Skokomish River Fecal Coliform TMDL Attainment Monitoring in Washington State George Onwumere, Ph.D. 2006 National Monitoring Conference, San Jose, California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(add state here) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

Fecal Coliform “Hot Spots” Monitoring Stacie Greco Senior Environmental Specialist Alachua County Environmental Protection Department.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Urban Rivers and Upper Bay Presented by: Jennifer Cragan Environmental Scientist.
Union County Conservation District Rain Barrel Workshop.
Whatcom CWP Partnership Whatcom County Planning and Development Whatcom County Health Whatcom County Public Works Whatcom Conservation District Nooksack.
1 United Water Delaware “Cut the Crypto” Watershed Control Plan 1 Nancy Trushell, P.E. Director of Engineering United Water Delaware.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Status Report on Catoctin Creek - A Scenic River Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch.
Butte Creek Sources to Chico T. E. Chapman CE 296B Assignment #4.
Charlotte, VT Justin Bezold Sarah Ford Ryan Salem.
Catoctin TMDL Project Proposal for New Initiatives to Loudoun Watershed Management Stakeholders Steering Committee Loudoun Watershed Watch Data Compilation.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Economics of Riparian Restoration on Western Washington Farms June 29, 2004 American Water Resource Association Olympic Valley, CA Carolyn J. Henri, PhD.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
The Cahaba River Watershed Nutrient TMDL 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA 2006 National Monitoring Conference San Jose, CA Presented by:
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
Bear River Cathy Lee CE 296 B Spring 1998 Assignment #4.
Skagit County Natural Resource Stewardship Program.
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section November 28, 2012.
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Samish Watershed Flying for Fish Habitat Tours 2009.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
Water Quality Partnership Meeting LOTT Alliance Regional Service Center November 18, 2010 Rob Duff and Josh Baldi Washington State Department of Ecology.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
Watershed Restoration Overview for the Klamath Basin.
San Francisco Estuary Project. Partners & Organizational Structure THE BAY INSTITUTE Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge.
1 United Water Delaware “Cut the Crypto” Watershed Control Plan 1 Nancy Trushell, P.E. Director of Engineering United Water Delaware.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
Adem.alabama.gov Tombigbee Basin Up-date July 29, 2015 Mark Sport.
 Temperature  Fecal Coliform Bacteria  Turbidity.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
Marin County: Boyle Park, Mill Valley. Overview Richardson Bay TMDL Boyle Park restoration Outreach and community involvement Watershed health monitoring.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Sustainable Vineyard Practices Replanting Strategies & Economics December 13, 2012 Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements Vineyards in Napa.
Laurie Carroll Sorabella Inspiring a Community to Restore a River.
Andrew Lyon and Daniel Storm Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDL for Four Mile Run
Sources, Transport, Fate Treatment Methodologies BMP Case Studies
Mulberry River Watershed
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference.
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Southfork of the Spring River Sub-Watershed Project ( )
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Presentation transcript:

Skokomish River Fecal Coliform TMDL Attainment Monitoring in Washington State George Onwumere, Ph.D National Monitoring Conference, San Jose, California

Introduction/Background Washington State is located in the Pacific Northwest and is bounded by: –British Columbia, Canada, to the north –Idaho to the east –Oregon to the south, and –Pacific ocean to the west

Introduction/Background The state has a: Population– 5.9 million people Land Area– 66,582 mi 2 (176,000 Km 2 ) Average annual Temp °C (40 °F) East °C (51 °F) Coast Average annual Rainfall - 6 in (152 mm) East in (4,064 mm) Coast

Introduction/Background (cont’d) Based on the 1998 Section 303(d) listing, Washington State has 1,316 impairments:  1,110 in stream/creek segments  141 in estuaries  65 in lakes/reservoirs/ponds

Introduction/Background (cont’d) As of 2006, the number of EPA- approved TMDLs in Washington State TMDLs. Close to 45% of Washington State approved TMDL is for FC bacteria. The state FC Bacteria water quality standard has 2 parts: – A geometric mean value (GMV) number – A 90 th percentile number Skokomish River is a Class AA waterbody with – Associated geometric mean value of 50 colony- forming units per 100 mL (cfu/100mL) – Not more than 10% of the samples used to calculate the GMV should exceed 100 cfu/100mL

Skokomish River Basin Skokomish River is located in Mason County about 30 miles northwest of Olympia. The river drains a basin of about 247 square miles before discharging into Annas Bay. Annas Bay, a rich shellfish harvest area, is located in southern Hood Canal near Potlatch. Annual rainfall – Between 75 and 230 inches.

