An Intro to the Distribution of Tuition Revenue to Schools & Colleges under ABB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Advertisements

The Benefits of Independent Higher Education to Pennsylvania Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Pennsylvania (AICUP) 101 North Front.
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.
Financial Aid Workshop Tuesday, July 22, 2014 Tuition Waiver Scholarships Overview.
TUITION & FEE PROPOSAL (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas Board of Regents (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
1 1 Budget Context for Townhall March 7,
Open Budget Meeting 1. 2 State Appropriations Tuition & Fees Auxiliary Enterprises Major Repair & Renovation (MRR) Salaries and Wages Utilities Supplies.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
Taxes Agenda: Important Information for 2014 Returns
1 New Budget Model Spring 2007 Update. Spring Guiding Principles The institution’s values as expressed in the academic plan should inform and drive.
Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.
School of Social Work Tuition & Aid Changes FY11-FY13 June 1,
1 Budget Model Update #2 Resources Implementation Team.
Critical Issues Facing SUNY Community Colleges Open Access Resources Community College Image Transfer and Articulation Growth/Capacity Turnover Accountability.
Arkansas Higher Education Financial Condition Report A Report to the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board October 30, 2009.
1 Budget Model Update Resources Implementation Team.
1 Important Information for 2012 Returns American Opportunity Tax Credit Lifetime Learning Tax Credit Tuition and Fees Deduction Qualified Tuition Programs.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” Dual Enrollment Plus The New Piece of the Puzzle--- Move On When Ready.
1 The Ohio State University Budgeting Basics Presented by: John Kuhar, Financial Planning & Analysis Henry Zheng, Office of Academic Affairs.
1 Faculty of Business Administration Budget Submission.
Manoa Budget Committee Update Kathy CutshawFebruary 18, 2015.
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING Fiscal Year June 7, 2005.
Campus Budget Update October 12, Tuition Proposed Tuition Rates: + 2.5% Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Undergraduate Resident $ $
Campus Budget Update December 7, State Appropriations Operating Recommendations: 6.1% ($1,623,145) Performance Incentives.
Sheri Austin Assistant Vice President, University Budgets Office of the Chief Financial Officer Academic Administrators Seminar Series October 2011.
Graduate School Is it for you?. Reasons to attend Good Reasons –Graduate school is necessary to pursue your particular career. –Specialization in a particular.
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Tuition Waivers.
Sheri Austin Assistant Vice President, University Budgets Office of the Chief Financial Officer Academic Administrators Leadership Series October 2013.
Framework for a New Campus Budget Process Incentive-based Budget Model Overview UCSD Campus Visit January 30, 2013.
An Intro to the Distribution of Tuition Revenue to Schools & Colleges under ABB.
Quick Guide to Divisional Budget Planning Tool – Undergraduate (DBPT-UG)
Consistent distribution of revenues and costs Distribute revenues to units Units pay for all the costs associated with their programs Eliminate the “General.
