Experimental Areas Controls Review  AB/CO Viewpoint Vito Baggiolini (on behalf of the CESAR team and several people in CO)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BE/CO Changes in LS1 to the Software Development Infrastructure and Widely Used Libraries Chris Roderick, Greg Kruk, Katarina Sigerud, Luigi Gallerani,
Advertisements

WG on possible controls restructuring 1 Controls activities of the AB equipment groups A. Butterworth E. Carlier, R. Losito, A. Masi, JJ. Gras, Q. King.
Supervision of Production Computers in ALICE Peter Chochula for the ALICE DCS team.
FESA Vs 2.0 AB/CO TC - 12 Feb July 2004 FECOMSA FESA2 2.0β.
LabVIEW Basic I with RADE introduction A. Raimondo (EN/ICE)
Industrial Control Engineering Industrial Controls in the Injectors: "You (will) know that they are here" Hervé Milcent On behalf of EN/ICE IEFC workshop.
Isabelle Laugier, AT/VAC/ICM Section February 7 th 2008.
Overview of Data Management solutions for the Control and Operation of the CERN Accelerators Database Futures Workshop, CERN June 2011 Zory Zaharieva,
Rapid Application Development Environment based on LabVIEW A. Raimondo (AB/CO) ATC/ABOC Days, January 2008.
controls Middleware – OVERVIEW & architecture 26th June 2013
Wojciech Sliwinski for BE-CO group Special thanks to: E.Hatziangeli, K.Sigerud, P.Charrue, V.Baggiolini, M.Sobczak, M.Arruat, F.Ehm LHC Beam Commissioning.
E. Hatziangeli – LHC Beam Commissioning meeting - 17th March 2009.
Suzanne Gysin1 Software for the LHC Types of Software Current Prototyping Architecture Ideas Requirements Revisited WBS considerations.
Pierre Charrue – BE/CO.  Preamble  The LHC Controls Infrastructure  External Dependencies  Redundancies  Control Room Power Loss  Conclusion 6 March.
Controls renovation WorkshopFE Software 1 Front-end software C.H.Sicard.
W. Sliwinski – eLTC – 7March08 1 LSA & Safety – Integration of RBAC and MCS in the LHC control system.
06/05/2004AB/CO TC RF controls issues Brief overview & status Requested from AB/CO Hardware, Timing, VME/FESA for LEIR, SPS, LHC Controls for LHC RF Power.
JCOP Workshop September 8th 1999 H.J.Burckhart 1 ATLAS DCS Organization of Detector and Controls Architecture Connection to DAQ Front-end System Practical.
14 December 2006 CO3 Data Management section Controls group Accelerator & Beams department Limits of Responsibilities in our Domains of Activities Ronny.
Proposal for Decisions 2007 Work Baseline M.Jonker for the Cocost* * Collimation Controls Steering Team.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
FAIR Accelerator Controls Strategy
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 LEIR Application Project LEIR Applications is a separate project.
Draft for approval in ABMB, 4 Feb 08 Andy Butterworth Claude-Henri Sicard for the Controls Coordination Committee (CO3) 22 Jan 20081ATC/ABOC Days.
Status Report – Injection Working Group Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities after long stops.
Controls for RF equipment AB/CO Review 22/9/2005 Andy Butterworth on behalf of AB/RF.
SPS re-commissioning with beam K. Cornelis PS-SPS days.
Online Software 8-July-98 Commissioning Working Group DØ Workshop S. Fuess Objective: Define for you, the customers of the Online system, the products.
LHC BLM Software revue June BLM Software components Handled by BI Software section –Expert GUIs  Not discussed today –Real-Time software  Topic.
Wojciech Sliwinski BE/CO for the RBAC team 25/04/2013.
BP & RS: BIS & SLP for AB/CO Review, 23 h Sept Realisation of the interlocking between SPS, LHC and CNGS and open issues Beam Interlock Systems.
K.Hanke – PS/SPS Days – 19/01/06 K.Hanke - PS/SPS Days 19/01/06 Recommissioning Linac2/PSB/ISOLDE from CCC  remote operation from CCC  upgrades & changes.
RBAC Content: LHC Operational Mode Piquet Roles RBAC Strict LHC Operational mode and CMW Acknowledgements: Pierre C., Wojtek S., Stephen P., Lars J., Verena.
