Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey BRFSS 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS3 & Global Commitments MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing.
Advertisements

State Center for Health Statistics Division of Public Health NC Dept. of Health and Human Services.
2004 Fannin County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Turning Information Into Health.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
An Overview of the North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Presentation to the State Health Director's Conference January 23,
A COLLABORATIVE EXPLORATION OF MINNESOTA PRAMS DIABETES CORE AND STANDARD QUESTIONS Barbara Frohnert, MPH Minnesota PRAMS Project Coordinator, Minnesota.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Healthy Communities: Healthy.
Women’s Health and BRFSS Presented By: Neha Thakkar Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator With the help of: Dr. John Senner Project Officer Arkansas Center for Health.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Contributors: Wayne A. Honey, MPH Jennifer E. Daniel, MPH Annie Hickman, BS Survey Unit, Injury & Behavioral.
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
BRFSS Salt Intake Module Epidemiology and Surveillance Team Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention National.
Kentucky Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Monitoring the health of Kentuckians: “A look at Mental Health Data” February 8, 2007.
Preconception Health of Adolescents in Cuyahoga County: Data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2014 CFHS ANNUAL MEETING APRIL 14, 2014 ERIKA S. TRAPL,
CLRN Evaluation Update Educational Support Systems May 28, 2009
0ictQATAR October 13, 2008 Qatar’s ICT Statistical Information Areas Tariq Gulrez.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Resource Core Yvette Roubideaux MD MPH University of Arizona.
Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1985 No Data
Endeavors in Transportation Health Impact Assessment LCDR Joseph Ralph, MPH, CHES Healthy Community Design Initiative June 2015 National Center for Environmental.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Enhancing Surveillance with the Colorado Child Health Survey Jodi Drisko, MSPH Jason Gannon Alyson Shupe, MSW, PhD Colorado Department of Public Health.
The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC. CDC ‘s Role in Vision.
Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment 2
1 What is your college doing to promote diversity? What is the college in the next county doing? What are the best diversity practices?
The Role of Local Specificity in the Interpretation of Small Area Estimation Benmei Liu Scott Gilkeson Gordon Willis Rocky Feuer 2012 FCSM Statistical.
MOLLY SCHWENN, MD CANCER REGISTRY MAINE CDC, DHHS OCTOBER 25, 2013 Population-based Cancer Surveillance: State Perspective.
A Profile of Health among Massachusetts Adults: Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Health Survey.
2004 Falls County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Welcome to BRFSS 2016 Annual Meeting.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey BRFSS 2013 Tuesday, August 14, Room - 540A (10:30 A.M. – 11:30 A.M.) Presented by: Judy Bass Arizona.
Bureau of Nutrition and Physical Activity Leadership for a Healthy Arizona Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Weight Status Arizona Adults and Youth August.
Professional Development Training: Utilization of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Data LaTonya Bynum Arkansas BRFSS Survey Coordinator.
SILC-NET, a project of ILRU – Independent Living Research Utilization 00 Gathering Consumer Feedback for SILCs September 27, 2011 SILC-NET Presents…
BRFSS and Caregiver Advocacy Katie Maslow Alzheimer’s Association March 18, 2009.
Seminar on Mid Term Evaluation in Objective 1 and 2 Regions Lessons from the Mid Term Evaluation of Merseyside Objective One.
Jordan National Behavioral Risk and Chronic Disease Survey Jordan 2004 / 2005 Dr. Meyasser Zindah Head of NCD Department Ministry Of Health.
New Mexico’s Racial and Ethnic Disparities Report Card Vicky Howell, Ph.D., Office of Policy and Performance New Mexico Department of Health.
Pushing forward with ASPIRE A System for Product Improvement, Review and Evaluation Heather Bergdahl, Paul Biemer, Dennis Trewin Q2014.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Using Health Care Indicators to Improve Individual and Systemic Health Care Outcomes National Core Indicators (NCI) Cross-State Data & Additional Health.
Preventing and Controlling Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in Maine: Maine Cardiovascular Health and Diabetes Strategic Plan Monitoring Plan.
4th June 2012 Nisha Kini Disparities in Heart Attack Knowledge by Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Education Level and Household Income among Maine adults.
Evaluation of the Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance System (RRFSS) RRFSS Annual Workshop 20 June 2006.
BreastCare in Arkansas: Results from the Arkansas BRFSS Presented By: LaTonya Steward, B.S. Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator.
Focus Area 24 Respiratory Diseases Progress Review June 29, 2004.
11 Mayview Regional Service Area Plan (MRSAP) Tracking: Supporting Individuals in the Community June 18, 2008.
ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY SCHOOLS Staff Safety Training Requirements As part of the Isle of Wight County Schools’ SAFESCHOOLS Initiative, all IWCS employees.
Shared Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Creating The Story About Our Data Penobscot County Fall 2015/Spring 2016.
Field Research Methods Interviews Observations Surveys Correspondences Public Events and Broadcast Media.
County of San Diego, Health and Human Services Agency, Public Health Services, Community Health Statistics Unit 25 years of Obesity in the U.S. and San.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey AZ DHS, Bureau of Public Health Services Khaleel Hussaini, PhD. – Bureau Chief Division of Public Health.
Improving the Health of All Kansans. 3/4/50 Rule That Contribute to 50% of all US Deaths Contribute to Four Chronic Diseases Cardiovascular Disease DiabetesLung.
Presented by: Khaleel S. Hussaini PhD Bureau Chief, Public Health Statistics Division of Public Health Preparedness Judy Bass Arizona’s BRFSS Coordinator.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Communication, monitoring and recruitment targets.
Introduction to NCHS Rob Weinzimer, Special Assistant for Outreach Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Planning a Customer Survey Part 1 of 3 Elaine Carlson, Westat Anne D’Agostino, Compass Evaluation & Research.
From the Delaware Behavioral Risk Factor Survey (BRFS) Cancer Consortium Retreat, February 20, 2012.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Epidemiology and Public Health Nursing.
Camden County BRFSS Results
Roles and Responsibilities of VDH Epidemiologists
Division of Surveillance: Available Data Sources
Working Group Five Indicators and Measurement: demonstrating and improving impact After deliberating the definition of "success" for a transparency regime,
Primary Care Alternatives PRC Results
2018 Surveys and Evaluations
Part 1: Data Sources Frank Porell
Including People with Disabilities: Public Health Workforce Competencies Module 3 Competency 2: Discuss methods used to assess health issues for people.
Presentation transcript:

