Faculty Senate President’s Goals for 2015/2016 Make campus more efficient Simplify/accelerate faculty hiring process Time limits on each hiring step Reduce number of steps as seen by faculty Other processes – please bring to my attention Increase faculty involvement in decision making Example: Budget making process Pass a bylaw amendment for the dean hiring process Increase communication between faculty and administration
IFC Tenure and post-tenure review Tom Schuman is S&T rep on this subcommittee Development of a statement on the value of tenure Conduct a critical review of current policies Develop mechanisms to reward achieving faculty through their career Identify areas where current post-tenure review policies should be modified Title IX Steve Grant is S&T rep on this subcommittee Monitor effects and implementation of Title IX Suggest possible changes Suggestion for all campuses to take the Coache Faculty Climate survey Guns on Campus Law Suit
Retirement Medical Benefits Renetta Gallup of UM System Benefits will address Faculty Senate at the November meeting UM System Total Rewards Advisory Committee has been effective in slowing down the administration decision process The issue: There has been a change to the rules in how future medical benefit liabilities are booked – future liabilities must be fully funded Liability is $1 billion in 2019 Projected liability in 30 years exceeds $4.5 billion Funding this liability would take money away from salaries and other critical budget items
Retirement Medical Benefits for Current Retirees UM System leaders recommend that the university: Continue to offer insurance coverage to current retirees Continue the premium subsidy for retirees currently participating in the UM plans Explore market alternatives to the university’s existing retiree insurance program that lower costs for both retirees and the university Have new alternatives in place by January 1, 2017
Retirement Medical Benefits for Future Retirees The discussion among UM System admin and faculty leaders is ongoing Considering ending retirement medical benefits for future retirees after a given date in the future. For those who retire at age 65 or older, current plans on open market appear better than UM system plans, e.g. Medicare Advantage plans The problem is for those who retire before age 65 where comparable plans do not exist