The Use of Trigger and DAQ in High Energy Physics Experiments Lecture 3: The (near) future O. Villalobos Baillie School of Physics and Astronomy The University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
HLT - data compression vs event rejection. Assumptions Need for an online rudimentary event reconstruction for monitoring Detector readout rate (i.e.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
1 ALICE Status Orlando Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham NuPECC Meeting Edinburgh 10 th October 2014.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Jornadas LIP, Dez P. Martins - CFTP-IST The NA60 Silicon Vertex Telescopes Dimuon measurements Dimuon measurements Vertex telescope used in: Vertex.
The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute for High Energy Physics Vienna Level-1 Trigger Menu Working Group CERN, 9 November 2000 Global Trigger Overview.
ALICE Upgrade for Run3: Computing HL-LHC Trigger, Online and Offline Computing Working Group Topical Workshop Sep 5 th 2014.
 production in p+p and Au+Au collisions in STAR Debasish Das UC Davis (For the STAR Collaboration)‏
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL HFT Issues that may Bear on the Fate of the SSD & SVT presented by Jim Thomas 07/07/2006.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
Quarkonium Physics with STAR Mauro Cosentino (University of Sao Paulo/BNL)
Results from first beam tests for the development of a RICH detector for CBM J. Eschke 1*, C. Höhne 1 for the CBM collaboration 1 GSI, Darmstadt, Germany.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
The Use of Trigger and DAQ in High Energy Physics Experiments Lecture 1 Principles of Triggering O. Villalobos Baillie School of Physics and Astronomy.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
CWG7 (reconstruction) R.Shahoyan, 12/06/ Case of single row Rolling Shutter  N rows of sensor read out sequentially, single row is read in time.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
Workshop ALICE Upgrade Overview Thorsten Kollegger for the ALICE Collaboration ALICE | Workshop |
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Physics whit ACORDE (ALICE Cosmic ray detector) Arturo Fernández for ACORDE-ALICE group.
Lærer-møde April 19, 2007 Dias 1 I.G. Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute ALICE: Upgrades & Perspectives.
Extending the PHENIX physics reach Physics beyond the baseline accessible at RHIC II Capabilities needed to address the new physics Detector upgrades to.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
CBM Experiment Computing Topics Volker Friese GSI Darmstadt HIC4FAIR Physics Day FIAS, Frankfurt, 11 November 2014.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
evoluzione modello per Run3 LHC
LHC experiments Requirements and Concepts ALICE
A heavy-ion experiment at the future facility at GSI
ALICE – First paper.
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Trigger  Detectors at 420m can be included in the HLT
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

The Use of Trigger and DAQ in High Energy Physics Experiments Lecture 3: The (near) future O. Villalobos Baillie School of Physics and Astronomy The University of Birmingham

September 14th The Auger experiment CBM ALICE run 3 Other considerations Summary Contents Lecture ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

The Auger Experiment This is a very large scale cosmic ray experiment, with a southern station over an extended area in Argentina Detectors are spread over an area of 3100 km 2 (about 1600 in all) Communication with the central trigger is very slow, so the detectors have to be autonomous. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

The Auger Experiment II September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

The Auger Experiment III Each unit consists of a water tank with 3 PMTs The PMTs are scanned every 25ns. A local trigger checks for 3 signals above threshold. If found, the values and the timestamp are transmitted to the central trigger via the microwave transmitter Local trigger output is ~20 Hz at each station, so data transmission time is negligible compared to live time. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

Auger IV Final trigger (T3) is made at the central trigger. An event is kept if three stations (non-collinear) simultaneously give a signal (in a 100 ms window). Final (T3) rate ~O(0.01 Hz) If so, readings for all stations giving counts above threshold are read out; if not, event discarded after 5s. Note final trigger decision made long after the data are read out. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

Analysis Auger is a very early example of a “triggerless” system. Detectors (stations) are self-triggering, and the final trigger is made by analysing the data coming from each station, after event readout has taken place. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

The Challenge September 14th 2013 ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie 8  typical CBM event: about 700 charged tracks in the acceptance  strong kinematical focusing in the fixed-target setup: high track densities  up to 10 7 of such events per second  find very rare signals, e.g., by decay topology, in such a background

