DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Business Need Introduction This exchange enables the transmission of information on the condition and usage of a supported.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 Presentation of the example business concept – DNV Exchange architecture - DNV Summary / issues from last workshop - DNV Presentation of Swedish.
Advertisements

Linking Technology and Defense. Introduction It stands for Product Life Cycle Support It is an International Standard It is an information standard It.
C O P Y R I G H T E U R O S T E P G R O U P Changes to ISO Rob Bodington, Phil Spiby.
Chapter 2 – Software Processes Lecture 1 1Chapter 2 Software Processes.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Telecon 29 April 2008 Trine Hansen.
Configuration Management Managing Change. Points to Ponder Which is more important?  stability  progress Why is change potentially dangerous?
TracDat V4 Situational Analysis Dave Choban. Agenda Situational Analysis  Introductions  Implementation Approach  Current Assessment Status  TracDat.
WM Software Process & Quality SPiCE Requirements - slide#1 1  Paul Sorenson REQUIREMENTS FOR A SPiCE ASSESSMENT A set of defined input information.
1 ITC242 – Introduction to Data Communications Week 12 Topic 18 Chapter 19 Network Management.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
THE BUSINESS RESEARCH COMPANY TECHNOLOGY CASE STUDIES.
Dr Rob Bodington Eurostep
Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) The Information Backbone to transform the Logistics Enterprise PLCSlib status PLCS OASIS TOG Filton, UK Rob.
05 | Configuration and Deployment Richard Currey | Senior Technical Trainer–New Horizons United George Squillace | Senior Technical Trainer–New Horizons.
Accelerated EMS Session 4 – 28 January 2008.
Microsoft ® Official Course Monitoring and Troubleshooting Custom SharePoint Solutions SharePoint Practice Microsoft SharePoint 2013.
Configuration Management Process and Environment MACS Review 1 February 5th, 2010 Roland Moser PR a-RMO, February 5 th, 2010 R. Moser 1 R. Gutleber.
RAM Modelling in the Project Design Phase Friday 30 th April, 2010 Paul Websdane Reliability Modelling for Business Decisions Asset Management Council.
With Microsoft Windows 7© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall1 PowerPoint Presentation to Accompany GO! with Microsoft ® Windows 7.
Rolls-Royce & Ministry of Defence Pilot for Early Implementation of PLCS Marine Olympus/Tyne Summary 3 Feb 04.
Configuration Management Managing Change. Points to Ponder Which is more important?  stability  progress Why is change potentially dangerous?
Configuration Management System
1 Proposed PLCS TC Organization and Functional Responsibilities Revision
Overview of the Database Development Process
RtReports in Action Barry Higgins Automation & Control Engineer.
Joe Mercer Operations Planning Engineer III Operation Planning Analysis PHAAUG Meeting Mar 12 th, 2015.
Conditions and Terms of Use
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
Configuration Management (managing change). Starter Questions... Which is more important?  stability  progress Why is change potentially dangerous?
Global Privacy and Information Quality Working Group.
Introduction to Software Testing Chapter 9.1 Challenges in Testing Software – Testing for Emergent Properties: Safety and Security Paul Ammann & Jeff Offutt.
Module 10: Monitoring ISA Server Overview Monitoring Overview Configuring Alerts Configuring Session Monitoring Configuring Logging Configuring.
1 Synchronize work on DEXs and reference data between PLCS pilots and OASIS/PLCS - Proposed PLCS TC Organization and Functional Responsibilities.
Apr 30, 20081/11 VO Services Project – Stakeholders’ Meeting Gabriele Garzoglio VO Services Project Stakeholders’ Meeting Apr 30, 2008 Gabriele Garzoglio.
Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards OASIS Symposium: The Meaning of Interoperability May 9, 2006 Simon Frechette, NIST.
11 CORE Architecture Mauro Bruno, Monica Scannapieco, Carlo Vaccari, Giulia Vaste Antonino Virgillito, Diego Zardetto (Istat)
UNIT II RCM PROCESS Module 2 PLANNING AND PREPARATION " Copyright 2002, Information Spectrum, Inc. All Rights Reserved."
ICS (072)Database Systems: An Introduction & Review 1 ICS 424 Advanced Database Systems Dr. Muhammad Shafique.
Encyclopaedia Idea1 New Library Feature Proposal 22 The Encyclopaedia.
Publish ISO Technical Corrigenda for ISO , and NSRP Systems Technology Panel Project Pete Lazo Product Data Services Corporation.
Develop Project Charter
David Adams ATLAS DIAL/ADA JDL and catalogs David Adams BNL December 4, 2003 ATLAS software workshop Production session CERN.
Database Administration
PLCS DEXs Trine Hansen DNV 20 April Content OASIS / PLCS Organization PLCS DEXs DEX architecture Process – define and verify capabilities Way forward.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Face-to-face meeting 1 October 2007 Trine Hansen.
DC 15 February 2006 Exploiting Product Life-Cycle Support (PLCS) Commander Tor Arne Irgens Chief Data Model & Information Management Norwegian Defence.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Telecon 22 January 2008 Trine Hansen.
Development of the CMS Databases and Interfaces for CMS Experiment: Current Status and Future Plans D.A Oleinik, A.Sh. Petrosyan, R.N.Semenov, I.A. Filozova,
Synchronise work on DEXs and reference data between PLCS pilots and OASIS/PLCS Workshop #3 10 – 11 November 2004.
Unit 17: SDLC. Systems Development Life Cycle Five Major Phases Plus Documentation throughout Plus Evaluation…
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards Simon Frechette National Institute of Standards.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Face to Face meeting 10 March 2008 Trine Hansen.
Public Libraries Survey Data File Overview. What We’ll Talk About PLS: Public Libraries Survey State level data Public library data (Administrative Entities)
Product Life Cycle Support (PLCS) The Information Backbone to transform the Logistics Enterprise Some suggestions for the PLCS OASIS TC / Implementers.
Synchronize work on DEXs and reference data between PLCS pilots and OASIS/PLCS - Background, Lessons learned, Conclusions, Recommendations, Plan forward.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
Skills and products portfolio an overview Lorenzo Martinelli – Business Development Contact:
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
© 2013 IBM Corporation IBM UrbanCode Deploy v6.0.1 Support Enablement Training Source Configuration and Database Upgrades Michael Malinowski
Review for Eclipse Release Review | © 2012 by Review for Eclipse Committers, made available under the EPL v1.0 1 Review for Eclipse (R4E) 0.11 Release.
The Changing Nature Of Software System software: Infrastructure software come under this category like compilers, operating systems, editors, drivers,
support task records, including product data collected by the task;
Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE)
Supplier Recovery Claim Automation
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
Lecture 6. Information systems
Operational Feedback DEX Status Jan 04
Data Transmission Tools & Services EDAMIS, SDMX, Validation
SDMX Implementation The National Accounts use case
Presentation transcript:

