NEW MEXICO STATE PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT GRANT (SPDG) Using iPads for Collecting Implementation and Fidelity of Implementation Data OSEP.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quality Improvement in the ONS Cynthia Z F Clark Frank Nolan Office for National Statistics United Kingdom.

Advertisements

Audrey Desjarlais, Signetwork Coordinator Survey Findings SPDG Initiative Goals SPDG Initiative Outcomes.

Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.

Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.

Office of Student and School Success “Ensure equality of outcome for Washington State’s 1.1 million students” Our Mission… Andrew E. Kelly Assistant Superintendent.

Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.

Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.

1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.

Would like to present to you:. Demo Overview Developed an online calendar Meant for small organizations –Efficiency –Communication As well as personal.

Web-based Transdisciplinary Training: Problem Solving and Response to Intervention Presented to Nebraska RtI Consortium February 23, 2007 Kathy L. Bradley-Klug,

Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.

Getting to the Point of Human Services. Provider –Conceived –Developed –Implemented Improve the quality of human services –Defined as improving quality.

NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.

Pat Mueller David Merves October 6, 2008 NH RESPONDS Evaluation Component.

MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.

School and LEA Users

F LORIDA ’ S I MPLEMENTATION OF M ULTI - TIERED S YSTEM OF S TUDENT S UPPORTS (MTSSS) Bambi J. Lockman, LL.D. Bureau Chief, Exceptional Education and Student.

Response to Intervention

The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.

Who We Are The Center for Children and Technology (A division of the Education Development Center) A non-profit education research group

DASHBOARDS FOR DISTRICT-LEVEL PROBLEM SOLVING Julie Q. Morrison, External Evaluator Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support Initiative Presentation.

The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,

A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.

Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.

A Web Based Workorder Management System for California Schools.

HUB Technical Assistance Review November CQI.

School-wide Facilitator Training September 15, 2010 School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.

Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.

Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.

Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.

1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.

2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.

Ruth Ryder SPDG National Meeting March 5-6, 2013 ESEA Flexibility and SPDG: What’s the connection?

Cyndi Boezio, PhD, SPDG Project Director Dan Jorgensen, Evaluation & Research Coordinator Colorado Department of Education Learning Supports Office SPDG.

RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.

THE SINGLE ASSESSMENT PROCESS AN INTRODUCTION STANDARD 2 OF THE N.S.F. FOR OLDER PEOPLE.

D. JAY GENSE & MARK SCHALOCK NCDB: TEACHING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY BARBARA PURVIS NCDB: HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER USING EVIDENCE-BASED.

Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.

Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.

NEW MEXICO STATE PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT GRANT (SPDG) Update: Using iPads for Collecting Implementation Data SPDG National Meeting, March 6-7, 2012.

1 Using Family-Centered Practices to Promote Child Outcomes: Professional Development M’Lisa Shelden, PT, Ph.D. Director, Family, Infant and Preschool.

IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.

The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.

Paducah Head Start/Preschool Self-Assessment. The Foundation for Building Program Excellence At least once each program year, with the consultation and.

Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.

Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington

Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships

National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.

In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.

Improving Technology Infrastructure and Web-based Information and Services Northeast Iowa Community College PRP031A Christine Woodson, Project Director.

Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.

Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A However,

Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.

OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.

Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.

Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.

Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.

Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.

Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau Titles I & II Technical Assistance (TA) Webex January 11, 2007 Donna Yutzy, NQC Consultant Quality Management 101.

High Quality Coaching: How Do We Know It? April 1, 2015

TEA Corrective Action Plan

SAPSI-S PEP Overview I-RtI Network December, 2012

Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.

SPR&I Regional Training

Process Evaluation the implementation phase

ABC Unified School District

GA’s SPDG Lessons Learned

Presentation transcript:

NEW MEXICO STATE PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT GRANT (SPDG) Using iPads for Collecting Implementation and Fidelity of Implementation Data OSEP

Overview  Process &benefits for collecting data on iPads  Implementation – Consultant Log  Fidelity of Implementation – System-level Assessment

Program and Evaluation Design  What:  Promoting evidence-based practices (OSEP Performance Measures) to address needs of students with disabilities (SPP Indicators)  Educational Plans for Student Success  RtI Principles

Program and Evaluation Design  How:  Professional Development Events  Site-Based Technical Assistance  Mini-Grants

Data Collection and Analysis  Consultant Protocols  Consultant log  Fidelity Checklists (core features based on EPSS)  Define implementation  Document dosage  Promotes standardized practices  Identifies conditions for success

Benefits  NOT web-based. Efficient, decentralized collection without need for real-time Internet connection. Synch for centralized security/management.  Detail. Checkboxes and drop-down menus. Linked to registration. Drill down to individuals  Compliance. Low burden. High convenience. More comprehensive picture of the training and technical assistance deployed to districts.

Data Collection and Analysis  Accuracy. The web-based form improves the accuracy of data through: (a) embedded help to ensure that all SPPIP consultants have a common understanding of the data being requested; required fields to ensure completeness; and (c) “forced” selections to standardize responses.  Utility. Data collection is real time (on synching) and ongoing allowing for monitoring and on-demand reporting at multiple levels: program, consultant, district, and school.

evaluation | research | technical assistance Demo iPad Tools

evaluation | research | technical assistance Demo iPad Tools

evaluation | research | technical assistance Demo iPad Tools

evaluation | research | technical assistance Demo iPad Tools

evaluation | research | technical assistance Demo iPad Tools

evaluation | research | technical assistance Demo iPad Tools

evaluation | research | technical assistance Results: Mission Areas

evaluation | research | technical assistance Results: Method

evaluation | research | technical assistance Results: Systems Checklist *not unduplicated

Challenges  New Technology. Learning Curve (for everyone)  Compliance. Did not solve – and now progress is hidden.  Reports. Need to develop iPad reports for immediate feedback.

evaluation | research | technical assistance Contact Carlos Romero