(1) CESAR the Cern Ea SoftwAre Renovation Project Vito Baggiolini, SL/CO.
Architectural issues M.Jonker. Things to do MD was a success. Basic architecture is satisfactory. This is not the end: Understanding of actual technical.
Nominal Workflow = Outline of my Talk Monitor Installation HWC Procedure Documentation Manufacturing & Test Folder Instantiation – NC Handling Getting.
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Shot by Shot Logging Status Report of Ti8 Tests AB/CO Technical.
Session 7: I-LHC Organization: Chamonix Summary Session7; Oliver Brüning 1 -session organized in collaboration with D. Manglunki and all speakers.
Isabelle Laugier, AT/VAC/ICM Section May 6 th 2008 LHC Vacuum Control system.
Strategy to achieve smooth upgrades during operations Vito Baggiolini BE/CO 1.
26 Jan 06Marine Pace - AB/CO1 LEIR Controls : Gain of Experience for the Running-in of LHC Marine Pace on behalf of AB/CO and LSA.
BE-CO review Looking back at LS1 CERN /12/2015 Delphine Jacquet BE/OP/LHC Denis Cotte BE/OP/PS 1.
The Software for the CERN Detector Safety System G. Morpurgo, R. B. Flockhart and S. Lüders, CERN IT/CO.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
Issues concerning Device Access (JAPC / CMW / FESA) With input from: A.Butterworth, E.Carlier, A. Guerrero, JJ. Gras, St. Page, S. Deghaye, R. Gorbonosov,
PM System Architecture Front-Ends, Servers, Triggering Ingredients Workshop on LHC Post Mortem Session 1 – What exists - PM System, Logging, Alarms Robin.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
DIAMON Project Project Definition and Specifications Based on input from the AB/CO Section leaders.
22/09/05CO Review: FESA IssuesJJ Gras [AB-BDI-SW] 1/18 AB-CO Review FESA  The Functionality  The Tools  The Documentation  The Support  Maintenance.
Standby Services or Reliance on Experts for Accelerator control? Claude-Henri Sicard AB/CO ATC/ABOC Days 2007.
Status of the AWAKE Control System Edda Gschwendtner, Janet Schmidt, Marine Gourber-Pace, Roman Gorbonosov, Peter Sherwood AWAKE Technical Board, 27 January.
LS1 – View from Applications BE-CO LS1 review – 1 December 2015 Greg Kruk on behalf of the Applications section.
Linac2 and Linac3 D. Küchler for the linac team. Planning first preparative meeting for the start-up of Linac2 in June 2013 –this early kick-off useful.
CO Timing Review: The OP Requirements R. Steerenberg on behalf of AB/OP Prepared with the help of: M. Albert, R. Alemany-Fernandez, T. Eriksson, G. Metral,
TE/TM 30 th March - 0v1 CERN MPP SMP 3v0 - Introduction 3 *fast *safe *reliable *available generates flags & values.
External Data and DIP Oliver Holme 18 th January 2008.
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Controls for LEIR AB/CO Technical Committee - 18 th March 2004.
Archives/References for SPS Faraday Cage Timing Vito Baggiolini AB/CO after discussions with M. Arruat, J.-C. Bau, R. Billen, A. Butterworth, F. Follin,
TCR Remote Monitoring for the LHC Technical Infrastructure 6th ST Workshop, Thoiry 2003U. Epting, M.C. Morodo Testa, S. Poulsen1 TCR Remote Monitoring.
LHC RT feedback(s) CO Viewpoint Kris Kostro, AB/CO/FC.
AB-CO Exploitation 2006 & Beyond Presented at AB/CO Review 20Sept05 C.H.Sicard (based on the work of Exploitation WG)
1 Cryogenics Instrumentation & Controls Commissioning for the LHC AB/CO viewpoint Enrique Blanco AB/CO IS.
H2LC The Hitchhiker's guide to LSA Core Rule #1 Don’t panic.
AB-CO Review Controls for BDI
SPS Applications Software issues - startup in 2006 and legacy problems
R. Denz, A. Gomez Alonso, AT-MEL-PM
Post-mortem of Experience with LEIR Controls
Instrumentation for SPS 2006 restart
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Areas Controls Review  AB/CO Viewpoint Vito Baggiolini (on behalf of the CESAR team and several people in CO)

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Color Code + Conventions Green: already done or no problems anticipated Orange: not yet 100% clear (potential non-critical problem) Red:critical problem, to be addressed urgently

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Standard Controls (“StdCtrls”) CESAR uses Standard CO controls where possible –JAPC: Communication services to the equipment on top of CMW –Middle tier services (data concentrators & elaborators, APIs,..) –On-line monitoring system for Logging, Fixed Displays, Statistics, SDDS –LHC Logging –Laser Alarm system –GUI building components (Java Dataviewer, Frame, beans, knobs, working sets,...) –Console manager –FESA, CMW, CMW-to-SL_Equip gateway Responsibilities: –CO: tools / services / components + support –Users (CESAR, BDI, OP): usage, configuration

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO CESAR Project (Applications EA + CNGS) State at the end of Run 2004 –Successfully tested in PCR, operationally used in West Area –Some functionality missing –Performance bottleneck –Need to adapt some parts to new “standard controls” Ongoing Work 2005/06 –Address the above points –Adapt to external changes (migration to FESA, new timing, new access system, new standard controls services, …) Resources –FTEs in 2004: 1.7 (CO/AP), 0.5 (ATB/EA), 3 2 nd Jobs (OP/SPS) –FTEs in 2005: 1.1 (CO/AP), 0.3 (ATB/EA) –FTEs in 2006 (until startup): 2 (CO/AP), 0.3 (ATB/EA), ?? (OP/SPS) CESAR Team is currently working on LEIR…

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Equipment control affecting CO: ItemEqptsH/WFESWRole CODate New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XSCI,FISC, XDWC, XION,SCAL 2005FESACesar adaptations Dry r.1 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XCET 4Q05FESANew GUIDry r.2 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XEMC 1Q06FESANew GUI start-up VME-based CEDAR XCED mid-06FESANew GUI3Q06 MAGEA *) Power supplies OKFESA?Cesar Adapt Dry r.2 VME EQ-bus master Continue till 2007 with existing SL-Equip/Nodal software Eqpt Bus based HW port to FESA XWCA, Position contr (colls, tax, …) as nowFESACesar adaptations 1Q07 In/out motorisations e.g. ABSMIO okFESA PLC FE softw, Upgr GUI Dry r.1 Other PLC-based items e.g. IGOR okFESA PLC FE softw, New GUI Dry r.1 Access control via PLCBetween CO and TSDry r.1 *) Decision in October 2005 For reference Lau’s Slide

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Equipment control affecting CO: ItemEqptsH/WFESWRole CODate New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XSCI,FISC, XDWC, XION,SCAL 2005FESACesar adaptations Dry r.1 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XCET 4Q05FESANew GUIDry r.2 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XEMC 1Q06FESANew GUI start-up VME-based CEDAR XCED mid-06FESANew GUI3Q06 MAGEA *) Power supplies OKFESA?Cesar Adapt Dry r.2 VME EQ-bus master Continue till 2007 with existing SL-Equip/Nodal software Eqpt Bus based HW port to FESA XWCA, Position contr (colls, tax, …) as nowFESACesar adaptations 1Q07 In/out motorisations e.g. ABSMIO okFESA PLC FE softw, Upgr GUI Dry r.1 Other PLC-based items e.g. IGOR okFESA PLC FE softw, New GUI Dry r.1 Access control via PLCBetween CO and TSDry r.1 *) Decision in October 2005 For reference CO implication well-defined and agreed on: Equipment converted to FESA (or not yet supported by CESAR) –Add functionality or adapt CESAR system  CESAR team –FESA development  Equipment groups –Exception: PLCs: First FESA implementation  CO/FC, (maintenance  BDI/SW) CO + CESAR do not implement specialist applications –To be done with standard controls solutions  Equipment Groups –Tools + Support  CO/AP –BUT: Minor changes in CESAR GUIs where useful  CESAR

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP Lau’s Slide

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP Agreed on.

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP  Nodal Support  CO/IN will support Nodal language on HP-UX through 2006 (But no piquet-style support can be provided)  Compatibility with new timing needs to be confirmed  CMW-to-SL_Equip Gateway  CMW gateway now deployed on each VME FE, “reliability should be OK”.  If MAGEA is not ported to VME/FESA, CO/FC needs to invest work on GW. (CMW gateway cannot be deployed on old PC-486 front-ends)

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP Agreed on. (StdCtrls)

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Applications for beam line operators,users:  Jython integration  Access control application program  Reading of Radiation monitors  Settings management  Surveillance, alarms, fixed displays, teletext  Logging (surveillance, measurements, set-actions)  Printing of GUIs  User documentation & Training for operators and EA+BDI experts  Long term maintenance and adaptation to new requirements (apart from configuration – done by ATB-EA) Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential Lau’s Slide

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Applications for beam line operators,users:  Jython integration  new StdCtrls (CESAR, CO/AP, CO/IN )  Access control application program  adaptations (CESAR)  Reading of Radiation monitors  CESAR (StdCtrls, CO/AP)  Settings management CESAR (functionality as in old Nodal System), (additional requirements under discussion)  CESAR  Surveillance  CESAR (StdCtrls, CO/AP), alarms  LASER, fixed displays  CESAR, (StdCtrls, CO/AP), teletext old system (CO/IN)  Logging (surveillance, measurements  LHC logging (StdCtrls, CO/DM), set-actions CESAR )  Printing of GUIs  StdCtrls ( CO/IN) (OK for experimental physicists?)  User documentation & Training for operators and EA+BDI experts  CESAR  Long term maintenance and adaptation to new requirements (apart from configuration – done by ATB-EA) Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Applications for beam line operators,users:  Jython integration  Access control application program  Reading of Radiation monitors  Settings management  Surveillance, alarms, fixed displays, teletext  Logging (surveillance, measurements, actions)  Printing of GUIs  User documentation & Training for operators and EA+BDI experts  Long term maintenance and adaptation to new requirements (apart from configuration – done by ATB-EA) Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential Long term maintenance responsibility CESAR Control System Core  maintained and extended by CO/AP Technology upgrades  mostly CO (some details to be discussed) GUIs  maintained and extended by OP/SPS, ATB/EA Configuration data (XML, Databases)  ATB/EA