Revenue Projections and Budget 2014 Mary Simon Senior Director, Budget Development & Planning PRESENTATION TO THE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING.
Costs of Central Services 1 T HE P AST : T RYING TO LOOK THROUGH DEEPLY TINTED GLASS U NIVERSITY F INANCIAL M ODEL Personnel Costs Endowment Income Actual.
1 November 20 th - Agenda Review Agenda, Explanation of Fee Types, Fee Reviews & Process, Review of Proposed Fee Changes - Janet Parker Mandatory Fee Presentations:
THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | ELLER COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT RCM BUDGETING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA OCTOBER 5, 2015.
3   What is the role of the Committee?   Review details of the tuition and fee proposal resulting in a recommendation to the President and Board.
UC Davis Budget and Professional Degree Supplemental Tuition Overview
SMALL DECISIONS… …BIG IMPACTS Bobby Lothringer, University Registrar (940)
FY12 Tuition Projections Tuition charged by Texas public universities is a combination of two charges: –Statutory Tuition –Designated Tuition 1.
Florida International University G51 BUDGET AND FACULTY FUNDING MODEL April 28, 2006.
FY10 Statutory Tuition Revenue Projections Different Rates for UG and GR; Resident and Non-resident Undergraduate, Resident $50 / Semester Credit Hour.
Budget Update FY 12 Mid Year Revenue Analysis and FY 13 Budget Planning Janet Parker, Associate Vice President, Financial Affairs Mary Simon, Senior Director,
1 U NIVERSITY F INANCIAL M ODEL UPDATE A UGUST 27, 2014.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Florida International University G-51 April 9, 2010.
Open Budget Meeting November 3, Open Budget Meeting 2.
2   Flat Rate (Pay the Same) Tuition if you enroll in 12 Semester Credit Hours (SCH) or more   Designated Tuition increases by 5% if you enroll in.
Kelly Ratliff Associate Vice Chancellor Student Affairs Leadership Team October 4, 2012 Campus Budget Overview.
1 Important Information for 2015 Returns American Opportunity Tax Credit Lifetime Learning Tax Credit Tuition and Fees Deduction Qualified Tuition Programs.
Budget Overview OSU Faculty Senate Budget Presentation November 10, 2011.
INCENTIVE FUNDING UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Created on 2/17/2016.
© 2015 Boise State University1 Boise State University Bronco Budget 2.0 Committee Ken Kline AVP, Budget and Planning.
Collective Bargaining Contracts with Performance Metrics A “Success Pool” and ”Faculty Excellence Awards” Kent State University NCSCBHEP 39 th Annual National.
1 Financial Topics Cost of Education Committee 9/04/2009.
Welcome to Financial Aid Night An overview of financial aid and the application process. Presented by the Ascension Parish Career Coaches.
UAccess Symposium March Who am I? What do I do? Native of Maryland BS, James Madison University MBA, Eller College of Management, University of.
One System…One Mission Edison State College Randy Hanna Chancellor Florida College System.
© 2015 Boise State University1 Boise State University Bronco Budget 2.0 Committee Ken Kline AVP, Budget and Planning.
Module 5.
FY18 Budget Planning Council Orientation
Tuition and Fee Structure
Budget Overview February 3, 2017.
at the University of Virginia
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
Operating fee revenue distribution calculations for ABB
David Jewell and Kyle Moore
Presentation transcript:

