelands undergraduates 57% 43%

Enrollment (Fall 2007)  Residency: In-State Out O.S. Int’l main campus undergraduates88% 10% 2% main campus graduate students67% 19% 15% Firelands99.6% 0.4% 0%  Average Age: main campus undergraduates: 21 main campus graduate students:31 students at Firelands:25

Enrollment (Fall 2007)  Gender: FemaleMale main campus undergraduates54%46% main campus graduate students63%37% Firelands65%35%  Ethnicity : Minority Eu.A Oth/UN main campus undergraduates15% 81% 4% main campus graduate students 9% 73%18% Firelands 9% 87% 3%

Applications and Admissions: (main campus first year students) Fall 02Fall 03Fall 04Fall 05Fall 06Fall 07 Applicants Admitted Acceptance Rate91.5%90.1%89.8%89.5%89.4%87.1% Enrolled Matriculation Rate39.2%38.3%39.0%36.3%35.1%33.2%

Family (main campus first year students, 08)  Parents both alive and living with each other: 66%  Parents both alive, divorced or living apart: 30%  One or both deceased 4%  Mother and father high school or less 19%  At least one parent a college graduate 63%  Both parents college graduates 27%  Less than $30,000 12%  $30,000-$49,999 15%  $50,000-$74,999 26%  $75,000-$99,999 20%  $100,000 or More 28%

College Expense $1500 and more from … (main campus first year students)  Parents, Relatives, Friends74% 62%  Other College Grant/Scholarship24% 52%  Other College Loan24%52%  Other Loan13% 25%  Pell Grant 9% 21%  College Work Study 6% 20%  Part-Time Job On Campus 4% 13%  78% of incoming freshman has concerns about their ability to finance their college education  About 60% of them are planning to work 10 hours or more per week during school year

Academic Background (main campus first year students)  Average HS GPA: 3.2  Average ACT Scores: 22  Special tutoring/remedial work in Mathematics21%27%32% Science 6% 7%10% Foreign Language 7% 7%10% Fall 2002Fall 2003Fall 2004Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007 N%N%N%N%N%N% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % <= %511.6%621.7%611.8%401.2%481.6% Total % % % % % % Average ACT

Why They Attend College (main campus first year students, 2008)  to prepare for a professional career 92%  to get a better job 74%  to make more money 71%  to learn more about things that interest me 69%

What They Believe (main campus first year students, 2008)  being very well off financially 85%  raising a family 80%  helping others in difficulty 73%  becoming an authority in my field 66%

What They Expect from BGSU? (main campus first year students, 2008)  get a Bachelor’s degree 85%  find a job in my major after graduation 75%  be satisfied with BGSU 69%  get a job to help pay for college expenses 59%  make at least a “B” average 52%  need extra time to complete your degree 4%  transfer to another college before graduation 4%  fail one or more courses 0%  drop out of college temporarily/permanently 0%

Graduation Rates (main campus undergraduates) The main campus four-year four-year and six-year freshmen graduation rates are higher than for other moderately selective universities that participate in the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange. The actual six-year graduation rate has consistently been higher than predicted by the U. S. News America’s Best College publication. (  33%-35% in four years (33.6% for )  53%-57% in five years (54% for )  57%-60% in six years (57% for )

Graduation Rates (main campus undergraduates) Reasons for taking more than four years to graduate: u I changed majors u I worked while enrolled u The class that I needed were not offered when I needed to take them u I received poor academic advising

One Year Retention Rates (main campus first year students)  74.0% in  74.2% in  77.9% in  79.1% in  76.1% in  75.9% in These rates are lower than the 82.2% retention rate achieved in with students with a similar academic profile, but higher (except for the most recent year) than the retention rates for other moderately selective universities that participate in the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange.

Students were more likely to be retained to their second fall semester if They…( ):  Female  Lived on campus  Had higher HS GPA and ACT  Had higher levels parent income, expected family contribution, gift aid, college work study; and had lower levels of gross need and unmet need.  Did not test into or enroll in any developmental courses except for Math  Had higher College GPA and greater credit hours earned; did not fail any courses; were in good academic standing after the fall and spring semesters

Students were more likely to be retained to their second fall semester if They… ( ):  Participated in the Center for Multicultural and Academic Initiatives or the President’s Leadership Academy; in any residential learning community; were not enrolled in UNIV 131 and UPAS program;  Had greater scores of social involvement, university involvement, and satisfaction with living arrangements from the New Student Transition Questionnaire; and were not identified as being at risk of attrition  Had no university-level disciplinary actions;  returned for their first spring semester;

Students were more likely to be retained to their second fall semester if they… ( ):  Enrolled in a major in the College of Education and Human Development; were not in Academic Enhancement;  Enrolled in a greater number of first year classes taught by full-time non-tenure-track faculty members (instructors and lecturers)  Changed their majors a greater number of times.

Hours per Week Preparing for Class (main campus, 2007 NSSE)  More than 90% of BGSU faculty expected their students (full-time) to spend 12 hours or more per week preparing for class (2003 FSSE Study). FreshmanSenior  %23%  %28%  %30%  %14%  > 30 3% 4%

Hours per Week Faculty Expect Students to spend preparing for Class (FSSE, 2003) Lower Division Upper DivisionFaculty  0 0% 0%  1-2 4% 9%  % 44%  % 33%  % 10%  >= 9 16% 4%

Hours per Week Relaxing and Socializing (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 1% 0%  % 19%  % 32%  % 35%  % 8%  > 30 9% 5%

Hours per Week Working for Pay (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 82% 58%  1-5 3% 5%  % 8%  % 17%  % 7%  > 30 1% 6%

Hours per Week Participating in Co- Curricular Activities (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 24% 36%  % 32%  % 14%  % 14%  % 4%  > 30 3% 1%

Hours per Week Providing care for dependents living with you (main campus, 2007) : FreshmanSenior  None 85% 74%  % 11%  % 5%  % 3%  % 2%  > 30 1% 6%

Hours per Week Commuting to Class (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 16% 6%  % 69%  % 19%  % 5%  % 1%  > 30 1% 0%

Academic Experiences (main campus, 2003 Study) Faculty Freshman Senior L.D. U.D  Frequently asked questions in class or contribute to class discussions 55% 71% 29% 44%  Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments 19% 26% 41% 30%  Used to comm. with an instructor 85% 80% 25% 38%  Received prompt feedback from faculty on your academic performance (written or oral) 51% 63% 93% 91%  Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 60% 68% 23% 36%  Talked about career plans with a faculty member 31% 47% 13% 23%  Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations 53% 59% 22% 38%

Relationships with... friendly, helpful,and understanding (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  Other students 81%85%  Faculty members 81% 80%  Adm. office and staff67% 56%

Satisfied with... (main campus undergraduates, 2007 Student Opinion Survey)  BGSU in general 85%  attitude of faculty towards students 83%  Class size and variety 83%  the out-of-class availability of my instructors 82%  Course content in your major field 82%  instruction in my major 78%  Testing/grading system 74%  Preparation you are receiving for your future occupation 64%  availability of your advisor 64%  Value of the information provided by your advisor 61%  availability of classes at the times I want them 41%

Satisfied with... (main campus, Graduating Senior, )  BGSU overall 83%  The overall quality of instruction 83%  Class size 82%  Ease of access to instructors 81%  feedback on assignments 76%  availability of classes at the times I want them 55%  concern for me as an individual 54%  the overall quality of academic advising 52%  helpfulness in preparing for further education 48%  helpfulness in preparing for employment 47%  service to commuters 35%

What we could do to help with …  Academic Advising  Career Preparation and Advising  Retention  Graduation  …

References BGSU Office of Institutional Research ( u BGSU Fact Book u BGSU First Year Student Questionnaire u National Survey of Student Engagement u Faculty Survey of Student Engagement u Student Opinion Survey u Graduating Senior Survey u Alumni Survey