Image Registration Lecture ?: Detecting Failure & Assessing Success June 14, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functions Reading: Epp Chp 7.1, 7.2, 7.4
Advertisements

MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Medical Image Reconstruction Topic 4: Motion Artifacts
Kinematics of Rigid Bodies
In the past few years the usage of conformal and IMRT treatments has been increasing rapidly. These treatments employ the use of tighter margins around.
CSci 6971: Image Registration Lecture 14 Distances and Least Squares March 2, 2004 Prof. Chuck Stewart, RPI Dr. Luis Ibanez, Kitware Prof. Chuck Stewart,
Image Registration: Demons Algorithm JOJO
Database-Based Hand Pose Estimation CSE 6367 – Computer Vision Vassilis Athitsos University of Texas at Arlington.
Nonrigid Registration
Face Recognition & Biometric Systems, 2005/2006 Face recognition process.
CENG 789 – Digital Geometry Processing 06- Rigid-Body Alignment Asst. Prof. Yusuf Sahillioğlu Computer Eng. Dept,, Turkey.
CSci 6971: Image Registration Lecture 4: First Examples January 23, 2004 Prof. Chuck Stewart, RPI Dr. Luis Ibanez, Kitware Prof. Chuck Stewart, RPI Dr.
1 Face Tracking in Videos Gaurav Aggarwal, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Rama Chellappa.
L Berkley Davis Copyright 2009 MER301: Engineering Reliability Lecture 14 1 MER301: Engineering Reliability LECTURE 14: Chapter 7: Design of Engineering.
Detecting and Tracking Moving Objects for Video Surveillance Isaac Cohen and Gerard Medioni University of Southern California.
Uncalibrated Geometry & Stratification Sastry and Yang
3D Augmented Reality for MRI-Guided Surgery Using Integral Videography Autostereoscopic Image Overlay Hongen Liao, Takashi Inomata, Ichiro Sakuma and Takeyoshi.
Yujun Guo Kent State University August PRESENTATION A Binarization Approach for CT-MR Registration Using Normalized Mutual Information.
Completeness February 27, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Yuping Lin and Gérard Medioni.  Introduction  Method  Register UAV streams to a global reference image ▪ Consecutive UAV image registration ▪ UAV to.
Component Reliability Analysis
Safety Consideration Software limits on robot controller Limit switches on the robot “wrist” to prevent excess rotations Limit switches on the vertical.
Navigation in Robotic Radiosurgery Achim Schweikard.
MRI Guided Radiation Therapy: Brachytherapy
Timothy Reeves: Presenter Marisa Orr, Sherrill Biggers Evaluation of the Holistic Method to Size a 3-D Wheel/Soil Model.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 7: Geometric Transformation March 16, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.
A Statistical Approach to Speed Up Ranking/Re-Ranking Hong-Ming Chen Advisor: Professor Shih-Fu Chang.
Shape from Stereo  Disparity between two images  Photogrammetry  Finding Corresponding Points Correlation based methods Feature based methods.
HomeWork 2 Solution Chen Zhanqing.
Methods Validation with Simulated Data 1.Generate random linear objects in the model coordinate system. 2.Generate a random set of points on each linear.
Medical Image Analysis Image Registration Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, by Atam P. Dhawan, IEEE Press, 2003.
Ground Truth Free Evaluation of Segment Based Maps Rolf Lakaemper Temple University, Philadelphia,PA,USA.
Feature based deformable registration of neuroimages using interest point and feature selection Leonid Teverovskiy Center for Automated Learning and Discovery.
Danny Ruijters 17 April D-3D intra-interventional registration of coronary arteries.
Spatio-Temporal Free-Form Registration of Cardiac MR Image Sequences Antonios Perperidis s /02/2006.
CSE554AlignmentSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 8: Alignment Fall 2013.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 10: Image Restoration
Digital Image Processing Lecture 16: Segmentation: Detection of Discontinuities Prof. Charlene Tsai.
A B C D E F A ABSTRACT A novel, efficient, robust, feature-based algorithm is presented for intramodality and multimodality medical image registration.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 11 - Chapter 13 Head motion and correction Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods, Peter Jezzard, Paul.
Course14 Dynamic Vision. Biological vision can cope with changing world Moving and changing objects Change illumination Change View-point.
October 1, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 9: From Edges to Contours 1 Canny Edge Detector However, usually there will still be noise in the array E[i, j],
MultiModality Registration Using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators By: Srinivas Peddi Computer Integrated Surgery II April 6 th, 2001.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 16: Segmentation: Detection of Discontinuities May 2, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.
Reformatting registration Fiducials segmentation registration dataset1 dataset2 dataset1 dataset2 transformation reformatted dataset transformation reformatted.
3D head pose estimation from multiple distant views X. Zabulis, T. Sarmis, A. A. Argyros Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology.
Population of 4D Computational Phantoms for CT Imaging Research and Dosimetry W. Paul Segars, PhD Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs Duke University.
4D XCAT Phantom for Multimodality Imaging Research W. Paul Segars, PhD Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs Duke University.
Accuracy, Reliability, and Validity of Freesurfer Measurements David H. Salat
A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a 3D bone surface model Longwei Fang
The Robotic Ear Nose and Throat Microsurgery System (REMS): IRB Study Paper Seminar Presentation Brian Gu Group 12 Mentors Kevin Olds Professor Taylor.
Registration Techniques in head surgery
Arithmetic and Geometric Transformations (Chapter 2) CS474/674 – Prof. Bebis.
Validation and Evaluation of Algorithms
ABSTRACT a Background: We sought to test the feasibility and accuracy of a new commercial 3D echo based strain analysis method in a controlled phantom.
Fluoroscopy Simulation on a Mobile C-arm Computer Integrated Surgery II Spring, 2016 Ju Young Ahn, and Seung Wook Lee, (mentorship by Matthew Jacobson,
Validation Against Sonomicrometry
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
V-Shaped SDLC Model Lecture-6.
Orthogonal and Least-Squares Based Coordinate Transforms for Optical Alignment Verification in Radiosurgery Ernesto Gomez PhD, Yasha Karant PhD, Veysi.
Presenter: Hajar Emami
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
Outline Announcement Texture modeling - continued Some remarks
Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root.
Image Registration 박성진.
Target Registration Error
Target Registration Error
Day 05 Horn's Method 5/24/2019.
MultiModality Registration using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators
Presentation transcript:

Image Registration Lecture ?: Detecting Failure & Assessing Success June 14, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai

Image RegistrationLecture 1 2 Introduction  The last component is a registration embedded system is often the determination of the quality of alignment, i.e. success for failure  The alignment need to be perfect, but it must be adequate for the problem at hand.  How to measure the degree of alignment?  The last component is a registration embedded system is often the determination of the quality of alignment, i.e. success for failure  The alignment need to be perfect, but it must be adequate for the problem at hand.  How to measure the degree of alignment?

Image RegistrationLecture 1 3 Measure of Success  Quality of alignment has been estimagted in published work  by visual inspection,  by comparison with a gold standard, or  by some self-consistency measure  Two distinct notion of success:  for a class of image pairs  for a given image pair  Quality of alignment has been estimagted in published work  by visual inspection,  by comparison with a gold standard, or  by some self-consistency measure  Two distinct notion of success:  for a class of image pairs  for a given image pair

Image RegistrationLecture 1 4 Target Registration Error  We have been using this type of error  Let (p,q) be the pair of corresponding points in the 2 images and T the mapping that takes the 1 st image to the 2 nd.  Often, only the magnitude of TRE is reported.  We have been using this type of error  Let (p,q) be the pair of corresponding points in the 2 images and T the mapping that takes the 1 st image to the 2 nd.  Often, only the magnitude of TRE is reported.

