Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UK Gas Entry Regime – Review of existing Interruptible Arrangements & Potential Reforms for this Winter.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Winter 2013/2014 Reliability Solution Including LNG MWHs N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Greg Lander Skipping Stone NEPOOL Markets & Reliability.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Process UNC Transmission Workstream 23 rd April 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Long Term Entry Capacity & User Commitment Transmission Workstream 7 th August 2008.
Modification Review Proposal 0166 Review of necessary reform of NTS Offtake Arrangements Thursday 6th September 2007.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
Enduring Offtake Arrangements including an Off-Peak Interruptible Service Peter Bolitho.
GRI NW Investment Workshop Chris Logue, European Policy Manager, 4 th June 2010 The Hague.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
PARCA: Contractual Overview TX Workgroup 27 th February 2013 Steve Pownall.
Transfer & Trades Special Transmission Workstream
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 214 – Reservation of firm NTS Exit Capacity at new NTS Exit Points in the transitional period Steve Rose.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review Group 221 Session 3: 13 October Introduction  During this presentation we will seek views on the following questions.  What should the.
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 2 7 th May 2008 Substitution Example.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Mod 166 Review Group Incremental Exit Capacity at New and Existing Exit Points.
Review Group 221: Option 3 – security provided after allocation.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 3 11 th June 2008 Substitution Example.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
15 February 2006 TPCR second consultation: gas offtake Offtake Arrangements Workstream 15 February 2006.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Fundamental review of entry charging principles UNC Transmission Workstream - 6 th August 2009.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th Feb 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
PARCA Demonstration Data Information Flow Diagram Footnote:- No set timescales – timescales will be agreed by the Project Team Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
NTS Exit Regime Transmission Workstream – 6 th July 2005.
The Entry Capacity Substitution Regime Transmission Workstream 7 th February 2008 Thoughts for discussion.
Interactions with the implementation of RIIO-T1
An alternative approach…..
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
UNC Modification Proposal 0373
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Developing capacity & connection processes: A long term non firm capacity product? 27th June 2012.
Mod 0452 (PARCA) – Further thoughts
PARCA Security and Termination Amounts
Draft Capacity & Connection Plan
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Transmission Workstream – 6th July 2005
Presentation transcript:

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. Developing capacity & connection processes Long term non-firm capacity: Draft business principles 6 th September 2012

2 Long Term Non-Firm: Recap  Allow new connections and existing site expansions access to the NTS ahead of timescales for firm incremental capacity delivery, but only where NTS reinforcement is needed  Would provide greater certainty for customers  Where customer has significantly progressed their project and NTS connection is ready, but firm capacity delivery is beyond the first potential gas flow date  Where customer project is ready ahead of schedule  Where customer project doesn’t need planning consent so timescales are potentially misaligned  ‘In flight’ projects  Aimed at covering the gap between firm capacity delivery and first gas flow date Option A: Long term off-peak exit / interruptible entry capacity Introduces new capacity product, sold through auctions (adhoc or fixed) Option B: Non-obligated firm capacity, with buyback option Released via non-obligated capacity mechanism with a buyback option contract attached

3 Draft Business principles  High level principles  First draft only  Industry discussion needed to ensure ideas are developed into a workable solution for industry, consider:  Are these options workable?  Are these viable alternatives?

4 Process trigger No Yes Customer signals incremental capacity requirement NG NTS analyse & determine how requirement could be met In the case that NTS build is required, does customer require early access to NTS? Unsold firm? Substitution? NTS build? Customer bids/applies for firm incremental capacity from the agreed delivery date Long term non-firm capacity release would be considered for the ‘early capacity period’

5 Long Term Non-Firm: Release criteria  Applies to both Option A & B  Only released where:  An incremental signal has been provided and  Earlier access to the NTS is required and  NTS reinforcement required  Staged capacity release (annually), conditional upon:  Demonstration requirements being satisfied (where a bilateral agreement is in place); and  There being insufficient unsold firm capacity available to fulfil the customer’s capacity requirement for the year ahead (customer must purchase any unsold firm capacity where available)

6 Option A: Draft business principles Capacity Product  Longer term release of Interruptible Entry and Off-Peak Exit Capacity  Release via an annual adhoc process  Subject to curtailment  Likelihood of curtailment provided to the relevant user for the release period Pricing  ‘Pay as Bid’ pricing, with a reserve price Duration  Capacity released throughout entire ‘early capacity period’  Held once a year for (up to) a 12 month period  Up to 12 Monthly blocks

7 Option B: Draft business principles Capacity Product  Non-obligated firm capacity  Release via an annual adhoc process  Buyback option contract for all days on which capacity is held  Likelihood of buyback provided to the relevant user for the release period Pricing  ‘Pay as Bid’ capacity pricing  Zero option price + exercise price capped at price paid for capacity Duration  Capacity released throughout entire early capacity period (annually)  Held once a year for (up to) a 12 month period  Up to 12 Monthly blocks

Long Term Non-Firm Capacity Scenarios: How might it work in practice?

9 Scenario 1 – Status quo arrangements Buyback Period Sold/Obligated Level Request level Firm capacity delivery date Achievable firm capacity delivery date LTNF = Long term non-firm capacity Time Capacity Quantity Incremental Capacity Situation: NG NTS unable to meet firm capacity delivery date and no permits to use

10 Scenarios 2&3 – Status quo arrangements LTNF Sold/Obligated Level Request level Scenario 2: NG NTS can meet firm capacity delivery date but customer requests early access Scenario 3: NG NTS unable to meet firm capacity delivery date, extend with permits First gas date Firm capacity delivery date extended by permits Firm capacity delivery date LTNF = Long term non-firm capacity Time Capacity Quantity Incremental Capacity

11 Scenario 4 – ‘PARCA’/Split Auctions & PCA LTNF Period Sold/Obligated Level Request level First gas date Firm capacity delivery date Demo Dates passed  All Planning Consents Obtained  Situation: Demonstration information satisfied and all planning consents obtained Time Capacity Quantity LTNF = Long term non-firm capacity Incremental Capacity

12 Initial LTNF period Sold/Obligated Level Request level LTNF to replace delayed incremental Original firm capacity delivery date Revised firm capacity delivery date due to planning consent delay NG NTS Planning consent obtained  Situation: Delay in obtaining NG NTS planning consent Scenario 5 – ‘PARCA’/Split Auctions & PCA First gas date Time Capacity Quantity LTNF = Long term non-firm capacity Incremental Capacity Customer Planning consent obtained 

13 Proposed first LTNF period Sold/Obligated Level Request level LTNF to replace delayed incremental Original firm capacity delivery date & revised first gas date Revised firm capacity delivery date due to planning consent delay Customer Planning consent obtained  Situation: Delay in obtaining customer planning consent Scenario 6 – ‘PARCA’/Split Auctions & PCA Original First gas date Time Capacity Quantity LTNF = Long term non-firm capacity Incremental Capacity NG NTS Planning consent obtained 

14 Sold/Obligated level Request level Final Demo Date failed Proposed LTNF period – year 1 Firm capacity delivery date First gas date Incremental capacity build & release cancelled Date LTNF would have been renewed for new gas year Proposed LTNF period – year 2 Situation: Failure to provide demonstration information Scenario 7 – ‘PARCA’/Split Auctions & PCA Time Capacity Quantity LTNF = Long term non-firm capacity Planned Incremental Capacity (no longer to be released at this stage)