1/7 Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00 Mayumi Munakata (NTT) Shida Schubert (NTT) IETF67 SIPPING 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 2, 2005SIPPING WG IETF 63 ETSI TISPAN ISDN simulation services Roland Jesske Denis Alexeitsev Miguel Garcia-Martin.
Advertisements

SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-02 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
Applicability of Instant Messaging in the Military Command and Control Systems Author: Juha Vermaja Superviser: Jorma Jormakka Instructor: Marko Luoma,
XML Configuration Access Protocol (XCAP) Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
1 IETF VoIP Peering BOF: Input on Inter-domain SIP Requirements for VoIP Peering Jean-François Mulé CableLabs
Authorization architecture sketches draft-selander-core-access-control-02 draft-gerdes-core-dcaf-authorize-02 draft-seitz-ace-design-considerations-00.
Request History – Solution Mary Barnes SIP WG Meeting IETF-57 draft-ietf-sip-history-info-00.txt.
IETF-78, July Alert-Info URNs for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-02 L. Liess, R. Jesske, D. Alexeitsev.
History of Voic Cullen Jennings Mary Barnes.
IETF 68 – SIMPLE WG SIMPLE Problem Statement draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis-00 Avshalom Houri – IBM Tim Rang - Microsoft Edwin Aoki – AOL.
MASS / DKIM BOF IETF – Paris 4 Août 2005 dkim.org  mipassoc.org/mass IETF – Paris 4 Août 2005 dkim.org  mipassoc.org/mass MIPA.
1 Notification Rate Control draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control th IETF,
Web Services Standards. Introduction A web service is a type of component that is available on the web and can be incorporated in applications or used.
IETF 60 – San Diegodraft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-07 Magnus Westerlund Real-Time Streaming Protocol draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-07 Magnus Westerlund Aravind.
DNS SRV and NAPTR Use for SPEERMINT - Tom Creighton, Gaurav Khandpur Comcast SPEERMINT Intermin Meeting Philadelphia Sept
SIPREC draft-ietf-siprec-req-02 Requirements for Media Recording using SIP Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lum IETF 78.5 Interim.
1 SIPREC draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-00 An Architecture for Media Recording using SIP IETF SIPREC INTERIM – Sept 28 th 2010 Andrew Hutton.
Draft-elwell-sipping- redirection-reason-00 Author: John Elwell
ISCSI Extensions for RDMA (iSER) draft-ko-iwarp-iser-02 Mike Ko IBM August 2, 2004.
Requirements for SIP-based VoIP Interconnection (BCP) draft-natale-sip-voip-requirements-00.txt Bob Natale For Consideration by the.
SIPREC draft-ietf-siprec-req-05 Requirements for Media Recording using SIP Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lum IETF 79.1 Interim.
P2P Streaming Protocol (PPSP) Requirements Ning Zong Yunfei Zhang Victor Pascual Carl Williams Lin Xiao draft-ietf-ppsp-reqs-02.
SIP working group IETF#70 Essential corrections Keith Drage.
IETF-90 (Toronto) DHC WG Meeting Wednesday, July 23, GMT IETF-90 DHC WG1 Last Updated: 07/21/ :10 EDT.
SIP Extensions for Network-Asserted Caller Identity and Privacy within Trusted Networks Flemming Andreasen W. Marshall, K. K. Ramakrishnan,
Sieve Loops Tony Hansen Cyrus Daboo
End-to-middle Security in SIP draft-ietf-sipping-e2m-sec-reqs-03 draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-02 Kumiko Ono IETF60.
Real-Time Streaming Protocol draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-01.txt Magnus Westerlund.
Extending the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Reason Header for Applications draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-application-00 draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-application-00.
SIP PUBLISH Method Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
End-to-middle Security in SIP draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-04 Kumiko Ono IETF62.
Slide 1 July 2006, Montreal, QuebecIETF DNSEXT 2929bis Donald E. Eastlake 3 rd
1 draft-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-05 Open Issues. 2 Overview I received many helpful reviews: Thanks Rob, Sandy, Sean, Randy, and Wes Most issues are minor.
Name that User John Elwell Cullen Jennings Venkatesh Venkataramanan
A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol User Agent Profile Delivery (draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-11) SIPPING – IETF 68 Mar 19, 2007 Sumanth.
MSRP Again! draft-ietf-simple-message- session-09.
Slide #1 Nov 6 -11, 2005SIP WG IETF64 Feature Tags with SIP REFER draft-ietf-sip-refer-feature-param-00 Orit
Caller Preferences Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
History-Info header and Support of target-uri Solution Requirements Mary Barnes Francois Audet SIPCORE.
DIME WG IETF 84 Diameter Design Guidelines draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide-15 Tuesday, July 31, 2012 Lionel Morand.
1 End-to-middle Security in SIP Kumiko Ono NTT Corporation March 1, 2004 draft-ietf-sipping-e2m-sec-reqs-01.txt draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-01.txt.
Mapping and interworking of Diversion information between Diversion and History-Info Headers in the SIP draft-mohali-bliss-diversion-history-info-00 draft-mohali-bliss-diversion-history-info-00.
SIPREC draft-ietf-siprec-req-04 Requirements for Media Recording using SIP Draft authors: K. Rehor, A. Hutton, L. Portman, R. Jain, H. Lum IETF 79 Beijing.
Slide 1 November 2005, Vancouver, BCIETF DNSEXT 2929bis etc. Donald E. Eastlake 3 rd
Page 1 IETF DRINKS Working Group Data Model and Protocol Requirements for DRINKS IETF 72 - Thursday July Tom Creighton -
IETF68 DIME WG Diameter Applications Design Guidelines Document (draft-fajardo-dime-app-design-guide-00.txt)
Diameter General Purpose Session draft-liebsch-dime-diameter-gps-01.txt M. Liebsch, G. Punz IETF79, Beijing Diameter Extensions (DIME) WG 11 th November.
SIPREC Conference Recording (draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-00) IETF 87, November 4, 2013 Authors: Michael Yan, Paul Kyzivat, Simon Romano.
SIPPING Working Group IETF 67 Mary Barnes Gonzalo Camarillo.
SIP Working Group IETF Chairs -- Rohan MAHY Dean WILLIS.
End-to-middle Security in SIP
IP-NNI Joint Task Force Status Update
Jonathan Rosenberg Volker Hilt Daryl Malas
Kumiko Ono End-to-middle Security in SIP draft-ietf-sipping-e2m-sec-reqs-04 draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-03 Kumiko Ono.
Request History Capability – Requirements & Solution
draft-ietf-simple-message-session-09
IETF80, Prague Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) WG
IP-NNI Joint Task Force Status Update
Jean-François Mulé CableLabs
ELECTRONIC MAIL SECURITY
ELECTRONIC MAIL SECURITY
IETF 101 (London) STIR WG Mar2018
INSIPID Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for logging and debugging (draft-kaithal-dispatch-sip-log-information-00 ) March 26th 2012 IETF -83.
IP Interconnection Profile
STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.
Change Proposals for SHAKEN Documents
draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-06
IETF 87 DHC WG Berlin, Germany Thursday, 1 August, 2013
M. Boucadair, J. Touch, P. Levis and R. Penno
DetNet Architecture Updates
Presentation transcript:

