ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr The Ontolog Collaborative Work Environment - the CoP’s Knowledge Repository by Peter P. Yim CIM3, CEO / ONTOLOG, co-convener a brief for the: Ontologizing the Ontolog Body of Knowledge Discussion Session -1 Ontolog Forum April 20, 2006 ( v 1.00)

ppy/CIM3-Ontolog_Leveraging-CWE-to-Bootstrap_CoPs--PeterYim_ /Feb ONTOLOG (aka. Ontolog Forum) est. Apr co-conveners3 co-conveners - PeterYim; LeoObrst & KurtConrad HostedHosted on the CIM3 collaborative work environment infrastructure Charter :Charter - Ontolog is an open, international, virtual community of practice, whose membership will:   Discuss practical issues and strategies associated with the development and application of both formal and informal ontologies.   Identify ontological engineering approaches that might be applied to the UBL effort, as well as to the broader domain of eBusiness standardization efforts.   Strive to advance the field of ontological engineering and semantic technologies, and to help move them into main stream applications. Activities:Activities:   Weekly conference calls of active members   Monthly virtual Invited Speaker events   Scheduled Technical Discussions   Specific Projects: like [CCT-Rep], [Health-Ont], NHIN-RFI response, Upper Ontology Summit, event podcast, Ontologizing the Ontolog Content...   Resides on a virtual collaborative work environment which serves as a dynamic knowledge repository to the community's collective intelligence We welcome your participation – see: welcome your participation – see: What are we?

ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr Ontolog – an open CoP Caption: John McCarthy having a dialog with Doug Engelbart at a tavern … with ‘the fishnet’ on the wall

ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr Working as Communities of Practice What are CoP’s anyway? small groups of people who have worked together over a period of time. Not a team, not a task force, not necessarily an authorized or identified group. They are peers in the execution of "real work." What holds them together is a common sense of purpose and a real need to know what each other knows. (--John Seely Brown / ref: )small groups of people who have worked together over a period of time. Not a team, not a task force, not necessarily an authorized or identified group. They are peers in the execution of "real work." What holds them together is a common sense of purpose and a real need to know what each other knows. (--John Seely Brown / ref: a group of professionals, informally bound to one another through exposure to a common class of problems, common pursuit of solutions, and thereby themselves embodying a store of knowledge. (--Peter & Trudy Johnson-Lenz / ref: )a group of professionals, informally bound to one another through exposure to a common class of problems, common pursuit of solutions, and thereby themselves embodying a store of knowledge. (--Peter & Trudy Johnson-Lenz / ref: garden/cop/definitions.shtml#purp47) garden/cop/definitions.shtml#purp47 groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and who interact regularly to learn how to do it better. (--Etienne Wenger / ref: )groups of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and who interact regularly to learn how to do it better. (--Etienne Wenger / ref: For the US federal government folks, it could be groups that work together along lines of business within the government that are dedicated to the support of certain business functions (ref: )For the US federal government folks, it could be groups that work together along lines of business within the government that are dedicated to the support of certain business functions (ref: - nid2K8F) - nid2K8F

ppy/CIM3-Ontolog_Leveraging-CWE-to-Bootstrap_CoPs--PeterYim_ /Feb The Fishnet Organization An Organizational Form that the CWE aims at Supporting – leading us toward Open Virtual Enterprises Source: Institute for the Future: Johansen, R., Swigart, R. Upsizing the Individual in the Downsized OrganizationUpsizing the Individual in the Downsized Organization these are temporary (or semi-permanent) hierarchies, that emerge out of the CoP's, which capitalize on distributed capabilities to achieve specific purposes; when those purposes are achieved (or when the opportunities no longer exist), they disband, and the resources (people, knowledge, skillsets) are returned to the CoP’s where they come from.

ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr Case Examples of Communities on the CIM3.NET Collaborative Work Environments (CWE’s) Ontolog CWE-dev Bootstrap Protégé eGov: COLAB eGov: DRM project work & public forum NIST IMS-US Millennium Project (AC/UNU) Digital Art Ontology Hosting of: SUMO, CODS, … (more)

ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr Ontolog’s key Differentiation Activities are community driven; we are neutral, open, and we are not answerable to any authority or institutional structure, except for (explicitly) our charter & IPR policy, and (implicitly) our professional integrity. We are adamant about collaboration, sharing and open knowledge … and are trying to spur organic or emergent behaviour in the community and our project teams

ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr Engelbart's Capability Infrastructure Tool System Media Portray Travel, View Study Manipulate Retrieve Compute Communicate Human System Paradigms Organization Procedures Customs Methods Language Attitudes Capability Infrastructure Percept.Motor Mental Skills Knowledge Training Capability to Improve Needs a prominent and explicit role! Harnessing explosive technology depends, to a new degree, on the “Capability-Improvement Capability ” - Doug Engelbart, Jan (excerpt from the Stanford ‘Unfinished Revolution-II’ Colloquium)Stanford ‘Unfinished Revolution-II’ Colloquium

ppy/Ontolog_Collaborative_Work_Environment--PeterYim_ /Apr Developing our Approach and Requirements … Let us bootstrap ourselves!Let us bootstrap ourselves!bootstrap Doug Engelbart: we need a prominent and explicit role for the “Capability to Improve” … he prompts us to identify our “improvement vector(s)”Doug Engelbart: we need a prominent and explicit role for the “Capability to Improve” … he prompts us to identify our “improvement vector(s)”Doug EngelbartDoug Engelbart Therefore …Therefore … in addition to “use cases” … let’s also ask, “What do we want to improve?” and “How can that improvement be made viral?” or, as Engelbart puts it: “what can we do to improve our capability to improve” and in our case here, look at the ‘Ontolog Charter’ again.