An Intro to the Distribution of Tuition Revenue to Schools & Colleges under ABB

Outline  What is the tuition revenue distributed under ABB?  What are the basics of the distribution process?  What are the nuances of the distribution process and what – as a result – are changes that units might wish to have made to ABB?  Where do the data used in ABB calculations come from? Can they be found in UW Profiles? Can they be obtained by unit administrators by querying the Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW)?  How does the ABB process fit in with the annual budget process?

Tuition Revenue

Only net operating fee revenue is distributed to schools/colleges Full-Time Resident Undergraduate Charges: Operating Fee$10,740 Building Fee$565 Total Tuition$11,305 S&A Fee$390 Tech Fee$123 IMA Bond Fee$96 Facilities Renovation Fee$252 U-PASS$228 Total Fees$1,089 Total Tuition & Fees$12,394

Only net operating fee revenue is distributed to schools/colleges  We distribute the amount of revenue that is actually collected - net operating fee revenue.  In order to achieve a given level of enrollment and a student body with particular characteristics (e.g., an economically diverse student population), institutions “discount” tuition.  This discounting is the main source of the difference between the total amount of tuition charged and the total amount collected.

Only net operating fee revenue is distributed to schools/colleges  Net operating fee revenue is calculated by subtracting several types of “financial aid” from the total amount of tuition charged:  Tuition waived (foregone revenue)  TA/RA waivers (about ¾ of total waivers)  Veteran’s waivers  Pool of need/merit waivers  Revenue used for financial aid  Legislatively mandated 4% “set-aside”  “Additional aid” pools - RUG, NonResUG (Purple/Gold Scholarships)

Only 70% of net operating fee revenue is distributed to schools/colleges  30% of net operating fee revenue (the ABB “tax”) is retained centrally. These funds are used for such things as:  Utilities, grounds, maintenance  Central services (e.g. libraries, police)  Strategic investments  (Provost Reinvestment Fund)

Distribution Basics

To determine the amount to be distributed, we first “pool” net operating fee revenue by tuition groups :  Undergrad  Grad Tier I  Grad Tier II  Grad Tier III  CoEnv Grad  Educ Grad  MSW  Public Health Grad  MPH  Engineering Masters  M Public Admin  MBA  Law (JD)  Law (Other Grad)  Nursing Grad  PharmD  Medicine (MD)  Dentistry (DDS)  Dentistry Grad

Then we distribute 70% of each pool according to the ABB distribution rules  60% based on SCH  40% based on degrees UndergradsGrad/Professional  20% based on SCH  80% based on major enrollments  Only SCH and major enrollment for students who are charged tuition are included  This means that fee-based activity is excluded  Also means that students with an “exemption” are excluded

What does it mean to distribute tuition revenue based on SCH?  We pool the total number of SCH (student credit hours) taken by students in each tuition group.  Using this information, we calculate the percentage of all SCH taken by students in a tuition group for which each school/college is responsible.  The portion of the revenue pool to be distributed by SCH is distributed according to those percentages.  The school/college that is responsible for the SCH in a course section is not determined on the basis of which faculty member teaches the section.  Instead it is determined on the basis of a “mapping” of curricula to departments (and thus to schools/colleges). (e.g. ACCTG – Foster, MATH to A&S, BIOENG – SOM & CoEng)

…based on major enrollments or degree majors?  We distribute 40% of undergraduate resident tuition based on degree majors.  We distribute 80% of graduate/professional tuition on the basis of major enrollments.  We begin by finding out all the majors in which students in each tuition group are enrolled, or all the majors associated with each bachelor’s degree earned.  We sum the total number of degree majors or major enrollments.  Using this information, we calculate the percentage of major enrollments or degree majors for which each school/college is responsible.  For this, we use a mapping” of majors to departments (and thus to schools/colleges).

ABB Nuances

 There are a number of details in the ABB tuition distribution process that are not straightforward.  When ABB was created, there were a number of decisions that needed to be made in order for calculations to be made.  When the effect of specific changes was assessed, in most cases, a choice one way or another had only minimal effects in most cases.  In some instances, the ultimate decision about how/whether to change things is an academic rather than budgetary choice. Faculty subcommittees have been charged with addressing four issues (three related to tuition revenue).

Nuances – net tuition  TA/RA waivers  Revenue is lost to the units in which students enroll (either on the basis of their major or on the basis of courses taken)  The unit appointing a TA/RA may not be the unit in which they enroll.  There are certain schools/colleges where this happens frequently (The Graduate School council has been asked to look at this issue.)

Nuances – net tuition  Summer quarter  Tuition revenue from summer quarter is not currently included in ABB tuition revenue calculations.  SCH and enrollments from summer quarter are not included in the tuition distribution calculations.  It is assumed (given the way in which the baseline ABB “supplement” was calculated) that units receive revenue for summer quarter through the supplement.  This means, however, that we don’t have the same incentives for growing summer quarter instruction as we do for growing instruction in autumn, winter, and spring quarters. (The Faculty Council on Teaching and Learning has been asked to look at this issue.)

Nuances – exemptions  Students who are UW employees, state employees, or senior citizens may enroll in up to six credits on a “space available basis” without paying tuition.  Following the initial ABB guidelines, any student with such an exemption is excluded from ABB calculations.  But….  Students pay tuition if enrolled for > 6 credits.  We have no way of determining those enrollments where the use of the exemption has been approved.  In fact, some exclusions to the exemption have now been created, but they cannot be identified in our data.

