Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2009 Ag Outlook and Management Seminars.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Advertisements

1 ACT AND ADAPT: CLIMATE CHANGE IN SCOTLAND Climate Change Division.
Carbon Credit Trading: Boom or Bust for Farmers & Ranchers? Soil & Water Conservation Society Fall Forum September 17, 2009 MISSOURI FARM BUREAU.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Presented to the Technical Society.
The Energy Bill, Biofuel Markets and the Implications for Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chesapeake College, Wye Mill, MD February 21, 2008 University.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Trade and Climate Change: International Perspective Mac Callaway, Ph.D UNEP-RISØ Center Technical University of Denmark CPA International.
Time for Action: Shaping Biofuel Production and Trade for the Common Good Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Scientific Symposium: Food and Fuel: Biofuels, Development,
What is cap and trade? What do legislative proposals currently in Congress say about it? Brent Sohngen Department of Agricultural, Environmental & Development.
Agriculture Industry Views on Climate Legislation and Markets David Miller Chief Science Officer AgraGate Climate Credits Corp & Director of Research Iowa.
Manitoba Hydro’s Emission Management Perspectives Bill Hamlin.
1 Status of and Outlook for Coal Supply and Demand in the U.S. Imagine West Virginia Spring 2010 Board of Governors Meeting April 13, 2010 Scott Sitzer.
EPA Offsets Experience and Analysis Bill Irving Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 28, 2009.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
Federal Policy Update Presented to Max Williamson June 17, 2010 M-AGG Policy Conference Washington, D.C. 1.
The Economic Perspective Economists are not concerned with whether it exists, but whether/what should be done about it. Even though climate change exists,
Overview of Carbon Markets and US Federal Proposals to Regulate GHGs American College of Construction Lawyers and Princeton University Joint Symposium.
Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Livestock.
LONG TERM ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PLAN STAFF RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS, ISSUES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN NOVEMBER 2004 Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission.
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
Cap & Trade. Cap & Trade (Cap) A cap commits a region or country to limits on greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and then reduces those limits over time.
Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte The Politics of Food Conference.
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Andy Engel and Andy Cook The Hamilton Consulting Group Hamilton-consulting.com.
Federal Climate Change Legislation – Charlotte Chamber September 22, 2009 Mike Stroben Director, EHS Policy.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
Department of Economics Trends & Issues in Agriculture 2009 Nationwide Agribusiness Annual Commercial Policyholder Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 20,
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
Presented at: Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food Agriculture and Greenhouse Gas/Climate Change Workshop Saskatoon December 11, 2000 Llewellyn Matthews and.
Delivering commercial insight to the global energy industry Wood MackenzieEnergy Natural Gas Markets Enter an Era of Unprecedented Uncertainty.
Reid Harvey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chief, Climate Economics Branch Climate Change Division 6 th Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum.
Agricultural input costs and uncertaintities LSU ANNUAL AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK CONFERENCE ALEXANDRIA, LA JANUARY 21, 2010 William H. Meyers
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Can Biofuels be Sustainable in an Unsustainable Agriculture? Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel Chad M. Hellwinckel American Chemical Society.
A Brave New World Cathy Woollums, SVP, Environmental and Chief Environmental Counsel NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting – June 2, 2014.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Department of Economics Crops and Climate Change Northwest Iowa Agronomy Group Holstein, Iowa December 15, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets.
El Gallo Hydroelectricity Project PDD Analysis
Department of Economics Cap & Trade Legislation: What’s Proposed and What Does It Mean Iowa Meeting of ASFMRA and RLI Ames, Iowa March 23, 2010 Chad Hart.
Agricultural Economics An Introduction to Markets for Ecosystem Services (Carbon Offsets) Jack Schieffer.
International Consultation on Pro-Poor Jatropha Development
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
USDA’s Inventory & Improvements Marci Baranski, PhD USDA Office of the Chief Economist Climate Change Program Office.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead Views from the U.S. Senate November 16, 2009 Hayden Milberg Senior Economist.
Department of Economics Crop Situation and Outlook Tri County Ag Marketing Club 2009 Grain Marketing Outlook Workshop Grundy Center, Iowa July 23, 2009.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy Prepared for: CEO Climate Change Task Force Meeting American Public Power Association Washington, D.C. December.
Biofuels, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability: Global Challenges and Opportunities Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Forum Tennessee Valley Unitarian.
 Cap and Trade Application: Global Warming 6. 2.
Department of Economics Policy Implications for Biofuels and Commodities Midwestern Legislative Conference Overland Park, Kansas August 9, 2009 Chad Hart.
The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard Melissa Powers Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School Portland, OR USA.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
1 UK Progress reducing emissions and preparing for climate change PPA Sustainability Summit, 8 October 2015 Adrian Gault, Chief Economist Committee on.
U.S. Mitigation Presentation Jonathan Pershing UNFCCC Pre-sessional Workshop Bangkok, Thailand April 2011.
1 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management An introduction Tim Holmes, P.E. Kenwood Energy Energy Consulting Services Kenwood Energy P.O.Box 692 Kenwood, CA
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2010 Iowa Turkey Federation Meetings.
Implications of Alternative Crop Yield Assumptions on Land Management, Commodity Markets, and GHG Emissions Projections Justin S. Baker, Ph.D.1 with B.A.
Jean-Mari Peltier Counselor to the Administrator on Agriculture Policy
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture
Carbon Offset Markets and Utah’s Opportunity
Presentation transcript:

Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2009 Ag Outlook and Management Seminars

Department of Economics Climate Change Source:

Department of Economics Climate Change Source: Congressional Budget Office

Department of Economics GHG Emission Rules Greenhouse gas rules are coming –Whether through legislation or regulation EPA has the authority to regulate GHGs –Via Clean Air Act However, Congress would like to set the rules –H.R. 2454, American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, Passed in U.S. House of Rep. on 6/26/09, –S. 1733, Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act Introduced 9/30/09, In committee (actually, six committees)

Department of Economics U.S. GHG Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics CO 2 Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics CH 4 Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics N 2 O Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics GHG Emission Categories Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics GHG Emissions by Sector Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics Agricultural GHG Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics GHG Emission Statistics Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:

Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: Congressional Research Service American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) Requires utilities to supply an increasing percentage of their demand from a combination of energy efficiency savings and renewable energy (6% in 2012, 9.5% in 2014, 13% in 2016, 16.5% in 2018, and 20% in ). Provides for issuing, trading, banking, retiring, and verifying renewable electricity credits. Establishes targets to cap and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, annually, so that GHG emissions from capped sources are reduced to 97% of 2005 levels by 2012, 83% by 2020, 58% by 2030, and 17% by 2050; and establish a federal GHG registry. Provides for trading, banking and borrowing, auctioning, selling, exchanging, transferring, holding, or retiring emission allowances.

Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: Craig Raysor, Gillon & Associates, PLLC Agriculture provisions in H.R Provides some exemptions from the GHG emission reduction requirements for agriculture and forestry Provides incentive-based approach to GHG emission reduction/capture Allows USDA to help establish eligible GHG offset practices and review of those practices Shifts question on indirect-land-use to an independent panel for study with EPA and USDA to review in the future Allows for a specific exemption for livestock (enteric fermentation from ruminant animals) from uncapped emissions guidelines

Department of Economics Lots of Analysis The EPA has funded the development of several models that are capable of examining the impact of this bill and other similar bills The environmental economists who worked on these models are very well respected and the work is sound However, the only certainty in the bill is the limit on carbon, everything else is assumption driven Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Key Assumptions The US economy was already on a slow growth path for energy consumption, the analysis assumes that this continues Coal fired plants largely shut down and are replaced by nuclear Enormous reliance on international and domestic offsets If we cannot build the large number of nuclear plants or find the international offsets, then the price of carbon will increase at about twice the reported rate Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Energy Sources Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics GHG Emissions & Abatements Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics Domestic Offsets Implementing regulations not yet written Uncertainty about how the offsets would work in agriculture, particularly for conservation tillage, but the intention is clearly to use these offsets as a way to stimulate agricultural incomes Consideration of leakage is prohibited pending a study Heavy reliance on the growth of trees on pasture and crop land Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Domestic Offsets Source: EPA Analysis of Waxman-Markey, April 20, 2009

Department of Economics Domestic Offsets Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Shifting Land Patterns Source: EPA, “Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture”, Nov. 2005

Department of Economics International Offsets Must be a developing country that is a member of a unilateral or multilateral emissions reduction agreement with the United States Must have the technical capacity to monitor, measure, report and verify forest carbon fluxes resulting from deforestation Must have the capacity to reduce emissions from deforestation, including strong forest governance The international offset project itself must be shown to result in permanent verifiable reductions that are net of any leakage measures Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Allowances Source: Congressional Research Service, June

Department of Economics Carbon Prices Increase Over Time Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics Prices Are Sensitive to Offsets Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics Energy Price Paths Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics Impacts on an Average Household Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics Impacts on Tillage Practices Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

Department of Economics Comparison of Results Allowance Price Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Assumptions Impact Results Fall 2007 CARD Data (Baseline) Fall 2008 CARD Data (Baseline) Model usedSearchinger et al.GreenAgSiM US Deforestation Yes No LCA ModelGREET BESS Agricultural Production No YesNoYes Ethanol increase (mill. liters) 55,950 29,859 Difference in Area Harvested (thou. ha.) 10,817 6,076 (1,281) 6,076 Difference in Emissions (million tons of CO 2 eq) 3,801 4,179 3,2181,4251, ,514 Payback Period (years) Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: USDA, Office of Chief Economist “A Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of HR2454 on U.S. Agriculture”

Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: FAPRI-Missouri, Report #05-09

Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: Ben Lieberman, Heritage Foundation, July 21, 2009 “Since farming is energy intensive, it will be hit hard by Waxman-Markey's energy price hikes. In addition to higher diesel fuel and electricity costs, prices for natural gas-derived fertilizers and other chemicals will also rise. Everything else affecting agriculture, from the cost of constructing farm buildings to the price of tractors and other farm equipment, will also go up. Consequently, farm profits are expected to decline by 28 percent in 2012 and will be an average 57 percent lower from ”

Department of Economics Results from a Budget Based Analysis USDA and FAPRI calculated the direct impact on corn production costs at 6% to 8% due to higher energy and fertilizer costs, actual increase could be twice this amount In addition, livestock producers will face higher utility costs Total for these two impacts is about $3.50 per hog by 2030 Benefits of about $1.50 per hog for fertilizer displacement and/or manure offsets Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

Department of Economics Concluding Thoughts The potential for cropland conversion points to higher crop prices and feed costs Crop prices will likely track carbon prices Cropland conversion will benefit landowners through higher rents Agriculture will experience the benefits and the costs of climate change legislation

Department of Economics Thank you for your time! Any questions?