2004 Credentialing & CVO Standards National Credentialing Forum February 20, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile Surveyor A Windows PDA/Mobile based survey Software for easy, fast and error free data collection.
Advertisements

©2013 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Information Current as of December 2, 2013 The Program Evaluation Committee and the.
Joint Commission Accreditation For Healthcare Organizations &
Standard 3 Plan and Manage Care NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
CAMSS The Complexities of Managed Care Credentialing Mei Ling Christopher, UnitedHealthcare Sallye Marcus, Anthem Blue Cross.
PIF- TOOLS AND TIPS Cindy Koonz, MS- Oregon Health & Science University Katy Oksuita, MS- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
Patient-Centered Medical Home & Multi-Payer Demo Training Webinar # 8 David Halpern, MD, MPH August 31st, 2011.
CCCA FCLB Certified Clinical Chiropractic Assistant A Certification Program for Chiropractic Assistants Who Assist with Therapies DRAFT PROGRAM CONCEPTS.
Telemedicine Credentialing and Privileging October 16, 2014.
HEDIS Audit – Appropriate Monitoring and Oversight of Vendors Presenter: Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, EQRO Services.
1 What They Don’t Teach You in Medical School (Steps in Medical Staff Credentialing) March 13, 2008 Judi Smedra, CPMSM, CPCS Director, Medical Staff Affairs.
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
FINAL PUBLIC REVIEW OF DRAFT NATIONAL CORE ARTS STANDARDS What you should know and be able to do!
New Directions: Online Learning & the University of California’s A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate.
Public School-Operated UPK Information Session. Goals Increase your understanding of QUALITYstarsNY Answer your questions and concerns about participating.
. Copyright  2011 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs to accompany Vocational Training and Assessment by Hill, Hill and Perlitz 4–1 TAE40110 Certificate.
111 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Presentation_ID.
Data Evaluation. Overview A&D now offers a professional data evaluation package to complement our testing tools –We have partnered to supply the commercial.
Keeping Up-to-Date with SACSCOC MAC Meeting Fall 2013.
All materials © 2012, National Committee for Quality Assurance NCQA Update National Credentialing Forum February 6, 2014.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Welcome to the Interactive Survey System. 2 What Is the Interactive Survey System? Online, interactive version of the documents needed for NCQA accreditation,
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Measuring Quality In Health Care Linda K. Shelton Assistant Vice President Product Development.
Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Jessica Briefer French, MHSA Assistant Vice President.
NAMSS UPDATE February 6, 2015 Linda Waldorf NAMSS President Director, UNC-HCS CCO & UNC OMSS.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
12 Developing a Web Site Section 12.1 Discuss the functions of a Web site Compare and contrast style sheets Apply cascading style sheets (CSS) to a Web.
Mission Statement: Every physician has the right to practice medicine without worry of financial burdens. Every person has the right to consult with any.
HealthLine Systems, Inc. Internet Based Credentialing Presented by Cheryl Tensley.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Final Webinar: Reviewing the NCQA Submission Process NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
NCQA Standards Update & Delegated Credentialing Tips NYSAMSS Annual Meeting – May 4, 2012 By: Di Hall, CPCS, CPMSM Director, Compliance & Quality Improvement.
Purpose of Volunteer Selection The primary purpose of volunteer screening is the protection of the youth enrolled in our programs, our volunteers and our.
Commission Updates Barbara J. Johnson July 18, 2014.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Hunter Douglas Corporate Safety Conference
2 ASSIST for Schools/Districts An Overview of the Framework Dr. W. Darrell Barringer.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
ISO :2015 Documentation kit for Accreditation of Certifying Body - by Global Manager Group
Documentation Requirements for Hospital Accreditation -By Global Manager Group.
North Carolina Association Medical Staff Services May 27, 2016 Renee Aird Dengler, RN, MS, CPMSM, CPCS NCQA CVO & NCQA CR Certification.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
Performing Credentials File Audits Kathy Matzka, CPMSM, CPCS.
Effective Practices for a Successful Standards Review.
DNV GL © 2013 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © 2013 DNV Healthcare – Top Survey Findings – Medical Staff National Credentialing Forum.
United Behavioral Health, operating under the brand Optum U. S. Behavioral Health Plan, California, doing business as OptumHealth Behavioral Solutions.
The Doctor FBI Series II Credentials File Search May 25, 2016 MSPs.
North Carolina Association Medical Staff Services June 13, 2016 Renee Aird Dengler, RN, MS, CPMSM, CPCS “Pending” Verifications and Documents.
NUR 607 Credentialing & privileging. Significance of these activities Initial Ongoing Ensure protection of the public Autonomy and independence of the.
HCR 230 Week 7 CheckPoint Effective Financial Policies and Procedures To purchase this material click below link
Credentialing: 2017 Updates and Frequently Asked Questions
Evolution of a system wide cvo
Diana K. “Di” Hall, CPCS CPMSM – Sr. Director, Compliance & Quality
Establishing and Understanding a CVO
I-129 & Export Compliance Internal Processes At Vanderbilt to Meet the New Export Control Requirements for H-1B & O-1A Petitions.
MANUALS READ THE MANUALS!!
Delegation Compliance Specialist
Microsoft SAM Managed Service Program
MGT 360 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
MGT 360 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Delegated Credentialing: Do You Know Where to Start?
Presentation to The Fourth National HIPAA Summit
607 Lakeside Drive, Southampton, Pa Telephone:
OBJECTIVES DISCUSS CREDENTIALING AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT
Compliance with Law CVO/Delegation
Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgery Fellowship Accreditation Program
Complaints, Malpractice Coverage/PLI, Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions
PPS Enrollment & Maintenance Services
Presentation transcript:

2004 Credentialing & CVO Standards National Credentialing Forum February 20, 2004

2004 Credentialing Standard Changes 2004 CVO Standard Changes Web Based Survey Tool Objectives

2003 MCO Standards CR 1: Policies CR 2: Committee CR 3: Initial Verification CR 4: Application and Attestation CR 5: Initial Sanction Information CR 6: Site Visits CR 7: Recredentialing Verification CR 8: Recredentialing Sanction Information CR 9: Performance Monitoring CR 10: Ongoing Monitoring of Sanctions and Complaints CR 11: Assessment of Providers

2004 Standard Changes Documented process to ensure accuracy of member materials (CR 1) Committee must only review credentials that do not meet criteria (CR 2) Verification of licensure becomes separate element (CR 3 & 7) Review of quality issues in CR 9 incorporated into CR 10

Current CVO Standards CVO 1 Written Policies and Procedures CVO 2 Process for Internal Continuous Quality Improvement CVO 4 Protection of Credentialing Information CVO 5 Application and Attestation CVO 6 Ongoing Monitoring CVO 3 Verification and Reporting State Licensure DEA Certificate Education and Training Malpractice History Malpractice Insurance Medical Board Sanctions Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions Standards 50 % of composite 90% on CVO 6 At least 70% on assessed elements Scoring

2004 CVO Standards Changes identified three core standards and designated them must-pass for CVO certification made Application and Attestation (former CVO 5) and Ongoing Monitoring (former CVO 6) separately scored certifications added Work History as a certification added CVO Application Content (CVO 5) as a certification eliminated Malpractice Insurance as a certification.

2004 CVO Standards CVO 1 Written Policies and Procedures CVO 2 Process for Internal Continuous Quality Improvement CVO 3 Protection of Credentialing Information CVO 4 State Licensure* CVO 5 DEA Certificate* CVO 6 Education and Training* CVO 7 Work History* CVO 8 Malpractice History* CVO 9 Medical Board Sanctions* CVO 10 Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions* CVO 11 Application and Attestation Processing* CVO 12 Application and Attestation Content CVO 13 Ongoing Monitoring of Sanctions Core Standards Must-pass all elements Separately scored standards Scoring Certifications *file review standards

Why was the process redesigned? Increase efficiency and quality of evaluation Enable cost-effective, timely process Maintain the rigor of accreditation Provide readiness evaluation tool for organizations Interactive Survey System

What Is the Interactive Survey System? Online, interactive version of the documents needed for NCQA accreditation, certification or recognition programs Two components –Standards and Guidelines (SGs) –Survey Tool (ST or “Tool”)

Standards and Guidelines Available in print or e-publication version Purchase license to use on ISS Web-based and fully searchable

The Survey Tool Interactive tool for readiness evaluation and information transfer to NCQA –Complete question/answer format for MCO survey preparation –Gives numeric results based on answers –Links supporting documents to show compliance –Captures notes and comments for project management –Includes the SGs in a drill-down format

Survey Process Survey Tool Submitted Off-site review (non-file review standards) On-site review (file review standards and other confidential information)