F. Lucarelli 1, S. Becagli 2, G. Calzolai 1, M. Chiari 1, T. Martellini 2, S. Nava 1, L. Paperetti 1, R. Udisti 2 and E. Yubero 3 1. INFN and Dept. of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Advertisements

P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. Thinh Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission.
Source apportionment of Swiss carbonaceous aerosols using radiocarbon analyses of different fractions References: S. Szidat et al., 2007: Dominant impact.
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF UK ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and National Centre for Atmospheric Science.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
PM mapping in Scotland, 2007 Andrew Kent. What are we presenting today? 1) Context to the work 2) Modelling process 3) Model results 4) Future work possibilities.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
Chemical composition of aerosols Composition of tropospheric aerosols is not uniform. It varies with particle size and source of particles: Ultrafine particles.
Fine Particle Characterisation and Source Apportionment in Manila and Hanoi from Using Nuclear Techniques David Cohen ANSTO, Australia.
Arifa Lodhi and Badar Ghauri Pakistan Space And Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPPARCO), P. O. Box 8402, University Road, Karachi-75270, Pakistan.
J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 1 College of Resources and Information Tech., China University.
Chromatography Dr.Tawfeq A. Al-Howiriny Associate Professor
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Organics in the Mix during SAPUSS M. Dall´Osto and the SAPUSS team CSIC, Barcelona, Spain
1 JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IAEAPNRI Particle air pollution monitoring with nuclear analytical techniques: challenges and opportunities.
Chemistry of Particles and Selected Trace Gases at Whistler, BC A.M. Macdonald, K.G. Anlauf and W.R. Leaitch.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Size-segregated analysis of PM10 at a tandem urban – rural site combination J. K. Gietl 1*, T. Tritscher 1,2, and O. Klemm 1 1 University of Münster, Institute.
6- PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ CRIMINALISTICS An Introduction to Forensic Science, 9/E By Richard Saferstein.
EMEP INTENSIVE MEASUREMENT PERIODS IN CLOSE PARTNERSSHIP WITH EU PROJECTS Wenche Aas, Andres Alastuey, Francesco Canonaco, Fabrizia Cavalli, Franco Lucarelli,
2. Method Aerosol physical and chemical properties were measured in two sites in Amazonia since January The clean site is at central Amazonia and.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Elemental composition of Tibetan Plateau top soils and its effect on evaluating atmospheric pollution transport Chaoliu Li, Shichang Kang, Qianggong Zhang,
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
Introduction Montelupo Fiorentino is a little town about 20 km west of Florence, characterised by the presence of a large number of ceramic and glass factories.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
Exceptional Event Analysis Draft, July 13, 2005
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Analysis Examples and Issues: Identifying Sources Policy Analysis Tools for Air Quality and Health A workshop hosted by NERAM and Pollution Probe Jeffrey.
Analysis of PM 10 using Scanning Electron Microscopy Comparison between a Traffic Site and a Forest Site S. Wagener 1, J.K. Gietl, O. Klemm University.
FASTNET Event Report: July4Haze, July 6, 2004 July 4, 2004 Aerosol Pulse Event Summary by the FASTNET Community Please send PPT slides or comments.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Temporal variations of aerosol components in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Cal-Mex campaign S. Takahama, A. Johnson, J. Guzman Morales, L.M. Russell Scripps.
Variations of Elemental Concentration in PM 10 and PM June 2007,Colombo. M.C. Shirani Seneviratne Head, Nulear Analytical Services Sec. Atomic.
SOURCES, COMPOSITION AND HEALTH IMPACTS OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and UK National Centre for Atmospheric.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Using Aethalometer Data to Examine Ambient Particulate Matter Sources: Fairbanks, AK Jay Turner Washington University in St. Louis June 15, 2010 Photo.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update Jin Xu. Update Visibility trends analysis (under revision) Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002 (modeling.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Nuclear-related techniques at LABEC for the analysis of atmospheric aerosols S.Nava, G. Calzolai, M. Chiari, F.Lucarelli, M. Giannoni, M. Fedi, L. Giuntini,
Accelerator Based Techniques for Air Pollution Studies Across Asia David Cohen, ANSTO, Sydney, Australia
Respiratory adverse effects of the particles during dust storm in China Dept. Occupational & Environmental Health Peking University School of Public Health.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Source Contribution to PM 2.5 and Visibility Impairment in Two Class I Areas Using Positive Matrix Factorization Keith Rose EPA, Region 10 June 22, 2005.
22nd International Conference on Ion Beam Analysis, June , 2015- Opatija, Croatia Characterization and source apportionment of fine particulate.
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
How to predict dust absorption in the atmosphere
Chapter 6 INORGANIC ANALYSIS
Source Apportionment of Water Soluble Elements, EC/OC, and BrC by PMF
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Sources of the PM10 aerosol in Flanders, Belgium, and re-evaluation of the contribution from wood burning Willy Maenhaut1,2, Reinhilde Vermeylen2, Magda.
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
Characterization of Aerosols at Fire Station 8, Atlanta, GA
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
EMEP/ACTRIS/COLOSSAL intensive measurement period Des 2017 – March 2018 Wenche Aas, EMEP/CCC.
Longer Term Aerosol Chemical speciation monitoring data during ACTRIS/EMEP activities ACSM Teams across Europe Many slides from Michael Bressi, JRC Italy.
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
WORK OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AIR QUALITY EXPERT GROUP (AQEG)
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

F. Lucarelli 1, S. Becagli 2, G. Calzolai 1, M. Chiari 1, T. Martellini 2, S. Nava 1, L. Paperetti 1, R. Udisti 2 and E. Yubero 3 1. INFN and Dept. of Physics (University of Florence), Italy, 2. Dept. of Chemistry (University of Florence), Italy, 3. LCA - Miguel Hernández University, Spain Since aerosol particles retain elemental compositions characteristic of their origin, the simultaneous detection of groups of elements by multi-elemental techniques, like PIXE, can be of great help in the study of aerosol sources by receptor models, like Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF). Many studies have been devoted to the application of these models to 24-h data; however, since the impact of many sources can vary on a time scale of few hours or less, the use of hourly concentration data sets can be of great help. In the framework of the PATOS project, the first extensive field campaign for the aerosol characterisation in Tuscany (Italy), the application of PMF to daily and hourly concentrations in the most polluted of the sampling sites (Lucca-Capannori) allowed to identify the main aerosol sources and to estimate their impact. INTRODUCTION SOURCE APPORTIONMENT BY PMF ON DAILY SAMPLES PMF has been applied to daily samples collected in Capannori (Lucca) during the fist 9 months (Sept05-Jun06): 6 sources have been identified and PM10 source apportionment calculated. SOURCE IDENTIFICATION BY ONE-HOUR RESOLUTION SAMPLES Average source apportionment Due to the important contribution of biomass burning, we further investigate this source: Since K is also present in the crustal composition, we calculated its enrichment factor and looked at its level of solubility (comparing concentrations obtained by PIXE and IC). We found very high enrichment values with respect to the crustal composition and we also found that most of this element is soluble, thus confirming the burning origin. Looking at the concentrations of the elements/compounds characteristic of this source in the other sampling sites we found that it is a local source (see for example the graph of K concentration on the right) further information came from the analysis of hourly concentrations (see below) PIXE analysis of streaker samples X FC SM The beam size corresponds to one hour of aerosol sampling: analysing the streak point by point elemental concentrations are measured p PM2.5PM Traffic (fine+coarse fractions)Biomass burning (fine fraction) Periodic pattern with peaks starting at about 19:00 and lasting ~10 h: suggesting wood burning for domestic heating Peaks during traffic rush hours Appling PMF to the streaker data we identified the following sources: Fine fraction: soil dust, traffic, sea salt Coarse fraction: secondary aerosols, biomass burning, traffic, soil dust. THE PATOS PROJECT  six sites in Tuscany, representative of areas of different typology Prato Arezzo Lucca Firenze Livorno Grosseto  PM10 daily samples collected for one year (Spt.05-Spt.06) by CEN equivalent samplers, simultaneously on Teflon and Quartz fiber filters thus allowing the application of different analytical techniques: PIXE  elemental concentrations for Z>10 IC  inorganic ions soluble component ICPMS  metals soluble component CHNTA  total C (TC) GC and GC-MS  n-alkanes and PAHs  hourly samples (fine and coarse fractions) collected for shorter periods, by a streaker sampler PIXE  elemental concentrations for Z>10 Lucca-Capannori resulted the most pollutted area with very high PM10 concentrations during winter Aerosol source apportionment by Positive Matrix Factorisation applied to daily and hourly concentration datasets obtained by PIXE Correlation coefficients (sources - elements/compounds) Day by day source apportionment  The source ‘Biomass burning’, characterised by high loadings of K, Nitrate, Glycolate and TC, gives the main contribution to PM10 and it is the responsible of the very high PM10 values during winter months (Nov-March).  Important contributions are also given by secondary inorganic aerosols and traffic  The high contribution of soil dust during June has been ascribed to a strong Saharan dust intrusion (see poster PII20) Source profiles (  g/  g)