Measurement and data extraction. How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. Accuracy and issues of these measurements. Data extraction issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hyper Status and Preliminary Testing of the New Hyper Bus Fault Detector CP Work done by CP section Based on Slides from Knud DAHLERUP-PETERSEN.
Advertisements

ELECTRO THERMAL SIMULATIONS OF THE SHUNTED 13KA LHC INTERCONNECTIONS Daniel Molnar, Arjan Verweij and Erwin Bielert.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
REVIEW OF THE CRYOGENIC BY-PASS FOR THE LHC DS COLLIMATORS ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT MODIFICATION, INCLUDING OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS PRESENTED BY A. SIEMKO.
CLIQ Coupling Loss Induced Quench Magnet protection system for HQ test Overview 1) CLIQ system overview 2) Adding lead to pizza box 3) remote triggering.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
MP3 report : W49 (6 slides, 6’) J.Ph Tock for the MP3 team Since oral report last week (24 th of November) 1JPhT – LMC 1st of December 2010.
LQS01 Test Preparation and Test Plan LARP Collaboration Meeting 12 LBNL - April 8-10, 2009.
Report on problem in opening the 13kA EE system (issue recently found during last CSCM) Bozhidar Panev
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
CSCM Project Powering cycle and results of the PSpice simulations Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to H. Thiesen, A. Verweij TE-MPE-TM
How to achieve higher redundancy of the UPS for QPS ? -The lack of redundancy concerns the supply lines from UPS to consumer but equally parts of the UPS.
LMC 30 LPC A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run Heat pulse.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
TE-MPE-EP, RD, 06-Dec QPS Data Transmission after LS1 R. Denz, TE-MPE-EP TIMBER PM WinCC OA Tsunami warning:
TE-MPE Workshop 14/12/2010, Manuel Dominguez, TE/MPE-EI 1 Stephen Pemberton, TE/MPE-EI RB Earth Spark Investigation Initial Report. S. Pemberton, G. D’Angelo.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
The diode lead resistance ‘issue’ A. Verweij, TE-MPE, CSCM workshop 7/10/2011 Contents:  Diode geometry  Measurements performed in the past  Measurements.
CERN Rüdiger Schmidt FCC week 2015 Long Magnet Stringpage 1 Incident September 19 th Architecture of powering and protection systems for high field.
HFM High Field Model, EuCARD WP7 review, 20/1/2011, Philippe Fazilleau, 1/16 EuCARD-WP7-HFM Dipole Conceptual Review Nb 3 Sn dipole protection Philippe.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Status & Plans – May 2011 MPE-TM – 12 May 2011 M. Koratzinos,
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
Frequency Transfer Function Measurements during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Arjan Verweij, Zinur Charifoulline, Andrea Musso MPE-TM
CSCM type test: Diode Leads and Diodes Gerard Willering & Vincent Roger TE-MSC With thanks to Bernhard Auchmann, Zinour Charifoulline, Scott Rowan, Arjan.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
LHC Magnets/Splices Consolidation (20 minutes) Francesco Bertinelli 7 June, slides  Status of LHC: electrical connections  Description of shunt.
MP3 recommendations from June 2013-Feb 2014 Arjan Verweij on behalf of the MP A. Verweij, LSC meeting 7/2/2014 One of the tasks of the MP3 is.
CSCM Project Status and Prospects Andrzej Siemko on behalf of the CSCM project core team: Mike Koratzinos, Jens Steckert, Hugues Thiessen and Arjan Verweij.
Recent cross-wiring issue and implication for circuits protection Bozhidar Panev TE-MPE-CP
LHC Enhanced Quench Protection System Review 24 – 26 February 2009.
A PROPOSAL TO PULSE THE MAGNET BUSES TO VALIDATE SPLICE QUALITY H. Pfeffer 3/7/09 Version 4.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
NQPS commissioning …a long way to go. Topics nQPS component overview Enhancements in Firmware Commissioning diagram Detailed task list Summary.
Cold powering test results of MBHSP102 Gerard Willering, TE-MSC-TF With thanks to Jerome and Vincent and all others from TF for their contribution.
Andrzej SIEMKO CERN, Geneva The 2014 Kyoto Workshop on HTS Magnet Technology for High Energy Physics –WAMHTS-2.
MP3 List of main Issues during March 2010 MP3 - Team.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
Advanced simulations of events in the RB circuit Short circuit to ground Quench of a dipole provoked by the quench heaters Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to.
LHC Machine Status Report Mike Lamont for the LHC team Acknowledgements: Mirko Pojer, Matteo Solfaroli, Katy Foraz et al.
HWC with nQPS Splice Monitoring Zinur Charifoulline & Bob Flora Real Time (~10 sec) BUS Voltage Energy Extraction Trip 300 µV threshold on Un-bypassed.
QPS high level controls LabView tools, an overview.
Main dipole circuit simulations Behavior and performance analysis PSpice models Simulation results Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele.
LHC circuit modeling Goal: Create a library of electrical models and results for each circuit Useful and usable for the next 20 years…… Web site cern.ch/LHC-CM.
TE-MPE –EI, TE - MPE - TM 8/12/2011, Antonopoulou Evelina RQS circuit Simulation results Antonopoulou Evelina December 2011 Thanks to E. Ravaioli.
MPE Workshop 14/12/2010 Analysis of the RB and RQF/D splice data recorded with nQPS - status and plans towards full automation Analysis of the RB and RQF/D.
CSCM (Thermal Amplifier) Sequence and detailed planning 07/10/2011 M.Solfaroli Thanks to: K.Brodzinski, G.D’Angelo, M.Koratzinos, M.Pojer, R.Schmidt, J.Steckert,
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
SC Undulators protection and commissioning W. Venturini Delsolaro Acknowledgements: R. Denz, R. Maccaferri.
STEVE HAYS AD E/E SUPPORT E4R POWER SYSTEM for HTS MAGNET WIRE TEST.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
LQS01a Test Results LARP Collaboration Meeting 14 Fermilab - April 26-28, 2010 Guram Chlachidze.
Proposed Power Supplies for Cryogenic Magnets for PIP II Bruce Hanna June 21, 2016.
CSCM Test description and Risk assessment  Goal  The typical and ultimate current cycle  Test sequence for type test and regular test  Risk assessment.
D1 and D2 powering and protection
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
MP3 Review Software tools
12 October 2009 RRB Plenary R.-D. Heuer
Powering the LHC Magnets
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Dipole diode lead resistance measurement
Dipole circuit & diode functioning
3 issues identified in review
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
Online data analysis Franco J. Mangiarotti CERN – TE-MSC-TF
Power Leads for Test Stands
Electrical measurements and diagnostics
Presentation transcript:

Measurement and data extraction. How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. Accuracy and issues of these measurements. Data extraction issues. Data analysis tools. Z.Charifoulline, TE/MPE-CP 10/7/20111CSCM Workshop

t plateau dI/dt I plateau I t FPA if V>V thr dV/dt to open the diodes Fast ramp down if V>V thr t1t2 500 A 4-6 kA 60 s PC in voltage modePC in current mode 500 A/s H. Thiesen – 16 August 2011 – TE-TM Trip by nQPS mBS CSCM current cycles 1 kA How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. “safe” measurements “unsafe” measurements 10/7/20112CSCM Workshop

How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. 0.5 – 1kA tests (“safe”): It is safe since any errors in protection thresholds will cause a trip but not yet a burning of any splices or diodes - ramps to verify new QPS hardware and software - RRR measurements (board A) - R diode measurements at low current (board B – board A) - define, load and verify voltage thresholds of mBS boards 4 – 6kA tests (“unsafe”): It is not safe since a single error in protection thresholds may cost as a burning of defective splice or diode! - (see A.W. talk) - redefine voltage thresholds after every ramp -> reload and verify if needed! - R diode measurements and case analysis for high values before next ramp - correctly detect runaway event if so for detailed off-line analysis later on On this step the tests still can be performed by use of conventional splice protection boards (nQPS BS ) and can be analyzed by existed software (SM), but we need to check new hardware and software. To be able to detect correctly the thermal runaways (or CSCM evnts) we need much faster DAQ. And we need parallel Board A&B measurements to distinguish runaways from high diode lead resistances. So this is why the nQPS mBS board was born! (Jiens child) 10/7/20113CSCM Workshop

nQPS BS Board A: EE012 EE013 (Bus bar) nQPS BS Board B: EE014 EE015 (Bus bar + 2 DLs) How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. “nQPS BS” boards will be replaced by “nQPS mBS” boards. But it will be no any additional patches => so voltage taps will be still the same. (see A.W, J.S. talks) 10/7/20114CSCM Workshop