Land Use Activities Rural residential dwellings Commercial and non-commercial agricultural activities Scattered pasture lands Forestry in the upper watershed (i.e. private land owners and within the Olympic National Forest).

Beneficial Uses of the river Fishing Primary contact recreation e.g. swimming and boating. Habitat for wildlife Shellfish resource near the mouth Scuba diving near the mouth

Water Quality Problem – FC Bacteria Impacts to humans include: –Gastrointestinal distress –Respiratory infection –Symptoms such as skin irritations (from contact recreation) Impacts to the Environment include: –Commercial shellfish beach closures –Recreational shellfish beach closures

Nonpoint Sources of FC Bacteria Agriculture Humans e.g. failing septic tank systems Recreation (uncontrolled human waste) Domestic animals Wild animals No point sources

FC Bacteria TMDL TMDL was developed and approved in TMDL target limits were set for 4 compliance points: SiteStudy GMV Target FC GMV Study 90 th Percentile Target 90 th Percentile Percent Reduction Hwy 106 Bridge* % Purdy Creek % Weaver Creek % Ten Acre Creek % Middle Skokomish **Ref. * Furthest downstream point of attainment ** Reference site

Best Management Practices Implemented ActivityAction Tree planting32,000 trees planted ($1.50 per tree) Fencing24,000 ft of riparian fencing installed ($3.50/ft) Land enrolment62 acres of land enrolled with a buffer with of 150ft Cascade land acquisition 175 acres of land acquired that is adjacent to prime fish habitat (total cost $350,000.00) On-site-septic systems repair Dept. of Fish & Wildlife inspected and repaired all the fish hatchery septic systems

Best Management Practices Implemented ActivityAction Port-a-potties installation Local farm stores installed port-a-potties during fishing seasons No trespassing signsPosted no trespassing signs resulting in a 40% reduction in trash (total cost $200.00) Waste management flyers distribution Put flyers on fishermen’s windshields on proper waste management and nearby toilet facilities On-going educational outreach Technical assistance on proper manure handling and storage

Monitoring Sites & Parameter Four compliance sites and one reference site established. Ecology sampled monthly for 2 months and quarterly after 2 months. Mason Conservation District (MCD) sampled bi-weekly. Parameter sampled – Fecal coliform.

Results SiteStudy GMV Target FC GMV Target Percent Reduction Current Ecology GMV Current Ecology Percent Reduction Current MCD GMV Current MCD Percent Reduction Hwy 106 Bridge* %6.2 (12) 81%12.0 (27) 63% Purdy Creek %8.3 (11) 85%13.4 (26) 75% Weaver Creek %15.2 (12) 72%14.0 (27) 75% Ten Acre Creek %11.7 (12) 66%12.0 (26) 65% Middle Skokomish ** Ref. 3.7 (11) Ref.3.6 (24) Ref. * Furthest downstream point of attainment ** Reference site Number in bracket – Sample size (n)

Results (Cont’d) Comparison of Geometric Mean Values at TMDL Compliance Sites

Results (Cont’d) Comparison of 90th Percentile Values at TMDL Compliance Sites

Results (Cont’d) Fecal Coliform Bacteria Percent Reductions at TMDL Compliance Sites

Conclusions FC bacteria concentrations comply with TMDL target limits for all the compliance sites. FC bacteria concentrations comply with both parts of the state water quality criterion GMV of 50 cfu/100mL Not more than ten percent of the samples used to calculate the GMV should exceed 100 cfu/100mL, except for Weaver Creek Implementation of best management practices responsible for the observed water quality improvements.

Recommendation Continue the implementation of Watershed Best Management Practices to control nonpoint sources of water pollution.

Resource Protection & Recreation

Questions?? Washington State Department of Ecology TMDL Information. TMDL Website: TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring Website: