MORSS – WG June 2004 Joint Forces Ready to Fight FOUO Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability (JAEC) Bill Millward Technical Lead, JAEC

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 2 Outline JAEC Background Performance Assessment Concept OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution Strategies for the Future

Training Transformation Vision and Capabilities Provide dynamic, capabilities-based training for the Department of Defense in support of national security requirements across the full spectrum of service, joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational operations. Establish Performance Assessment Architecture Joint Assessment & Enabling Capability Build Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) Training Environment Joint National Training Capability Create Dynamic, Global Knowledge Network Joint Knowledge Development & Distribution Capability

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 4 Training Transformation Background To achieve training system transparency in joint force operations, the Deputy Secretary of Defense established the following training transformation objectives to better enable joint operations: Strengthen joint operations by better preparing forces for new warfighting concepts Continuously improve joint force readiness by aligning joint education and training capabilities and resources with combatant command needs Develop individuals and organizations that intuitively think jointly Develop individuals and organizations that improvise and adapt to emerging crises Achieve unity of effort from a diversity of means Source: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 5 T2—JNTC and JKKDC Capabilities Joint Certified Courses Individuals Joint Educated International / Multinational Reach-Back Mission Planning and Rehearsal Adaptability Regional Centers Regional Centers Human Experts Human Experts Models and Simulations Models and Simulations Digital Knowledge Bases Digital Knowledge Bases JKDDC War Colleges Universities War Colleges Universities Illustrative Metrics Preparing forces individually Major Training Centers Major Training Centers Test Ranges Test Ranges Models and Simulations Models and Simulations Embedded Systems Embedded Systems JNTC Joint Training Events Units trained to Joint Standards Mission Planning and Rehearsal New Joint Operational Concepts Lessons Learned Adaptability Illustrative Metrics Preparing forces collectively

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 6 T2—JAEC role Illustrative Metrics T2 Capabilities Joint Operational Concepts Joint Operational Concepts Training Value Training Value DOTMLP Barriers JNTC JKDDC Unit Strategies and Investments Strategies and Investments Individual Staff JAEC Strategic Transformation Appraisal Strategic Transformation Appraisal Defense Readiness Reporting System Defense Readiness Reporting System Anticipating, Evaluating, and Guiding Development TC AOA

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 7 JAEC Tenets To achieve Training Transformation objectives leading ultimately to training system transparency in joint force operations 1, then we must understand the ways and means necessary to reach this future state. JAEC provides the analytic rigor to understand, assess, measure and report training system performance and progress toward achieving transparency in joint force operations. JAEC assessments will include analyses across the joint training continuum to help determine optimal means of joint capability sourcing, delivery and improvement feedback. To properly conduct assessments, we must be able to determine measures of merit. –measures of effectiveness, –measures of performance. 1) Refer to 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 8 Outline JAEC Background Performance Assessment Concept OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution Strategies for the Future

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 9 Setting Measurable Outcomes for T2 Focused on COCOM needs All Forces Joint Educated and Trained New Joint Operation Capabilities Dynamic Mission Planning and Rehearsal Continuous Readiness Improvements The Secretary has a saying “you can only manage what you can measure,” and that’s what JAEC is all about. Trying to systematically assess, adapt, be able to revise and understand what these other capabilities are bringing to bear. The department has made a tremendous investment of resources, both dollars and people, and we want to know, does it make a difference. Dr. Paul Mayberry, DUSD (Readiness) Ref: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 10 Performance Assessment Concept T2 Vector Assessments COCOM Alignment Service Alignment Force Transformation Alignment T2 Integration Assessments Policy integration Program and process integration Information systems integration T2 Training Value Assessments Joint Educated and Trained Personnel - quantity Staffs & Unit skill mix Responsiveness to COCOM requirements changes Source: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0) Throughput All Forces Joint Educated and Trained Near-Term Outcome Innovation Enable Environment to Create New Joint Operational Capabilities Mid-Term Outcomes Transparency Dynamic Mission Planning and Rehearsal Far-Term Outcomes T2 metrics evolve over time to guide achievement of successive outcomes

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 11 Outline JAEC Background Performance Assessment Concept OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution Strategies for the Future

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 12 Main Menu Force Management Risk Institutional Risk Future Challenges Operational Risk Main Menu  BACK: Title Slide DoD Balanced Scorecard

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 13 Training Transformation Balanced Scorecard Concept COCOM Satisfaction Initial Measures Customer satisfaction Training Integration Assessment Level 2 Initial Measures Policy integration Process integration Information integration The T2 Balanced Scorecard The T2 Balanced Scorecard Through the T2 Strategic Plan and Goals and Implementation Plan tied to the TPG and Strategic Performance Assessment “The Balanced Scorecard for Risk Management is a central element of the Defense Strategy. It gives DoD leaders a disciplined way of measuring near and mid-term defense outputs, in critical areas, against longer-term strategic Defense goals.” Dr. David Chu, USD(P&R) Transformation Vector Assessment Level 3 Initial Measures COCOM Alignment OFT Alignment Services Alignment Training Value Assessment Level 1 Initial Measures Quantity Quality Responsiveness

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 14 Outline JAEC Background Performance Assessment Concept OSD Balanced Scorecard – T2 contribution Strategies for the Future

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 15 Industrial Age Model of Education and Training Military Service (Suppliers) COCOM’s (Customers) Constraints Can Limit Achievement of Goals Military Service (Suppliers) COCOM’s (Customers) JKDDC JNTC JAEC Information Age Model of Education and Training Driven by the Deliberate Planning Cycle MPETE requirements poorly understood Difficulty aligning supply with demand Relatively low throughput efficiency Throughput: Efficiency achieved by distributing production of Jointness across DoD Innovation: Continuous process / readiness improvements = adaptable, agile, and lethal Transparency: Convergence of education, training, mission planning and rehearsal Harmonizing MPETE flow around system capacity Use Metrics to align T2 Capabilities Transforming the Joint Education & Training Enterprise MPETE: Manpower, Personnel, Education, Training & Experience Source: 2004 DoD Training Transformation Implementation Plan (Section 1.0)

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 16 What’s ahead for the JAEC Analysis Support? ‘The Industrial Age brought about specialization of skills. The Information Age brings about specialization of the mind’ – Charles Williams How might we apply Fourth-Generation Instructional System Design (ISD4) across the Education/Training continuum to deliver, more optimally, the right forces with the right skill & ‘mind’ mix at the right time to meet combatant commander needs ? Given the current compliance-focused tenet of education and training measurement – ‘teach what you test and test what you teach’ – what other type measurement frameworks are available to assess performance (readiness) ? How might we employ performance-based Standards and Conditions (versus compliance-based) across the Education/Training continuum to ensure quality results are delivered in sufficient quantity and when needed ? How might we achieve ‘adaptive’ readiness – readiness beyond base requirements that serves to meet constantly evolving joint warfighting needs ?

Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability 17 Questions & Discussion