Current lead protection (nominal) Board ABoard BMeaning LD1:U_RES EE11 - EE21EE12 - EE22Copper part of C.L. LD1:U_HTSEE21 - EE31EE22 - EE32HTS part of C.L. U_BB_1EE41 - EExxEE42 - EExx From bottom of HTS Copper HTS TT893 (TT811) EE11,EE12 EE21,EE22 EE31, 32 41, 42 HeLiquidlevel PT100 PT100 U_RES U_HTS 1st Magnet: EE012, EE013 (Board A) EE014, EE015 (Board B) 1 st Bus Bar segment We are not going to measure the current leads? The first bus bar segments will be protected and measured exactly the same way as others. (as it is now in the tunnel at cold) Only the difference, that they had never been measured at warm (biddle testing, RRR?) and there is no diode from one side. nQPS 1 st crate: BS or mBS How to measure the current lead interconnections? 10/7/20115CSCM Workshop

QP3-simulation: RB Bus Bar, RRR BUS =200, RRR SC =120 Temperature = 20K Length = 30 and 40m Single Side Defect = 2, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50mm Current = 1kA and 6kA Bus Bar Segment Resistance (plus diode leads Board B) Bus Bar Splice Defect How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. 1 kA 6 kA 10/7/20116CSCM Workshop ∆t

How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. 1 kA ~60-100s, 5Hz => points - U0 1kA values will be calculated and stored for boards A and B - to be used to define 4kA thresholds: U thr = 4*U0 1kA + U safe - (U B – U A ) will be the diode leads voltages (analysis will be added) - bus bar resistances will be calculated (=>RRR, +length or 300K tests) U0 1kA Simulation: RB, Sector12 Real Bus Bar lengths T=20±2K, RRR=200±50 ±50uV noise mBS: Simulation: RB, Sector12 Real Bus Bar lengths T=20±2K, RRR=200±50 ±50uV noise mBS: It would be the nice bus bar length pattern if RRR and T He are constant! Dipole: 15m 55m, but mainly ~30m and ~40m Quads: 100m 250m, but in some cases ~450m! 10/7/20117CSCM Workshop

There are important voltage drops to worry about... 10/7/2011CSCM Workshop magnet [BA23.L1 BB22.L1] A23L1 magnet B22L1 splicebridge 11kΩ Cable 2Cable 1 2.2Ω bridge 22kΩ Cable 4Cable 3 5.1Ω 248uV 367mV352mV 14.7A 24mΩ 25mΩ 16uA33uA 82uV 73uV 17uΩ 403uV Correction can be 70% of signal! Length cable 2= 29m Length cable 3= 66m Timber Calculated M.K. TE/MPE, kA 5-40uΩ ~1V 30 … 100m 10 … 40mV ~50uA 250uV ~3-5% So CSCM will be at least one more RRR-measurements within 5% but without complicated corrections and for whole sector. How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. 8

6 kA Simulation: RB, Sector12 Real Bus Bar lengths T=20±2K, RRR=200±50 ±50uV noise mBS: ~30mm defect! - U0 6kA values and thresholds calculated from previous ramp! - (U B – U A ) will be the diode leads voltages (analysis will be added) Board A 10/7/20119CSCM Workshop ∆t

How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. 6 kA Simulation: RB, Sector12 Real Bus Bar lengths T=20±2K, RRR=200±50 ±50uV noise mBS: ~30mm defect! 20µΩ white noise added! (diode leads simulation) Board B - U0 6kA values and thresholds calculated from previous ramp! - (U B – U A ) will be the diode leads voltages (analysis will be added) It is extremely important to collect and analyze the test data from every ramp > 4kA for both Boards A & B and to define and load correct thresholds for every channel! Thresholds calculation might be not so trivial, especially for dU/dt of board B. 10/7/201110CSCM Workshop

10/7/2011CSCM Workshop11 Data extraction issues and analysis tools. -threshold calculations, U and dU/dt? - saving to proper files for loading - check after loading for data consistency Calculated thresholds

2048 total 30 bus bars > 1.2nΩ 10σ for MB 3σ for MQ MB 301 ± 85pΩ MQ 306 ± 313pΩ nQPS BS (A&B) U_MAG: LSB=1.9µV, Range=±15.9V PtP≈500µV(noise) U_RES: LSB=1.5nV, Range=±12.8mV PtP≈50µV-100µV (noise) 5Hz, 50points moving average (10s) 2048 channels (x2) Logging DB U_RES(t), U_MAG(t) I_MEAS(t) Magnet Bus Bar Data extraction issues and analysis tools. nQPS BS: Cold Splice Protection and Measurement 10/7/201112CSCM Workshop

