“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Thinking Critically Exercise Question #4 Mel-Con Paragraph Writing Strategy M: Edwards’s sermons persuaded people.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards
Advertisements

Do Now Think about a time you tried to change someone’s mind. Did you use a gentle approach, scare tactics, or something in between? Have you ever persuaded.
from Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards
Define the following and provide an example of each. Simile - Metaphor – Personification – A figure of speech that makes an explicit comparison between.
The Great Awakening: “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
ROMANS Laying a solid foundation Romans 5:1- 11 Calvin Chiang A Faith Worth Believing.
Puritans ENG III.
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Jonathan Edwards (1703 – 1758) is best remembered for his masterful sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” In addition to his achievements as.
from Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Sinners In The Hands of an Angry God
Jonathan Edwards “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
Jonathan Edwards’s “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” PURITAN LITERATURE.
Resource Pages.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. For Edwards, science, reason, and observation of the universe confirmed for him the existence of God. A brilliant.
American Literature A- Unit two
SENTENCE STRUCTURE Rohan M. Shamika S. & Aaron K..
From Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God Jonathan Edwards.
“Sinners in the Hands of An Angry God” By Jonathan Edwards.
Jonathan Edwards Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God Kush Singh, Sapan Shah, Ishaaaan Vachhani, Nikhil Jain.
Am Lit: Do Now 9/16/14 Think about a time you tried to change someone’s mind. Did you use a gentle approach, scare tactics, or something in between? Have.
 It is easy for God to send evil people (his enemies) to Hell.
Are people basically GOOD?. Jonathan Edwards Believed in “Predestination”: one’s salvation or damnation was decided by God at the beginning of time Also.
 Born in East Windsor, CT  As the only grandson, he was the chosen heir of Rev. Solomon Stoddard  Admitted to Yale at 13  Married in 1727.
Between Heaven and Hell: The Puritan Tradition
Sinners in the Hands of an angry god Sept Bellwork Define imagery in your own words. How does Edwards us imagery to increase the authority of his.
Reading Log Notes---Jonathan Edwards from “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Literary Terms: Parallelism {parallel structure} --repetition of words.
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Sermon by Jonathan Edwards Background: Text: Sermon by Jonathan Edwards Background: Text:
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” By: Jonathan Edwards Standards: (ELAALRL 1,2,3,4,5,LAALRC4)
Weekly Objectives Analyze an 18 th -century sermon Analyze an 18 th -century sermon Appreciate author’s use of persuasive writing Appreciate author’s use.
Sinners Review. How does Edwards portray God? How is this different than Bradstreet’s portrayal of God? God is often a vengeful, angry God. Bradstreet.
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God Alex, Trenton, Jackson, Zoe, AJ, & Cristina.
Jonathan Edwards. Edward’s sermon begins with a thesis – God is all- powerful and keeps you from harm He attempts to persuade his congregation through.
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Sinners in the hands of an angry god
Historical Objective Relate Puritan beliefs to nature of work. Identify role of individual in 1700’s Literature Objective Persuasive Writing Figurative.
TODAY’S NEWS  discuss “sinners in the hands of an angry god” – do graff analysis and response - Glossary  collect “allegory of the cave”  watch.
Welcome to American Literature Warmup: What do you expect a sermon titled “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” to be like?
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD
Jonathan Edwards. The Great Awakening  What historians call “the first Great Awakening” can best be described as a revitalization of religious piety.
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD October 21. Do Now Think about a time you tried to change someone’s mind. Did you use a gentle approach, scare tactics,
Tenets of Puritanism Original Sin – Man is evil and must be controlled Asceticism – Man must lead a life of self-denial and self-evaluation Theocracy –
You need:  Assertion  Embedded Evidence  Analysis/Commentary (2-3 Sentences)  Embedded Evidence  Analysis Commentary (2-3 Sentences)  Transition.
Objectives: Students will 1. make a personal connection to the theme of The Crucible via an in-class “witch hunt”, 2. discuss significant imagery details.
From Colony to Country: Literature in the Puritan Tradition.
Rhetorical language in Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD By: Jonathan Edwards.
Create a folder on your desktop and name it “American Literature.” Go to Click “American.
Analyzing Edwards “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
Introduction to the Puritans and their Literature.
Rhetorical Analysis of from “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
WRITING A CTC EDWARDS: “SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD”
from Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Jonathan Edwards “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
Do Now Think about a time you tried to change someone’s mind. Did you use a gentle approach, scare tactics, or something in between? Have you ever persuaded.
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
“sinners in the hands of an angry god” Jonathan Edwards
Study for vocab.
Based on what we’ve just discussed…
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
Jonathan Edwards “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”
American Literature.
From Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
What is CQC?? CLAIM/CONTEXT– make your point, introduce your quote
Beginning the sermon through images and text Mrs. Knighten-Miller
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards
For your journal entry today, write a brief summary of this text.
Quick Write For each of the following slides write your thoughts/reactions to the image or words you see.
Presentation transcript:

“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Thinking Critically Exercise Question #4 Mel-Con Paragraph Writing Strategy M: Edwards’s sermons persuaded people to change their lives for a number of reasons. E: For example, Edwards convinced many of God’s power by stating God could “cast his enemies down to hell” which was a “pit prepared” with God holding sinners over it “much as one holds a spider”. L: These horrifying images created a sense of fear and powerlessness in his audience. Con: With Christ as their only salvation, many in his audience altered their way of living.

“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Thinking Critically Exercise Question #5 Mel-Con Paragraph Writing Strategy M: The people who belonged to Edwards’s congregation believed that human beings are inherently evil and can only escape hell through God’s grace, not by anything they can do themselves. E: One can see this clearly when Edwards offers God’s grace only through a “door of mercy wide open” and by “rejoicing in hope of the glory of God”. L: Hope for mercy from God, not actions, are the only chance for salvation. Con: With the belief that they were evil beings only spared by God, Edwards’s audience was left feeling powerless.

“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Thinking Critically Exercise Questions #6 Mel-Con Paragraph Writing Strategy M: In this sermon, human beings are presented as powerless to control their own lives; God is presented as powerful and threatening. E: With rhetoric such as “the God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider” this becomes clear. L: By using this simile and imagery to explain the relationship between God and man, Edwards’s sermon paints a grim picture of existence for mankind. Con: Overall, Edwards’s sermon offers hope for sinners from the perils of hell only because of God’s grace.

JOURNAL # 1 If you were writing a sermon today that aimed at trying to persuade an audience about the existence of God, what would have to be addressed in your sermon? Why? Think about the likes and dislikes of everyday Americans. 100 words