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Business Need Introduction This exchange enables the transmission of information on the condition and usage of a supported product. Feedback includes: support task records, including product data collected by the task; product state and usage records; resource element state and usage records; product configuration information; any issues arising from work.

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Business Process This DEX enables the transmission of information on the condition and usage of a supported product gathered during its operation. This DEX will provide inputs and triggers for maintenance tasks (Work_package_definition) and feedback information generated through the execution of maintenance tasks is covered by the Work_ package_ report DEX. Examples of information about the usage of a supported product: flying hours on an aircraft; mileage travelled by an automobile; number of starts for an electrical generator; volume of fluid pumped through a pipeline or process plant; operational cycles for a gas turbine engine; occurences of operation outside preset limits i.e. overspeed, or overstress; feedback from system monitoring; fatigue index; location of the part or product.

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Scope (1) The following are WITHIN the scope of this DEX: Recording the transmission of information; Reporting the usage of a product as realized; (Note the usage is the activities that a product has been engaged in). Reporting the current configuration of the product as realized; Reporting the condition of a product as realized, before, during or after performing a support activity or operational usage, recorded as properties, states or observations; (Note this includes reporting the fault state, as defined or otherwise in the FME(C)A, observed on a product as realized). Reporting the location of the product as realized; The identification of the FME(C)A. (Note the definition of the FME(C)A is covered by the Fault_states DEX). The environment is which a product was operating.

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Scope (2) The following are OUTSIDE the scope of this DEX: Reporting the work performed on a product as realized; Reporting the resources used to perform work on a product as realized. (Note the reporting of work performed and resources used is covered by the Work_package_report DEX). The definition of the FME(C)A. (Note the definition of the FME(C)A is covered by the fault states DEX).

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Overview

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback CAPABILITIES -TABLE

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback DEPENDENT CAPABILITIES -TABLE

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Reference Data Development

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Summary of Remaining Work

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Status / Remaining Work Capabilities / DEXs –The ones that DEX 7 are responsible for are complete but requires Checking – have all entities been used? Testing – not yet This requires test data + availability of ALL capabilities Testing –Requires ALL capabilities used by the DEX to be complete before the consistency of the EXPRESS can be tested. –Requires test data to cover the scope of the DEX. Reference Data –Model reference data complete –Business reference data in work – complete April 2004

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Issues / Remaining Work Quality –We need to review ALL the DEX/Capabilities wrt to quality, consistency, accuracy –Checklists will help –Effort for DEX7 Modeller effort: 3 days Subject Expert: 3 days Validation –Check that the DEX EXPRESS is complete –Requires all capabilities used by DEX to be in place –Requires development of long form – XML or EXPRESS –Effort for DEX7 Modeller effort: 2 days Subject Expert: 0 days Testing Neutral test files –We should continue development of Bike test data to cover DEX7 –The data should provide support to ALL the DEXs –We should use the data as an input to translator test rallies –Effort for DEX7 Modeller effort: 10 days Subject Expert: 5 days Real test data –We should identify some real data from applications –Map to DEX7 –Effort for DEX7 Modeller effort: ? days Subject Expert: ? days

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Issues / Remaining Work Reference Data –“It is modelling!” Needs Subject expert + modeller input –Needs scoping –Perhaps use TRILS –How are we to proceed with ISO 15926? What database is available? Is it web accessible – both as OWL and Web Services? What tools are available for building the ref data? How does it interface to the PLCS model? –Effort for DEX7 – Can be funded by MOD Infrastructure development: ???? Modeller effort: 20 days Subject Expert: 20 days Infrastructure –How do we publish in OASIS? They may well have different requirements. –Improvements –HTML publications Paul Nolan committed – progress? –Issue logs Paul Nolan committed – progress?

DEX 7 – Operational Feedback Issues / Remaining Work Missing Capabilities – cannot be funded by MOD –Properties Modeller effort: 10 days Subject Expert: 5 days –Product as realized Modeller effort: 10 days Subject Expert: 3 days –Product configuration Modeller effort: 2 days Subject Expert: 1 days –Scheme Modeller effort: 4 days Subject Expert: 1 days –Justification Modeller effort: 2 days Subject Expert: 0 days –Date time, Person Organization Modeller effort: 2 days Subject Expert: 0 days TOTAL EFFORT Modeller effort: 30 days Subject Expert: 10 days