nQPS mBS (A&B) U_MAG: LSB=1.9µV, Range=±15.9V PtP≈500µV(noise) U_RES: LSB=305nV, Range=±2.5V PtP≈50µV-100µV (noise) 16.5Hz, no filtering 2048 channels (x2) Logging DB U_RES(t) I_MEAS(t) Magnet Bus Bar nQPS mBS: CSCM Main changes: Hz DAQ, no filtering; - 5Hz data available in logging DB; - internal buffers (for boards A&B!) ; (see J.S. talk) Data extraction issues and analysis tools. A&B Buffers extractions need to be added to the existing data flow. 10/7/201113CSCM Workshop 5Hz from TIMBER or Front End T=20K R BB_dipole = 0.36µΩ/m => R BB_quad = 0.57µΩ/m => R diode lead = 5-20µΩ =>

Data extraction issues and analysis tools. By courtesy of A.Gorzawski Test 3minBuffers extraction2x15min ~180s By Test Operator Special Macro or LabView It will give absolute time reference for all curves within ±200ms and guarantee correct analysis of runaways By Test Operator Special Macro or LabView Application will toggle ST_BOARD_A to avoid board mixture Finally Test Data stored in Logging DB and ready for analysis. But the timescales need to be correctly reconstructed (5Hz -> 16.5Hz) 10/7/201114CSCM Workshop

Data extraction issues and analysis tools. By courtesy of A.Gorzawski 10/7/201115CSCM Workshop Data stored in Logging DB and ready for analysis. But the timescales still need to be correctly reconstructed (5Hz -> 16.5Hz) DS buffers reading application - adapted already for mBS buffers. Data can be saved and analyzed in EXCEL. Arkadiusz QPS DB (develop.) -BS signals -DS signals -Bus Bar Lengths -Splice cold resistances - and many more …

10/7/201116CSCM Workshop Data extraction issues and analysis tools. Summary: - mBS DAQ is sensitive and fast enough to make measurements at mV ranges; - bus bar RRR can be re-measured within 3-5% (will depend on T He stabilization); - mSB buffers triggering and extraction procedures established and checked; - all data will be saved to logging DB with absolute time stamps (<1s) and A/B signatures, which allow correct off-line expert’s analysis; -Special Java Application developing to read the data from logging DB, to reconstruct the timescales, to save data to csv-files or to QPS DB for online analysis of the whole considered sector. -Splice Monitor application (or new) will be upgraded for new requirements: - board A/B analysis, thresholds estimations and preparing for loading; - diode leads resistance evaluation from two boards data; - and needs to be very reliable and be checked before going to high currents;

10/7/2011CSCM Workshop17 Thanks!

RB, 30m, 6kA How to measure the splice and diode interconnections. 40mm, 15K, 20K, 25K 15K, 20K, 25K 30mm He-Bath temperature variation effect 10/7/201118CSCM Workshop

Diode lead ‘resistances’ for 6 kA quenches Conclusion: Large spread among the 12 leads. ‘Steps’ occurring in first 15 s. 5  : maximum measured at reception in SM18 13  : specification during reception in SM18 10/7/201119CSCM Workshop

Diode lead ‘resistances’ for B15R5 Anode Conclusion: Inductive signal is small. Results indicate the presence of one or more irregular contacts. The three 6 kA curves differ a factor 2. 10/7/201120CSCM Workshop

Resistance of the heat sink at 10 K with RRR=  Resistance of the lower diode bus at 10 K with RRR=100 (upper heat sink) 0.17  Resistance of the lower diode bus at 10 K with RRR=100 (lower heat sink) 0.28  Resistance of the upper diode bus at 10 K with RRR=  Power in a diode at 2 kAAbout 2.4 kW Power in a diode at 6 kAAbout 6.6 kW Energy needed to warm up the helium inside the diode from 1.9 to 2.17 K1.4 kJ Energy needed to warm up the helium inside the diode from 2.17 to 4.3 K5.1 kJ Energy needed to evaporate the helium inside the diode14 kJ Energy needed to warm up both heat sinks from 1.9 to 4.3 K4 J (see next plot) Temperature rise of the diode lead (RRR=100, adiab.) for 6 kA, t=50 s decay1.9 K to 31.3 K Resistance rise of the diode lead (RRR=100, adiab.) for 6 kA, t=50 s decay 0.59 to 0.86  Resistance of the lower diode lead at 110 K 4.6 to 7.7  Temperature rise of the heat sink (adiab.) for 6 kA, t=50 s decay1.9 K to 110 K Some numbers 10/7/201121CSCM Workshop