Nuances – distribution by SCH  A curriculum may be mapped to more than one unit (e.g. bioengineering)  If a particular curriculum is attributed to two units, the associated SCH will be counted twice. If it is attributed to three units, they will be counted three times. Undergraduate SCH A 120 C SCI120 E 120 M E120 BIOEN120 Total600 CoE120 CoE120 CoE120 CoE120 CoE120 SoM120 Total720 CoE83.3% SoM16.7%

Nuances – distribution by SCH Course sections may be offered “jointly”.  In the case of “official” joint courses, one course is identified as the “responsible” course  e.g., ENV H 461 is offered jointly with CEE 490, and CEE 490 is the responsible course, so all credits are attributed to Engineering  In the case of “ad hoc” joint courses, a course section may be offered jointly without being designated as an official joint offering. In such an instance, credits are attributed to unit based on how each student enrolls in the course. (The Faculty Council on Academic standards has been asked to look at the issues of joint courses.)

Nuances – distribution by degree major  A given student may graduate with more than one degree (e.g., B.A. and B.S.), and each degree may be associated with more than one major.  Each major may be mapped to more than one unit.  Suppose five undergraduates graduate: A&SEngrMed Student 1BAEnglish1 Student 2BAPhilosophy1 BS Math1 Physics1 Student 3BSElect Eng1 Student 4BAHistory1 Student 5BSBioEng11 We have: 5 students 6 degrees 7 different majors 8 “degree majors” 62.5% to A&S 25% to Engineering 12.5% to Med

Nuances – distribution by major enrollments  A given student enroll in more than one program simultaneously.  So if a particular tuition group has a large proportion of students with multiple program enrollments, the revenue pool for that group may end up being diluted.  MBA: 98% of majors and SCH are attributable to Foster.  MPH: Only 70% of majors and 76% of SCH are attributable to SPH.  As with degrees, it is also the case that a given major may be attributed to more than one school/college. (The Faculty Council on Academic standards has been asked to look at the issue of double/concurrent majors.)

Nuances - campuses  To date, tuition revenue generated by UW Bothell and UW Tacoma has gone to those campuses, with ABB distribution rules applying only to UW Seattle.  This means that course-taking on the UW Seattle campus by UW Bothell and UW Tacoma students is not included in the SCH distribution.  It also means that course-taking on the UW Bothell or UW Tacoma campuses by UW Seattle students is not included in the SCH distribution.  So, what happens when, for example, there is a joint program between School of Pharmacy and Bothell’s MBA program?

Data for ABB

Key Data Issues – How are ABB data sourced?  ABB was built on the Planning and Budgeting Database (PNBDB) rather than the Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW) because the relevant data elements didn’t exist in EDW.  Requirements  Census day snapshots of enrollments and course registrations.  Mapping of curricula, majors, and degrees to fin orgs.  Good news!  Currently OPB and EDA are working to move functionality from PNBDB into EDW.  In the meantime, anyone who wishes can get access to PNBDB and ABB queries.  Bad news:  For now, you cannot get the numbers out of EDW or UW Profiles.

ABB calculations and the annual budget process

Although calculations are done in Spring, the “process” starts in Fall  Each Fall, schools and colleges prepare for annual budget discussions with the Provost. In that process, they are asked to provide:  Recommendations for tuition rates for their programs  Information about whether they wish to create a new tuition category  Any expected substantial changes in enrollment in their graduate/professional programs.

Calculation of true-up  As of spring census day (let’s use Spring 2015 as example), the final tuition revenue estimate for is calculated.  The final distribution for is calculated using:  Actual SCH from  Actual major enrollments from  Degree majors from  The true-up to each unit is the difference between the final ABB distribution of revenue for and the projected distribution of revenue from the prior spring.

Calculation of incremental revenue for coming fiscal year  To calculate the incremental revenue for the coming year ( in our example), we must begin with a projection of the revenue pool for the coming year. For that, we assume:  Tuition rates proposed/approved for next year, and  Enrollments expected for the coming year.  Undergraduates: We use an enrollment projection model.  Graduate/Professional: Informed by unit responses about expected changes in grad/professional programs.  To calculate the distribution of revenue, we assume the percentage distribution of SCH and major enrollments from and degree majors from