1/7 Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00 Mayumi Munakata (NTT) Shida Schubert (NTT) IETF67 SIPPING 1 - Nov. 6th, 2006

2/7 Problems of privacy mechanism Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP (draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00) Privacy related RFCspriv-value RFC 3323defines the privacy mechanism for SIP user, header, session, none, critical RFC 3325defines the privacy extension for P-Asserted-Identity header id RFC 4244defines the privacy extension for History-Info header history priv-value: privacy header value The semantics of priv-values aren't clear. The target headers to be obscured per priv-value are not explicitly specified. Mismatching interpretations ruins interoperability!

3/7 Purpose of the draft  To clarify the use of privacy mechanism - the semantics of each priv-value - the handling of the relevant target SIP headers for each of the priv-value  To provide guidelines on privacy considerations for future specifications - for new SIP headers - for new priv-values Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP (draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00)

4/7 SIP-headers of interests Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP (draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00) Target headersuserheadersessionidhistory Warningmodify Record-Routestrip P-Asserted-Identitydelete History-Infonot add delete Pathstrip Referred-Bymodify Replaces Service-Routestrip Target-Dialogmodify Identity-Infomodify These are just recommended behaviors of privacy service. The behaviors in colored columns need more discussion.

5/7 Issue 1 Should the scope be limited to only SIP headers, or extended to SIP parameters? - Our recommendation is the latter choice. The purpose of a privacy service is to protect a user's privacy. If user's privacy related information is included in SIP message in certain parameters, it should be obscured by privacy server. Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP (draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00)

6/7 Issue 2 Do we need to clarify where the privacy service should be executed for each priv- value? - Our recommendation is No. It could say that "user" is best done near the origination point, "session" can be done almost anywhere, but the others need to be done near to the exit point of the trust domain. However, it really depends on service policy. Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP (draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00)

7/7 Are we interested ? Next Step: - extend the scope to SIP parameters. - more discussions. Some need to be supported by examples. Thank you. Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP (draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00)