Engineering Design GE121 Finding Answers to the Problem Part V

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Woodburn Interchange EA Evaluation Framework Presentation SWG Meeting #2 April 10, 2003.
Advertisements

GE 121 – Engineering Design Engineering Design GE121 Oral Presentations Lecture 10.
DECISION MODELING WITH Multi-Objective Decision Making
Unit 252 Planning and monitoring work
Course Web Site – Also linked from Blackboard Course Materials – Excel Tutorials – Access Tutorials – PPT.
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
INVESTMENT APPRAISAL NON DISCOUNTING By Lucky Yona.
Some Problems evaluating large programs or program going in many different directions 1. the objectives are too general; they are really goals many.
Adapting Designs Professor David Torgerson University of York Professor Carole Torgerson Durham University.
Control Structures Control structures are used to manage the order in which statements in computer programs will be executed Three different approaches.
PROBLEM MANAGEMENT & SOLUTION FOCUSED THERAPY WEEK NINE.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
Chapter 10 Ranking and Value Management of Computer System Performance.
true (any other value but zero) false (zero) expression Statement 2
Project Time Management
MULTIPLYING AND DIVIDING FRACTIONS Case 2. MULTIPLICATION  Multiplying fractions is actually very easy!  You begin by placing the two fractions you.
Objective A: Convert from one American unit of length to another.
Objectives: 1. Solve exponential and logarithmic equations. 2. Solve a variety of application problems by using exponential and logarithmic equations.
Calculating Baseball Statistics Using Algebraic Formulas By E. W. Click the Baseball Bat to Begin.
Health Economics & Policy 3 rd Edition James W. Henderson Chapter 4 Economic Evaluation in Health Care.
The Marriage Problem Finding an Optimal Stopping Procedure.
Kenzo Fry Measuring how equitable your service delivery is.
Statistical Analysis. Basic Calculations Mean - Average Median - Middle Mode – Most often Range – Diff. b/w the highest and lowest.
Ways to Improve Your Senior Design Final Presentation (Based on Previous Years’ Comments) W. Wilson.
ELearning / MCDA Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Introduction to Value Tree Analysis eLearning resources / MCDA team Director.
© University of Wisconsin-Madison 1 Prioritization Matrix.
A2 Business Studies Objectives and Strategy –Unit 6 Decision Trees.
1 Employee Relations/Reward Assessing job size. 2 Question??????? Why is one job worth more than another? How do you measure or evaluate jobs in a way.
Unit 4 – Capital Budgeting Decision Methods
Leena Razzaq Office: 310BWVH Office hours: Monday 11am-1pm or by appointment jys.
Design and Society Lecture 5 Tim Sheard. Reading Thirty-Something (Million): Should They Be Exceptions? 3x5 cards - discussion.
Selection Control Structures. Simple Program Design, Fourth Edition Chapter 4 2 Objectives In this chapter you will be able to: Elaborate on the uses.
© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama t e n t h e d i t i o n Gary Dessler.
2005MEE Software Engineering Lecture 11 – Optimisation Techniques.
Client Management Production Process.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
Needles Powers Crosson Principles of Accounting 12e Short-Run Decision Analysis and Capital Budgeting 25 C H A P T E R ©human/iStockphoto.
What do students really know? What can they really do?
Facilitating Collaborative Decision Making Anne Wright.
Fall Last Homework assignment −Complete the FSD. Due Today. Put on website and a copy to me. −Work on the Concept Generation portion of the.
Project Management.
Decision-Making. Decision Making ▪Decision Making - is choosing among two or more alternatives (choices) ▪Begins with identification of a problem and.
GE 121 – Engineering Design Engineering Design GE121 Finding Answers to the Problem Part VI Lecture 13A.
© 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley 1 Product Design Alternative Generation, Evaluation, and Selection.
Adeyl Khan, Faculty, BBA, NSU 1. Sorting, Categorizing, Rating and Evaluating a large quantity of ideas. Simple checklists To complex weighted scoring.
Decision Making Matrix A Closer Look at Preliminary Ideas.
Correlation – Spearman’s. What does it do? Measures rank correlation – whether highest value in the 1 st data set corresponds to highest in the 2 nd set.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.1 Financial & Managerial Accounting 2002e Belverd E. Needles, Jr. Marian Powers Susan Crosson.
Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management Accounting: Information for managing and creating value 4e Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith.
Concept Selection and DFMEA Heidi Ploeg Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.
Grading for the information age. Clarity by Design Edward Naillon Oroville School District.
Chapter Outline 6.1 Why Use Net Present Value?
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
EE15N The Art & Science of Engineering Design Winter Quarter 2017
Preference Assessment 1 Measuring Utilities Directly
Health Services Administration
Improvement Selection:
Decision Matrices Business Economics.
Welcome W 6.1 Introduction to Engineering Design II (IE 202)
Testing for a difference
GCE PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS SERVICES AS 3
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering
Assignment Name:-Decision-Making & Process Submitted To:-Sir Fahad Maqbool Submitted By:-Zunera Latif Roll No: Registration No:-2017-GCUF
Warm Up Use scalar multiplication to evaluate the following:
Steve Lambert Mechanical Engineering, U of Waterloo
Managerial Accounting 2002e
Selecting a Solution Path
Extra Brownie Points! Lottery To Win: choose the 5 winnings numbers
Section 11.1: Significance Tests: Basics
Teaching, Learning and Course Design
Presentation transcript:

