RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors. Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.
RTI and LD: Case Studies Rhode Island RTI Initiative Module 5 Edition 2, Feb
Creating vital partnerships between: Children Home School Community.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Learners with Learning Disabilities ED226 Fall 2010.
SLD Body of Evidence and Eligibility Denver Public Schools, 2011.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Assessment of Learning Disabilities Chapter 5. Purpose of Assessment Protects the interests of children Protects the interests of children Help schools.
Secondary Goals and Transition Strategies Speech and Language Support.
Determining Eligibility Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework TASP 2013 Fall ConferenceTASP 2013 Fall Conference Theresa Nicholls, Ed.S., NCSPTheresa Nicholls,
Assessment of Special Education Students
Educationally Related Therapy Services Understanding the role of physical and occupational therapists in the school environment Jackie Davis Templin, MS,
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Special Education Process Part I-Identification of a Suspected Disability National Association of Special Education Teachers.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
The Nuts & Bolts in developing an Eligibility IEP Charter School Institute.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 6 and 8.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
RTI in Tigard-Tualatin School District: Effective Behavior & Instructional Support (EBIS) National SEA Conference on SLD Determination April 20, 2006 Erin.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
EIP SUBGROUP — ASSESSMENT Tony D’Angelo Ruth Kirsch Regina Oliver.
What is (RtI)?  Establishes a comprehensive assessment and intervention process to support students in need of academic and behavioral.
Problem Solving December 17, 2012 Aubrey Tardy Michelle Urbanek.
OBSERVING CHILDREN: A Tool for Assessment
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Section 504 The Basics for Campus SOP. Definition of 504 Child Find Responsibilities Duty to Evaluate triggers Service Plans.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
File Review Can be used to gather information during pre- referral process Requirements for eligibility for: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Communication, Emotional.
Best Practices and Compliance
Advocacy Using Assessment of FASD in Schools
Specific Learning Disability (SLD)Eligibility Training
Referral and Identification for Special Education: RTI Tier Three
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
TAG and the Law
Problem Solving Training Module
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors

Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision Has potentially lifelong consequences Needs to be based on established standards Requires qualification by virtue of following the established process as defined Should not be done “just to help” kids Should not be done for the money (modified from Tilly, Heartland AEA11, 2009)

Definition Exclusionary Factors Rule out important factors other than SLD Exclusionary Factors

Keyword Keyword = “primarily” Exclusionary Criteria…

Exclusionary Factors Screen first… Further assessment only if needed Vision, Hearing, Motor Cognitive Disability Emotional Disability Cultural Factors Environment, Economic

Use available screening level data Gather additional assessment data only if necessary No legal requirement to do an in-depth eval. of any of these areas

Vision, Hearing or Motor Disability Review of health records Results of past routine vision, hearing, and motor (e.g. from P.E.) screenings Observations and reports Parent reports Areas to Consider:

Cognitive Disability Performance in other academic areas (average/ expected performance in any academic area may indicate that student does not have a cognitive disability) Review of adaptive behavior history/ adaptive behavior screener (age-appropriate adaptive behavior indicates that the student does not have a cognitive disability) Classroom observations and/or reports Parent reports Areas to Consider:

Cognitive Disability Additional Considerations: Nothing in the law requires any IQ type assessment for disability determination “Slow learner” term no longer relevant (IL FAQ doc. #41) If low on adaptive behavior screener… – How low is “low”? – Consider possibly further directly assessing specific areas If low performance across all academic areas… – Again consider how low is “low”? – Consider any additional academic/ achievement data

Emotional Disability Any existing behavioral screening data (e.g attendance records, discipline referrals, etc.)… or any other district specific screeners Behavior checklists Behavior rating scales Observations Interviews (teacher, parent, student, etc.) Areas to Consider:

Emotional Disability Additional Considerations: If there are behavioral concerns: – Consider if student’s learning problems are an antecedent of the behavior?... – Or, if emotional problems are impacting the student’s ability to acquire academic skills?

Cultural Factors Compare results of academic/ achievement data with overall performance outcomes of the subgroup (e.g. race/ ethnicity, gender) in the district Consider student’s acculturation in comparison to similar peers Interviews (parents, students, staff) Areas to Consider:

Cultural Factors Additional Considerations: If data is low for subgroup… – Are we providing “appropriate instruction” to this whole group? Can we even consider eligibility for this student? – Compare student’s performance in intervention to other students with a similar culture also receiving those supports… are similar peers benefiting from this? – Possibly consider the magnitude of the discrepancy and use supporting data to evidence this

Environmental or Economic Disadvantage Free/ Reduced Lunch status Review and compare results of academic/ achievement data with overall performance outcomes of students of similar socioeconomic status in the district Also consider chronic medical conditions, frequent absences, sleep disruptions, etc. Interviews with the family Developmental histories Areas to Consider:

Examples…

Documentation on Eligibility Forms