{ Formative Assessment 8th Grade Mathematics. ➢ Build a shared understanding of formative assessment techniques, relative to the SMPs and content standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
SVMI Concept Development Lesson Common Core State Standards- Mathematics (CCSS-M) Conference Mariana Alwell Professional Development Provider Silicon Valley.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Examining Instruction, Part I Nov. 7, Plan for Today 4:10-4:15 Welcome and Overview 4:15-5:00 Tuning Protocol on Data Overviews 5:00-5:50 Observing.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Welcome to Lesson Study
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Elementary Mathematics
Classroom Discussions
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
Determining Essential Learnings or Essential Outcomes September 14, 2010.
November 2013 Network Team Institute
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
WEEK 2 DAY 2 Goals for the day: Tools to collect evidence of student learning. Create clear teaching points for student learning and criteria for success.
Audience: Peer Observers, Deans, Vice Presidents for Instruction Fall 2011 Peer Observer Training.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Module 2 Planning an Integrated Common Core Literature Lesson.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Math-It’s Elementary February 2013 Investigating strategies that promote highly effective teaching and learning for meeting the Kentucky Core Academic.
GOMATH! Day 2 Network 609 Core Curriculum Planning June 2013 Presenter: Karen Cardinali.
MFAS Mathematics Formative Assessment System We shall be using tasks from MFAS.
Professional Learning Communities Session 2 Tenino High School December 15, 2009.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
CCGPS Mathematics First Grade Update Webinar Unit 2: Developing Base Ten Number Sense September 12, 2013 Update presentations are the result of collaboration.
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
Conferring Early Release Roseburg Public Schools-Elementary 1 st Trimester-2013.
Leveraging Student Representations and Discourse to Advance Learning through Progressions LEUSD Middle and High School September 23, 2015.
Learning by Doing: A Workshop Model Facilitators Debbie Poslosky (Mason Ridge) Erin Arledge (Carman Trails) Francesca Kottkamp (Shenandoah Valley)
Coaching for Math GAINS Professional Learning Day 2 April, 2009.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science November 13, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
 Lesson Plan ◦ Lesson Idea ◦ Refining the Lesson Plan  Observation Process (Points of interest, challenges) ◦ Scribing ◦ Observer  Learning Points 
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,
The Lesson PlanningProcess The BLaST IU17 Liberty Fellowship September 20, 2011 Dr. Fran Macko
SCS TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group #4 Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Arrive At Essential Understandings: Part 2- Asking Advancing Questions.
Page 1 Building Understanding of the Fractions Through Hands-On Experiences Marcia Torgrude and Bailey Kowalski K-12 Math Specialists
Marcia Torgrude TIE K-12 Math Specialist
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Math Leadership Teams October, 2014.
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
The Power of Observation. Before Observation Which students are the focus of the observation? What method will best capture the observation? What opportunities.
{ Developing Student Thinking Seventh Grade Mathematics.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
On Going Support Training November 12, 2015 Grades 2-3 Presenters: Julie Villeneuve, Fran Gibson, and Pat Gibson.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Models for Lessons Thinking about planning. The Verbs of Doing Mathematics Explaining Investigating Exploring Interpreting Analyzing Describing Deriving.
Balanced Math Overview
Stage 1 – Desired Results Level I – Quarter 1 – Art History Established Goals Enduring Understanding: The Elements & Principles of Design are found throughout.
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Welcome Protocols in Math Study Group-Session -6 Facilitator; Alaka Das June 19, 2015.
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Classroom Video Observation
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Welcome to Day Eight.
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

{ Formative Assessment 8th Grade Mathematics

➢ Build a shared understanding of formative assessment techniques, relative to the SMPs and content standards. Purpose ➢ Refine our skills in formatively assessing students’ progress toward a specific learning target and develop students’ thinking. Outcome

➢ What does it really mean to utilize formative assessment techniques as they relate to both the Content Standards and the Standards for Mathematical Practices (SMPs)? Essential Question

What will today look like?

8: :35 - Lesson Design 10: :00 - Observation #1 (Period 2) 11: :40 - Debrief 12:40 - 1:10 - Observation #2 (Period 3) Or (1:50 - 2:20, period 4) 1:10 - 3:00 – Lunch & Debrief/Reflections Schedule 8:00 - 3:00 - 8th Grade

❧ Every voice is heard ❧ Listen to understand ❧ Focus on evidence ❧ Have fun Norms

Math Pre-Task: Living in the problem * First read: No pencils in hand. You get 30 seconds to read through the problem. ➢ Share what the problem is about without using numbers *Second read: You may take notes - Do not solve. ➢ Share relating numbers to observations in the first read

1. Review the Work 2. Discuss the Work 3. Reflections from the Hosting Teacher 4. Suggestions for Teaching and Learning 5. Debrief Analyzing and Learning from Student Work Protocol

Review the Work · Identify facilitator. · Participants review the work silently. Analyzing and Learning from Student Work Protocol

Pile the work, Small Group discussion Round 3. Identify: What are the student misconceptions? Round 4. Question: What questions do you have about the work? Round 1. Describe: What do you notice about the student work (big picture)? Round 2. Interpret: What do the students understand?

{{ Describe ✧ What do you notice about the student work? ✧ “In general, I noticed…” ✧ “I agree with _____ and I noticed…” Sharing Protocol 1. Each person silently looks at papers 2. Each person shares, and others listen without interjecting Round 1

Interpret: What do the students understand? “___ of ___ students understand…” Round 2

Identify: What are the student misconceptions? Pile the work Share out & come to consensus Round 3

Question: What questions do you have about the work? Round 4

1. Identify task 2. Design plan ➢ Questions to reveal thinking ➢ Build on what they know ➢ Plan how to move student thinking/learning ➢ What questions might help draw out the big idea? Identify/Plan Task

The four legs of the canopy are 6 feet tall and when it is set up, are 10 feet apart. The bar that goes from the center of the top to the top of the leg is 8 feet. He wants to find out how tall the center of the canopy will be when it is set up. More info...

How could Brooke change the tent so that it would fit in the space? So...

➢ Content goal: G.7 - Apply PT in real-world problems ➢ SMP goal: 7 Use of structure Identify goals:

Execute and Observe What do we want to capture? Which students are we watching?

➢ How did students interact with the task? ➢ What evidence of the Content Standards was documented? ➢ What evidence of the SMPs was documented? What does the evidence tell us?

How can we adjust to improve student learning? ✓ Individual think time ✓ Small group discussion ✓ Whole group discussion/consensus

Execute and Observe What do we want to capture? Which students are we watching?

➢ How did students interact with the task? ➢ What evidence of the Content Standards was documented? ➢ What evidence of the SMP goal was documented? What does the evidence tell us?

How can we adjust to improve student learning? ✓ Individual think time ✓ Small group discussion ✓ Whole group discussion/consensus

➢ Upon which strategies or students’ ideas do we want to capitalize in order to move students’ understanding of the SMP Goal or Content Goal? ➢ What questions might the teacher ask to help draw out the big ideas? Debrief/Follow-Up Planning

➢ What are your take-aways? ➢ How might you use this with your PLCs? Closure/Reflection