SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
PATHWISE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION SYSTEM
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership Training Module 2
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Teacher Observation Training
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Observation Training
The Framework for Teaching: Digging Deeper August 27, 2012 Bernie Cleland & Duffy Miller
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
NYSED August 4-5, 2011 Teaching & Learning Solutions teachinglearningsolutions.com Albert (Duffy) Miller Ed.D Bernadette (Bernie) Cleland, Ed.D Teacher.
November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
How can we collect relevant evidence of student understanding?
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
JOHN F. SHEEHAN, PH.D. EVIDENCE-BASED OBSERVATIONS.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Evaluating the 21st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Pitt County Schools January, 2012.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Panorama High School Professional Development Teaching and Learning Framework January 10, 2013 California Standard for the Teaching Profession Engaging.
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
CCSS & NYS Teaching Standards ELA Training Liane Benedict Oswego County BOCES Sign in & put on a name tag Sit by grade level No more than 2 people at a.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Checking for Understanding: Are You With Me So Far? Presented by Peer Observers Karen Buelow Jennifer Fuerman Marianne Kenney Joe Ladow.
November 29, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 3 Developed by Teaching.
Math and Science Institute Exploring Physical Science Today’s Agenda Review of homework and participant sharing of their ENGAGE components of 5E. Engage.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Mathematics Professional Development Senior School Teachers Session 1: Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
Effective Lesson Planning EnhanceEdu. Agenda  Objectives  Lesson Plan  Purpose  Elements of a good lesson plan  Bloom’s Taxonomy – it’s relevance.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Agenda Present overview of the structure and purpose of the Framework for Teaching. Identify characteristics and behaviors of excellent teachers and align.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
A brief introduction to
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
TEAM TRAINING.  Two announced  Two unannounced NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Pitt County Schools January, 2012.
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
The Year of Core Instruction
Classroom-based assessment to promote equity
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
The Framework for Teaching
Setting Instructional Outcomes
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Cooperating Teacher Training
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Lesson Planning and Pacing with Laptops
Presentation transcript:

SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Workshop Objectives: SESSION 2 Participants will: Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Priorities of the Rubrics Cognitive Engagement Constructivist Learning 21 st Century Skills The LEARNING is done by the LEARNER ! Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Priorities of the Rubrics TASK: For your assigned priority, work with your partner/group to come up with: A brief definition A few “look-fors” for observing this priority in the classroom ( you can pick a grade &/or subject) If possible, an example you have observed in a classroom  PRIORITIES = Cognitive Engagement, Constructivist Learning, 21 st Century Skills Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Priorities of the Rubrics Cognitive Engagement “Effective” = students must be cognitively engaged “Highly Effective” = cognitive engagement PLUS meta- cognition and student ownership of their learning Constructivist Learning Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of learning experiences designed to facilitate students’ construction of knowledge & connections to prior knowledge. 21 st Century Skills Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of application of 21st Century college & career-readiness skills and dispositions Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD 6

Observing Practice Observe the video Collect evidence, especially evidence of Domain 3: Instruction// Standard 3: Instructional Practice Be prepared to share your evidence Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Checking Evidence Use the self-check questions to review your evidence collection Have I recorded only facts? Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being examined? Whenever possible, have I quantified words such as few, some, and most? Have I used quotation marks when quoting a teacher or student? Does my selection or documentation of evidence indicate any personal or professional preferences? Have I included any opinion (in the guise of fact)? Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Observing Practice: Sorting Evidence With a partner, sort your evidence so that it aligns with the appropriate criteria in your rubric for instruction Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Observing Practice: Clarifying Questions With your partner, develop questions you have about the lesson you observed that must be answered before you rate the teacher’s performance. Be prepared to share one or two of your questions. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Question Review Review the questions you and your partner created Be sure to frame your questions to ensure that they are designed to promote a climate of professional inquiry Consider the following: How does the question make you feel? How might the teacher respond to the question? Revise your questions as necessary. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Leveling Teacher Performance Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

The Evidence Cycle Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD COLLECT DATA (Evidence) SORT TO ALIGN WITH YOUR FRAMEWORK Interpret: Clarify Conclusions NO!

Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD Unsatisfactory / Ineffective – Teaching shows evidence of not understanding the concepts underlying the component - may represent practice that is harmful - requires intervention Basic / Developing – Teaching shows evidence of knowledge and skills related to teaching - but inconsistent performance Levels of Performance

Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD Proficient / Effective - Teaching shows evidence of thorough knowledge of all aspects of the profession. Students are engaged in learning. This is successful, accomplished, professional, and effective teaching. Distinguished / Highly Effective – Classroom functions as a community of learners with student assumption of responsibility for learning. Levels of Performance

Debrief and Closure Next steps – Future sessions at BOCES How are you sharing this information with teachers? Got It/Want It/Questions Please remember to complete the workshop evaluation Thank you for your participation! Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD