Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation in the ILC BDS Carl Beard ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory People Requirement Recent Successes Future Aims.
Advertisements

08/01/2007Juan Luis Fernandez-Hernando End Station A Measurements on Collimator Wakefields 4th Wakefield Interest Group - CI 05/03/2008 Luis Fernandez-Hernando,
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
Collimator Damage Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Cockcroft Institute “All Hands Meeting”, January 2006.
CLIC collimator survival IWLC 2010 J.L. Fernández-Hernando – ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute (Daresbury Lab.) 21/10/2010 J.L. Fernández-HernandoASTeC/CI21/10/2010.
Tungsten wire & VISAR Goran Skoro 24 October 2008.
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
R.M. Jones (University of Manchester/Cockcroft Inst.) on behalf of CLIC Collaboration., ESTB Workshop, SLAC, 17 th March Collimator Wakefield Measurements.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
EM background tests of IP feedback hardware Christine Clarke Oxford University 24 th September 2007 Oxford (P. Burrows, C. Perry, G. Christian, T. Hartin,
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Personal summary of work carried out at Daresbury Laboratory: ILC/CLIC, NLS, ALICE and ITER Luis Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Philip Burrows ECFA LC Workshop, Warsaw, 10 June Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University G. Christian, C. Clarke, B. Constance, H.
Feedback On Nano-second Timescales: An IP Feedback System for the Future Linear Collider Requirement for a fast IP beam-based feedback system Simulation.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Plans for collimator survival and SLAC tests J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
1 Collimator Design Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester, UK Annual EuroTev meeting - Frascati, Italy, January 2008.
1 Collimator Design Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester, UK Annual EuroTev meeting - Frascati, Italy, January 2008.
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Proposal of Halo collimation system for ATF2 A.Faus-Golfe, N. Fuster-Martínez J. Resta-López (IFIC) P. Bambade, S. Liu, S. Wallon (LAL) 113/02/1417th ATF2.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
A TPC for ILC CEA/Irfu, Apero, D S Bhattacharya, 19th June Deb Sankar Bhattacharya D.Attie, P.Colas, S. Ganjour,
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Collimator design and short range wakefields Adriana Bungau University of Manchester CERN, Dec 2006.
2 nd EuroTeV Annual Meeting, Daresbury 9 th January 2007 WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
ILC-BDS Collimators - Simulation and Experiment Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Group Annual Meeting December, 2007, Manchester Adriana Bungau.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Nigel Watson / Birmingham CollimationCollimation EDR to specify and find optimal solutions for  Damage survival, 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV  Jaw.
G.Kurevlev - Daresbury meeting Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
Nigel Watson, 17 Nov 2008 ILC08/LCWS08 FNAL ILC: Beam Delivery System Collimation System Outline Comments on changes since EDR plan Nigel Watson / Birmingham.
Taikan SUEHARA et al., LCWS2007 & DESY, 2007/06/01 R&D Status of ATF2 IP Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Taikan SUEHARA, H.Yoda, M.Oroku,
Jonathan Smith, 27 th August 2008, Uppsala 1 Optimal Collimators for the ILC Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute)
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
1 1 H. Hayano and ATF group ATF Status August/2004 H. Hayano and ATF group Multibunch emittance Instrumentation developments Plans for run Multibunch.
Measurement of the Electron Cloud Density in a Solenoid Field and a Quadrupole Field K. Kanazawa and H. Fukuma KEK June 2009 CTA09 1.
Damping intense wake-fields in the main Linacs and PETS structures of the CLIC Linear Collider Vasim Khan: 1 st year PhD Student Supervisor: Dr. Roger.
(T-488) FONT: C Clarke, C Swinson, P Burrows, T Hartin, G Christian, H Dabiri Khah SLAC: Mike Woods, Ray Arnold, Steve Smith et al.
Status of Collimator Damage Studies
Experimental tests of wakefields and material damage for ILC spoilers
Radiation damage simulations for CLIC and ILC spoilers and ATF tests
LCABD WP 4.2 – Spectrometer and BPM Studies
Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Collimator design and short range wakefields
Undulator Tolerances for LCLS-II using SCUs
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Background study plans : from to ILC
Nigel Watson (Birmingham) LAL, 16-May-2006
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
ILC Beam Tests in End Station A
Undulator Line Design Liz Moog, Advanced Photon Source April 24, 2002
Presentation transcript:

Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab

The collimator mission is to clean the beam halo from e- or e+ off orbit which could damage the equipment, but mainly to clean the beam from photons generated during the bending of the beam towards the Interaction Point. These photons, if not removed, would generate a noise background that would not allow the detectors to work properly. Highlights T480 data analysis/test beam at ESA Mafia/GdfidL simulations of T480 Collimators Beam damage simulations (FLUKA/Geant4, ANSYS) Beam damage test beam at ATF (phase 1) Task 5.3 Programme

Achieved: Analysis of T480 wakefield test beams. Reconstructed kick factor with errors below 10% (in most cases). Uniformity of results using different analysis methods. Achieved and going: Phase 1 of the damage tests, main objective of our EUROTeV work. Damaged sample to be analysed at BegbrokeNano in Oxford. Achieved: Improved GdfidL calculations. Uncertainties attributed to the calculations using a scheme based on convergence of results to zero mesh size.

Beam Parameters at SLAC ESA and ILC ParameterSLAC ESAILC-500 Repetition Rate10 Hz5 Hz Energy28.5 GeV250 GeV Bunch Charge2.0 x Bunch Length 300  m Energy Spread0.2%0.1% Bunches per train1 (2*)2820 Microbunch spacing- (20-400ns*)337 ns *possible, using undamped beam

T480 “wakefield box” ESA beamline

Kick (V/pC/mm) Error (V/pC/mm) GdfidL 500 um (V/pC/mm) Error*sqrt(c hisq/ndf) GdfidL 1 mm (V/pC/mm) Error*sqrt(chi sq/ndf) col col Col3 (1m) col col col col col col col col col col col col Col GdfidL does not include resistive or surface effects.

0.5 mm bunch length 1 mm bunch length Experimental result (Jonny Smith)

GdfidL: Convergence of results to zero mesh size (Jonny Smith)

The purpose of the first test run at ATF is to: 1.Make simple measurements of the size of the damage region after individual beam impacts on the collimator test piece. This will permit a direct validation of FLUKA/ANSYS simulations of properties of the materials under test. 2.Allow us to commission the proposed test system of vacuum vessel, multi-axis mover, beam position and size monitoring. 3.Validate the mode of operation required for ATF in these tests. 4.Ensure that the radiation protection requirements can be satisfied before proceeding with a second phase proposal. Assuming a successful first phase test, the test would be to measure the shock waves within the sample by studying the surface motion with a laser-based system, such as VISAR (or LDV), for single bunch and multiple bunches at approximate ILC bunch spacing. Material damage test beam at ATF Simulations with FLUKA of melted surface on the Ti alloy target against the beam parameters.

[Measurements c/o Marc Ross et al., Linac’00] A similar test done in SLAC FFTB gave the results that can be seen in the bottom left plot of this section. Results of a FLUKA simulation using same beam and target specification can be seen in the bottom right plot of this section. There is a systematic divergence of ~100 µm 2 but both plots agree in the slope.

We gained experience in working at ATF and commissioning the mover system, beam control and instrumentation. 11 mm (George Ellwood)

(Bino Maiheu, Mark Slater)

Hits with different beam charges, from 0.8x10^10 to triple bunch hits with a total charge of 3.6x10^10. Calculated beam sizes of 15x2 to 15x5 microns square (James Jones). A Ti alloy target, same material as spoiler preliminary design, was hit by the ATF electron beam, at KEK, the amount of damage (melted surface) will be measured with the help of a SEM and compared to what FLUKA simulations predict. Phase 1 of Damage Test Beams at ATF-KEK

Second phase of radiation damage test beam at ATF2-KEK: Will be used to study the stress waves generated by a bunch hitting the material and this data will be compared to FLUKA + ANSYS simulations. beam (George Ellwood)

Outlook: GdfidL will be on a much larger (1584 core) cluster which will allow more realistic modelling. Will be used to study wakefields in a first conceptual collimator design from the DL project engineering group. Outlook: June test beam at ESA that will give significant improvement in the measurement accuracy with respect to other test beams, with upgrades to the BPM system upstream. Outlook: Phase 2 of the damage tests at ATF2 were stress-waves will be measured. Needed to fulfill our EUROTeV obligations.