Image RegistrationLecture 1 5 Fiducial Registration Error  Very similar to TRE, but applies only to “fiducial” features.  Fiducial features are selected because of their locatability  Easily visible anatomical features  Centroid of specially designed fiducial markers affixed to the anatomy before imaging  Very similar to TRE, but applies only to “fiducial” features.  Fiducial features are selected because of their locatability  Easily visible anatomical features  Centroid of specially designed fiducial markers affixed to the anatomy before imaging

Image RegistrationLecture 1 6 Comparison between TRE & FRE  TRE is more meaningful than FRE  TRE measured at clinically relevant point, whereas FRE limited to fiducial points  FRE may over- or underestimate registration error.  Why?  Other measures:  Distance between lines  Distance between surfaces  Angular displacement for rigid-body xform  TRE is more meaningful than FRE  TRE measured at clinically relevant point, whereas FRE limited to fiducial points  FRE may over- or underestimate registration error.  Why?  Other measures:  Distance between lines  Distance between surfaces  Angular displacement for rigid-body xform

Image RegistrationLecture 1 7 Methods for Verification  Compare with a ground truth transformation  Some gold standard registration system with accuracy known to be high.  Registration Circuits  Consistency measure among a set of images  Compare with a ground truth transformation  Some gold standard registration system with accuracy known to be high.  Registration Circuits  Consistency measure among a set of images

Image RegistrationLecture 1 8 Gold Standards  May be based on  computer simulation,  phantoms (better for development work),  Cadavers (limited due to changees at death), or  Patients (most difficult choice)  May be based on  computer simulation,  phantoms (better for development work),  Cadavers (limited due to changees at death), or  Patients (most difficult choice)

Image RegistrationLecture 1 9 Computer Simulations  Computer simulations are image pairs generated by computer.  Possible to produce both images, but often one is simulated from another using known geometrical transformation.  Advantages:  Transformation is know exactly  Transformation is readily available  Disavantages:  Lack of realism due to anatomical changes, such as respiration, cardiac cycle, etc  Computer simulations are image pairs generated by computer.  Possible to produce both images, but often one is simulated from another using known geometrical transformation.  Advantages:  Transformation is know exactly  Transformation is readily available  Disavantages:  Lack of realism due to anatomical changes, such as respiration, cardiac cycle, etc

Image RegistrationLecture 1 10 (con’t)  Providing an upper bound on success  Useful for system under development  Intramodality registration  Using only geometrical transformation  Due to interpolation issues, images with isotropic voxel/pixel are prefered, such as MR volumes.  Intermodality registration  Identify issue types  Generate new graylevel values according to the physical processes of the 2 nd image modality  Providing an upper bound on success  Useful for system under development  Intramodality registration  Using only geometrical transformation  Due to interpolation issues, images with isotropic voxel/pixel are prefered, such as MR volumes.  Intermodality registration  Identify issue types  Generate new graylevel values according to the physical processes of the 2 nd image modality

Image RegistrationLecture 1 11 Target Features  Stereotatic frame attached to the skull  Appropriate only for rigid anatomy because all positioning is measured relative to the frame  Providing easier and reliable verification, since neither the anatomy nor the pathology are involved in frame-base registration  Stereotatic frame attached to the skull  Appropriate only for rigid anatomy because all positioning is measured relative to the frame  Providing easier and reliable verification, since neither the anatomy nor the pathology are involved in frame-base registration

Image RegistrationLecture 1 12 Fiducial Marker Systems  Fiducial markers are implanted on the skull or skin.  Excellent gold standard for both intramodality and intermodality  Disadvantages:  High invasiveness  Subject to relative motion of the marker and anatomy between image acquisitions. More so for skin-attached markers  Fiducial markers are implanted on the skull or skin.  Excellent gold standard for both intramodality and intermodality  Disadvantages:  High invasiveness  Subject to relative motion of the marker and anatomy between image acquisitions. More so for skin-attached markers

Image RegistrationLecture 1 13 Registration Circuits  A consistency measure involving at least three images of the same modality.  By independently registering A->B, B->C, and C->A, a target point in A can be mapped using the circuit back to A.  Serious weakness is the assumption that the errors between registrations are uncorrelated  Inevitably violated, since successive registrations, A->B and B->C, say, share a common image (B).  A consistency measure involving at least three images of the same modality.  By independently registering A->B, B->C, and C->A, a target point in A can be mapped using the circuit back to A.  Serious weakness is the assumption that the errors between registrations are uncorrelated  Inevitably violated, since successive registrations, A->B and B->C, say, share a common image (B).

Image RegistrationLecture 1 14 Conclusion  Improving registration accuracy is an important goal.  But without a means of validation, no registration method can be accepted as a clinical tool.  Improving registration accuracy is an important goal.  But without a means of validation, no registration method can be accepted as a clinical tool.