External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Services Division. Progression and Award Regulations for Taught Courses Registry Academic Services Division Chris Bexton, PG Registry Manager.
Advertisements

Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Registry
UG ARTS Vicki Phillips April Session Outline What is End of Session? Assessment Periods What is an ART? UG ARTs (when to apply, what each ART does,
End of Session for Undergraduate Students 2011/12 Katie Hoare and Vicki Phillips May 2011.
Academic Registry Assessment Regulations for Northumbria Awards (ARNA) Enid Ashdown, Quality Frameworks Manager Liz Morrow, Quality Review Manager.
GT ARTS April Session Outline What is End of Session? Assessment Periods What is an ART? GT ARTs (when to apply, what each ART does, BIRMS auto-calculation)
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
© University of South Wales Regulations Briefings Overview of University of Wales, Newport regulations – still in place for ex-Newport students completing.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Colin Davis Academic Registry 20 November 2013.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY NEW STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD How do I progress between levels? How is my final award calculated?
Academic Affairs Presentation Examination Liaison Officers 16 February 2015 Catherine McCorry / Angela Douglas Academic Affairs.
Key points of Reference and Assessment Regulations External Examiner Induction.
Our Academic Framework Modular Regulations. Two semesters –September to January –February to June –(The summer period) BUT Three terms –September to Christmas.
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Assessment Boards External Examiner Training 13 May 2015.
1 External Examiner Induction Beatrice Ollerenshaw Karen Hadley Jessica Greenlees.
Programme Leader’s event The framework and progression.
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
External Examiners Induction
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY POSTGRADUATE STUDENT INDUCTION: FINAL AWARD How is my final award calculated?
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
External Examiners Staff Development October 2010 Quality Standards, Review and Enhancement Registrar and Secretary’s Office.
© University of South Wales University of South Wales ‘Regulations for Taught Courses’ Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit.
Our Academic and Quality Frameworks Phil Brimson Quality Manager (Validation and Review)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Changes to the Taught Assessment Regulations Academic Services Ailsa Taylor April 2013
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners Spring 2013 Derek Milligan Director of Academic Programme Development.
Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site Our core activities are the resolution and determination.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
1 External Examiner Induction Iain Rowan David Blackwell Jessica Greenlees Stuart Sutcliffe.
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Assessment Regulations Registry Academic Services Sara Welham 31 August 2010.
How your degree is assessed and your classification decided.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Michael Wing Academic Registry June 14, 2016.
BOARDS OF EXAMINERS’ REVIEW Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 16 th November 2015 Slide 1.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s key examination and assessment regulations Mr Paul Cecil Quality and Standards Manager (Academic Standards.
Prof Richard Barnes Student Director
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATES
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
External Examiner Induction
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
POSTGRADUATE STUDENT INDUCTION: FINAL AWARD
MMU Regulations.
The New Academic Framework and progression
OBU Regulations.
External Examiners Induction
Taught Award Regulations
Marks/Exams Information – All Years
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Guide 4: Undergraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
How will my Degree be Classified
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners Spring 2014
Guide 4: Undergraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
How will my Degree be Classified?
What happens if I don’t pass first time
Academic Misconduct Policy
Presentation transcript:

External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November

Academic Regulations The regulations apply to all programmes (some programme specific requirements) Supplementary policies and procedures support the regulations, providing more detailed information (e.g. Assessment and Feedback, Personal Mitigating Circumstances, Boards of Examiners, External Examining) Key documents are provided for External Examiners on the External Examiner webpage 2

Assessment Modules normally have one or two components of assessment A student is normally allowed: a) one initial attempt to take a module (with attendance) and b) one opportunity to be reassessed in components of failed module(s) and c) one final opportunity to retake a module (with attendance) Assessments are verified and then set at specified times (e.g. exams in examinations period) Modules are normally capped at pass mark if reassessed or retaken UG modules at one level must normally be passed before progression to next level 3

Assessed Work All written examinations at Levels 5, 6 and 7 levels are marked anonymously All the above are subject to moderation however if any Level 4 assessments contribute to classification (e.g. FD), moderation is also required As part of the moderation process, external examiners cannot negotiate individual marks There is currently no requirement for coursework to be marked anonymously 4

All elements of assessment are mark out of 100 and recorded as a % mark, unless graded Pass/Fail Level 7 (pass = 50%)Levels 3-6 (pass = 40%) outstanding90% – 100%outstanding excellent80% – 89%excellent very good70% – 79%very good Good60% – 69%good satisfactory50% – 59%fair unsatisfactory40% – 49%adequate Inadequate30% – 39%unsatisfactory Poor20% – 29%poor very poor10% – 19%very poor extremely poor 0% – 9%extremely poor Assessment Marking Scales 5

Late Submission Penalties Late submission penalties are: Up to 1 working day late - penalty of 5 marks (not %) Up to 2 working days late - penalty of 10 marks Up to 3 working days late - penalty of 15 marks Up to 4 working days late - penalty of 20 marks More than 4 working days late, assessment becomes a non- submission (and cannot be submitted/marked) In the case of late submission, if the original mark awarded was a pass, the penalised mark cannot go below pass mark If original mark awarded was a fail, no further penalty is applied for late submission 6

Personal Mitigating Circumstances There are three categories of PMC request that can be considered: 1.Absence 2.Non submission 3.Late submission PMCs must be submitted within 10 working days of the assessment and are usually considered within 3 working days of submission. The Board of Examiners must decide on the action to implement in the case of an accepted PMC: 1.Absence – offer replacement attempt 2.Non submission - offer replacement attempt 3.Late submission – remove late submission penalties By sitting/submitting an assessment, students are deemed to be fit to sit 7

Automatic Compensation Automatic compensation for a ‘narrow failure’ can be awarded in some circumstances for failure in up to 20 credits (Levels 3 to 6) or 30 credits (L7) Automatic compensation gives credit for the module in question, it does not change the module mark 8

Degree Classification Standard Honours degree programme mark is derived from: 25% of weighted mean mark for best 100 credits at level % of weighted mean mark for best 100 credits at level 6 Class of degree thresholds: 68.50%First 59.00%Upper second 49.50%Lower second 40.00%Third No discretion for students close to the next classification boundary. Non-standard degree programme mark (including top-up degrees) derived from all available credits at levels 5 and 6, i.e. no credits excluded from the calculation. 9

Awards with Merit and Distinction Foundation Degrees Programme mark derived from best 100 credits at each of Levels 4 and 5, weighted 25:75 Mark of at least 68.50% = FD with Distinction Mark of at least 59.00% = FD with Merit Postgraduate Diploma Programme mark derived from best 120 credits at Level 7 Programme mark of at least 70.00% = PgDip with Distinction Programme mark of at least 60.00% = PgDip with Merit Masters Degree Programme mark derived from 180 credits at Level 7 Programme mark AND Project Stage mark of at least 70.00% = Masters with Distinction Programme mark AND Project Stage mark of at least 60.00% = Masters with Merit 10

Academic Misconduct Cases are considered by a School Academic Misconduct Panel or, in the most serious cases, the Disciplinary Panel. All suspected cases will be investigated and, if proven, one of the following penalties will be applied: A mark of 0 (or grade of fail) is awarded for the component of assessment A mark of 0 (or grade of fail) is awarded for the module A mark of 0 (or grade of fail) is awarded for the module and marks for all other modules at that level are kept at minimum pass mark/grade 11

Academic Appeals An appeal can only be considered valid on one or more of the following grounds: personal mitigating circumstances were not notified to the Board of Examiners and there was good reason for this there has been a procedural irregularity in the assessment process that the Board of Examiners has acted in a way which is manifestly unreasonable 12