Spring 2015 Lecture 2: Analysis of Algorithms 2IL50 Data Structures Spring 2015 Lecture 2: Analysis of Algorithms
Analysis of algorithms the formal way …
Analysis of algorithms Can we say something about the running time of an algorithm without implementing and testing it? InsertionSort(A) initialize: sort A[1] for j = 2 to A.length do key = A[j] i = j -1 while i > 0 and A[i] > key do A[i+1] = A[i] i = i -1 A[i +1] = key
Analysis of algorithms Analyze the running time as a function of n (# of input elements) best case average case worst case elementary operations add, subtract, multiply, divide, load, store, copy, conditional and unconditional branch, return … An algorithm has worst case running time T(n) if for any input of size n the maximal number of elementary operations executed is T(n).
Analysis of algorithms: example n=10 n=100 n=1000 1568 150698 1.5 x 107 10466 204316 3.0 x 106 InsertionSort 6 x faster 1.35 x faster MergeSort 5 x faster InsertionSort: 15 n2 + 7n – 2 MergeSort: 300 n lg n + 50 n The rate of growth of the running time as a function of the input is essential! n = 1,000,000 InsertionSort 1.5 x 1013 MergeSort 6 x 109 2500 x faster !
Θ-notation Intuition: concentrate on the leading term, ignore constants 19 n3 + 17 n2 - 3n becomes Θ(n3) 2 n lg n + 5 n1.1 - 5 becomes n - ¾ n √n becomes Θ(n1.1) ---
“Θ(g(n)) is the set of functions that grow as fast as g(n)” Θ-notation Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have Θ(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c1, c2, and n0 such that 0 ≤ c1g(n) ≤ f(n) ≤ c2g(n) for all n ≥ n0 } “Θ(g(n)) is the set of functions that grow as fast as g(n)”
Notation: f(n) = Θ(g(n)) Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have Θ(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c1, c2, and n0 such that 0 ≤ c1g(n) ≤ f(n) ≤ c2g(n) for all n ≥ n0 } n n0 c1g(n) c2g(n) f(n) Notation: f(n) = Θ(g(n))
Θ-notation Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have Θ(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c1, c2, and n0 such that 0 ≤ c1g(n) ≤ f(n) ≤ c2g(n) for all n ≥ n0 } Claim: 19n3 + 17n2 - 3n = Θ(n3) Proof: Choose c1 = 19, c2 = 36 and n0 = 1. Then we have for all n ≥ n0: 0 ≤ c1n3 = 19n3 (trivial) ≤ 19n3 + 17n2 - 3n (since 17n2 > 3n for n ≥ 1) ≤ 19n3 + 17n3 (since 17n2 ≤ 17n3 for n ≥1) = c2n3 ■
Θ-notation Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have Θ(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c1, c2, and n0 such that 0 ≤ c1g(n) ≤ f(n) ≤ c2g(n) for all n ≥ n0 } Claim: 19n3 + 17n2 - 3n ≠ Θ(n2) Proof: Assume that there are positive constants c1, c2, and n0 such that for all n ≥ n0 0 ≤ c1n2 ≤ 19n3 + 17n2 - 3n ≤ c2n2 Since 19n3 + 17n2 - 3n ≤ c2n2 implies 19n3 ≤ c2n2 + 3n – 17n2 ≤ c2n2 (3n – 17n2 ≤ 0) we would have for all n ≥ n0 19n ≤ c2.
“O(g(n)) is the set of functions that grow at most as fast as g(n)” O-notation Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have O(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c and n0 such that 0 ≤ f(n) ≤ cg(n) for all n ≥ n0 } “O(g(n)) is the set of functions that grow at most as fast as g(n)”
Notation: f(n) = O(g(n)) O-notation Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have O(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c and n0 such that 0 ≤ f(n) ≤ cg(n) for all n ≥ n0 } n n0 cg(n) f(n) Notation: f(n) = O(g(n))
“Ω(g(n)) is the set of functions that grow at least as fast as g(n)” Ω-notation Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have Ω(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c and n0 such that 0 ≤ cg(n) ≤ f(n) for all n ≥ n0 } “Ω(g(n)) is the set of functions that grow at least as fast as g(n)”
Notation: f(n) = Ω(g(n)) Let g(n) : N ↦ N be a function. Then we have Ω(g(n)) = { f(n) : there exist positive constants c and n0 such that 0 ≤ cg(n) ≤ f(n) for all n ≥ n0 } n n0 cg(n) f(n) Notation: f(n) = Ω(g(n))
Asymptotic notation “asymptotically equal” Θ(…) is an asymptotically tight bound O(…) is an asymptotic upper bound Ω(…) is an asymptotic lower bound other asymptotic notation o(…) → “grows strictly slower than” ω(…) → “grows strictly faster than” “asymptotically equal” “asymptotically smaller or equal” “asymptotically greater or equal”
More notation … f(n) = n3 + Θ(n2) means f(n) = means O(1) or Θ(1) means 2n2 + O(n) = Θ(n2) means there is a function g(n) such that f(n) = n3 + g(n) and g(n) = Θ(n2) there is one function g(i) such that f(n) = and g(i) = O(i) a constant for each function g(n) with g(n)=O(n) we have 2n2 + g(n) = Θ(n2)
Quiz O(1) + O(1) = O(1) O(1) + … + O(1) = O(1) = O(n2) ⊆ O(n3) An algorithm with worst case running time O(n log n) is always slower than an algorithm with worst case running time O(n) if n is sufficiently large. true false
Quiz n log2 n = Θ(n log n) n log2 n = Ω(n log n) n log2 n = O(n4/3) O(2n) ⊆ O(3n) O(2n) ⊆ Θ(3n) false true
Analysis of algorithms
Analysis of InsertionSort InsertionSort(A) initialize: sort A[1] for j = 2 to A.length do key = A[j] i = j -1 while i > 0 and A[i] > key do A[i+1] = A[i] i = i -1 A[i +1] = key Get as tight a bound as possible on the worst case running time. ➨ lower and upper bound for worst case running time Upper bound: Analyze worst case number of elementary operations Lower bound: Give “bad” input example
Analysis of InsertionSort InsertionSort(A) initialize: sort A[1] for j = 2 to A.length do key = A[j] i = j -1 while i > 0 and A[i] > key do A[i+1] = A[i] i = i -1 A[i +1] = key Upper bound: Let T(n) be the worst case running time of InsertionSort on an array of length n. We have T(n) = Lower bound: O(1) O(1) worst case: (j-1) ∙ O(1) O(1) O(1) + { O(1) + (j-1)∙O(1) + O(1) } = O(j) = O(n2) Array sorted in de-creasing order ➨ Ω(n2) The worst case running time of InsertionSort is Θ(n2).
Analysis of MergeSort MergeSort(A) // divide-and-conquer algorithm that sorts array A[1..n] if A.length = 1 then skip else n = A.length ; n1 = floor(n/2); n2 = ceil(n/2); copy A[1.. n1] to auxiliary array A1[1.. n1] copy A[n1+1..n] to auxiliary array A2[1.. n2] MergeSort(A1); MergeSort(A2) Merge(A, A1, A2) O(1) O(1) O(n) O(n) ?? O(n) T( n/2 ) + T( n/2 ) MergeSort is a recursive algorithm ➨ running time analysis leads to recursion
frequently omitted since it (nearly) always holds Analysis of MergeSort Let T(n) be the worst case running time of MergeSort on an array of length n. We have O(1) if n = 1 T(n) = T( n/2 ) + T( n/2 ) + Θ(n) if n > 1 frequently omitted since it (nearly) always holds often written as 2T(n/2)
Solving recurrences
Solving recurrences Easiest: Master theorem caveat: not always applicable Alternatively: Guess the solution and use the substitution method to prove that your guess it is correct. How to guess: expand the recursion draw a recursion tree
The master theorem Let a and b be constants, let f(n) be a function, and let T(n) be defined on the nonnegative integers by the recurrence T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n) Then we have: If f(n) = O(nlog a – ε) for some constant ε > 0, then T(n) = Θ(nlog a). If f(n) = Θ(nlog a), then T(n) = Θ(nlog a log n) If f(n) = Ω(nlog a + ε) for some constant ε > 0, and if af(n/b) ≤ cf(n) for some constant c < 1 and all sufficiently large n, then T(n) = Θ(f(n)) can be rounded up or down note: logba - ε b b b b b
The master theorem: Example T(n) = 4T(n/2) + Θ(n3) Master theorem with a = 4, b = 2, and f(n) = n3 logba = log24 = 2 ➨ n3 = f(n) = Ω(nlog a + ε) = Ω(n2 + ε) with, for example, ε = 1 Case 3 of the master theorem gives T(n) = Θ(n3), if the regularity condition holds. choose c = ½ and n0 = 1 ➨ af(n/b) = 4(n/2)3 = n3/2 ≤ cf(n) for n ≥ n0 ➨ T(n) = Θ(n3) b
The substitution method The Master theorem does not always apply In those cases, use the substitution method: Guess the form of the solution. Use induction to find the constants and show that the solution works Use expansion or a recursion-tree to guess a good solution.
