Predictions of Diffractive and Total Cross Sections at LHC Confirmed by Measurements Konstantin Goulianos / Robert Ciesielski The Rockefeller University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
Advertisements

Diffractive, Elastic, and Total pp Cross Sections at the LHC Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University.
CERN March 2004HERA and the LHC: Diffractive Gap Probability K. Goulianos1 HERA and the LHC K. Goulianos, The Rockefeller University CERN March.
DIFFRACTION NEWS FROM CDF Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Otranto (Lecce), Italy.
Brazil 31 Mar – 2 Apr 2004 Diffraction: from HERA & Tevatron to LHC K. Goulianos1 Diffraction: from HERA & Tevatron to LHC K. Goulianos, The Rockefeller.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University EDS May 2005 Chateau de Blois, France Twenty Years of Diffraction at the Tevatron
Diffractive x-sections and event final states at the LHC Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University / Diffraction Day.
High Energy Physics Seminar University of Connecticut 7 February 2005 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University QCD ASPECTS OF HADRONIC DIFFRACTION.
Diffraction, saturation, and pp cross-sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
Diffraction, saturation, and pp cross-sections at the LHC Diffraction, saturation and pp cross sections at the LHC Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University Pomeron Intercept and Slope: are they related? Small-x and Diffraction, FERMILAB, March 2007 intercept slope.
Manchester Dec 2003 Diffraction from HERA and Tevatron to LHCK. Goulianos1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Workshop on physics with.
1 Inclusive Double-Pomeron Exchange at the Fermilab Collider Authors : M.E. Convery, K. Goulianos, K. Hatakeyama The Rockefeller University Godparents.
The Rockefeller University and the CDF Collaboration
19-24 May 2003K. Goulianos, CIPANP Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University & The CDF Collaboration CIPANP-2003, New York City, May.
DIFFRACTION RESULTS FROM CDF XIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects (DIS 2011) April 11-15, 2011 Newport News, VA.
BNL 3-5 Feb 2005Diffraction from CDF2LHC K. Goulianos1 Diffraction from CDF2LHC K. Goulianos Tev4LHC 3-5 February 2005 Brookhaven National Laboratory.
September 17-20, 2003.Kenichi Hatakeyama1 Soft Double Pomeron Exchange in CDF Run I Kenichi Hatakeyama The Rockefeller University for the CDF Collaboration.
CDF The Future of QCD at the Tevatron Fermilab, May 2004 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University.
ISMD July – 1 August 2004 Sonoma County, California, USA DIFFRACTION FROM THE DEEP SEA Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University.
Diffraction at CDF 12th International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Forward Physics and QCD – Blois2007 Hamburg, Germany, May.
Diffractive W/Z & Exclusive CDF II DIS 2008, 7-11 April 2008, University College London XVI International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and.
Diffraction at CDF and Universality of Diffractive Factorization Breaking Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
Pp cross sections at the LHC K. Goulianos UK 6-8 Dec pp cross sections at the LHC Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Forward.
Diffractive and Total pp cross sections at LHC K. Goulianos EDS 2009, June 29-July 3 1 Diffractive and Total pp Cross Sections at LHC Konstantin Goulianos.
Recent Results on Diffraction and Exclusive Production from CDF Christina Mesropian The Rockefeller University.
Factorization Breaking in Diffraction  pp,  p and  *p  Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University.
Diffractive x-sections and event final states at the LHC Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University CDF  PHENO  CMS
23-28 June 2003K. Goulianos, Blois Workshop, Helsinki, Finland1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University & The CDF Collaboration Xth Blois Workshop.
Diffractive and total pp cross sections at the LHC and beyond Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
Diffraction with CDF II at the Tevatron Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University and The CDF Collaboration.
Diffractive W and Z Production at Tevatron Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University and the CDF collaboration Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions.
4-7 June 2003K. Goulianos, Low-x Workshop, Nafplion1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University & The CDF Collaboration Low-x Workshop, Nafplion,
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University Diffraction at the Tevatron: CDF Results Diffraction 2006 Milos island, Greece, 5-10 September 2006  presented.
Aspen Feb Tevatron / LHC K. Goulianos1 DIFFRACTION FROM THE TEVATRON TO LHC Aspen Winter Conference February 2005 Konstantin.
Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Diffraction at CDF and at the LHC LOW X MEETING: HOTEL VILLA SORRISO, ISCHIA ISLAND, ITALY, September 8-13.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
Predictions of Diffractive, Elastic, Total, and Total-Inelastic pp Cross Sections vs LHC Measurements Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University DIS-2013,
2009 Diffraction at CDF and cross sections at the LHC K. Goulianos1 Diffraction at CDF and cross sections at the LHC K. Goulianos 9-12 Dec 2009.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University (Representing the CDF Collaboration) DIS April – 1 May Madison, Wisconsin Update on CDF Results on Diffraction.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University Pomeron Intercept and Slope: the QCD connection 12 th Blois Workshop, DESY, Hamburg, Germany May2007 intercept.
Predictions of Diffraction at the LHC Compared to Experimental Results Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University 1
K. Goulianos CDF RESULTS ON DIFFRACTION AND EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION Konstantin Goulianos 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering (EDS Blois Workshop.
CMS results on soft diffraction Konstantin Goulianos (on behalf of the CMS collaboration ) The Rockefeller University EDS BLOIS 2013, 15 th Conference.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University Renormalized Diffractive Parton Densities and Exclusive Production Diffraction 2006 Milos island, Greece, 5-10.
New results on diffractive t-distributions from CDF Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University (for the CDF Collaboration) DIS-2012 DIS-2012, Bonn,
Predictions of Soft Processes at the LHC Implemented in PYTHIA8 Konstantin Goulianos* The Rockefeller University 1 low-x 2012 CyprusSoft Processes at LHC.
Review of RENORM Diffractive Predictions for LHC up to 8 TeV and Extension to 13 TeV Konstantin Goulianos 1DIS-2015.
LHC Results Support RENORM Predictions of Diffraction 1MIAMI 2014 LHC Results Support RENORM Predictions of Diffraction K.Goulianos Konstantin Goulianos.
HARD DIFFRACTION AT CDF Konstantin Goulianos (for the CDF II Collaboration) 1EDS2013, Saariselca Hard Diffraction at CDF K. Goulianos SAARISELKÄ, FINLAND.
Feb, 2006M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference 1 A robust prediction of the LHC cross section Martin Block Northwestern University.
CDF RESULTS ON DIFFRACTION and EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION Konstantin Goulianos 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering (EDS Blois Workshop ) Frontiers.
17-20 September 2003K. Goulianos, Small x and Diffraction, Fermilab1 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Small x and Diffraction
Precision RENORM / MBR Predictions for Diffraction at LHC Konstantin Goulianos Precision predictions ? Wow!
RENORM Diffractive Predictions Extended to Higher LHC and Future Accelerator Energies Konstantin Goulianos
XII-th International Workshop on HEP & QFT Diffraction at the LHC Samara, Russia, July 2015 László Jenkovszky, Kiev
New Results on Diffractive and Exclusive Production from CDF Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University (for the CDF Collaboration) DIS-2013, Marseille.
RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Diffractive Predictions
on behalf of the CDF and DØ collaborations
Predicting and measuring the total inelastic cross section at the LHC
Precision RENORM Tensor-Pomeron Cross Sections at LHC and Beyond
Aspects of Diffraction at the Tevatron
MB&UE Working Group Meeting UE Lessons Learned & What’s Next
DIFFRACTIVE DIJET PRODUCTION AT CDF
Precision RENORM / MBR Predictions for Diffraction at LHC
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
CDF RESULTS ON DIFFRACTION AND EXCLUSIVE PRODUCTION
member of Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
Konstantin Goulianos What puzzle? Miami17
Precision RENORM MBR Predictions vs. LHC Results K. Goulianos
Presentation transcript:

Predictions of Diffractive and Total Cross Sections at LHC Confirmed by Measurements Konstantin Goulianos / Robert Ciesielski The Rockefeller University DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 1 DIS-2014 University of Warsaw

Basic and combined diffractive processes CONTENTS DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 2  Diffraction  SD1 pp  p-gap-X SD2p  X-gap-pSingle Diffraction / Single Dissociation  DDpp  X-gap-XDouble Diffraction / Double Dissociation  CD/DPEpp  gap-X-gapCenral Diffraction / Double Pomeron Exchange  Renormalization  unitarization  RENORM model  Triple-Pomeron coupling  Total Cross Section  RENORM predictions Confirmed  References  MBR in PYTHIA8  CMS PAS  DIS13  2013 summary:  CTEQ Workshop, “QCD tool for LHC Physics: From 8 to 14 TeV, what is needed and why”” FINAL, 14 November, 2013 CTEQ Workshop, “QCD tool for LHC Physics: From 8 to 14 TeV, what is needed and why”” FINAL, 14 November, 2013

Basic and combined diffractive processes 4-gap diffractive process-Snowmass gap SD DD DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 3

KG-PLB 358, 379 (1995) Regge theory – values of s o & g PPP ? Parameters:  s 0, s 0 ' and g(t)  set s 0 ‘ = s 0 (universal IP )  determine s 0 and g PPP – how? DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 4  (t)=  (0)+  ′t  (0)=1+ 

A complicatiion…  Unitarity! A complication …  Unitarity!   sd grows faster than  t as s increases *  unitarity violation at high s (similarly for partial x-sections in impact parameter space)  the unitarity limit is already reached at √s ~ 2 TeV !  need unitarization DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 5 * similarly for (d  el /dt) t=0 w.r.t.  t  but this is handled differently in RENORM

Factor of ~8 (~5) suppression at √s = 1800 (540) GeV  diffractive x-section suppressed relative to Regge prediction as √s increases see KG, PLB 358, 379 (1995) 1800 GeV 540 GeV M ,t,t p p p’ √s=22 GeV RENORMALIZATION Regge FACTORIZATION BREAKING IN SOFT DIFFRACTION CDFCDF DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 6 Interpret flux as gap formation probability that saturates when it reaches unity

Gap probability  (re)normalize to unity Single diffraction renormalized independent variables: t color factor gap probability subenergy x-section KG  CORFU-2001: DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 7

Single diffraction renormalized - 2 color factor Experimentally: KG&JM, PRD 59 (114017) 1999 QCD: DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 8

Single diffraction renormalized - 3 set to unity  determines s o DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 9

M2 distribution: data KG&JM, PRD 59 (1999)  factorization breaks down to ensure M 2 scaling Regge 1 Independent of s over 6 orders of magnitude in M 2  M 2 scaling  d  dM 2 | t=-0.05 ~ independent of s over 6 orders of magnitude ! data DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 10

Scale s 0 and PPP coupling DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 11  Two free parameters: s o and g PPP  Obtain product g PPP s o  from  SD  Renormalized Pomeron flux determines s o  Get unique solution for g PPP Pomeron-proton x-section Pomeron flux: interpret as gap probability  set to unity: determines g PPP and s 0 KG, PLB 358 (1995) 379

Saturation at low Q 2 and small-x figure from a talk by Edmond Iancu DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 12

DD at CDF renormalized gap probabilityx-section DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 13

SDD at CDF  Excellent agreement between data and MBR (MinBiasRockefeller) MC DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 14

CD/DPE at CDF  Excellent agreement between data and MBR  low and high masses are correctly implemented DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 15

Difractive x-sections  1 =0.9,  2 =0.1, b 1 =4.6 GeV -2, b 2 =0.6 GeV -2, s′=s e -  y,  =0.17,  2 (0)=  0, s 0 =1 GeV 2,  0 =2.82 mb or 7.25 GeV -2 DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 16

Total, elastic, and inelastic x-sections GeV 2 DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 17 KG Moriond 2011, arXiv:  el p±p =  tot ×(  el  tot ), with  el  tot from CMG small extrapol. from 1.8 to 7 and up to 50 TeV ) CMG

The total x-section √s F =22 GeV 98 ± 8 mb at 7 TeV 109 ±12 mb at 14 TeV DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 18 Main error from s 0

Reduce the uncertainty in s 0 DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 19  glue-ball-like object  “superball”  mass  1.9 GeV  m s 2 = 3.7 GeV  agrees with RENORM s o =3.7  Error in s 0 can be reduced by factor ~4 from a fit to these data!  reduces error in  t.

TOTEM vs PYTHIA8-MBR DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 20  inrl 7 TeV = 72.9 ±1.5 mb  inrl 8 TeV = 74.7 ±1.7 mb TOTEM, G. Latino talk at CERN 2012 MBR: 71.1±5 mb superball  ± 1.2 mb RENORM: 72.3±1.2 mb RENORM: 71.1±1.2 mb

SD/DD extrapolation to  ≤ 0.05 vs MC model DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 21 CMS data best described by PYTHIA8-MBR Central yellow-filled box is the data region (see left figure)

p T distr’s of MCs vs Pythia8 tuned to MBR DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 22  COLUMNS Mass Regions  Low5.5<MX<10 GeV  Med.32<MX<56 GeV  High176<MX<316 GeV  ROWS MC Models  PYTHIA8-MBR  PYTHIA8-4C  PYTHIA8-D6C  PHOJET  QGSJET-II-03(LHC)  QGSJET-04(LHC)  EPOS-LHC  CONCLUSION  PYTHIA8-MBR agrees best with reference model and can be trusted to be used in extrapolating to the unmeasured regions.  Pythia8 tuned to MBR

Charged mult’s vs MC model – 3 mass regions DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 23 Pythia8 parameters tuned to reproduce multiplicities of modified gamma distribution KG, PLB 193, 151 (1987 ) Mass Regions  Low5.5<MX<10 GeV  Med.32<MX<56 GeV  High176<MX<316 GeV

Pythia8-MBR hadronization tune 24 PYTHIA8 default  Pp (s) expected from Regge phenomenology for s 0 =1 GeV 2 and DL t-dependence. Red line:-best fit to multiplicity distributions. (in bins of Mx, fits to higher tails only, default pT spectra) good description of low multiplicity tails R. Ciesielski, “Status of diffractive models”, CTEQ Workshop 2013 Diffraction: tune SigmaPomP Diffraction: QuarkNorm/Power parameter DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 24

SD and DD x-sections vs theory DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 25  KG*: after extrapolation into low  from the measured CMS data using MBR model Includes ND background KG*

DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 26 Monte Carlo algorithm - nesting y'cy'c Profile of a pp inelastic collision  y‘ <  y' min hadronize  y′ >  y' min generate central gap repeat until  y' <  y' min ln s′ =  y′ evolve every cluster similarly gap no gap final state of MC w /no-gaps t gap t t t1t1 t2t2

DIS-2014 Warsaw Predictions for Diffraction Confirmed at LHC K. Goulianos 27 SUMMARY  Introduction  Diffractive cross sections:  basic: SD1,SD2, DD, CD (DPE)  combined: multigap x-sections  ND  no diffractive gaps:  this is the only final state to be tuned  Monte Carlo strategy for the LHC – “nesting” derived from ND and QCD color factors Thank you for your attention