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey BRFSS 2014

 Bureau of Public Health staff update  The annual AZ BRFSS report is undergoing some evolutionary changes  A new question will be asked from 2014 forward

Recommendations and Guidelines Identify Disparities / Anomalies Track Emerging State and National trends Progress toward Healthy People 2020 goals Improve Program Evaluation Refine Program Planning Assessing/Monitoring Chronic Disease Risks

BRFSS 2013Original sample size New targeted sample size Landlines Cell Phones

Strata 1 = 500 Strata 2 = 450 Strata 3 = 450 Strata 4 = 450 Strata 5 = 500 2

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey BRFSS 2014  Core Questions  Optional Modules  State - Added Questions  JUSTIFICATIONS

 From this point forward, the Arizona BRFSS will ask for the Respondents’ nearest major cross-streets.  This data will be securely housed by the Bureau of Public Health Statistics  The information gathered from this question will not be publicly available ◦ E.g., this question and the “STATEQUE” variable will be redacted from the data made available to the public on the AZ BRFSS Website

 By adding this question, the AZ BRFSS data will be geocoded ◦ Data can then be assigned to the appropriate CHAA, PCA, or other small area  The current data is not designed to assign an observation to its appropriate sub-county  Stakeholders are increasingly asking for sub- county information

 The CDC has been exploring Small Area Estimation (SAE) techniques  A request was sent to the State Coordinators seeking input on SAE methodology and techniques  SAE techniques were applied to the AZ BRFSS data  The data structure did not allow for appropriate aggregation to CHAA level  The smallest level is Zip-Code, which is too restrictive

The AZ BRFSS will continue to provide County-level information. However, to better serve our stakeholders and the State of Arizona, new methodologies will be explored and assessed for validity. Some of the techniques explored thus far: Methods-SAE.docxMethods-SAE.docx Direct EstimationSynthetic Estimation Spatial SmoothingMultilevel Regression

 State-added and Optional Module costs will be $5,100 per question for  CDC is planning to increase the ratio of cell phone interviews from 30% to nearly 50% over the next 5 years  Therefore, the cost per question will likely increase to $7,000+ in 2016

 Applicants received copies of the applications from each of the stakeholders and programs  Only applicants who are present are allowed to vote  Everyone who is not a qualified applicant will be asked to leave at the end of the meeting  Q/A session  Vote on all modules recommended by CDC first  Next, the State-Added- asking that you vote on the lesser number of questions first  Then the State-Added you will vote on the greatest number of questions to be asked

 Judy Bass  Phone #  -  Website:

Thank you!