Trigger Considerations Signatures vary qualitatively: – local and simple: J/ψ->μ + μ - – non-local and simple: J/ψ -> e + e - – non-local and complex: D,Ω->charged hadrons For maximal interaction rate, reconstruction in STS is always required (momentum information), but not necessarily of all tracks in STS. Trigger architecture must enable – variety of trigger patterns (J/ψ: 1% of data, D mesons: 50% of data) – multiple triggers at a time – multiple trigger steps with subsequent data reduction Complex signatures involve secondary decay vertices; difficult to implement in hardware. Extreme event rates set strong limits to trigger latency. September 14th 2013 ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie 9

Running Conditions September 14th 2013 ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie 10 ConditionInteraction ratelimited byApplication No Trigger10 4 /sarchival ratebulk hadrons, low-mass di-electrons Medium Trigger10 5 /s – 10 6 /sMVD (speed, rad. tolerance), trigger signature open charm multi-strange hyperons, low-mass di-muons Max. Trigger /s (even more for p beam) on-line event selection charmonium Detector, FEE and DAQ requirements are given by the most extreme case Design goal: 10 MHz minimum bias interaction rate Requires on-line data reduction by up to 1,000

CBM Readout Concept September 14th 2013 ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie 11 Finite-size FEE buffer: latency limited throughput limited

CBM Although the rates are very different from those of Auger, the concepts are quite similar. –Autonomous detectors that are self-triggering. –Event selection done by analysing readings. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

14 luminosity upgrade – 50 kHz target minimum-bias rate for Pb–Pb run ALICE at this high rate, inspecting all events improved vertexing and tracking at low p T preserve particle-identification capability new, smaller radius beam pipe new inner tracker (ITS) (performance and rate upgrade) high-rate upgrade for the readout of the TPC, TRD, TOF, CALs, DAQ-HLT, Muon-Arm and Trigger detectors collect more than 10 nb -1 of integrated luminosity implies running with heavy ions for a few years after LS3 for core physics programme – factor > 100 increase in statistics (maximum readout with present ALICE ~ 500 Hz) for triggered probes increase in statistics by factor > 10 ALICE upgrade after LS2 For CTP after LS2 see M. Krivda talk R. Lietava ICTDHEP Jammu September 2013

15 ALICE

Some detectors (TPC, possibly ITS and Muon system) can read out continuously –Therefore in principle, don’t need trigger. Data instead divided into time frames, separated via a heartbeat trigger (software), which marks the boundaries of each chunk of continuous readout serves to monitor synchronization of local and central clocks Other detectors read out upon a minimum bias like trigger Greatly improved data links allow data to be transferred to an improved High Level Trigger (HLT) for software analysis HLT performs event selection and data compression tasks. –Requires large expansion in online computing for HLT system. Important because ALICE signals require complex data processing of events, not compatible with traditional triggers. ALICE Run 3 Trigger Upgrade September 14th 2013 ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie 16

Summary on Triggerless Operation Original motivation for triggering was that data acquisition cannot keep up with reading out every event for offline analysis. Too much data Too slow Huge improvements in online computing capabilities (speed and massive parallel processing) mean that data can now be filtered in real time. Still don’t write all data to tape, but can analyse events at minimum bias level. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

Other upgrades “Triggerless operation” is not the only option. As we heard in the trigger workshop, ATLAS are keeping the original trigger concept, with strong selections at the first triggering level, but are instead optimising all levels of the system. One general point is the improvement of the granularity of the system. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

Trigger Thresholds September 14th Good Trigger threshold usually quoted as when efficiency reaches 50% There is a tail of completely unwanted below threshold triggers There is a region above the nominal threshold where the efficiency is still poor (and needs corrections, which may be not be precisely known. Not wanted Nominal threshold Low efficiency Sharper decision optimises selection ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie

Summary In these lectures you have seen several aspects of triggering: 1.Why limited data acquisition rates mean triggering is necessary 2.The constraints of dead time 3.Why colliders impose additional constraints on triggers and data throughput, leading to a need for pipelining at high rate 4.Why massive improvements in online processing (HLTs) mean that problem 1 has to some extent gone away, so “triggerless systems” can be considered for some applications. 5.However, close attention to all details of the trigger, and optimisation of all features, remains very important. September 14th ICTDHEP Jammu India - O. Villalobos Baillie