Puget Sound Harvest Status of ESA and NEPA Review Susan Bishop Sustainable Fisheries Division NOAA Fisheries

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 7, 2013 Petition to List Queen Conch Southeast Regional Office Protected Resources Division.
Advertisements

Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Comprehensive Management Plan for Puget Sound Chinook Harvest.
Stormwater Management Initiative Update. ODOTs Goal Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff treatment program to: Develop a streamlined stormwater runoff.
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Consultation Under the Endangered Species Act Garwin Yip, NOAA Fisheries Service, Southwest Region.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Upper Willamette River Recovery Planning WITHIN OUR REACH New Partnerships for a Healthier Willamette December
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
MSRA Environmental Review Requirement. Section 107 Requirements Revise and Update Procedures Consult with CEQ and Councils, involve public Sole environmental.
Coho Reintroduction in the Upper Columbia: Using Adaptive Management to Achieve Success Fisheries Resource Management Yakama Nation.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
458 Population Projections (policy analysis) Fish 458; Lecture 21.
Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty Cedar River Sockeye Hatchery Proposed Adaptive Management Plan.
Missing collaborator. Conceptual Overview SHIRAZ Landscape Processes Land Use Freshwater Habitat Biological Response Land use & landscape processes affect.
1 Update on the Ongoing ESA Section 7 Consultation and DEIS Development for the Southeast Shrimp Fishery Louisiana Shrimp Task Force November 29, 2011.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
South March Highlands Blanding’s Turtle Conservation Needs Assessment March 18, 2013.
Incorporating Ecosystem Objectives into Fisheries Management
1 Proposed Revisions to the National Standard 1 Guidelines: Adding Guidance on Annual Catch Limits and Other Requirements Presentation to the Regional.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
Klamath Coho Integrated Modeling Framework (IMF)
2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
West Coast Region September 12-14, 2015 Salmon Consultation on the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery: Salmon Consultation on the Pacific Coast Groundfish.
The Intersection of the National Environmental Policy Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act November 4, 2010 Roger Williams.
Atlantic Salmon Recovery Framework Briefing for Regional Director November 1, 2010.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
February 5, 2003 Integrating Fisheries Management Into Comprehensive Recovery Planning Jeff Koenings, Randy Kinley Mike Grayum, Curt Kraemer, Kit Rawson.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Washington State Steelhead Stock Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING AMILEE WILSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 2004.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.
The influence of variable marine survival on fishery management objectives for wild steelhead Dan Rawding & Charlie Cochran.
Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Recovery Planning Advances Cherise M. Oram Stoel Rives LLP Northwest Environmental Summit October 20, 2005.
Implementing Hatchery Reform The Dawn of a New Beginning or more of the same old thing? Mike Delarm NOAA Fisheries.
West Coast Groundfish Quota Program Workshop PLANNING FOR A REVIEW OF THE WEST COAST GROUNDFISH TRAWL CATCH SHARE PROGRAM CHUCK TRACY, PACIFIC FISHERY.
Background Historic data sets are really only available for Sandy and Clackamas. Current harvest management uses these populations as drivers, but we know.
Strategies for Complex Section 7 Endangered Species Act Consultations with examples from Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri Russ Rommé BHE Environmental, Inc.
Generic Management Plans Use of the EFIMAS toolbox in their evaluation John Casey, Chair STECF.
Public Meeting For Scoping Of An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For The Perham Resource Recovery Facility: Introductions Agenda Good evening, my.
Settlement Agreement “The emphasis of this Agreement is …restoration and recovery of wild, indigenous salmon runs, including ESA-listed and unlisted.
June 12, /19/2018 Agenda Item I.1.a Supplemental NMFS PPT (Bishop) March 2017 Salmon Bycatch in the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fisheries: Scenario.
Missing collaborator.
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 1 November 2018
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 2 November 2018
Land Use Permit Tracking: Monitoring and Evaluation of Land Use Regulatory Programs for Salmon Recovery Planning in Hood Canal Scott Brewer, Hood Canal.
Skeena Fisheries Review and Update
Developing a shelter strategy
Presentation transcript:

Puget Sound Harvest Status of ESA and NEPA Review Susan Bishop Sustainable Fisheries Division NOAA Fisheries

ESA Actions u Puget Sound chinook, Hood Canal summer-run chum ESUs listed March, 1999 u ESA Evaluations – 1999: Biological opinion – 2000: Biological opinion – : 4(d) application (Limit 6), NEPA u NMFS concluded that actions “…would not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery…”

2001 Harvest Plan Challenged u Lawsuit on (d) approval – Process: NEPA, ESA biological opinion – Substance: Harvest Approach u Settlement agreement reached

Terms of Settlement u 2003 – One year 4(d) application – One year biological opinion – Environmental Assessment u 2004 – Multi-year 4(d) application – Multi-year biological opinion – Environmental Impact Statement

Alternatives for NEPA Analysis u Determined from: – Settlement agreement – Public scoping – Internal scoping u Proposed Action (EA and EIS) u Escapement goal management (EIS) u Escapement goal management; population level; terminal only fisheries (EA, EIS) u No take of listed Puget Sound chinook (EA, EIS)

Basis of Alternatives u Fulfill terms of settlement agreement u Reasonable range of alternatives u Focused on alternatives to general harvest management framework u Harvest-centric

Proposed Action  Uses a mixture of exploitation rates and escapement thresholds  Accounts for all fishing-related impacts across all fisheries  Incorporates uncertainty in data & the environment, & minimizes risk  Harvest objectives updated with changing environmental and habitat conditions

Proposed Action objectives u Abundance thresholds – Critical: maintain population stability triggers additional fishery restriction – Upper:abundance with negligible risk of extinction measured under current habitat conditions u Exploitation rates – Based on abundance thresholds or recent years with stable escapements – 2 steps:rebuilding rates above critical threshold minimum regime below critical threshold – Incorporates error and uncertainty

Puget Sound Chinook Harvest Plan Hypothetical Puget Sound Chinook Stock Proportion of adult population harvested Rebuilding Extreme low abundance Max. ?% harvest Max. 30% harvest Max. fishery restrictions Recovered Low abundance threshold Current estimate of habitat productivity & capacity Number of Spawners Habitat productivity & capacity increases Recovery is achieved

NEPA Analysis u Will  Evaluate harvest effects  General framework  Broad scale look  ESU level assessment  Provide information for other processes u Won’t Watershed specific Other H scenarios Fine level tuning

Opportunities for Input u 2003 RMP final determination pending u Public scoping for EIS has already occurred u Public review and comment – DEIS – Proposed determination on 2004 RMP u General input opportunities, but not as collaborative a process as Shared Strategy

Schedule for Completion of 2004 RMP EIS Harvest Plan Implemented DEIS published for public review 5/15 summer/03fall/03 winter/04 5/ Harvest Package Final 45d Public comment 2004 Harvest Plan Development Address public comment, revise Final EIS 30d cooling off Comment closed Harvest Plan to NMFS 2004 Harvest Plan Review and Revision 4(d) Evaluation and Determination Biological Opinion 2004 Fisheries Open

Integration u 4(d) rule requires monitoring, review, evaluation u Section 7 requires re-initiation upon substantial new information u RMPs evaluated so far include adaptive management processes