Engineering Design GE121 Finding Answers to the Problem Part V Lecture 13C

Connecting Concepts to Objectives: Selecting the BEST Designs Can be done by many different approaches Some Formal and Rigorous Others are simple – Example: Simply the alternative that the team likes the best! Use Objectives (and Constraints) to compare Process usually begins by examining alternatives in terms of Constraints Alternatives that don’t satisfy ALL constraints can be immediately rejected Different clients have different Values (weights on objectives) May end up choosing different designs for same problem

Numerical Evaluation Matrices Following Examples show Numerical Evaluation Matrices for two different clients Notice that calculated Weights (importance of each objective) are different for each – possibly due to different corporate values Constraints dictate that two options are eliminated - Glass bottle with twist-off cap, and Aluminum can with pull-tab (don’t meet constraints) Compare / Contrast for your own benefit

Numerical Evaluation Matrices (continued) Fig. 5.4 p110 (2nd Edition)

Numerical Evaluation Matrices (continued) Fig. 5.5 p111 (2nd Edition)

Weighted Checkmark Method Simpler, Qualitative version of Numerical Evaluation Method High / Medium / Low Priority 3 Checkmarks for High, 2 for Medium, 1 for Low Metrics are taken as 1 if greater than 0.5 and 0 if less than 0.5 Binary Method is susceptible to temptation to ‘Cook’ results to achieve desired outcome

Weighted Checkmark Method (continued) Fig. 5.6 p112 (2nd Edition)

Best of Class Chart Rank each alternative for how it meets the objective, with 1 being the best down to 5 for the worst (assuming 5 alternatives) Ties allowed, but split rankings (two alternatives tied for 1st would each get (1+2)/2 = 1.5) Lowest score is best, unless used with previous weighting scheme (then use 5 as best and 1 as worst for ranking, and Highest score wins) Advantages – Ranks alternatives rather than just binary, and is easy Disadvantages – Opinion-based, may also be tempted to ‘fudge’ results

Caution on All 3 Methods No excuse for accepting results blindly and uncritically Treat relatively close scores for 2 alternatives as equal If results were unexpected, check expectations/ metrics/ weights Check to see if evaluations were really fair Examine alternatives rejected based on constraints to see if it was really valid

Concept Screening These same processes can be used earlier in the design process (especially weighted checkmark) to do Informal Concept Screening

Activity Continue working on your 4 (or 3 if you’re a group of 3) design concepts (all 4 must meet all constraints) Make sure that you have Metrics and Weighting factors ready to go for ALL of your Objectives – you will need them next week to make a decision as to which design is best Continue to work on your Final Report and your Presentation weekly as you cover each step of the process!