Doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 Power Amp Effects for HRb OFDM Paul Chiuchiolo and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /202r1 Submission July 2000 Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 of 22 Frequency Domain Modulators for b Mark Webster Intersil Corporation.
Advertisements

Frequency Domain Modulators for b
Suggested PA Model for HRb
Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /286r0 Submission May 2001 Shoemake and Batra, TI Range vs. Rate Comparison of Remaining IEEE g Proposals: PBCC and CCK-OFDM.
Presented By: Nishant Divecha
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 Submission January 2015 Daniel Schneider, SonySlide 1 Non-Uniform Constellations for Higher Order QAMs Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
CEFRIEL Deliverable R4.1.5 MAIS adaptive and reconfigurable modem Giovanni Paltenghi Roma – 24 Novembre 2005.
The University of Texas at Austin
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1399r0 Submission November 2014 Multi-Carrier Training Field for OFDM Transmission in aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /296r1 Submission September 2000 M. Webster, Mike SealsSlide 1 Suggested Phase Noise Model for HRb Mark Webster and Mike Seals.
DMG-12/00 Page 1 April 23, 2002 Digital Communications Basics Dan M. Goebel 4/23/2002.
60 GHz Impairments Modeling
Doc.: IEEE /396 Submission November 2000 S. Halford, P. Chiuchiolo, G. Dooley, and M. WebsterSlide 1 Implementation and Complexity Issues for.
Doc.: IEEE /1074r0 Submission September 2004 WKFisher/ARINCSlide 1 IEEE p Draft Review Wayne Fisher Broady Cash ARINC, Inc Annapolis, MD.
Doc.: IEEE /0111r0 Submission April 2008 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Spectral Mask Implications IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /436r0 Submission July 2001 S. Halford, et al IntersilSlide 1 CCK-OFDM Normative Text Summary Steve Halford Mark Webster Jim Zyren.
Doc.: IEEE /102r0 Submission January 2002 M. Webster, et al IntersilSlide 1 Proposed Change to CCK-OFDM Signal Extension Mark Webster Steve Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /0424r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom Downclocking Options for TGaf PHY Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /283 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster and K. HalfordSlide 1 Spectral Mask Considerations for HRb Mark Webster and Karen Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
July 2002doc.: IEEE /420r0 Submission Rishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal) Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products.
Doc.: IEEE /188 Submission July 2000 Jan Boer, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band Jan Boer, Lucent Technologies.
Doc.: IEEE /089 Submission January 2002 Steve Halford, IntersilSlide 1 Maximum Received Power for g Steve Halford Mark Webster.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission November 2015 Thomas Handte, SonySlide 1 Effect of Impairments on the Performance of Non-Uniform Constellations.
Doc.: IEEE /072 Submission May 2000 Mark Webster and Karen Halford, Intersil Corporation Slide 1 Market Acceptability Throughput Issues for HRb.
Simulation Data for Letter Ballot Comments on Quasi-guard Subcarriers and Reverse Link Waveform Lai King (Anna) Tee January 15, 2007.
Doc.: IEEE /429r0 Submission July 2002 Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 Scrambler Mismatch Correction Using the MAC FEC Mark Webster, Mike Seals,
Submission doc: IEEE /0807r0 July 2010 R. Kudo et al., NTT Slide 1 PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO Date: Authors: Name AffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0291r0 Submission October 2008 Stephen Kuffner, MotorolaSlide 1 Power Amplifier Spectral Regrowth IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /392 Submission November 2000 K. Halford, S. Halford and M. Webster, IntersilSlide 1 OFDM System Performance Karen Halford, Steve Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /418 Submission November 2000 Niels Van Erven, 3ComSlide 1 Suggested Approach for 22 Mbps b Implementation Niels Van Erven 3Com.
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /0213r1 Submission Slide 1 David Tung, et al. (Ralink Technology) March 2005 On the Efficiency of TGnSync Preambles David Tung,
Doc.: IEEE /390 Submission November 2000 Mark Webster and Steve Halford, IntersilSlide 1 Reuse of b Preambles with HRb OFDM Mark Webster.
Doc.: IEEE /0400r0 SubmissionZander Lei, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 ACK Transmission Date: Authors: March 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /296 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster, Mike SealsSlide 1 Suggested Phase Noise Model for HRb Mark Webster and Mike Seals Intersil.
Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. Anuj Batra, Ph.D.
Spectral Mask Implications
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
Phase Noise Sensitivity of HRb OFDM
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
PPM Sensitivity of 10 MHz OFDM Channels
John Ketchum, Bjorn A. Bjerke, and Irina Medvedev Qualcomm, Inc.
2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)
Error Rate Results of OFDM from Bluetooth Interference
60 GHz Impairments Modeling
Measured Spectra for OFDM Transmission Based on PA Models of BRAN
Evaluating Channel Estimation Sensitivity
doc.: IEEE /304 Mark Webster Steve Halford
Range & Rate of CCK-OFDM
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
CCK-OFDM Closing Remarks
Technical complexity related to meeting the RF mask
Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
Technical complexity related to meeting the RF mask
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
White Space Regulatory Issues
Spectral Mask Implications
Spectral Mask Implications
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Performance Analysis of Outer RS Coding Scheme
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 Power Amp Effects for HRb OFDM Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster Intersil Corporation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 2 Non-Ideal PA Effects for OFDM Spectral characteristics of PA input/output –BPSK, QPSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM –Over-sample rate of 4x –Pulse shaping requirements same as a PER with PA –PA Output Backoff Backoff from full saturation –RAPP model used with p=2 and 3 Good approximation of existing amplifiers –6.6, 13.2, 26.4 and 59.4 Mbps, 1000 bytes –Oversample rate of 4x –Estimate subcarrier amp/phz over packet (non-ideal)

