ACSIP data: a new lens Sarah McKenzie, PhD Assessment, Research and Accountability.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

Advertisements

DPAS II: Component V The Process: Step 1: MUST use a minimum of two (2) measures MUST use Measure A for all students assessed by DCAS in reading and/or.

MAP Information Martha - introduction October 23, 2013.

Bloomington Public Schools K-12 Pathways Based in part on NWEA (2012) study of RIT scales and ACT College Readiness Benchmarks, TIES equating with MCA.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.

Determining Dual Discrepancy for SLD Using The PED Short Cycle Test Results in K-3 Donald J. Frazier, Ph.D.

AYP Status Determination in Smart Accountability Six Steps to Status.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.

1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.

Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,

To Monitor Performance of Students in Terms of Common Core State Standards FALL 2014.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children David Holdzkom Assistant Superintendent - Evaluation & Research Ken Branch Senior Director.

Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results

CAHSEE MATH PREP Includes test overview, scoring, and practice questions.

Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement

Welcome to Open House. All parents should have a copy of their student’s schedule (if student is not here). If necessary, please collect one at the tables.

Holt MS Sarah McKenzie PhD October 27, Staff Questions: Q) Is one test more difficult than another? How do we know that if the scale score falls.

Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.

Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September

Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

Cecilia Sisk Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Fall 2012.

Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY

7 th Grade: Decreased # of students in Basic by 7% 8 th Grade: Students are moving from BB to BAS scale EOC Literacy: Students are moving from BB to BAS.

Everyone Can Learn Math Sam Bowne Math, Science, CTE Teacher's Conference.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

1 Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading & Writing-Grade 7 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status District Reading.

James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.

ESI: Education Statistics Investigations Sarah McKenzie PhD TOSA: Data and Assessment Fayetteville Public Schools.

Academic Growth in Math High Poverty Students – WASL and MAP Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.

Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.

Annual Public Meeting Data Presentation October 19, 2009 Cabe Student Center 6:00 p.m.

2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.

California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.

DRE Developing Achievement Levels for FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 A & S October 11, 2011.

Tuesday, November 27, 2015 Board of Education Meeting District MAP.

October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.

Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

1 AYP for 2007 Haywood County Schools George Chapman Superintendent.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.

Student Achievement Data Display Mathematics, Reading & Writing Grade 4 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.

USING MAP DATA TO SET GOALS AND ENGAGE STUDENTS AND FAMILIES 7/14/16.

February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations

Newberry Data Overview

MISIC Regional Meeting Spring 2016 NWEA Iowa Team Jessica Knierim – Account Manager Sue Madagan – Regional Manager.

Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report Including Challenge Index August, 2017.

Welcome to the BT Super Conference

Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin

Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

Delaware Department of Education

Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report

Celebration using Galileo Data

2nd QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter February 2012.

2nd QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter February 2012.

4th QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter June 2012.

Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement

Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School

Virginia Board of Education’s

Presentation transcript:

ACSIP data: a new lens Sarah McKenzie, PhD Assessment, Research and Accountability

AYP Achieving!

Who will count- Literacy? 342 Combined 209 Caucasian 60 African American 60 Hispanic 150? FRLP 38 LEP 48 SPED

7th to 8th Literacy 2009/2010BBBPA 4210 B P A011562

7th to 8th Math 2009/2010BBBPA B510 0 P A002683

But our kids are different... What we really want to know is: How is the student doing compared to other students who started at the same place? To do this we statistically CONTROL for prior performance, basically use mathematics to ‘pretend’ that all students were at the same starting line

Proficiency Prediction: Literacy 70% Probability NoYes% pro Grade Caucasian FRLP??? 9-12 Literacy AYP Goal: 75.81% SH FRLP= 72.45%

Proficiency Prediction: Literacy 70% Probability NoYes% pro African American Hispanic Caucasian FRLP LEP SPED Literacy AYP Goal: 75.81%

8th Grade Reading- FPS Spring 2009 Scaled Score * MAP RIT

Growth Targets for Students

Growth Targets for Schools?

Below the 50th %tile: Spring MAP Data- Reading 45% of current 8th Graders Foundations of Reading: 73% are below 33rd %tile 36% of current 9th Graders Foundations of Reading: 57% are below 33rd %tile

Below the 50th %tile: Spring MAP Data- Math 42% of current 8th Graders Numbers and Operations: 80% are below 33rd %tile 43% of current 9th Graders Numbers and Operations: 70% are below 33rd %tile

MAP 50th %tile 100% of 8th graders above 50th %tile for Literacy were proficient/advanced 97% of 8th graders above 50th %tile for Math were proficient/advanced 100% of 9th graders above 13th %tile for Math were proficient/advanced on Algebra EOC

Literacy Goal What is a meaningful literacy goal for Ramay?