New Employee Induction Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Mentoring New Educators
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Mentoring and Beginning Teacher Induction Program Karen Linville, WV Center for Professional Development Nathan Estel, West Virginia Department of Education.
FLY Teacher Induction. Purpose of Teacher Induction Develop and continue lifelong learning for both the new teachers and mentor teachers to improve student.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
ENG131 TECHNICAL WRITING ORAL PERSUASIVE PRESENTATION DELIVERED TO XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX DR. ELIZABETH LOHMAN, TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, CC-BY Quality Teachers.
New Teacher Development Program Tamika Estwick-Sen. Program Manager Elizabeth Kurkjian Henry- New Teacher Developer Alexis Harewood- Year II Teacher.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Holland Central School District New Teacher Mentoring Program Introduction.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
New Teacher Mentoring Programs Presented by: Shannon Butler, Suzanne Brown, Brandy Day, Giovanni Hines, Scott Holland and Ann Marie Nelin EPPL 643 Spring.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Parkway School District Summer, Outcomes Why Mentor? Phases of New Teacher Development Roles of the Mentor Teacher Responsibilities and Expectations.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Mentoring and Induction of New Teachers (MINT) CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS CPS Teachers Academy for Professional Development Diane H. Zendejas, Director The.
MENTORING BEGINNING TEACHERS TO PROMOTE HIGHER STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION RATES.
CULTURES OF COACHING AND MENTORING Principal’s role in Coaching and Mentoring teachers.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
What makes a successful mentoring program? Kathryn Burr and Kyle Moser EPPL 501.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
MEYER ELEMENTARY SPRING ISD LORETTA DAVENPORT Campus Improvement Project III Teacher Mentoring Program.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Office of Service Quality
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
By William Gray Rinehart and Kristi Ley
Presented by: La Chandra Cobb Audrey Collins Mellow Tatmon.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
District Mentoring Plan
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
February 21-22, 2018.
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

New Employee Induction Program By Shawn Huntley

Define the Issue: New teachers are faced with many challenges when beginning their career in special education. Some of theses challenges include: Unfamiliar with district initiatives No prior knowledge of district curriculum Classroom management Due process paperwork

What’s the Research? “It is estimated that between 40% and 50% of new teachers leave within the first five years of entry into teaching.” “One negative consequence of the high turnover in teaching is its link to the teacher shortages that seem to annually plague many schools.” “Data shows that beginning teachers, in particular, report that one of the main factors behind their decision to depart is a lack of adequate support from school administrators.” “Data also indicates that induction can help retain teachers and improve their instruction. The data also show that the kinds and amounts of support vary. And some research suggests that content, intensity, and duration are important.” Data retrieved from: http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2 012/05/16/kappan_ingersoll.h31.html

The Adaptive Challenge A school district should adopt a teacher induction program that provides a framework for supporting new teachers. A comprehensive induction program would benefit a district by: Increase retention rates Provide high quality services to students Ensure alignment with district initiatives Increase teacher performance due to feeling adequately supported

Desired Outcome To ensure that new teachers are supported by expert teachers in similar positions, that enables new teachers to deliver high quality instruction to students that aligns with the district’s curriculum and initiatives. Stakeholders Required: Superintendent Human Resources Teachers’ Union Principals Special Education Administration Expert Teachers New Teachers

Special Considerations The plan must be supportive in nature and in no way be construed as, or involved in, the evaluation of teacher performance. Teachers union must vote and approve new induction program. Mentor rubric must be created to ensure equitable access to become a mentor since a stipend is part of the position Determine an adequate number of mentor/mentee meetings Not to extend beyond contractual agreement. Mentor teacher will receive a stipend of $50 per visit. For example: Mentor visits new teacher 9 times during first year = $450.

Developing the Plan Expectations of Mentor and New Employee Monthly Meetings: The mentor and new employee must meet on a regular basis. Nine visits are required during a new teacher’s first year. Six visits are required for second year teachers. Three visits are required for third year teachers. Meetings will require mentor to obtain a half-day substitute teacher so visit allows for the mentor to observe the teacher and provide modeling and coaching.

Additional Expectations Monthly Mentoring Log: The monthly mentoring log must be filed out jointly by the mentor and mentee. The log should include observation notes and area of focus along with an action plan for new teacher to complete over the next month. This log must be turned in to supervising administrator.

Mentoring Required Mentoring Training: Why is mentoring important Mentor expectations and roles Support strategies Typical new staff member concerns Building relationships Communication and listening skills Use of mentoring logs Coaching and observation techniques What to do if relationship is strained Roles and Responsibilities of Mentor: Attend mentor trainings Participate in professional learning community Serve as a coach and resource person Encourage new employee Conduct informal observations Allow new employee to develop own personal style Maintain documentation Guide new employee in reflection, self-assessment and establishment of professional development plan.

New Employee Role of the Mentee: Develop a trusting relationship with mentor Attend professional learning community Meet with mentor designated amount of times Use data to inform and improve Accept, learn and grow from constructive criticism Develop and reflect on goals for continuous improvement

Financial Impact The cost to the district uses the average of new teachers the district employed over the past 10 years. Given this information and for informational purposes we will use the average of 20 new teachers each year in special education. This gives us 2o first year teachers, 20 second year teachers and 20 third year teachers. Cost for Mentor Stipend = $18,000.00 Cost of half-day substitutes (given $60 per sub)= $21,600.oo Cost of Mentor training (2 full days during summer for new mentors) = $10,304.00 Total cost to district: $49,904.00 (roughly the cost of one teacher)

Evaluation Plan The number of highly qualified teachers should increase with this program thus decreasing the number of new hires required each year. Mentee survey completed by all mentees that shows how they benefited from the program and ask questions for continued improvement.