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 3 RAPP Power Amplifier (PA) Model (Amplitude out/in)

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 4 RAPP Power Amplifier (PA) Model (dB out/in) Output from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 5 1 dB Compression Point vs. Full Saturation "p" parameter Output Power (dB) Output Power at 1 dB Compression Point Saturation Point Where is 1 dB Compression Point? P=2: 2 dB from Full Saturation P=3: 1 dB from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 6 PA Back-off for b DSSS Barker b mask PA: Rapp Model p = 2 Must Back-off PA 3.7 dB from full saturation to meet spectral mask.

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 7 PSD for PA Input with BPSK Subcarriers Equivalent a mask 11 MHz

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 8 PSD for PA Output with BPSK Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.7dB backoff=4.7dB backoff=8.2dB backoff=12.0dB P = 2 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 9 PSD for PA Output with BPSK Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.4dB backoff=4.6dB backoff=8.1dB backoff=12.0dB P = 3 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 10 PSD for PA Input with QPSK Subcarriers Equivalent a mask

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 11 PSD for PA Output with QPSK Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.7dB backoff=4.7dB backoff=8.2dB backoff=12.0dB P = 2 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 12 PSD for PA Output with QPSK Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.4dB backoff=4.6dB backoff=8.1dB backoff=12.0dB P = 3 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 13 PSD for PA Input with 16-QAM Subcarriers Equivalent a mask

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 14 PSD for PA Output with 16-QAM Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.7dB backoff=4.7dB backoff=8.2dB backoff=12.0dB P = 2 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 15 PSD for PA Output with 16-QAM Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.4dB backoff=4.6dB backoff=8.1dB backoff=12.0dB P = 3 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 16 PSD for PA Input with 64-QAM Subcarriers Equivalent a mask

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 17 PSD for PA Output with 64-QAM Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.7dB backoff=4.7dB backoff=8.2dB backoff=12.0dB P = 2 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 18 PSD for PA Output with 64-QAM Subcarriers backoff=16.0dB backoff=3.4dB backoff=4.6dB backoff=8.1dB backoff=12.0dB P = 3 Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 19 PER for 6.6 Mbps with p=2 Backoff from full saturation byte Packets Backoff from Full Saturation

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 20 PER for 6.6 Mbps with p=3 Backoff from full saturation. Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 21 PER for 13.2 Mbps with p=2 Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 22 PER for 13.2 Mbps with p=3 Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 23 PER for 26.4 Mbps with p=2 Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 24 PER for 26.4 Mbps with p=3 Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 25 PER for 59.4 Mbps with p=2 Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 26 PER for 59.4 Mbps with p=3 Backoff from Full Saturation 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 27 SNR Degradation Table 1000 byte Packets

doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 28 Conclusions At the lower data rates up to 13.2 Mbps, PA back-off is the same as b. Back-off PA more at higher data rates. P=3 is slightly better than p=2. OFDM is competitive