Recursion-trees T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n n n/2 n/2 n/4 n/4 n/4 n/4 n/2i n/2i … n/2i Θ(1) Θ(1) … Θ(1)
Recursion-trees T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n n n/2 n/2 n/4 n/4 n/4 n/4 n/2i n/2i … n/2i Θ(1) Θ(1) … Θ(1) n 2 ∙ (n/2) = n 4 ∙ (n/4) = n log n 2i ∙ (n/2i) = n n ∙ Θ(1) = Θ(n) + Θ(n log n)
Recursion-trees T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n2 n2 (n/2)2 (n/2)2 (n/2i)2 (n/2i)2 … (n/2i)2 Θ(1) Θ(1) … Θ(1)
Recursion-trees T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n2 n2 n2 (n/2)2 (n/2)2 (n/2i)2 (n/2i)2 … (n/2i)2 Θ(1) Θ(1) … Θ(1) n2 2 ∙ (n/2)2 = n2/2 4 ∙ (n/4)2 = n2/4 2i ∙ (n/2i) 2 = n2/2i n ∙ Θ(1) = Θ(n) + Θ(n2)
Recursion-trees T(n) = 4T(n/2) + n n n/2 n/2 n/2 n/2 Θ(1) Θ(1) … Θ(1)
Recursion-trees T(n) = 4T(n/2) + n n n n/2 n/2 n/2 n/2 4 ∙ (n/2) = 2n Θ(1) Θ(1) … Θ(1) n2 ∙ Θ(1) = Θ(n2) + Θ(n2)
The substitution method 2 if n = 1 2T( n/2 ) + n if n > 1 T(n) = Claim: T(n) = O(n log n) Proof: by induction on n to show: there are constants c and n0 such that T(n) ≤ c n log n for all n ≥ n0 T(1) = 2 ➨ choose c = 2 (for now) and n0 = 2 Why n0 = 2? How many base cases? Base cases: n = 2: T(2) = 2T(1) + 2 ≤ 2∙2 + 2 = 6 = c 2 log 2 for c = 3 n = 3: T(3) = 2T(1) + 3 ≤ 2∙2 + 3 = 7 ≤ c 3 log 3 log 1 = 0 ➨ can not prove bound for n = 1 3/2 = 1, 4/2 = 2 ➨ 3 must also be base case
The substitution method 2 if n = 1 2T( n/2 ) + n if n > 1 T(n) = Claim: T(n) = O(n log n) Proof: by induction on n to show: there are constants c and n0 such that T(n) ≤ c n log n for all n ≥ n0 choose c = 3 and n0 = 2 Inductive step: n > 3 T(n) = 2T( n/2 ) + n ≤ 2 c n/2 log n/2 + n (ind. hyp.) ≤ c n ((log n) - 1) + n ≤ c n log n ■
The substitution method Θ(1) if n = 1 2T( n/2 ) + n if n > 1 T(n) = Claim: T(n) = O(n) Proof: by induction on n Base case: n = n0 T(2) = 2T(1) + 2 = 2c + 2 = O(2) Inductive step: n > n0 T(n) = 2T( n/2 ) + n = 2O( n/2 ) + n (ind. hyp.) = O(n) ■ Never use O, Θ, or Ω in a proof by induction!
Analysis of algorithms one more example …
Example Example (A) // A is an array of length n n = A.length if n=1 then return A[1] else begin Copy A[1… n/2 ] to auxiliary array B[1... n/2 ] Copy A[1… n/2 ] to auxiliary array C[1… n/2 ] b = Example(B); c = Example(C) for i = 1 to n do for j = 1 to i do A[i] = A[j] return 43 end
Example Example (A) // A is an array of length n n = A.length if n=1 Let T(n) be the worst case running time of Example on an array of length n. Lines 1,2,3,4,11, and 12 take Θ(1) time. Lines 5 and 6 take Θ(n) time. Line 7 takes Θ(1) + 2 T( n/2 ) time. Lines 8 until 10 take time. If n=1 lines 1,2,3 are executed, else lines 1,2, and 4 until 12 are executed. ➨ T(n): ➨ use master theorem … Example (A) // A is an array of length n n = A.length if n=1 then return A[1] else begin Copy A[1… n/2 ] to auxiliary array B[1... n/2 ] Copy A[1… n/2 ] to auxiliary array C[1… n/2 ] b = Example(B); c = Example(C) for i = 1 to n do for j = 1 to i do A[i] = A[j] return 43 end Θ(1) if n=1 2T(n/2) + Θ(n2) if n>1
Tips Analysis of recursive algorithms: find the recursion and solve with master theorem if possible Analysis of loops: summations Some standard recurrences and sums: T(n) = 2T(n/2) + Θ(n) ➨ ½ n(n+1) = Θ(n2) Θ(n3) T(n) = Θ(n log n)
Announcements Group sign-up closes tonight (Wed 04-02-2015) at midnight. Not signed up for group ➨ steps will be taken Thursday 05-02-2015 Some students might be moved to equalize sizes. Email your assignment as .pdf to your tutor, not to me.