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Other CO responsibilities:  Long term maintenance & support for all software under CO responsibility  Timing with 5 events, that should ‘always’ be present (also for dry runs), including VME hardware, software and support  Tools to populate & maintain configuration database (AB/CO/DM)  Transmission of beam line status to the users (“STDBLK, NSTDBLK”)  Provides and supports PC’s for CCC and areas  Console manager Lau’s Slide

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Other CO responsibilities:  Long term maintenance & support for all software under CO responsibility  Timing with 5 events, that should ‘always’ be present (also for dry runs), including VME hardware, software and support  discussed & agreed (CO/HT)  Tools to populate & maintain configuration database (AB/CO/DM)  Now implemented with MS Access, to be ported to standard technology  Transmission of beam line status to the users (“STDBLK, NSTDBLK”)  online monitoring + SDDS (StdCtrls, CO/AP), small additions to CESAR  Provides and supports PC’s for CCC and areas  StdCtrls, CO/IN  Console manager  StdCtrls, CO/AP

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO EAST Area: Needs for 2006 and beyond: All the needs we have for the North Area, apart from the upgrade related items. This includes:  Maintenance of existing software  Timing  PC configuration and maintenance in EBCR  Control consoles in CCC However, the CCC is far from the East Area, the lack of remote control becomes serious handicap. Instrumentation is very limited At the EA day a controls upgrade project will be presented for 2007 To be evaluated when the request comes.  CO priorities? Lau’s Slide

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO CNGS Equipment Control: Equipment#Responsibility of CO TBID1Read, log & display, fit, orthogonal scans with magnets upstream the target ‘BLM’ (used as ion chambers) 2-4Read, log & display Horn/Reflector1/1On, Off, Reset, change current by max. 10%, change polarity, grounding; switch valve (water cooling); Read, log & display water cooling system parameters Helium Tube2Read, log & display of Oxymeter Shutter1Read, log & display position, move shutter for Access Decay Tube1Read, log & display pressure Muon Monitors 2 x ( fixed +1 motorized ) Read, log & display intensity in each monitor, display profiles; set or scan position of motorized monitor Temp. Probes Read, log & display Timing + data interchangeGPS time stamp for every extraction, data interchange between CERN and Gran Sasso Alarms, Interlocks, ACCESS For reference Lau’s Slide

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO CNGS Equipment Control: Equipment#Responsibility of CO TBID1Read, log & display, fit, orthogonal scans with magnets upstream the target ‘BLM’ (used as ion chambers) 2-4Read, log & display Horn/Reflector1/1On, Off, Reset, change current by max. 10%, change polarity, grounding; switch valve (water cooling); Read, log & display water cooling system parameters Helium Tube2Read, log & display of Oxymeter Shutter1Read, log & display position, move shutter for Access Decay Tube1Read, log & display pressure Muon Monitors 2 x ( fixed +1 motorized ) Read, log & display intensity in each monitor, display profiles; set or scan position of motorized monitor Temp. Probes Read, log & display Timing + data interchangeGPS time stamp for every extraction, data interchange between CERN and Gran Sasso Alarms, Interlocks, ACCESS For reference [Detailed analysis of requirements still ongoing] Standard Controls Requirements Read/Control  WorkingSets/Knobs (StdCtrls, CO/AP) Display  Fixed Displays (StdCtrls, CO/AP) Logging  Monitoring Service (StdCtrls, CO/AP), LHC Logging (StdCtrls, CO/DM) Profile display  Emittance/Profiles project (OP/SPS)? Scan  CESAR Alarms  LASER, Interlocks  SPS/LHC interlocks, Access  SPS/LHC access Horn/Reflector expert control with UNICOS Special Requirements Data exchange between CERN and Gran Sasso  LHC Logging? (To be analyzed)

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Conclusions Requirements for SPS-EA clear and well managed –Good and solid collaboration –No worries for Control System Core –We need “our” CESAR GUI developers (from OP/SPS) in 1 st half 2006 for new equipment and missing functionality + CNGS work –Long-term maintenance clear, details to be defined East Area for 2007 not yet taken into account CNGS (secondary beamline) –Good and promising collaboration –Overall requirements understood (detailed analysis ongoing) –No problems anticipated, mostly standard controls If we get “our” GUI developers and if LEIR work stops end of 2005, we can handle Dry Runs, CNGS and SPS Operations in 2006.

AB/CO Review Vito Baggiolini AB/CO