Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 114.
Ponatinib in Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL) Resistant or.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma O’Day S et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 4. Hodi FS et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract.
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Initial Results of a Multicenter, Open Label.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
CML TKIs – where are we up to? Steve O’Brien
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
1 Flinn I et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 084.
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Working Groups in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Choice of First-line Therapy This program is supported by an educational grant from.
Update on Approved TKIs Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Swain SM et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Presentation transcript:

Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety from the Phase III DASISION Study Kantarjian H et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA6500. Kantarjian H et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(24):

Kantarjian H et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA6500; Kantarjian H et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(24): Background Achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and/or major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months on imatinib is associated with superior long-term progression-free survival (PFS) (NEJM 2006;355:2408, JCO 2008;26:3358). Dasatinib induced high rates of CCyR and PFS in patients with CML after IM failure (Haematologica 2010;95:232). Phase II single-arm study demonstrated high rates of CCyR and MMR with dasatinib used in the first line for CML-CP (JCO 2010;28:398). Current study objective: –Assess the efficacy and safety of dasatinib as first-line treatment for patients with CML-CP.

DASISION: Phase III Trial Schema Eligibility (N = 519) Ph + CML-CP within 3 months of diagnosis No prior treatment for CML except hydroxyurea or anagrelide Adequate hepatic or renal function Primary endpoint was confirmed CCyR (defined as confirmed CCyR on two consecutive assessments at least 28 days apart) by 12 months. Dasatinib 100 mg QD (n = 259) Kantarjian H et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA6500; Kantarjian H et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(24): R Imatinib 400 mg QD (n = 260)

Response Rates Dasatinib (n = 259) Imatinib (n = 260)p-value Confirmed CCyR by 12 months 1 77%66%0.007 CCyR by 12 months 2 83%72%0.001 MMR by 12 months46%28%< MMR at any time52%34%< Progression to accelerated/ blastic phase 1.9%3.5%— 1 Confirmed CCyR is defined as CCyR detected in two consecutive assessments. The second confirmation could have occurred after 12 months. 2 CCyR defined as CCyR detected at least once in at least 20 metaphases. Kantarjian H et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA6500; Kantarjian H et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(24):

Selected Drug-Related Adverse Events Adverse Event Dasatinib (n = 258) Imatinib (n = 258) All GradesGrade 3/4All GradesGrade 3/4 Neutropenia65%21%58%20% Anemia90%10%84%7% Thrombocytopenia70%19%62%10% Superficial Edema9%0%36%<1% Pleural Effusion10%0% Muscle Inflammation4%0%17%<1% Vomiting5%0%10%0% Kantarjian H et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA6500; Kantarjian H et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(24):

Conclusions Dasatinib has superior efficacy compared to imatinib in first- line CML-CP. –Superior confirmed CCyR, CCyR and MMR –Lower rate of progression to accelerated/blastic phase –Faster rates of confirmed CCyR and MMR –Hazard ratio for shorter time to confirmed CCyR: 1.5, p < –Hazard ratio for shorter time to MMR: 2.0, p < Dasatinib was well tolerated. Longer follow-up may demonstrate better long-term outcomes with dasatinib in patients with CML-CP based on the association of achieving CCyR by 12 months and improved PFS in response to imatinib. Kantarjian H et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA6500; Kantarjian H et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362(24):

Investigator comment on the results of DASISION: A Phase III study of dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP This was a two-arm randomized trial of orally administered dasatinib at the dose of 100 mg per day, which was found in the follow-up studies to be as effective and probably less toxic than 70 mg twice a day, the dose at which dasatinib was originally approved. The second arm was the standard approach of imatinib 400 mg per day. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months, and the study met its endpoints. There was a significantly superior rate of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months with dasatinib compared to imatinib, a significantly higher incidence of major molecular response and a trend for a reduction in the rate of progression to accelerated phase and blastic phase. Additionally, we observed less of the bothersome toxicities with dasatinib. There were lower incidences of muscle aches, nausea, vomiting and skin rash. We did observe a little more Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and 10 percent of the patients had pleural effusions, which were all mild to moderate and reversible with modifications of the dose and interruptions. Interview with Hagop M Kantarjian, MD, June 30, 2010